Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to F Definitions

Failure rate

What Is Failure Rate?

In the realm of personal finance and retirement planning, failure rate is a critical metric that quantifies the likelihood that a retiree's investment portfolio will be depleted prematurely, failing to provide sufficient income throughout their desired retirement horizon. It is a key concept within retirement planning and financial planning and is often used by financial professionals to assess the robustness of an individual's investment portfolio and withdrawal rate strategy. A higher failure rate indicates a greater risk of running out of money before the end of retirement, while a lower rate suggests a more sustainable plan. The concept of failure rate helps individuals and their advisors stress-test a plan against various market conditions and personal circumstances.

History and Origin

The concept of evaluating portfolio longevity and the probability of running out of funds gained significant traction with pioneering research in the 1990s. As average life expectancy increased, the need for robust retirement planning strategies became more pronounced. A seminal work in this area was published in 1994 by William P. Bengen, who explored "safe withdrawal rates" from retirement portfolios. This research, along with subsequent studies such as the widely referenced 1998 "Trinity Study" by Philip L. Cooley, Carl M. Hubbard, and Daniel T. Walz, helped popularize the use of historical data and Monte Carlo simulations to determine the probability of portfolio depletion under various asset allocations and withdrawal scenarios. These studies effectively laid the groundwork for defining and calculating the failure rate as a quantifiable measure of a retirement plan's sustainability. Financial Planning Association research, for instance, has extensively explored how different stock/bond allocations and withdrawal rates impact the percentage of times a portfolio runs out of money before a set horizon, like 30 years.7

Key Takeaways

  • The failure rate measures the probability that a retirement portfolio will be exhausted before the end of the planned retirement period.
  • It is a crucial indicator in financial planning for assessing the sustainability and risk of a retiree's income strategy.
  • Key factors influencing the failure rate include the initial withdrawal rate, the asset allocation of the portfolio, market volatility, and the retiree's longevity.
  • Lower failure rates are generally desirable, but an excessively low rate may suggest overly conservative planning.
  • Monte Carlo simulations are commonly used to calculate failure rates by running thousands of hypothetical scenarios.

Interpreting the Failure Rate

Interpreting the failure rate involves understanding it within the broader context of risk tolerance and the dynamic nature of retirement. A failure rate of, for example, 10% means that in 100 simulated scenarios, the portfolio ran out of money in 10 of those scenarios. While a 0% failure rate might seem ideal, it often implies a highly conservative withdrawal rate that could lead to significant underspending in retirement. Financial professionals often guide clients to consider an acceptable failure rate that balances financial security with the desire to maintain a desired lifestyle.

The interpretation also considers factors like sequence of returns risk, where poor investment returns early in retirement can significantly increase the failure rate, even with what might seem like a reasonable initial withdrawal rate. Conversely, strong early returns can lower the effective failure rate. It's also important to note that a "failure" in these simulations doesn't always mean destitution; it might simply mean the investment portfolio is depleted, requiring adjustments to spending or reliance on other income sources.

Hypothetical Example

Consider Jane, who is retiring at age 65 with a $1,000,000 investment portfolio. She plans to withdraw $40,000 per year, adjusted for inflation, for a projected 30-year retirement. Her asset allocation is 60% equities and 40% bonds.

To determine the failure rate for Jane's plan, a financial advisor would typically employ a Monte Carlo simulation. This involves:

  1. Generating thousands of hypothetical scenarios: The simulation randomly draws historical or projected annual returns for equities and bonds, accounting for their market volatility and correlation.
  2. Tracking portfolio value: For each scenario, the simulation calculates the portfolio's value year by year, factoring in Jane's annual withdrawals and the simulated investment returns.
  3. Identifying failures: A scenario is deemed a "failure" if the portfolio balance reaches zero before the end of the 30-year period.
  4. Calculating the rate: If, out of 10,000 simulations, 800 scenarios result in the portfolio being depleted prematurely, Jane's plan has an 8% failure rate.

This means that, based on the simulation, there's an 8% chance her portfolio would not last her entire retirement under the defined parameters. Jane can then adjust her withdrawal rate, asset allocation, or retirement horizon to lower this failure rate if it's outside her comfort zone.

