Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to H Definitions

Human well being

What Is Human Well-being?

Human well-being, in a broad sense, refers to the overall condition of individuals and societies, encompassing various aspects that contribute to a good and fulfilling life beyond mere material wealth. It is a multidimensional concept within the realm of Socio-Economic Indicators, reflecting not just economic prosperity but also factors like health, education, social connections, environmental quality, and personal security. While traditional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measures economic output, human well-being seeks to capture the broader quality of life experienced by people. Understanding human well-being requires looking at a more comprehensive set of economic indicators that reflect human flourishing.

History and Origin

The concept of evaluating societal progress beyond purely economic metrics has roots in ancient philosophical thought, but its modern resurgence in policy discussions began in earnest in the late 20th century. A pivotal moment came with the emergence of the "Gross National Happiness" (GNH) philosophy in Bhutan. In the 1970s, Bhutan's Fourth King, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, famously declared that Gross National Happiness was more important than Gross Domestic Product, advocating for a holistic approach to development that prioritized the non-economic aspects of well-being. This innovative concept has since guided Bhutan's development policy and garnered international attention.14, 15

The global financial crisis of 2008 further underscored the limitations of relying solely on GDP to gauge societal health, leading to increased calls for alternative measures. This culminated in the establishment of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, also known as the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission, in 2008. This commission's influential report, published in 2009, recommended shifting emphasis from measuring economic production to measuring people's well-being and placing it in a context of sustainable development.11, 12, 13

Key Takeaways

  • Human well-being is a holistic measure of societal progress, extending beyond traditional economic metrics like GDP.
  • It encompasses material living conditions, quality of life, and the sustainability of well-being over time.
  • Various international initiatives and national governments are developing frameworks and indicators to measure human well-being.
  • Data on well-being informs public policy to address societal challenges and improve overall living conditions.
  • While subjective perceptions are considered, human well-being also relies on objective data across multiple dimensions.

Interpreting Human Well-being

Interpreting human well-being involves assessing various dimensions to understand the overall state of individuals and societies. Unlike a single financial ratio, there isn't one numerical "score" for human well-being. Instead, it's typically understood through a "dashboard" approach, where a range of indicators are tracked and analyzed. These indicators might include metrics for health, education, environmental quality, social connections, and civic engagement, alongside traditional economic factors like income and wealth. Evaluating human well-being means looking for trends across these dimensions, identifying areas of strength and weakness, and understanding disparities among different population groups. This comprehensive view helps policymakers gauge social progress and direct efforts towards improving areas where well-being is lagging.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a fictional country, "Prosperia," which aims to assess its human well-being. Traditionally, Prosperia focused heavily on its rising GDP. However, recent data suggests that while GDP has grown, citizen satisfaction has not improved commensurately.

Prosperia decides to adopt a broader human well-being framework. They collect data on:

  1. Material Living Conditions: Average household consumption, debt levels, and housing affordability.
  2. Health: Life expectancy, rates of chronic diseases, and access to healthcare.
  3. Education: Literacy rates, educational attainment, and quality of schooling.
  4. Social Connections: Reported feelings of loneliness, participation in community activities, and trust in others.
  5. Environmental Quality: Air and water quality, access to green spaces, and carbon emissions.

After a year, Prosperia's report shows:

  • GDP increased by 3%, but average household income remained stagnant for the bottom 40% of the population, indicating rising inequality.
  • Life expectancy slightly increased, but mental health issues saw a significant rise, particularly among young adults.
  • Educational attainment improved, yet surveys revealed a decline in job satisfaction among recent graduates.
  • While official community event participation remained stable, subjective reports of social isolation increased.
  • Air quality improved in urban centers due to new regulations, but deforestation rates in rural areas accelerated.

By analyzing this multi-dimensional data on human well-being, Prosperia's government realizes that solely focusing on GDP growth was insufficient. They can now devise targeted public policy interventions, such as mental health programs, vocational training aligned with job satisfaction, and equitable distribution of environmental benefits, to improve the holistic well-being of their citizens.

