Historical beta

What Is Historical Beta?

Historical beta is a financial metric used to measure the systematic risk of an asset or portfolio by comparing its past price movements to those of a relevant market benchmark. This concept is central to portfolio theory, providing investors with insight into how an investment has historically reacted to broader market swings. A historical beta of 1.0 indicates that the asset's price has tended to move in lockstep with the market. A beta greater than 1.0 suggests the asset has been more volatile than the market, while a beta less than 1.0 indicates lower volatility. Understanding historical beta helps in assessing an investment's risk profile and its potential contribution to a diversified portfolio.

History and Origin

The concept of beta, including its historical calculation, emerged from the development of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) in the early 1960s. Pioneered by economists such as William Sharpe, Jack Treynor, John Lintner, and Jan Mossin, the CAPM provided a framework for understanding the relationship between risk and expected return for investments³⁰, ³¹. William Sharpe's seminal 1964 paper, "Capital Asset Prices—A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk," was particularly influential in establishing beta as a key measure of an asset's sensitivity to market movements. ²⁹The model provided the first coherent framework for relating the required return on an investment to its risk. ²⁸Beta was initially used to categorize securities by their systematic risk, and its application has since expanded to become a practical tool for portfolio managers.
²⁷

Key Takeaways

• Historical beta quantifies an asset's past price volatility relative to the overall market.
• A beta of 1.0 means the asset's price movements mirror the market.
• A beta greater than 1.0 indicates higher volatility than the market, while less than 1.0 suggests lower volatility.
• It is a key component of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and helps estimate expected returns relative to investment risk.
• Historical beta is typically calculated using historical price data over a specific period, such as three to five years of monthly returns.
  ²⁶

Formula and Calculation

Historical beta is calculated using statistical regression analysis, specifically by determining the covariance between an asset's returns and the market's returns, and dividing it by the variance of the market's returns. This calculation measures the slope of the line through a regression of data points, where each point represents an individual stock's returns against the market's returns.

The formula for historical beta ($\beta$) is:

Where:

• (\text{Cov}(R_a, R_m)) = The covariance between the asset's return ((R_a)) and the market's return ((R_m)). Covariance measures how two variables move together.
• (\text{Var}(R_m)) = The variance of the market's return ((R_m)). Variance measures the dispersion of the market's returns around its average.

This calculation typically uses historical price data, often 60 months of monthly return data, to identify patterns reflecting an asset's sensitivity to market movements.
²⁵

Interpreting the Historical Beta

Interpreting historical beta involves understanding what its value signifies about an asset's relationship with the broader market.

• Beta of 1.0: An asset with a historical beta of 1.0 tends to move precisely with the market. For instance, if the market increases by 10%, the asset is expected to increase by 10%, and vice-versa. Such an asset is considered to have average market risk.
• Beta greater than 1.0: Assets with a beta higher than 1.0 are considered more volatile than the overall market. For example, a stock with a beta of 1.5 is theoretically expected to move 1.5 times as much as the market. If the market rises 10%, the stock might rise 15%; if the market falls 10%, it might fall 15%. These assets carry higher systematic risk and are often associated with growth-oriented companies or cyclical industries.
• Beta less than 1.0 (but greater than 0): Assets with a beta between 0 and 1.0 are generally less volatile than the market. A stock with a beta of 0.75 might only move 7.5% for every 10% market movement. ²⁴These are often considered more defensive investments, such as utility stocks or consumer staples, and can offer a degree of downside protection during market downturns.
• Beta of 0: An asset with a beta of 0 indicates its returns are uncorrelated with the market. Cash or a short-term Treasury bill might approximate this.
• Negative Beta: Although rare, a negative historical beta means the asset tends to move in the opposite direction of the market. If the market goes up, the asset tends to go down, and vice-versa. ²³This inverse correlation makes them potential hedging instruments. Inverse ETFs are designed to have negative betas.

While historical beta provides valuable insight into past volatility, it is important to remember that it is a backward-looking metric and may not perfectly predict future movements.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who is evaluating two stocks, Company A and Company B, to add to her portfolio. She uses the S&P 500 as her market benchmark.

