Horizontal fiscal imbalances: Meaning, Criticisms & Real-World Uses

What Is Horizontal Fiscal Imbalances?

Horizontal fiscal imbalances refer to the disparities in the fiscal capacity among different subnational governments or jurisdictions at the same level within a country. These imbalances occur when regions or provinces have varying abilities to raise revenue from their own sources, or face different costs in providing a comparable level of public services to their residents, even with similar tax efforts⁴³, ⁴⁴. It is a critical concept within the broader field of public finance, specifically concerning fiscal federalism, where financial responsibilities are distributed across multiple levels of government⁴². Addressing horizontal fiscal imbalances is often a key objective of a nation's fiscal policy, aiming to ensure equitable service provision across the country⁴⁰, ⁴¹.

History and Origin

The concept of horizontal fiscal imbalances gained prominence with the evolution of federal systems of government, where different regions possess varying economic endowments and populations, leading to natural disparities in their ability to generate revenue³⁸, ³⁹. To mitigate these inherent differences and promote national cohesion, many federations have developed mechanisms to address such imbalances.

A notable example is Canada's Equalization Program, which was first introduced in 1957 and is enshrined in the Constitution Act of 1982³⁷. This program provides equalization payments from the federal government to provinces with lower revenue-generating capacity, ensuring that all Canadians have access to reasonably comparable levels of public services at similar levels of taxation, regardless of where they live. The program compensates provinces for relatively weak tax bases or resource endowments, thereby offsetting monetary imbalances between different parts of the country³⁵, ³⁶. This system is a direct response to horizontal fiscal imbalances, aiming to foster a more uniform standard of living and service across the federation.

Key Takeaways

Horizontal fiscal imbalances denote disparities in the ability of subnational governments at the same level to raise revenue or provide services.
These imbalances arise from differing economic bases, demographic structures, and resource endowments across regions.
They can lead to unequal access to public services and varying tax burdens for citizens in different parts of a country.
Mechanisms like intergovernmental transfers, such as equalization payments, are often used to reduce horizontal fiscal imbalances.
Addressing horizontal fiscal imbalances is crucial for promoting regional equity and national cohesion in federal systems.

Interpreting Horizontal Fiscal Imbalances

Interpreting horizontal fiscal imbalances involves understanding the extent to which a country's various regions or subnational governments can independently finance their expenditure responsibilities. A significant horizontal fiscal imbalance indicates that some regions are much wealthier or have more robust tax bases than others, allowing them to provide higher quality or a greater quantity of public services with less effort in terms of taxation ³³, ³⁴. Conversely, less affluent regions may struggle to fund essential services without imposing disproportionately high taxes or relying heavily on financial assistance from the central government³².

Policymakers and economists often analyze measures of fiscal capacity to gauge the severity of horizontal fiscal imbalances. Fiscal capacity refers to a subnational government's potential to raise revenue from its own sources, given a "standard" tax effort³¹. A large spread in fiscal capacities across regions signals substantial horizontal fiscal imbalances, prompting discussions about redistribution policies and intergovernmental transfers to promote equity²⁹, ³⁰.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical country, "Federation X," composed of two provinces: Province Alpha and Province Beta.

Province Alpha: Has a robust manufacturing sector, a high concentration of high-income earners, and significant natural resource reserves. This allows Province Alpha to collect substantial tax revenue from income taxes, corporate taxes, and resource royalties.
Province Beta: Primarily an agricultural region with a smaller, lower-income population and no significant natural resources. Its tax base is considerably smaller.

Both provinces are responsible for providing similar public services, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, to their residents. Due to its strong economic growth and rich tax base, Province Alpha can easily fund its public services and even invest in advanced infrastructure, all while maintaining relatively low tax rates for its citizens. Province Beta, however, despite taxing its citizens at a similar or even higher rate, struggles to meet the basic needs for its public services and has a constant budget deficit in its operations.

This scenario illustrates a horizontal fiscal imbalance. Province Alpha has a much greater fiscal capacity than Province Beta. To address this, Federation X's central government might implement an equalization program. Under such a program, a portion of the revenue collected by the federal government (which often receives revenue from all provinces) or through specific grants would be transferred to Province Beta. These transfers would allow Province Beta to provide public services at a reasonably comparable standard to Province Alpha, without placing an undue tax burden on its less affluent population.

Practical Applications

Horizontal fiscal imbalances are a fundamental concern in public finance, particularly in countries with federal or decentralized governmental structures. Their practical applications primarily revolve around the design and implementation of policies aimed at achieving fiscal equity and ensuring uniform public service standards across a nation.

Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: Governments use an understanding of horizontal fiscal imbalances to structure financial relationships between the central government and subnational entities. This often involves the design of intergovernmental transfers, such as equalization payments, to redistribute financial resources from wealthier to poorer regions²⁸. These transfers help overcome disparities in fiscal capacity and ensure equitable access to essential public services, regardless of a resident's location²⁶, ²⁷.
Regional Development Policy: Recognizing horizontal fiscal imbalances informs regional development strategies. Policies may be enacted to stimulate economic activity in lagging regions, aiming to boost their local tax bases and reduce their reliance on central government transfers²⁵. This might involve investments in infrastructure, education, or incentives for businesses to locate in less developed areas.
Budgeting and Financial Planning: For both central and subnational governments, awareness of horizontal fiscal imbalances is crucial for sound budgeting. Central governments must account for the financial commitments of equalization or other transfer programs, while subnational governments must plan their expenditures and revenue collection strategies in light of their own fiscal capacity and potential transfer receipts.
Economic Research and Analysis: Economists and policy researchers extensively study horizontal fiscal imbalances to understand their causes, consequences, and the effectiveness of various remedies. Academic papers often develop methodologies to measure these imbalances and evaluate the redistributive impact of fiscal policies²⁴. For instance, research published in Regional Studies has explored methods to compute fiscal capacities based on regression analysis to measure horizontal fiscal imbalances in Italian municipalities²³.
International Comparisons: Organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) analyze fiscal imbalances across countries. The IMF, for example, highlights how fiscal policy and structural reforms can address broader economic imbalances, including those that manifest horizontally within nations²². This comparative analysis helps governments learn from different approaches to fiscal federalism and adopt best practices for promoting macroeconomic stability and equity.

