Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to H Definitions

Higher_moments

What Are Higher Moments?

Higher moments are advanced statistical measures used in quantitative finance to describe the shape of a probability distribution beyond its basic central tendency and dispersion. While the first two statistical moments—the mean and variance—provide information about a dataset's average value and spread, respectively, higher moments offer crucial insights into the asymmetry and "tailedness" of the distribution. Specifically, the third statistical moment is skewness, which measures the asymmetry of the distribution, and the fourth moment is kurtosis, which gauges the "peakedness" and the presence of fat tails in the distribution. Analyzing higher moments helps investors and analysts gain a more comprehensive understanding of potential risks and opportunities in investment returns that might be overlooked by relying solely on mean and variance.

History and Origin

The concept of statistical moments has roots in physics, where a "moment" refers to a force about a point of rotation. This concept was adapted to statistics by Karl Pearson, a pivotal figure in the establishment of modern mathematical statistics. Pearson, an English mathematician and biostatistician, is credited with formally introducing the method of moments as a way to fit distributions to samples and describe their characteristics. Hi19s extensive work in the late 19th and early 20th centuries laid much of the groundwork for current statistical methodologies, including the widespread use of higher moments to describe data distributions. He16, 17, 18 established the world's first university statistics department at University College London in 1911 and significantly contributed to the fields of biometrics and meteorology.

#15# Key Takeaways

  • Higher moments provide a deeper understanding of a dataset's distribution beyond just its average and spread.
  • Skewness (the third moment) measures the asymmetry of a distribution, indicating if outcomes are more likely to fall on one side of the mean.
  • Kurtosis (the fourth moment) quantifies the "peakedness" and the likelihood of extreme values, often associated with "fat tails."
  • In finance, higher moments are critical for assessing tail risk and modeling financial phenomena that do not conform to a normal distribution.
  • Ignoring higher moments can lead to an underestimation of potential losses or gains, particularly during periods of market volatility.

Formula and Calculation

Statistical moments are typically calculated as the expected value of a random variable raised to a certain power. For sample data, central moments (moments about the mean) are often used to define skewness and kurtosis.

The k-th central moment, denoted as (\mu_k), for a random variable (X) with mean (\mu) is given by:

μk=E[(X−μ)k]\mu_k = E[(X - \mu)^k]

The first moment is the mean itself. The second central moment is the variance, (\sigma2 = E[(X - \mu)2]).

For skewness (the third standardized moment), the formula is:

Skewness=E[(X−μ)3]σ3\text{Skewness} = \frac{E[(X - \mu)^3]}{\sigma^3}

For kurtosis (the fourth standardized moment), the formula is:

Kurtosis=E[(X−μ)4]σ4\text{Kurtosis} = \frac{E[(X - \mu)^4]}{\sigma^4}

In practice, for a sample of (n) data points, the formulas for sample skewness ((g_1)) and kurtosis ((g_2), or "excess kurtosis") are often used, which adjust for sample size:

g1=n(n−1)(n−2)∑i=1n(xi−xˉs)3g_1 = \frac{n}{(n-1)(n-2)} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\frac{x_i - \bar{x}}{s}\right)^3 g2=[n(n+1)(n−1)(n−2)(n−3)∑i=1n(xi−xˉs)4]−3(n−1)2(n−2)(n−3)g_2 = \left[ \frac{n(n+1)}{(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\frac{x_i - \bar{x}}{s}\right)^4 \right] - \frac{3(n-1)^2}{(n-2)(n-3)}

where (\bar{x}) is the sample mean and (s) is the sample standard deviation. The "excess kurtosis" subtracts 3 because a normal distribution has a kurtosis of 3, making the excess kurtosis of a normal distribution equal to zero. Th12, 13, 14e National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides detailed information on these and other statistical concepts in its Engineering Statistics Handbook.

##11 Interpreting the Higher Moments

Interpreting higher moments is crucial for understanding the true characteristics of a data series, especially in financial contexts where assumptions of normality can be misleading.

