Skip to main content
← Back to F Definitions

Fair value accounting

What Is Fair Value Accounting?

Fair value accounting is an accounting standards principle within financial reporting that requires certain assets and liabilities to be recorded and reported at their current market value, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This approach aims to provide a more relevant and up-to-date representation of a company's financial position compared to historical cost accounting. Fair value accounting is a market-based measurement, meaning it reflects current economic conditions rather than past transaction prices.13, 14

History and Origin

The concept of fair value accounting has roots that trace back decades, but its widespread adoption and standardization gained significant momentum in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Prior to its formalization, many assets were primarily reported at their historical cost, meaning the original purchase price. However, as financial markets grew in complexity and volatility, a need arose for accounting methods that better reflected the true economic value of assets and liabilities, especially for financial instruments like derivatives.

Key milestones in the development of fair value accounting include the issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS 157) by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the United States in 2006, which was later codified into ASC 820, and the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 13, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in 2011. These standards sought to unify the definition of fair value and provide a consistent framework for its measurement and disclosure globally.11, 12 The move towards fair value accounting often sparked debate, particularly during periods of market instability, as the shift from historical cost raised questions about potential earnings volatility and the reliability of valuations for illiquid assets.9, 10 Reuters reported on the "long journey to market value accounting," highlighting the ongoing discussions and developments surrounding this accounting methodology.8

Key Takeaways

  • Fair value accounting reports assets and liabilities at their current market value, providing a more relevant picture of financial health.
  • It is a market-based measurement, focusing on exit prices in orderly transactions between market participants.
  • The fair value hierarchy (Level 1, 2, and 3 inputs) categorizes valuation inputs based on their observability, prioritizing quoted prices in active markets.
  • Fair value accounting aims to enhance transparency and comparability across financial statements.
  • While offering relevance, it can introduce volatility to financial statements due to market fluctuations.

Interpreting Fair Value Accounting

Interpreting fair value accounting involves understanding that the reported value of an asset or liability is an estimate of its market-based "exit price" at a specific measurement date. This means it reflects the price at which an asset could be sold, or a liability transferred, in an orderly transaction, not necessarily the price at which it was acquired or created.6, 7 The valuation process relies heavily on available market data and assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the item, including considerations of risk.5

For instance, a company's balance sheet reflecting fair value accounting for certain investments implies that those investment values fluctuate with market conditions. A higher fair value for an asset generally suggests an increase in its perceived market worth, while a lower fair value for a liability indicates a reduction in the estimated cost to transfer that obligation. The reliability of the fair value measurement largely depends on the observability of the inputs used in its calculation, which are categorized within a fair value hierarchy.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Tech Innovations Inc.," a publicly traded company that holds a portfolio of marketable equity securities.

  • Initial Acquisition: On January 1, Year 1, Tech Innovations Inc. purchases 1,000 shares of "Startup Alpha" stock for $10 per share, totaling $10,000.
  • Historical Cost: Under historical cost accounting, this investment would remain on the books at $10,000, regardless of market fluctuations, until sold or impaired.
  • Fair Value Accounting: Tech Innovations Inc. applies fair value accounting to its investment in Startup Alpha.
    • On March 31, Year 1 (quarter-end), the market price for Startup Alpha stock rises to $12 per share due to positive news about its new product.
    • Under fair value accounting, Tech Innovations Inc. would revalue its investment to 1,000 shares * $12/share = $12,000.
    • The unrealized gain of $2,000 ($12,000 - $10,000) would be recognized on the income statement as a gain from investment revaluation, impacting the company's reported earnings for the quarter.
    • If, on June 30, Year 1, the market price falls to $9 per share, the investment would be revalued to $9,000, resulting in an unrealized loss of $3,000 ($9,000 - $12,000) for that quarter.

This example illustrates how fair value accounting provides a more dynamic view of asset values and how it can introduce volatility into a company's reported earnings.

