Skip to main content
← Back to F Definitions

Forward rate agreement fra

What Is Forward Rate Agreement (FRA)?

A Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) is an over-the-counter (OTC)) contract between two parties that locks in an interest rate for a specified future period on a predetermined notional amount. As a type of interest rate derivative, FRAs are primarily used for hedging against adverse interest rate movements or for speculation on future rate changes. Unlike a loan, no principal is exchanged; instead, the settlement is made in cash based on the difference between the agreed-upon forward rate and the prevailing market reference rate at the contract's maturity.25, 26

History and Origin

Forward Rate Agreements emerged as a key tool in the evolving landscape of financial markets and interest rate risk management. Their development paralleled the growth of the broader OTC derivatives market in the late 20th century. This expansion was fueled by a need for more flexible and customized instruments to manage exposure to fluctuating interest rates, particularly for banks and corporations. The trading of OTC interest rate derivatives, including FRAs, significantly increased between 2016 and 2019, outpacing exchange-traded derivatives, driven by technological advancements, reduced transaction costs, and changing expectations about short-term interest rates.23, 24

Key Takeaways

  • A Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) is an OTC contract designed to fix an interest rate for a future period.
  • FRAs involve a cash settlement based on the difference between the agreed FRA rate and the prevailing market reference rate at maturity, without the exchange of principal.
  • They are primarily used by financial institutions and corporations for hedging against interest rate volatility or for speculative purposes.
  • The most common reference rate for FRAs has historically been LIBOR, though the market has largely transitioned to alternative benchmark rates like SOFR.
  • While offering flexibility, FRAs carry counterparty risk and can lack liquidity.

Formula and Calculation

The cash settlement amount for a Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) is calculated at the settlement date, typically as the difference between the agreed-upon FRA rate and the prevailing reference rate (e.g., SOFR). This difference is applied to the notional amount for the contract period and then discounted back to the settlement date.

The formula for the FRA payment (from the perspective of the FRA buyer) is:

FRA Payment=(Reference RateFRA Rate)×Notional Principal×(Period DaysYear Days)1+Reference Rate×(Period DaysYear Days)\text{FRA Payment} = \frac{(\text{Reference Rate} - \text{FRA Rate}) \times \text{Notional Principal} \times (\frac{\text{Period Days}}{\text{Year Days}})}{1 + \text{Reference Rate} \times (\frac{\text{Period Days}}{\text{Year Days}})}

Where:

  • Reference Rate: The actual market interest rate observed on the settlement date for the contract period.
  • FRA Rate: The fixed interest rate agreed upon in the Forward Rate Agreement.
  • Notional Principal (NP): The nominal amount on which the interest difference is calculated. This principal is never exchanged.
  • Period Days: The number of days in the interest period covered by the FRA (e.g., 90 days for a 3-month FRA).
  • Year Days: The number of days in the year used for calculation (e.g., 360 or 365, depending on market conventions).
  • The denominator discounts the future interest payment difference back to the settlement date to determine its present value, reflecting the timing of the actual cash flow.21, 22

Interpreting the Forward Rate Agreement (FRA)

Interpreting a Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) involves understanding the market's expectation of future interest rates and assessing the potential financial impact of entering the agreement. When a party enters into an FRA, they are essentially taking a view on whether the future spot interest rate will be higher or lower than the agreed-upon FRA rate.

For example, if a borrower enters an FRA to fix a future borrowing rate, they anticipate that the actual interest rates in the future will rise above their agreed FRA rate. If this occurs, they receive a payment from the FRA seller, effectively offsetting their higher borrowing costs in the market. Conversely, if future rates fall below the FRA rate, the borrower pays the seller, meaning they locked in a higher rate than otherwise available. FRAs therefore provide valuable insights into market sentiment regarding future interest rate movements and are a key tool in risk management strategies.20

Hypothetical Example

Consider Company A, which anticipates needing to borrow $10 million in three months for a period of six months. Company A is concerned that interest rates might rise in the interim, increasing their future borrowing costs. To hedge this risk, Company A enters into a 3x9 Forward Rate Agreement (meaning the agreement starts in 3 months and covers a 6-month period, ending in 9 months from today) with Bank B at an agreed FRA rate of 4.50%. The notional amount is $10 million.

Three months later, at the settlement date, the prevailing 6-month reference rate (e.g., SOFR) is 4.80%. Since the actual rate (4.80%) is higher than the agreed FRA rate (4.50%), Company A receives a payment from Bank B.