  • Skewness:

    • A skewness of zero indicates a perfectly symmetrical distribution, like a normal distribution.
    • Positive skewness means the right tail of the distribution is longer or fatter, suggesting more frequent small losses and a few large gains. In finance, positively skewed returns are generally desirable, as they imply a higher probability of positive extreme outcomes than negative ones.
    • Negative skewness means the left tail is longer or fatter, indicating more frequent small gains and a few large losses. For investment returns, negative skewness is typically undesirable, as it suggests a higher likelihood of significant downside events.

  • Kurtosis:

    • A kurtosis of 3 (or an excess kurtosis of 0) is characteristic of a normal distribution. Such distributions are called mesokurtic.
    • Leptokurtic distributions have kurtosis greater than 3 (positive excess kurtosis). They have fatter tails and a higher peak than a normal distribution, implying that extreme values are more probable. In finance, this indicates a higher probability of both very large positive and very large negative returns, often referred to as fat tails. Th10is is a common characteristic of financial market data.
    • Platykurtic distributions have kurtosis less than 3 (negative excess kurtosis). They have thinner tails and a flatter peak than a normal distribution, suggesting that extreme values are less probable.

Understanding these characteristics provided by higher moments allows for more informed quantitative analysis and decision-making, helping to capture risks that standard deviation alone would miss.

#9# Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical investment portfolios, Portfolio A and Portfolio B, with the following simulated annual returns over a decade:

  • Portfolio A Returns: +10%, +12%, +9%, +11%, +8%, +10%, +10%, +9%, +11%, +10%
  • Portfolio B Returns: +15%, +5%, +1%, +20%, +10%, +12%, +8%, +2%, -10%, +17%

Both portfolios might have similar average returns and even similar standard deviations. Let's assume, for simplicity, both have a mean return of approximately 9.5% and a standard deviation of around 1.2% for Portfolio A, and 8% for Portfolio B.

However, when we calculate the higher moments:

  • Portfolio A (Low Skewness, Low Kurtosis): This portfolio's returns are tightly clustered around the mean, with no significant extreme gains or losses. Its skewness would be close to zero, and its kurtosis close to 3 (or excess kurtosis near zero), resembling a normal distribution. This indicates consistent, predictable returns.
  • Portfolio B (Negative Skewness, High Kurtosis): This portfolio experiences a wider range of outcomes, including a significant loss (-10%) and very high gains (+15%, +20%). Its skewness would likely be negative due to the larger left-tail event (the -10% return), and its kurtosis would be significantly higher than 3 (positive excess kurtosis) due to the presence of these extreme values. This suggests fat tails, meaning large deviations from the mean are more common than a normal distribution would predict.

An investor relying solely on mean and standard deviation might perceive Portfolio A and B as having similar "risk" if their standard deviations were close. However, by analyzing the higher moments, particularly the negative skewness and high kurtosis of Portfolio B, a more accurate picture emerges: Portfolio B carries a higher risk of large, unexpected losses despite its potential for large gains. This illustrates how higher moments provide essential context for evaluating investment returns.

Practical Applications

Higher moments are increasingly integrated into various aspects of financial modeling and risk management to better capture the complexities of financial markets.

  • Portfolio Construction and Asset Allocation: Traditional portfolio theory, such as the Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), primarily focuses on mean and variance. However, incorporating skewness and kurtosis allows for the construction of portfolios that better align with an investor's preferences for downside protection or upside potential. Investors might seek positively skewed portfolios to avoid large losses or accept higher kurtosis for the chance of significant gains.
  • Value at Risk (VaR) and Tail Risk Measurement: VaR models often assume a normal distribution of returns, which can severely underestimate potential losses during extreme market risk events. By integrating higher moments, particularly kurtosis, VaR estimations can become more accurate in capturing "tail risk" – the probability of extreme, rare events. This8 is especially crucial given that financial markets exhibit fat tails more frequently than a normal distribution would suggest.
  • 6, 7Derivatives Pricing: The Black-Scholes model, a cornerstone of option pricing, assumes log-normally distributed asset returns, implying a normal distribution of log-returns. However, real-world asset returns often display significant skewness and kurtosis. More advanced options pricing models, such as those employing jump-diffusion processes or stochastic volatility, explicitly account for these higher moments to provide more accurate valuations, particularly for out-of-the-money options.
  • Regulatory Frameworks: Regulators recognize the importance of robust financial modeling that accounts for a full range of potential outcomes. For example, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve System jointly issued supervisory guidance on model risk management, emphasizing the need for banks to manage risks arising from quantitative models. This guidance encourages thorough validation processes that indirectly necessitate an understanding of model performance across the entire distribution of outcomes, including tails, thus highlighting the relevance of higher moments.