Practical Applications

Fair value accounting is extensively applied across various domains in finance, particularly in financial reporting and investment management. Its primary applications include:

  • Financial Instruments: Many financial instruments, such as derivatives, marketable securities, and certain debt instruments, are required to be measured at fair value on the balance sheet. This provides investors with a current assessment of these often volatile assets and liabilities.
  • Investment Property: Under certain accounting standards, investment properties may be accounted for using the fair value model, where they are revalued to fair value at each reporting date, with changes recognized in profit or loss.
  • Business Combinations: In a business acquisition, the acquired assets and liabilities are typically recognized at their fair values at the acquisition date. This is crucial for determining the goodwill or gain from a bargain purchase arising from the transaction.
  • Pension and Employee Benefit Plans: The assets held by pension funds are often measured at fair value to provide a clear picture of the plan's funding status and its ability to meet future obligations.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S., mandate the use of fair value accounting for various financial disclosures to ensure transparency and comparability among public companies. The FASB consistently updates its guidance, such as Accounting Standards Update 2022-03, to clarify fair value measurement principles for specific situations, like equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions.4

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its benefits in providing more relevant financial information, fair value accounting faces several limitations and criticisms:

  • Subjectivity for Illiquid Assets: For assets without active markets (e.g., private equity investments, certain real estate, complex derivatives), determining fair value requires significant judgment and the use of valuation techniques involving unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy). This subjectivity can lead to inconsistencies and potential manipulation, as the reported fair value might not accurately reflect a true "exit price."
  • Earnings Volatility: Valuing assets and liabilities at fair value means that fluctuations in market conditions directly impact a company's reported earnings, even if those assets have not been sold. This can lead to increased volatility in the income statement, making it harder for users of financial statements to discern underlying operational performance from market-driven revaluations.
  • Procyclicality Concerns: Critics argue that fair value accounting can exacerbate economic downturns. During a crisis, falling asset prices due to fair value accounting can lead to lower reported capital for financial institutions, potentially forcing them to sell assets into a declining market, further depressing prices. This "feedback loop" was a significant point of discussion during the 2008 financial crisis, where some argued that fair value rules contributed to the crisis's severity.3
  • Cost and Complexity: Implementing fair value accounting, especially for complex instruments or illiquid assets, can be costly and require specialized expertise in valuation.

Fair Value Accounting vs. Historical Cost Accounting

Fair value accounting and historical cost accounting represent two distinct approaches to asset and liability valuation in financial reporting. The fundamental difference lies in their measurement basis.

FeatureFair Value AccountingHistorical Cost Accounting
Measurement BasisAssets and liabilities are reported at their current market value, or the price achievable in an orderly exit transaction.Assets are recorded at their original purchase price (cost incurred to acquire them), and liabilities at the amount of cash or equivalents paid or the fair value of consideration received when the obligation was incurred.
RelevanceProvides more timely and relevant information, reflecting current economic conditions.Provides reliable and verifiable information based on past transactions, but may not reflect current economic value.
VolatilityCan lead to greater volatility in the income statement and balance sheet due to market fluctuations.Generally results in less volatility as values are fixed unless an asset is sold or impaired.
SubjectivityMay involve significant subjectivity for illiquid assets where observable market prices are unavailable.Highly objective, as it is based on verifiable transaction data.
ApplicationOften used for financial instruments, investment property, and certain business combinations.Traditionally used for property, plant, and equipment, and inventory, though often adjusted for depreciation or the lower of cost or net realizable value.

While historical cost emphasizes reliability and verifiability, fair value accounting prioritizes relevance. The debate between these two methods centers on the trade-off between providing verifiable, objective data (historical cost) versus providing current, market-reflective data (fair value accounting), particularly during periods of economic uncertainty.

FAQs

What is the fair value hierarchy?

The fair value hierarchy categorizes the inputs used in valuation techniques to measure fair value into three levels. Level 1 inputs are the most reliable, representing unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (e.g., stock prices for publicly traded shares). Level 2 inputs are observable, but not directly quoted prices for identical items in active markets (e.g., quoted prices for similar assets). Level 3 inputs are unobservable and require significant judgment, often used for illiquid assets. This hierarchy increases consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures.1, 2

Why is fair value accounting important?

Fair value accounting is important because it aims to provide users of financial statements with more relevant and current information about a company's financial position and performance. By reflecting current market conditions, it can offer a more accurate representation of an entity's assets and liabilities, particularly for dynamic elements like financial instruments. This can aid investors and other stakeholders in making more informed decisions.

Does fair value accounting apply to all assets and liabilities?

No, fair value accounting does not apply to all assets and liabilities. The specific accounting standards, such as IFRS or U.S. GAAP, dictate which assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, which may be measured at fair value, and which must be measured using other methods (like historical cost). For example, while many financial instruments are fair valued, property, plant, and equipment are generally measured at historical cost less depreciation.