What Is a Feldstudie?
A Feldstudie, or field study, is a type of empirical research conducted in a real-world, natural setting rather than a controlled laboratory environment. Within the realm of Empirische Forschung and particularly Verhaltensökonomie, field studies are employed to observe and analyze phenomena as they naturally occur, often without direct manipulation of variables by the researcher. This approach aims to understand how individuals, institutions, or markets behave in their actual operating environments, making the findings highly relevant and relatable to practical situations. A key strength of a Feldstudie lies in its ability to capture the complexities and nuances of real-world interactions, including the various contextual factors that influence behavior and outcomes.
History and Origin
While the concept of observing phenomena in their natural settings has ancient roots, the formal application of field studies within economic and financial contexts gained significant traction with the rise of behavioral economics in the latter half of the 20th century. Pioneers in this field recognized that traditional economic models, often based on assumptions of perfect rationality, sometimes failed to explain real-world financial decision-making. Researchers began to employ the Forschungsmethoden of psychology and sociology, including field experiments, to bridge this gap. This shift facilitated a deeper understanding of how psychological biases, social norms, and environmental cues impact economic behavior. For instance, early research in behavioral household finance increasingly utilized real-world data collection and observation to understand how households manage their finances, save, and invest.92 Similarly, field experiments gained prominence for their ability to provide causal evidence in complex settings, moving beyond purely observational studies.91
Key Takeaways
- A Feldstudie is research conducted in a natural, real-world environment.
- It aims to observe behavior and phenomena as they naturally occur, enhancing the Generalisierbarkeit of findings.
- Field studies are crucial in Verhaltensökonomie for understanding financial decision-making under realistic conditions.
- The approach emphasizes external validity by capturing the complexities of real-world contexts.
- It contrasts with laboratory experiments, which prioritize control over external realism.
Interpreting the Feldstudie
Interpreting the results of a Feldstudie involves understanding the implications of observations made in an uncontrolled environment. Unlike a highly controlled laboratory setting, a field study inherently includes extraneous variables that might influence the observed outcomes. Researchers meticulously collect Datenerhebung in these environments, often employing statistical techniques from Ökonometrie to account for confounding factors and establish potential Kausalität. The power of a Feldstudie lies in its strong external validity, meaning the findings are highly likely to apply to the broader population or similar real-world scenarios. This makes them particularly valuable for informing policy, product design, and market interventions, as the behaviors observed are those exhibited by actual market participants making real financial decisions.
Hypothetical Example
Consider a financial institution launching a new savings product designed to encourage greater retirement contributions among its customers. To evaluate its effectiveness using a Feldstudie, the institution could design an experiment where a randomly selected group of existing customers (the treatment group) receives targeted messaging and nudges about the new product through their regular online banking portal, while a control group receives no such prompts.
Over several months, the researchers would track the savings behavior of both groups using their actual account data. They might observe if the treatment group exhibits a statistically significant increase in their retirement contributions or a higher rate of adoption for the new product compared to the control group. This real-world observation, conducted within the customers' actual financial environment, would provide direct evidence of the messaging's impact on their Entscheidungsfindung regarding savings, offering insights far beyond what a survey or a lab experiment could reveal. The data would reflect genuine changes in Rendite or contribution rates influenced by the intervention.
Practical Applications
Field studies are extensively applied across various domains of finance and economics to gain insights into complex behaviors and market dynamics. In Finanzmärkte, they can assess how different regulatory disclosures impact investor behavior or how new trading platforms influence liquidity. For instance, research has explored how customer data influences financial decisions through field experiments conducted directly with bank clients.
In90 Portfoliomanagement, field studies help understand how different investment advice delivery methods affect an investor's Risikobereitschaft and asset allocation choices. A notable area of application is in promoting financial literacy and savings. Researchers have used field experiments to test the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving individuals' savings habits and understanding why people might not save enough. Ano89ther example involves examining the impact of financial advice on consumer behavior, observing how and when individuals act upon professional guidance in real-world settings.
##88 Limitations and Criticisms
Despite their significant advantages, field studies are not without limitations. A primary challenge is the lack of experimental control compared to a laboratory setting. Researchers cannot always isolate specific variables or control for every confounding factor present in the natural environment, which can make it difficult to establish clear Kausalität between an intervention and an outcome. The Validität of a Feldstudie can be threatened by unforeseen external events or unmeasured variables that affect the study's subjects or context.
Another criticism relates to the potential for Voreingenommenheit in participant selection, even if efforts are made to create a representative Stichprobe. While highly realistic, field studies can also be more costly and time-consuming to conduct than laboratory experiments due to the complexities of managing real-world interactions and data collection. The ethical considerations of conducting research in natural settings, particularly concerning privacy and informed consent, also require careful attention.
Feldstudie vs. Laborexperiment
The fundamental difference between a Feldstudie and a Laborexperiment lies in their setting and the degree of control. A Feldstudie is conducted in a natural, real-world environment where participants are often unaware they are part of a study, or if aware, their behavior is observed in a typical context. This approach prioritizes external validity, aiming for findings that are highly generalizable to the population.
In contrast, a Laborexperiment takes place in a highly controlled, artificial setting, such as a dedicated research room. Here, researchers can precisely manipulate specific variables and control for extraneous factors, making it easier to establish internal validity and determine cause-and-effect relationships. Participants are typically aware they are in an experiment, which can sometimes lead to altered behavior (e.g., the Hawthorne effect). While a Feldstudie excels in capturing ecological realism, a Laborexperiment is superior for isolating variables and demonstrating precise causality. Many researchers use both approaches to complement each other, leveraging the strengths of each method in Experimentelle Wirtschaftsforschung.