Practical Applications

The measurement and analysis of human well-being have numerous practical applications across various sectors:

  • Policy Making: Governments use well-being indicators to inform and prioritize public policy decisions, moving beyond purely economic growth targets to address broader societal needs. For example, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) launched its Better Life Initiative in 2011 to provide data and insights into key indicators of well-being, including health, education, and environmental quality, helping member countries develop "better policies for better lives."8, 9, 10
  • International Development: Organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the United Nations incorporate human well-being into their frameworks, recognizing its importance for sustainable development and inclusive growth worldwide.6, 7
  • Investment Decisions: While not a direct financial metric, a nation's commitment to and success in fostering human well-being can be a qualitative factor for long-term investment stability and social responsibility considerations.
  • Academic Research: Researchers leverage well-being data to study the complex interplay between economic factors, social structures, and individual flourishing, contributing to fields like behavioral finance and public health.
  • Corporate Strategy: Businesses are increasingly considering the well-being of their employees and the communities they operate in, recognizing that a higher level of human well-being can correlate with productivity and a stronger local human capital base. The Federal Reserve Board also conducts the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED), which tracks the financial stability and economic well-being of U.S. households, offering insights valuable for both policymakers and businesses.4, 5

Limitations and Criticisms

While the shift towards measuring human well-being is largely seen as a positive development, it is not without limitations and criticisms. One significant challenge is the inherent subjectivity of well-being itself; what constitutes a "good life" can vary greatly among individuals and cultures, making universal measurement complex. Despite efforts to create objective economic indicators, some aspects, such as life satisfaction or community vitality, often rely on self-reported data, which can be influenced by temporary moods or cultural biases.

Furthermore, integrating diverse data points into a cohesive framework for human well-being can be methodologically challenging. There is no single, universally agreed-upon formula or composite index, leading to a proliferation of different frameworks and indicators, which can complicate international comparisons and policy benchmarking. Critics also point out that while frameworks like those inspired by the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission advocate moving "beyond GDP," they do not necessarily lead to immediate changes in economic growth policies or overcome political inertia. The challenge lies not just in what to measure, but how to effectively translate these measurements into tangible policy changes that improve well-being without unintended consequences or resource misallocation.1, 2, 3

Human Well-being vs. Financial Well-being

While related, human well-being and financial well-being are distinct concepts. Human well-being is a broad, holistic concept encompassing the overall quality of life, including physical health, mental health, social connections, environmental conditions, and personal fulfillment, alongside material comfort. It seeks to understand how individuals and societies are flourishing in a comprehensive sense.

Financial well-being, in contrast, is a specific component or subset of overall human well-being. It focuses on an individual's or household's ability to manage their financial life to meet their current and future financial obligations, feel secure in their financial future, and make choices that allow them to enjoy life. This includes aspects like adequate income, manageable debt, sufficient savings, and financial literacy. A person can have high financial well-being (e.g., be wealthy) but still experience low overall human well-being due to poor health, lack of social connections, or environmental concerns. Conversely, someone might have modest financial resources but high overall human well-being due to strong community ties and a healthy lifestyle.

FAQs

Q: Why is human well-being gaining prominence over traditional economic measures?
A: Traditional measures like GDP primarily capture economic output and do not fully account for critical aspects of life such as environmental health, social equity, or personal happiness. Human well-being frameworks aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of social progress and the overall quality of life experienced by people.

Q: Can human well-being be measured objectively?
A: While some aspects, like health outcomes or educational attainment, can be measured objectively, other dimensions of human well-being, such as life satisfaction or community vitality, often rely on subjective self-reported data. Most frameworks combine both objective and subjective economic indicators for a balanced view.

Q: How does human well-being relate to investment?
A: While not a direct investment metric, a nation's focus on human well-being can indicate a stable and productive society. Strong social safety nets, good health outcomes, and high human capital can contribute to long-term economic stability and attract responsible investment, enhancing the overall standard of living.

Q: What are the main challenges in implementing human well-being frameworks?
A: Challenges include data collection for diverse indicators, the subjective nature of some measures, methodological complexities in combining different data types, and gaining political buy-in to shift focus from traditional economic growth metrics to broader well-being goals.

Q: Is "wealth" the same as "human well-being"?
A: No, wealth is a measure of financial assets and resources, which contributes to financial well-being. While financial well-being is a part of human well-being, true human well-being encompasses a much broader range of non-material factors that contribute to a fulfilling life.