Over the past three years:

• The S&P 500 has had an average monthly return of 1%.
• Company A has had an average monthly return of 1.3%.
• Company B has had an average monthly return of 0.8%.

Sarah calculates the historical beta for each company.

For Company A, she finds the covariance between Company A's monthly returns and the S&P 500's monthly returns to be 0.0008. The variance of the S&P 500's monthly returns is 0.0005.

Company A has a historical beta of 1.6. This suggests that Company A has historically been 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. If the S&P 500 moves up or down by 10%, Company A is expected to move by 16% in the same direction. This implies a higher potential for both gains and losses.

For Company B, Sarah finds the covariance between Company B's monthly returns and the S&P 500's monthly returns to be 0.0003. The variance of the S&P 500's monthly returns remains 0.0005.

Company B has a historical beta of 0.6. This indicates that Company B has historically been less volatile than the S&P 500, moving only 60% as much as the market. If the S&P 500 moves up or down by 10%, Company B is expected to move by 6% in the same direction. This suggests Company B might be a more stable investment, potentially offering more stability during market downturns.

Sarah uses these historical beta values to adjust her asset allocation and manage her portfolio's overall risk exposure.

Practical Applications

Historical beta finds various practical applications in finance and investment management:

• Portfolio Management: Investors use historical beta to construct portfolios that align with their risk tolerance. High-beta stocks are used to seek higher returns in rising markets but also carry greater risk, while low-beta stocks can provide stability. Adjusting a portfolio's overall beta can facilitate faster or slower movements compared to the market.
  ²²* Asset Pricing: As a core component of the CAPM, historical beta is used to estimate the expected return of an asset given its systematic risk. This helps in valuing securities and making investment decisions.
• Risk Assessment: Companies use beta to assess the cost of equity for capital budgeting decisions. A company's beta influences its weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which is crucial for evaluating potential projects.
• Regulatory Filings: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires public companies to provide quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, which can involve concepts related to beta and market volatility. ²¹Companies are required to disclose assumptions and limitations inherent in their modeling techniques used for these quantitative disclosures. ²⁰The SEC also requests research on the correlation between historical risk measures and expected future risk levels for mutual funds and other investment companies.
  ¹⁹* Performance Evaluation: Historical beta can be used in evaluating the performance of fund managers. By adjusting for market exposure, beta helps differentiate a manager's skill from their willingness to take on market risk. ¹⁸This is especially relevant when analyzing risk-adjusted returns.
• Hedging Strategies: For investors seeking to hedge against market downturns, assets with low or negative historical betas can be considered. These assets tend to perform well when the broader market declines, providing a counterbalance to the portfolio.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its widespread use, historical beta has several significant limitations and criticisms:

• Backward-Looking Nature: Historical beta is calculated using past data, meaning it may not accurately predict future market conditions or a company's changing risk profile. ¹⁷Markets are dynamic, influenced by economic shifts, industry trends, and company-specific events, which can render historical data less relevant over time.
  ¹⁶* Assumption of Constant Relationship: Beta assumes a constant linear relationship between an asset's returns and market returns, which often doesn't hold true in real-world markets, especially during extreme market conditions.
  ¹⁵* Ignores Fundamental Factors: Historical beta focuses solely on price volatility relative to the market and does not consider a company's fundamental factors such as earnings growth, management quality, or competitive landscape. This can lead to an incomplete assessment of risk.
  ¹⁴* Benchmark Sensitivity: The calculated beta value can vary significantly depending on the chosen market benchmark. Using a different index (e.g., sector-specific index versus a broad market index like the S&P 500) can result in a different beta for the same asset.
  ¹³* Time Period Dependency: The time period used for calculation (e.g., one year, three years, five years) can significantly impact the resulting beta. Short-term distortions can occur due to the sensitivity to specific time periods, failing to capture long-term risks effectively.
  ¹²* Inapplicability to New or Illiquid Stocks: Historical beta may not be reliable for newly listed companies with limited price history or for illiquid stocks that trade infrequently. Low trading volume can skew beta calculations and misrepresent a stock's actual risk.
  ¹⁰, ¹¹* Oversimplification of Risk: Critics argue that beta oversimplifies risk by focusing only on systematic risk and ignoring idiosyncratic risk (company-specific risk). ⁹While systematic risk cannot be diversified away, idiosyncratic risk can be mitigated through diversification.
• Poor Predictive Power: While useful for short-term risk assessment, historical beta often has poor predictive power for long-term performance. ⁸Research Affiliates, an investment management firm, has highlighted how historical performance of some "smart beta" strategies had little to no correlation with realized excess returns, suggesting past returns can be artificially inflated by revaluation. ⁷Rob Arnott, chairman of Research Affiliates, notes that value strategies have struggled for reasons like market environments creating outsized demand for technology.
  ⁶