Using the formula (assuming 360 days in a year and a 180-day period for 6 months):

FRA Payment=(0.04800.0450)×$10,000,000×(180360)1+0.0480×(180360)\text{FRA Payment} = \frac{(0.0480 - 0.0450) \times \$10,000,000 \times (\frac{180}{360})}{1 + 0.0480 \times (\frac{180}{360})}

FRA Payment=(0.0030)×$10,000,000×0.51+0.0480×0.5\text{FRA Payment} = \frac{(0.0030) \times \$10,000,000 \times 0.5}{1 + 0.0480 \times 0.5}

FRA Payment=$15,0001+0.024\text{FRA Payment} = \frac{\$15,000}{1 + 0.024}

FRA Payment=$15,0001.024$14,648.44\text{FRA Payment} = \frac{\$15,000}{1.024} \approx \$14,648.44

Company A receives approximately $14,648.44 from Bank B. This payment compensates Company A for the higher interest expense they will incur on their $10 million loan, effectively locking in a borrowing cost closer to their desired rate. If the reference rate had been lower than 4.50%, Company A would have paid Bank B.19

Practical Applications

Forward Rate Agreements (FRAs) are versatile financial products widely utilized by various market participants for strategic financial planning and risk mitigation.

  • Hedging Interest Rate Risk: Corporations and financial institutions frequently use FRAs to hedge against future interest rate volatility. For instance, a company planning to issue debt in several months can purchase an FRA to lock in a borrowing rate, protecting against potential increases. Conversely, a bank with future lending commitments can sell an FRA to guard against falling rates.16, 17, 18
  • Speculation: Traders and investors also use FRAs to take directional positions on anticipated interest rate movements. If a trader believes rates will rise, they might buy an FRA; if they expect rates to fall, they might sell one.15
  • Asset-Liability Management: Banks employ FRAs as part of their broader asset-liability management strategies. They can use FRAs to manage mismatches between the maturities of their assets (loans) and liabilities (deposits), ensuring stable net interest margins.
  • Pricing Other Financial Instruments: The implied forward rates derived from FRAs are crucial inputs for pricing other derivatives and fixed-income securities, contributing to broader market liquidity and price discovery within capital markets.14
  • LIBOR Transition: In the wake of the transition away from LIBOR, FRAs, like other interest rate derivatives, have adapted to reference new benchmark rates such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). This shift required significant market adjustments to ensure continuity in hedging and trading. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has played a key role in facilitating this transition.13

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their utility in managing interest rate exposures, Forward Rate Agreements (FRAs) come with inherent limitations and risks, particularly given their over-the-counter (OTC)) nature.

One significant drawback is counterparty risk. Since FRAs are bilateral contracts not traded on exchanges, participants are exposed to the risk that the other party may default on its obligations. While this risk can be mitigated through careful counterparty selection and collateral agreements, it remains a concern, especially in volatile markets.11, 12

Another limitation is liquidity risk. Unlike exchange-traded futures, FRAs are customized, which can make it challenging to unwind or offset a position before its maturity. Finding a willing counterparty for an opposite trade can be difficult, potentially leading to higher transaction costs or being locked into unfavorable terms if market conditions change.9, 10

Furthermore, the lack of standardization in OTC contracts means that terms can vary, adding complexity to valuation and increasing operational risk. This can make it difficult for parties to accurately assess the fair value of an FRA, which in turn can make it more difficult to negotiate favorable terms.8 The opaque nature of OTC markets, where transaction details are not publicly disclosed, also limits market transparency, which can hinder effective surveillance by regulators.7

Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) vs. Interest Rate Swap (IRS)

Forward Rate Agreements (FRAs) and Interest Rate Swaps (IRS) are both interest rate derivatives used for managing interest rate risk, but they differ in their structure and application.

An FRA is a single-period contract that fixes an interest rate for a specific future period on a notional principal. It involves a single cash settlement at the beginning of the underlying interest period, based on the difference between the agreed FRA rate and the market reference rate for that period. FRAs are typically used to hedge short-term, discrete interest rate exposures, such as anticipated future borrowings or deposits.

An IRS, on the other hand, is a series of exchanges of fixed interest rate payments for floating interest rate payments over multiple periods, typically for longer durations. It involves periodic exchanges of payments (e.g., quarterly or semi-annually) over the life of the swap, based on a notional principal that is never exchanged. While an IRS can be seen as a series of linked FRAs, there are technical differences in their calculation methodologies and cash payment structures that lead to slight pricing discrepancies. IRS are generally used for longer-term hedging or transforming interest rate exposures across an entire debt or asset portfolio.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of a Forward Rate Agreement (FRA)?

The primary purpose of an FRA is to help parties, such as corporations or banks, hedge against the risk of unfavorable changes in future interest rates. It allows them to lock in an interest rate for a future borrowing or lending period.

Is the notional amount exchanged in an FRA?

No, the notional amount in a Forward Rate Agreement is never exchanged. It is merely a reference figure used to calculate the cash settlement payment, which is based on the difference between the agreed FRA rate and the prevailing market reference rate at maturity.6

What are the main risks associated with FRAs?

The main risks include counterparty risk, which is the risk that the other party to the contract defaults. Additionally, because FRAs are over-the-counter (OTC)) instruments and can be customized, they may have lower liquidity compared to exchange-traded derivatives, making it harder to exit a position.3, 4, 5

How does the LIBOR transition impact Forward Rate Agreements?

Historically, LIBOR was the most common benchmark rate for FRAs. With LIBOR's cessation, new FRAs and many legacy contracts now reference alternative risk-free rates, such as SOFR. This has required market participants to adapt their systems and contract terms.1, 2