Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to F Definitions

Finra rule 5320

What Is FINRA Rule 5320?

FINRA Rule 5320, officially titled "Prohibition Against Trading Ahead of Customer Orders," is a critical piece of securities regulation designed to ensure fairness and prevent conflicts of interest in the U.S. equity markets. It generally prohibits a broker-dealer from executing a trade for its own proprietary account at a price that would satisfy an existing customer order, unless the customer order is immediately executed at the same or a better price and for at least the same size. This rule falls under the broader category of market microstructure regulations, aiming to maintain equitable access and transparency for all participants. The core principle of FINRA Rule 5320 is to prioritize customer orders over a firm's own trading interests when an executable customer order is held. It applies to both market orders and limit orders in equity security instruments.

History and Origin

The origins of FINRA Rule 5320 can be traced back to earlier rules and interpretations that addressed the practice of "trading ahead." Before the consolidation of rulebooks, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) had rules such as NASD IM-2110-2 (Trading Ahead of Customer Limit Order) and NASD Rule 2111 (Trading Ahead of Customer Market Orders). Similarly, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) had its own prohibitions, most notably NYSE Rule 92. These disparate rules created complexities for firms that were members of multiple self-regulatory organizations.19

Recognizing the need for consistency and simplification, FINRA undertook an initiative to consolidate and harmonize its rulebook. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the new FINRA Rule 5320 in February 2011, with an effective date of September 12, 2011.18 This new rule consolidated the previous NASD provisions and aimed to align them more closely with other market regulations, including the SEC's Regulation NMS (National Market System), which sought to modernize and strengthen the regulatory structure of U.S. equity markets.17,16 The harmonization efforts between FINRA and exchanges like the NYSE regarding their "trading ahead" rules, including the transition from NYSE Rule 92 to the new 5320 structure, sparked discussions within the industry regarding the shift in customer protection assumptions.15,14

Key Takeaways

  • FINRA Rule 5320 prohibits a broker-dealer from trading for its own account at a price that would satisfy an unexecuted customer order unless the customer order is immediately filled at the same or a better price.
  • The rule is designed to enforce best execution principles and prevent conflicts of interest, prioritizing client interests.
  • It applies to both market and limit orders in equity securities.
  • Certain exceptions exist, such as for institutional accounts and large orders, where customers may "opt-in" to the rule's protections or consent to different handling.
  • Firms must have written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with FINRA Rule 5320 and related order handling obligations.

Interpreting FINRA Rule 5320

FINRA Rule 5320 mandates that member firms prioritize customer orders over their own proprietary trading interests. When a firm receives a customer order for an equity security that is marketable (i.e., it could be immediately executed at the prevailing market price), the firm generally cannot trade for its own account at a price that would satisfy that customer order, unless the customer order is filled concurrently or immediately thereafter at an equal or superior price. This obligation is central to a broker-dealer's fiduciary duty to its clients.

The rule requires firms to have a documented methodology for handling and prioritizing pending orders, ensuring consistent application.13 For instance, if a firm has an unexecuted customer limit order to buy a stock at $50, and the firm's trading desk then wants to buy that same stock for its own account at $50 or less, FINRA Rule 5320 dictates that the customer's order must be executed first, or concurrently at a better price, up to the size of the proprietary trade. The rule also encourages firms to "cross" marketable customer orders with other orders received on the opposite side of the market when possible.12

Hypothetical Example

Consider a scenario where ABC Brokerage receives a limit order from Customer Jane to buy 500 shares of XYZ Corp. at $25.00 or better. This order is held by ABC Brokerage because the current lowest available sell price (the offer) is $25.10.

Later, the market price for XYZ Corp. drops, and ABC Brokerage's internal trading desk identifies an opportunity to buy 300 shares of XYZ Corp. for its own proprietary trading account at $24.95.

Under FINRA Rule 5320, if the internal trading desk executes its 300-share order at $24.95, it would be "trading ahead" of Customer Jane's unexecuted order. To comply with FINRA Rule 5320, ABC Brokerage must immediately execute Customer Jane's order for at least 300 shares at $24.95 (or better) before or concurrently with its own proprietary trade. If ABC Brokerage trades for its own account at $24.95 without filling Jane's order, it violates the rule. The firm is obligated to fill the customer's order at the more favorable price obtained for its own account, demonstrating the rule's emphasis on customer priority.

Practical Applications

FINRA Rule 5320 is fundamental to the operational framework of broker-dealer firms in the United States, particularly within the context of market making and order execution. Its primary application is to prevent firms from engaging in "front-running," a form of trading ahead where a firm trades on its own account with knowledge of pending customer orders.