Historical Beta vs. Forward-Looking Beta

Historical beta and forward-looking beta both aim to measure an asset's market sensitivity, but they differ fundamentally in their approach and underlying data. Historical beta, as discussed, relies on past price movements and returns data, typically over a period of three to five years. ⁵It provides a backward-looking perspective, indicating how an asset has reacted to market changes. Its primary strength lies in its simplicity and ease of calculation using readily available historical data.

In contrast, forward-looking beta attempts to predict an asset's future volatility relative to the market. This is often achieved by incorporating real-time market data, such as options pricing, implied volatilities, and other forward-looking indicators. ⁴Forward-looking beta aims to provide a more dynamic and current assessment of risk, potentially better reflecting anticipated changes in a company's risk profile or market conditions. For example, forward-looking beta has been shown to outperform historical beta in predicting future volatility, with one study finding a 0.72 correlation with future realized beta for forward-looking beta compared to 0.61 for historical beta.
³
The key distinction lies in their time orientation: historical beta describes what has happened, while forward-looking beta attempts to forecast what might happen. While historical beta is useful for stable industries, forward-looking beta is often preferred for high-growth or dynamic sectors where rapid changes can significantly alter an asset's risk profile. ²Both methods have their strengths, but choosing the right one depends on the specific analytical needs and the nature of the investment. Investors often confuse the two due to their shared goal of assessing market sensitivity.

FAQs

What is a "good" historical beta?

There isn't a universally "good" historical beta; it depends on an investor's goals and investment strategy. A beta close to 1.0 is considered average market risk. Investors seeking higher potential returns and comfortable with more volatility might prefer assets with a beta greater than 1.0 (e.g., growth stocks). Those seeking stability and less risk might prefer assets with a beta less than 1.0 (e.g., defensive stocks). A negative beta is desirable for hedging purposes, as these assets tend to move inversely to the market.

How often does historical beta change?

Historical beta is dynamic and can change over time due to various factors, including shifts in a company's business model, industry trends, economic cycles, and market sentiment. While typically calculated using historical data over a set period (e.g., 3-5 years), recalculating it periodically (e.g., quarterly or annually) can provide a more up-to-date reflection of an asset's market sensitivity. A stock's volatility can change significantly depending on its growth stage and other factors.

Can historical beta be negative?

Yes, historical beta can be negative, though it is rare for most common stocks. ¹A negative historical beta indicates an inverse relationship with the market: when the market goes up, the asset tends to go down, and vice-versa. Assets like gold or certain inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are examples of investments that may exhibit a negative beta, offering potential benefits for portfolio diversification and hedging against market downturns.

Is historical beta the only measure of risk?

No, historical beta is not the only measure of risk. While it effectively quantifies systematic risk (market risk), it does not account for idiosyncratic risk (company-specific risk). Other important risk measures include standard deviation, which measures the overall volatility of an asset's returns, and qualitative factors like a company's financial health, management quality, and competitive landscape. A comprehensive risk assessment typically involves considering a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors.

Why is the choice of market benchmark important for historical beta?

The choice of market benchmark is crucial because historical beta measures an asset's volatility relative to that specific benchmark. If an inappropriate benchmark is used, the resulting beta may not accurately reflect the asset's true market sensitivity. For example, using a broad market index like the S&P 500 for a highly specialized industry stock might lead to a misleading beta. A relevant benchmark should represent the market or sector in which the asset primarily operates.