Practical Applications

The failure rate is a cornerstone of modern retirement planning and has several practical applications across financial disciplines:

  • Determining Sustainable Withdrawal Rates: One of the primary uses of failure rate analysis is to help retirees establish a sustainable withdrawal rate from their portfolios. By modeling various withdrawal percentages, planners can identify a rate that corresponds to an acceptable failure rate, helping ensure the longevity of retirement savings.
  • Portfolio Management and Asset Allocation: Understanding the failure rate helps in crafting appropriate asset allocation strategies. For instance, diversification across different asset classes can help mitigate sequence of returns risk, thereby influencing the overall failure rate. Research shows that a balanced portfolio (e.g., 50/50 stock/bond) can achieve a lower failure rate than an all-stock or all-bond portfolio for certain withdrawal rates.6
  • Financial Advising and Client Communication: Financial advisors utilize failure rate calculations to illustrate the risks associated with different retirement income strategies to their clients. This quantitative measure facilitates informed discussions about lifestyle choices, risk tolerance, and contingency planning, making complex financial scenarios more tangible for individuals.
  • Longevity Risk Management: With increasing life expectancy, the failure rate provides a quantitative measure for managing longevity risk—the risk of outliving one's savings. It underscores the importance of planning for potentially longer retirement periods.
  • Estate Planning: For individuals concerned with leaving a legacy, the failure rate can also inform decisions about capital preservation versus current spending, helping to balance immediate needs with long-term goals for heirs. Many retirement plans unfortunately fail due to a lack of structure that accounts for longevity, inflation, and market risk.

5## Limitations and Criticisms

While the failure rate is a valuable tool, it has certain limitations and criticisms that warrant consideration:

  • Assumption-Dependent: The calculated failure rate is highly dependent on the assumptions used in the underlying simulations, such as historical market returns, inflation rates, and fixed withdrawal rates. Real-world market conditions can deviate significantly from historical averages, impacting actual outcomes. Some research indicates that assuming a fixed 30-year retirement period may lead to an overly conservative withdrawal rate if actual lifespans are shorter.
    *4 Static Spending Models: Many failure rate calculations assume a fixed real (inflation-adjusted) spending amount throughout retirement. In reality, retirees often exhibit dynamic spending patterns, adjusting their expenditures based on market performance, health, and lifestyle changes. Ignoring this flexibility can lead to an overestimation of the actual failure rate.
  • Definition of "Failure": The strict definition of "failure" as portfolio depletion might not fully capture the nuances of a challenging retirement. A portfolio nearing depletion might still be able to support a reduced lifestyle, or other income sources (like Social Security or part-time work) might become available. Critics argue that simply running out of wealth before death is a narrow definition of failure.
    *3 Behavioral Aspects: The failure rate is a statistical probability and doesn't account for behavioral responses to market downturns or personal financial stress. Panicked selling during a market decline, for example, could exacerbate a poor outcome not fully captured by a purely probabilistic model.
  • 100% Success is Not Optimal: Aiming for a 100% probability of success (or 0% failure rate) is often impractical and undesirable. Achieving this often requires underspending significantly, leading to a diminished quality of life in retirement for most scenarios. A failure rate of 10% or 15% is often considered acceptable by many financial planners, acknowledging that some flexibility or adjustments may be needed.

2## Failure Rate vs. Probability of Success

The terms failure rate and probability of success are two sides of the same coin in retirement planning, representing complementary perspectives on the same outcome.

  • Failure Rate: As discussed, this metric quantifies the chance that a retirement portfolio will be depleted before the end of the specified retirement period. It focuses on the potential negative outcome.
  • Probability of Success: This is the inverse of the failure rate. It measures the likelihood that a retirement portfolio will last for the entire planned retirement horizon, successfully supporting the desired withdrawal rate.

Mathematically, if the failure rate is (X%), then the probability of success is ((100 - X)%). For instance, an 8% failure rate corresponds to a 92% probability of success.

Confusion can arise because both terms are used interchangeably by some, but they highlight different aspects of risk and confidence. A financial professional might present both, emphasizing the probability of success to build client confidence, while still analyzing the failure rate to identify and mitigate potential risks. While a 70% probability of success may sound acceptable on its face, it equally implies a 30% failure rate, which might prompt a deeper discussion about potential adjustments.

1## FAQs

What is considered a "good" failure rate for a retirement plan?

There isn't a universally agreed-upon "good" failure rate, as it depends on an individual's risk tolerance, financial independence goals, and capacity to adjust spending. Many financial advisors aim for a failure rate between 5% and 15% (or a probability of success between 85% and 95%). A 0% failure rate is often impractical as it usually means significant underspending during retirement.

What factors most influence a retirement plan's failure rate?

The primary factors influencing a retirement plan's failure rate include the initial withdrawal rate (how much you take out), the asset allocation of your investment portfolio (how your money is invested between stocks, bonds, etc.), market volatility (fluctuations in investment returns), and your life expectancy (how long your retirement needs to last, also known as longevity risk).

Can I completely eliminate the failure rate in my retirement plan?

While you can strive to minimize your failure rate, completely eliminating it (achieving a 0% failure rate) is often unrealistic and generally not the most effective strategy. To reach a 0% failure rate in simulations, you would likely have to withdraw so little from your portfolio that you would significantly underspend your savings, potentially sacrificing your desired lifestyle. Acknowledging a small, manageable failure rate allows for a more optimal withdrawal rate and lifestyle during retirement.