This rule is crucial for ensuring that public customers receive fair and prompt execution of their market orders and limit orders. For a market maker, who actively quotes bid and ask prices and facilitates trading, FINRA Rule 5320 means that they cannot use their unique market position or knowledge of customer order flow to their own advantage at the expense of clients. Firms must implement robust internal controls and supervision to ensure compliance, including strict information barriers between different trading units to prevent the misuse of confidential order information.11 The rule is often enforced in conjunction with FINRA Rule 5310, which governs best execution obligations, reinforcing the requirement for firms to achieve the most favorable terms for customer transactions.10 The broader regulatory landscape, including the SEC's Regulation NMS, further reinforces the principles of fair and efficient markets that FINRA Rule 5320 supports.

Limitations and Criticisms

While FINRA Rule 5320 aims to protect customer interests, it has faced some criticisms and has specific limitations. One notable area of discussion revolves around the "no-knowledge" exception and how firms implement information barriers. This exception permits a firm to trade for its own account if the trading unit making the proprietary trade has no knowledge of the unexecuted customer order that would otherwise trigger the rule's restrictions.9,8 Critics argue that the effectiveness of this exception relies heavily on the integrity and strictness of internal controls, and potential breaches or less-than-perfect barriers could undermine the rule's intent.

Another point of contention stems from the rule harmonization that occurred with the adoption of FINRA Rule 5320. Specifically, the shift from older rules like NYSE Rule 92 altered the default assumption regarding customer consent for certain types of proprietary trading alongside customer orders. Under the new rule, for certain institutional accounts or large orders, customers may be required to "opt-in" to the rule's protections, rather than being automatically protected unless they "opt-out."7,6 Some market participants view this as potentially weakening customer protection for larger orders by shifting the burden of compliance awareness more towards the buy-side. Additionally, the broader market structure facilitated by rules like Regulation NMS, which FINRA Rule 5320 operates within, has been criticized by some for contributing to issues like market fragmentation and the rise of high-frequency trading.

FINRA Rule 5320 vs. NYSE Rule 92

FINRA Rule 5320 superseded and harmonized various pre-existing rules, notably those previously enforced by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), such as NYSE Rule 92. While both rules aimed to prevent broker-dealers from trading ahead of customer orders, their approaches and nuances differed significantly, particularly concerning customer consent and exceptions.

Historically, NYSE Rule 92 generally prohibited firms from trading ahead of customer orders unless they obtained affirmative consent from the customer, particularly for certain types of block orders. This meant customers had to actively "opt-out" if they did not want the protection.5,4 FINRA Rule 5320, in its consolidated form, maintained the general prohibition but introduced more explicit provisions regarding institutional accounts and large orders. For these specific categories, FINRA Rule 5320 allows firms to trade for their own account without immediately executing the customer order, provided they disclose this practice to the customer and offer a "meaningful opportunity to opt-in" to the rule's protections.3,2 This shift from an "opt-out" to an "opt-in" mechanism for certain order types changed the burden of ensuring full protection, leading to discussions about potential impacts on customer order priority. Another distinction was that NYSE Rule 92 made some distinctions based on the type of firm activity (e.g., facilitation, hedging), whereas FINRA Rule 5320 has a more direct prohibition, though it includes a "no-knowledge" exception.1

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of FINRA Rule 5320?

The primary purpose of FINRA Rule 5320 is to prohibit broker-dealer firms from trading for their own accounts when they hold an unexecuted customer order that could be filled at the same or a better price. It aims to ensure that customers receive fair treatment and prompt execution, preventing firms from profiting at the expense of their clients.

Does FINRA Rule 5320 apply to all customer orders?

FINRA Rule 5320 generally applies to all market orders and limit orders in equity securities. However, it includes specific exceptions for certain large orders or orders from institutional accounts. For these exceptions, firms may trade ahead if they have provided disclosure to the customer and offered them a chance to "opt-in" to the rule's protections.

What is the "no-knowledge" exception under FINRA Rule 5320?

The "no-knowledge" exception allows a firm to conduct proprietary trading without violating FINRA Rule 5320 if the specific trading unit executing the proprietary trade has no knowledge of a pending customer order that would otherwise trigger the rule's protections. This typically requires robust information barriers within the firm to separate different trading desks and their access to order information.

How does FINRA Rule 5320 relate to best execution?

FINRA Rule 5320 is closely related to a broker-dealer's best execution obligations, which require firms to use reasonable diligence to ascertain the best market for a security and to buy or sell in that market so that the resultant price to the customer is as favorable as possible. FINRA Rule 5320 specifically prevents a firm from disadvantaging its own customer's price by trading ahead for its own account.

What are the consequences of violating FINRA Rule 5320?

Violations of FINRA Rule 5320 can result in significant disciplinary actions by FINRA, including fines, suspensions, and censures for the firm and involved individuals. Firms are expected to have comprehensive supervisory controls in place to ensure compliance, and a lack of such controls can lead to additional penalties.