L5imitations and Criticisms

Despite their utility, the use of higher moments in quantitative finance comes with limitations and criticisms.

One significant challenge lies in the estimation of higher moments, especially with limited historical data. Skewness and kurtosis are much more sensitive to outliers and extreme observations than the mean or variance. This4 means that a few unusual data points can drastically alter their values, making them less stable and harder to estimate accurately, particularly with smaller sample sizes. In d3ynamic financial markets, where conditions can change rapidly, historical data may not always be a reliable predictor of future higher moments.

Furthermore, while higher moments provide valuable descriptive statistics, they do not inherently explain the underlying economic reasons for a distribution's shape. A high kurtosis value, indicating fat tails, tells us that extreme events are more probable but doesn't explain why those events occur or predict when they will occur. This2 can lead to a false sense of precision if models relying on higher moments are not also underpinned by sound economic reasoning and qualitative risk management practices.

Some argue that focusing excessively on higher moments can complicate financial modeling without a commensurate increase in practical insight, especially for non-experts. Simpler models based on the first two moments may be preferred for their interpretability and ease of use, even if they sacrifice some precision regarding tail events. However, major financial events, such as the 2008 financial crisis, have highlighted the significant underestimation of risk that can occur when fat tails are ignored and models are built solely on the assumption of a normal distribution. This1 underscores the ongoing debate and the need for a balanced approach to incorporating higher moments into financial analysis.

Higher Moments vs. Variance

While both higher moments and variance are measures related to the characteristics of a probability distribution, they capture distinct aspects of data. Variance (the second statistical moment) measures the average squared deviation of each data point from the mean. It quantifies the dispersion or spread of the data—how far, on average, individual data points lie from the center. A higher variance indicates greater variability or risk management (volatility).

In contrast, higher moments—specifically skewness (the third moment) and kurtosis (the fourth moment)—describe the shape of the distribution beyond its central location and spread. Skewness reveals the asymmetry of the distribution: whether it is skewed to the left or right, indicating a longer tail on one side. Kurtosis describes the "tailedness" and "peakedness" of the distribution, providing insights into the likelihood of extreme values, or fat tails.

The key difference lies in the level of detail provided. Variance offers a broad measure of risk, assuming a symmetrical distribution around the mean. However, it does not distinguish between upside and downside volatility, nor does it quantify the probability of extreme events. Higher moments fill this gap by providing crucial information about the direction of asymmetry and the intensity of extreme outcomes, which is vital for a comprehensive understanding of market risk and portfolio theory.

FAQs

What are the four main statistical moments?

The four main statistical moments are the mean (first moment, measuring central tendency), variance (second moment, measuring dispersion), skewness (third moment, measuring asymmetry), and kurtosis (fourth moment, measuring peakedness and tail fatness).

Why are higher moments important in finance?

Higher moments are crucial in finance because financial market returns rarely follow a perfect normal distribution. They often exhibit asymmetry (skewness) and a higher probability of extreme events (fat tails due to kurtosis). Analyzing these characteristics allows for more accurate risk management, better financial modeling, and more robust Value at Risk (VaR) calculations, which traditional measures like standard deviation alone cannot capture.

Can higher moments predict market crashes?

While higher moments, particularly negative skewness and high kurtosis, can indicate an increased probability of extreme negative events or "tail risk," they are not predictive tools for specific market crashes. They describe the shape of the probability distribution of investment returns, highlighting areas of potential vulnerability, but do not provide timing signals for future events.