FAQs
What kind of data is collected in a Feldstudie?
A Feldstudie can collect a wide range of Datenerhebung, including quantitative data like transaction records, investment returns, or policy uptake rates, and qualitative data such as observations of social interactions, interviews, or surveys. The specific type of data depends on the research question and the natural setting of the study.
Why is a Feldstudie important in finance?
A Feldstudie is crucial in finance because it allows researchers to study how real people and institutions behave in actual Finanzmärkte and situations. This provides insights into topics like investor irrationality, savings behavior, or the impact of financial regulations that might not be fully captured in controlled laboratory settings or through theoretical models alone.
Can a Feldstudie prove cause and effect?
While a Feldstudie provides strong evidence for real-world impact and Generalisierbarkeit, proving definitive cause and effect can be more challenging than in a controlled Laborexperiment. Researchers use sophisticated statistical methods, often from Ökonometrie, to account for confounding variables and enhance the likelihood of establishing Kausalität in a natural environment.
What is an example of a Feldstudie in behavioral economics?
An example would be studying how different default options on a retirement savings plan impact employees' contribution rates. By observing actual employees' decisions within their company's plan, researchers can see how these "nudges" influence real financial choices, providing insights relevant to Verhaltensökonomie.
What are the main challenges of conducting a Feldstudie?
The main challenges include controlling for extraneous variables, managing the complexity of data collection in uncontrolled environments, and ensuring the Validität of the findings amidst numerous real-world influences. Ethical considerations, particularly regarding privacy and informed consent, also pose important challenges.
References
Michael G. 87Faulkender, "Behavioral Household Finance", NBER Reporter, 2021.
"Customer D86ata and Financial Decisions: A Field Experiment", Federal Reserve Board, 2023.
"Why People85 Don’t Save Enough: A Field Experiment", The New York Times, 2013.
"When Do Cons84umers Act On Financial Advice? A Field Experiment", Chicago Booth, 2018.1, [2](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269844337_Challenges_to_Field-Based_Outdoor_Research_Pitfalls_and_Pos[81](https://dovetail.com/research/field-study/), 82, 83sibilities)3, 4, [5](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269844337_Chall[79](https://blog.uxtweak.com/field-study/), 80enges_to_Field-Based_Outdoor_Research_Pitfalls_and_Possibilities)[6](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/combining-behavioral-economics-and-field-experiments[77](https://dovetail.com/research/field-study/), 78-to-reimagine-early-childhood-education/87AB3312B808558CCA011970F6344678), 7[8](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behaviou[74](https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods/s13-02-pros-and-cons-of-field-researc.html), 75, 76ral-public-policy/article/combining-behavioral-economics-and-field-experiments-to-reimagine-early-childhood-education/87AB3312B808558CCA011970F6344678)910, 11, [12](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.[71](https://www.nber.org/papers/w14356), 72com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE3VxgH9qbG8i5PIJ-U48yDoXaGQvcaZSA_rSZzTxUW47_apTP06EZe-QLirkICcPhf-swSqY-flhCZiRFmq5at1GYvK0m-qwvJ0IEL-CRHuS9T7DiQd75kbbdvr64kaWrePMQLZR3gGeBBusGIA-me3VdEGS52fQjNP7xdkTO7wPSYen3ingQMkVKzJzxS7JVg67yu4rVWkZBr55nXXAO8N9A=)13, 1415, [16](https://fieldworkhub.com/what-we-do/industr[67](https://dovetail.com/research/field-study/), 68ies/financial-services/)1718, [19](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/[64](https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods/s13-02-pros-and-cons-of-field-researc.html), 65, 66field-data-collection/)[20](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE3VxgH9qbG8i5PIJ-U48yDoXaGQvcaZSA_rSZzTxUW47_apTP06EZe-QLirkICcPhf-swSqY-flhCZiRFmq[63](https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/906685/3416behavioralbrentfriesengangadharanliebbrandt.pdf)5at1GYvK0m-qwvJ0IEL-CRHuS9T7DiQd75kbbdvr64kaWrePMQLZR3gGeBBusGIA-me3VdEGS52fQjNP7xdkTO7wPSYen3ingQMk[61](https://www.studysmarter.de/studium/bwl/beratung-bwl/feldexperiment/), 62VKzJzxS7JVg67yu4rVWkZBr55nXXAO8N9A=), [21](https://www.routledge.com/Field-Experiments-in-Ec[59](https://blog.uxtweak.com/field-study/), 60onomics-History-and-Methodology/Favereau-Nagatsu/p/book/9780367194642)22, 23[24](https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~jmcollin/wp/wp-cont[56](https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/psychology/research-methods-in-psychology/field-experiment/), 57ent/uploads/2018/01/experiments.pdf)25, 2627, [28](https://wpgs.de/fach[54](https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/psychology/research-methods-in-psychology/field-experiment/), 55texte/forschungsdesigns/feldforschung-laborstudien-ort-der-untersuchung/)29, [30](https://www.y[52](https://www.studysmarter.de/studium/bwl/beratung-bwl/feldexperiment/), 53outube.com/watch?v=a_CXAGqM7p4)31, 3233, 3435, 3637, 38, 394041, 4243, 4445, 464748, 4950