Skip to main content
← Back to G Definitions

Group of ten g 10

What Is General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB)?

The General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) was a lending agreement between the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Group of Ten (G10) countries, designed to supplement the IMF's financial resources during times of global financial instability. Falling under the umbrella of international finance, the GAB served as a critical mechanism to provide liquidity to member countries experiencing severe balance of payments difficulties. Essentially, it allowed the IMF to borrow foreign currency from these financially strong nations to assist other countries in economic distress, thereby helping to prevent the spread of financial crisis.

History and Origin

The General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) was established in 1962, a crucial period during the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. Its creation stemmed from concerns that the existing resources of the International Monetary Fund might be insufficient to address potential threats to the international monetary system, particularly those arising from the balance-of-payments issues of major reserve currency countries like the United States and the United Kingdom13. The agreement was initially between the IMF and eight industrial countries, with two more joining shortly after, forming the core of what became known as the "Group of Ten" or G1012.

Over the years, the GAB played a role in buttressing the global financial safety net. Switzerland, though not an IMF member until 1992, associated with the GAB in 1964, further strengthening its capacity11. While significant in its time, the GAB's relevance diminished with the introduction of the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) in the late 1990s, which offered a broader membership and a larger pool of resources10. The GAB was allowed to lapse at the end of 2018, having been largely superseded by the NAB as the primary supplementary financing mechanism for the IMF9.

Key Takeaways

  • The General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) was a supplementary lending agreement for the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
  • Established in 1962, it involved the IMF borrowing from the Group of Ten (G10) countries.
  • Its primary purpose was to provide liquidity to countries facing severe balance-of-payments problems.
  • The GAB helped stabilize the international monetary system during periods of financial strain.
  • It was eventually superseded by the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) and allowed to lapse in 2018.

Interpreting the General Arrangements to Borrow

The General Arrangements to Borrow was a standby agreement, meaning that its funds were not continuously active but could be activated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) when specific conditions were met. Interpretation of the GAB revolved around its role as a last resort or supplementary financing tool for the IMF, primarily to address systemic risks that could threaten the global economy. Its activation signaled a significant level of perceived financial distress in the international system, indicating that the IMF's regular quota resources were deemed insufficient to handle a crisis or a substantial need for sovereign debt assistance.

The GAB's existence and occasional activation demonstrated a commitment from major industrialized nations to collective financial stability. It provided a framework for coordinated action among central banks to prevent financial contagion.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine a scenario in the 1970s where a major industrialized nation, let's call it "Nation X," experiences an unexpected and severe oil price shock, leading to a massive trade deficit and a rapid depletion of its foreign currency reserves. Nation X, a member of the IMF and one of the G10 countries, finds itself on the brink of a currency crisis.

At this point, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) would assess Nation X's situation. If the crisis were deemed severe enough to potentially destabilize the broader international financial system and Nation X's borrowing needs exceeded the IMF's available quota resources, the IMF could propose activating the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB). The GAB participants—the other financially strong G10 countries—would then consider the request to lend their currencies to the IMF, which would then disburse these funds to Nation X under strict conditions, such as implementing fiscal reforms or reducing government spending (often referred to as austerity measures). This injection of liquidity from the GAB would help Nation X bridge its immediate financing gap, restore confidence, and implement policies to regain economic stability.

Practical Applications

The General Arrangements to Borrow found its practical application primarily as a critical safety net within the architecture of international finance. It was designed to address large-scale balance-of-payments deficits and liquidity crises that threatened the stability of the global financial system. Its main utility was in providing the International Monetary Fund with supplementary resources beyond its regular quota contributions from member countries.

Historically, the GAB allowed the IMF to access additional funds from financially strong nations to assist countries experiencing severe economic distress, thereby mitigating the risk of financial instability spreading across borders. While not frequently activated, its very existence provided a level of assurance to markets during times of uncertainty. International financial institutions like the IMF, supported by mechanisms such as the GAB, play a crucial role in providing public goods that contribute to global economic stability.

#8# Limitations and Criticisms

While the General Arrangements to Borrow served an important function for decades, it faced certain limitations and criticisms that ultimately led to its replacement. One key limitation was its relatively narrow membership, primarily confined to the Group of Ten (G10) countries. This meant that the pool of available funds, though substantial for its time, might not be sufficient to address broader, more pervasive crises affecting a larger number of developing countries or emerging markets.

Another criticism, sometimes leveled against IMF lending in general, was the perception that such arrangements could enable countries to delay necessary economic reforms or that the associated conditions, such as structural adjustment, might impose severe social costs. However, these were often broader debates about the IMF's role rather than specific to the GAB's structure.

The primary limitation that led to the GAB's diminishing role was the increasing scale and complexity of global financial crises. The need for significantly larger resources to respond to potential downturns became apparent in the late 1990s, leading to the proposal and eventual establishment of the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB). After the NAB became operational, the GAB could generally only be activated if access to the NAB had been refused. Ul7timately, participants in the GAB agreed to allow the program to lapse at the end of 2018, recognizing that its usefulness had become limited.

#6# General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) vs. New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB)

The General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) and the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) are both agreements that allowed the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to supplement its ordinary resources by borrowing from member countries. However, they differ significantly in their scope, size, and operational hierarchy.

FeatureGeneral Arrangements to Borrow (GAB)New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB)
Establishment19621998 (first proposed in 1995)
MembershipPrimarily the Group of Ten (G10) countries (11 participants) 5Broadened to include 40 countries (as of 2024)
Resource SizeApproximately SDR 17 billion (around $24 billion)Significantly larger, over SDR 360 billion (around $500 billion)
4 RoleOriginal supplementary lending facilityBecame the primary supplementary lending facility
ActivationCould be activated directly by the IMFGenerally activated first; GAB only if NAB activation refused 3
Current StatusLapsed at the end of 2018Active and remains a key component of the IMF's lending capacity

The NAB was proposed following the Mexican financial crisis in the mid-1990s, when it became evident that the IMF would require a much larger resource base to effectively respond to increasingly complex and widespread financial challenges. The New Arrangements to Borrow expanded both the number of participating countries and the total lending capacity, making it a more flexible and robust mechanism for global financial stability compared to the GAB.

#2# FAQs

What was the main purpose of the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB)?

The main purpose of the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) was to supplement the financial resources of the International Monetary Fund. It allowed the IMF to borrow additional funds from a group of financially strong nations, primarily the G10 countries, to provide emergency liquidity to other member countries facing severe balance-of-payments difficulties and to prevent the spread of financial crises.

Which countries were part of the General Arrangements to Borrow?

The General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) initially involved eight industrial countries: Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Sweden and Switzerland (as an associate member) later joined, forming what became known as the Group of Ten (G10).

#1## Is the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) still in effect today?

No, the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) is no longer in effect. It was allowed to lapse at the end of 2018, having been largely replaced by the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB). The NAB offers a broader membership and a significantly larger pool of resources for the International Monetary Fund to draw upon for its lending activities.

How did the GAB help maintain global financial stability?

The GAB contributed to global financial stability by acting as a supplementary safety net. When the IMF's regular resources were insufficient to manage a large financial crisis or provide necessary liquidity to a struggling economy, the GAB allowed it to access additional funds from leading industrialized nations. This mechanism helped prevent financial distress in one country from spiraling into a broader international crisis, thus maintaining confidence in the international monetary system.

What replaced the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB)?

The General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB) was primarily replaced by the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB). The NAB, established in 1998, has a larger membership of financially sound countries and a significantly greater lending capacity, making it the primary facility for the International Monetary Fund to supplement its quota resources during times of financial need.

LINK_POOL