Limitations and Criticisms

While mechanisms to address horizontal fiscal imbalances are designed to promote equity, they are not without limitations and criticisms. One significant concern is the potential for disincentives among both donor and recipient jurisdictions. Donor regions, which contribute more to equalization schemes, may argue that such transfers reduce their incentive to grow their own economies, as a portion of their increased revenue-generating capacity is redistributed²¹.

Conversely, recipient regions might face what is sometimes termed a "moral hazard" or "dependency trap." Critics suggest that consistent transfers could reduce the incentive for these subnational governments to pursue difficult but necessary reforms to enhance their own fiscal capacity or control government spending ¹⁹, ²⁰. If a region consistently receives substantial aid, it might become less motivated to develop its local tax base or streamline its public services, potentially hindering long-term economic growth.

Furthermore, the calculation of horizontal fiscal imbalances and the determination of appropriate intergovernmental transfers can be complex and politically contentious¹⁸. Defining "comparable" levels of public services or "standard" tax effort is often subjective and can lead to disputes between different levels of government. Academic studies, such as one published in Sustainability by MDPI, have empirically analyzed whether transfer systems for horizontal fiscal alignment lead to decreased financial system stability through increased borrowing at municipal and national levels, noting that a "suboptimal system of horizontal fiscal alignment" can lead to a rise in public finance debt and undermine stability¹⁷.

The design of transfer formulas also presents challenges, as they must balance equity considerations with efficiency and accountability. Overly complex formulas can be difficult to understand and administer, while overly simplistic ones may not adequately capture the nuanced differences in fiscal needs and capacities across diverse regions.

Horizontal Fiscal Imbalances vs. Vertical Fiscal Imbalances

Horizontal fiscal imbalances and vertical fiscal imbalances are two distinct but related concepts within public finance that describe mismatches between governmental responsibilities and financial resources. While both represent a form of "fiscal gap," they differ in which levels of government are affected and the nature of the disparity¹⁶.

Horizontal Fiscal Imbalances (HFI) occur among governments at the same level within a country. This means disparities exist between provinces, states, or municipalities. HFI arises because different regions have varying fiscal capacity—their potential to raise revenue from their own sources, such as taxes on local economic activity or natural resources. ¹⁴, ¹⁵Even with similar tax efforts, some regions are inherently richer or have broader tax bases, allowing them to fund public services more easily than others. ¹³The challenge with HFI is ensuring that all citizens, regardless of their location, have access to reasonably comparable levels of public services without facing vastly different tax burdens.
¹²
Vertical Fiscal Imbalances (VFI), in contrast, occur between different levels of government in a multi-tiered system (e.g., between the federal/central government and the combined subnational governments). VFI typically emerges when a higher level of government (like the federal government) collects a disproportionately large share of revenue, while lower levels of government (like states or municipalities) are responsible for a larger share of expenditure responsibilities. ¹⁰, ¹¹This creates a structural gap where subnational governments lack sufficient own-source revenue to finance their mandated spending. ⁸, ⁹VFI is often resolved through intergovernmental transfers from the higher level to the lower levels, allowing them to meet their financial obligations.

In essence, horizontal fiscal imbalances are about inequality between peers, while vertical fiscal imbalances are about the mismatch of resources and responsibilities across layers of government. ⁷Both types of imbalances can exist simultaneously and often interact, influencing the overall fiscal health and equity of a nation.

FAQs

What causes horizontal fiscal imbalances?

Horizontal fiscal imbalances are typically caused by variations in the economic base, population, and natural resource endowments across different regions or provinces within a country. Some regions may have thriving industries and a wealthy population, leading to higher tax revenues, while others may be less developed or have fewer resources, resulting in lower revenue-generating capacity.
⁶

How do governments address horizontal fiscal imbalances?

Governments typically address horizontal fiscal imbalances through various forms of intergovernmental transfers, such as equalization payments. These mechanisms redistribute revenue from wealthier regions or from the central government's general revenues to less affluent regions, aiming to ensure comparable levels of public services across the country.
⁵

Why are horizontal fiscal imbalances important?

Horizontal fiscal imbalances are important because they can lead to unequal access to essential public services (like education and healthcare) and differing tax burdens for citizens depending on their location. Addressing these imbalances promotes fairness, national unity, and ensures that all citizens can receive a similar standard of government services.
⁴

Is there a single formula to measure horizontal fiscal imbalances?

No, there isn't a single universal formula. Horizontal fiscal imbalances are often measured by assessing the differences in fiscal capacity (the potential to raise revenue) among subnational governments. ³Various economic indicators and statistical methods, including regression analysis, are used by researchers and policymakers to quantify these disparities.¹, ²