Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Impact investors

LINK_POOL:

What Is Impact Investors?

Impact investors are individuals or entities who make investments with the explicit intention of generating positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return. This approach falls under the broader category of responsible investing, moving beyond traditional financial metrics to incorporate tangible benefits for people and the planet. Unlike traditional investing, where social or environmental considerations might be secondary or non-existent, impact investors consider both aspects equally important. The Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) defines impact investments as "investments made into companies, organizations, and funds with the intention to generate social and environmental impact alongside a financial return."23 Impact investors aim to deploy capital to address pressing global challenges in various sectors, including renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, affordable housing, and healthcare.22

History and Origin

The concept of impact investing evolved from earlier forms of values-based investing, such as Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) and ethical investing. However, the term "impact investing" gained prominence in the early 2000s, with a more formalized movement emerging around 2007. The Rockefeller Foundation played a significant role in convening a group of early practitioners, leading to the coining of the term and the subsequent establishment of the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) in 2009.20, 21 This organization was founded to promote and scale impact investing globally, creating a common language and framework for measuring social and environmental performance alongside Financial Returns.18, 19 This development marked a shift from simply avoiding harm (as in some SRI approaches) to actively seeking to create positive, measurable impact through investment.

Key Takeaways

  • Impact investors seek to generate both financial returns and positive social or environmental impact.
  • Intentionality is a core characteristic, meaning the investor explicitly aims for social or environmental benefit.
  • Impact investing can occur across various Asset Classes and target a range of financial returns, from below-market to market-rate.
  • Measurement and reporting of social and environmental performance are crucial aspects of impact investing.
  • The field aims to address global challenges traditionally tackled by Philanthropy or government.

Interpreting Impact Investors

For impact investors, the interpretation of an investment's success extends beyond traditional financial metrics. While Rate of Return is still important, the primary focus is on the measurable social or environmental outcomes. This involves a rigorous process of defining the intended impact, setting specific targets, and continually monitoring and reporting progress. For example, an investment in a clean energy project would not only be evaluated on its profitability but also on the amount of greenhouse gas emissions reduced or the number of households powered by renewable energy.

The GIIN emphasizes the importance of "intentionality" in impact investing, meaning that the investor's explicit goal is to create positive impact.16, 17 Furthermore, impact investors typically commit to measuring and reporting the social and environmental performance of their underlying investments.15 This contrasts with approaches like Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing, where the focus might be on assessing a company's risk and opportunities related to ESG factors, rather than necessarily driving intentional, measurable impact through the investment itself.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an impact investor, "Sustainable Futures Fund," looking to invest in a developing region. Sustainable Futures Fund identifies a company, "AquaPure Innovations," which is developing low-cost water purification systems for rural communities.

  1. Investment Thesis: Sustainable Futures Fund believes that investing in AquaPure Innovations will not only generate financial returns but also address a critical social need: access to clean water.
  2. Impact Goals: The fund sets specific, measurable impact goals, such as providing clean water to 100,000 people within five years and reducing waterborne diseases in target communities by 30%.
  3. Financial Goals: Alongside impact, the fund aims for a modest but positive Market Rate of return on its Private Equity investment.
  4. Monitoring: Sustainable Futures Fund regularly monitors AquaPure Innovations' progress against both its financial and impact goals, using metrics like the number of purification units deployed, the volume of water purified, and health data from the communities served. This diligent approach helps ensure that the investment is achieving its dual objectives.

Practical Applications

Impact investing manifests in various forms across the financial landscape. Institutional investors, such as pension funds and university endowments, are increasingly allocating capital to impact strategies.14 Asset Management firms offer impact investment funds that cater to both individual and institutional clients. These investments can span diverse sectors, including sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, microfinance, and affordable housing.13

A notable application of impact investing is through Social Impact Bonds (SIBs). SIBs are a financing mechanism where private investors provide upfront funding for social programs, and governments or other entities repay investors based on the achievement of specific, predefined social outcomes. This innovative approach aligns financial incentives with social good, providing a new vehicle for impact investors to fund programs that address societal problems.12 The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has explored how impact investors in SIBs can drive improved performance in the social sector.10, 11

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its growing popularity, impact investing faces several limitations and criticisms. One significant challenge is the difficulty in consistently and rigorously measuring social and environmental impact. Unlike financial returns, which are typically quantifiable, social outcomes can be complex and harder to standardize. This can lead to concerns about "impact washing," where investments are labeled as impactful without sufficient evidence of real-world change.8, 9 The Stanford Social Innovation Review has highlighted the need for impact investing to embrace complexity and deliver "additionality," meaning the impact would not have occurred without the investor's intervention.7

Another criticism revolves around the potential for lower Financial Returns compared to traditional investments. While many impact investors seek market-rate returns, some are willing to accept below-market returns for significant social or environmental benefits. This can be a point of contention for those focused solely on maximizing profit. Furthermore, the nascent stage of the impact investing market can present challenges in terms of liquidity and the availability of suitable investment opportunities, requiring thorough Due Diligence and robust Risk Management strategies.

Impact Investors vs. Socially Responsible Investing (SRI)

While both impact investing and Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) consider environmental and social factors, a key distinction lies in their primary intent and approach.

FeatureImpact InvestorsSocially Responsible Investing (SRI)
Primary GoalGenerate positive, measurable social/environmental impact and financial returns.Incorporate ethical and social criteria into investment decisions, often by screening out "bad" companies.
IntentionalityExplicit intention to create specific impact.Focus on responsible corporate behavior and risk mitigation; impact is often a secondary outcome.
ApproachProactive investment in solutions to social/environmental problems.Often involves negative screening (avoiding certain industries) or positive screening (choosing companies with good ESG practices).
MeasurementStrong emphasis on measuring and reporting social/environmental outcomes.May measure ESG performance, but not necessarily direct social/environmental outcomes of the investment itself.

Impact investors are actively seeking to be agents of change through their Capital Allocation, whereas SRI often focuses on aligning investments with personal values or mitigating ESG-related risks. While an SRI portfolio might avoid tobacco companies, an impact investing portfolio might specifically invest in companies developing smoking cessation programs or sustainable agriculture technologies.

FAQs

What types of organizations do impact investors typically fund?

Impact investors fund a wide range of organizations, including for-profit companies, non-profit organizations, and investment funds across various sectors such as renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, education, healthcare, and affordable housing.6

Can impact investors achieve competitive financial returns?

Yes, impact investors can target and often achieve competitive Financial Returns. While some impact investments may target below-market returns, many aim for risk-adjusted market rates. The GIIN's definition confirms that impact investments can target a range of returns depending on investor objectives.4, 5

How do impact investors measure their social and environmental impact?

Impact investors utilize various frameworks and metrics to measure their social and environmental impact. This can involve setting specific key performance indicators (KPIs) related to their impact goals, collecting data on relevant outcomes (e.g., carbon emissions reduced, number of people served), and reporting against established standards like the Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS+).2, 3

Is impact investing the same as philanthropy?

No, impact investing is distinct from Philanthropy. While both aim for positive societal change, philanthropy typically involves grants or donations with no expectation of financial return. Impact investing, conversely, involves the expectation of both financial returns and social or environmental impact.1 It uses investment capital rather than grant capital to address challenges.