Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Impaired goodwill

What Is Impaired Goodwill?

Impaired goodwill refers to a reduction in the recorded value of a company's goodwill on its balance sheet. It falls under the broader category of financial accounting and occurs when the fair value of a business unit to which goodwill has been allocated falls below its carrying amount. This decline indicates that the acquired company or business unit is no longer performing as well as originally anticipated, leading to a write-down of this intangible asset. A significant event or change in circumstances often triggers the need to assess for impaired goodwill.

History and Origin

Historically, goodwill arising from a business combination was systematically amortized, similar to other intangible assets, over a period of its estimated useful life. However, in the United States, this practice changed significantly with the issuance of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in 2001. This standard, now codified as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350, eliminated the systematic amortization of goodwill and instead introduced an impairment-only approach. Under ASC 350, companies are required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if a "triggering event" occurs that suggests the fair value of a reporting unit may have fallen below its carrying amount.20,19,18 This shift aimed to provide more relevant information to financial statement users by recognizing declines in goodwill value only when they truly occurred, rather than through a predictable, arbitrary amortization schedule.

Key Takeaways

  • Impaired goodwill represents a write-down of the intangible asset goodwill on a company's balance sheet.
  • It is recognized when the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill.
  • Goodwill impairment testing is a requirement under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
  • An impairment charge reduces reported earnings and the carrying value of goodwill, impacting the financial statements but not directly affecting cash flow.
  • Triggering events, such as a significant decline in market conditions or a company's stock price, necessitate interim impairment tests.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of impaired goodwill under U.S. GAAP involves a one-step test for public entities (as simplified by ASU 2017-04). This test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.

The formula for the goodwill impairment charge is:

[
\text{Goodwill Impairment Charge} = \text{Carrying Amount of Reporting Unit} - \text{Fair Value of Reporting Unit}
]

An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The loss recognized cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The fair value can be determined using various valuation techniques, such as a market approach, an income approach (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis), or a combination of both.17

Interpreting Impaired Goodwill

When a company reports impaired goodwill, it signifies that the economic prospects or underlying value of a previously acquired business or asset have deteriorated since the time of acquisition. This charge is recorded on the income statement as a non-cash expense. Investors and analysts interpret impaired goodwill as a signal of potential issues within a company's operations or a specific segment. It can indicate that the synergies expected from an acquisition did not materialize, that the market conditions have worsened, or that the acquired business unit is underperforming its initial projections. While it doesn't represent an immediate cash outflow, it reduces reported net income and can impact a company's debt covenants or future borrowing capacity by affecting its financial ratios.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Alpha Corp," a technology company, that acquired "Beta Software" for $500 million. At the time of the acquisition, Beta Software's identifiable net assets were valued at $300 million. The excess $200 million was recorded as goodwill on Alpha Corp's balance sheet.

A few years later, due to unexpected changes in the software market and Beta Software's declining sales, Alpha Corp performs its annual goodwill impairment test. Alpha Corp determines that the fair value of the Beta Software reporting unit has fallen to $350 million, while its carrying amount (including the $200 million goodwill) is $480 million (original assets of $300 million + goodwill of $200 million - accumulated depreciation/amortization of $20 million on identifiable assets).

Applying the formula:

Fair Value of Reporting Unit = $350 million
Carrying Amount of Reporting Unit = $480 million

Goodwill Impairment Charge = $480 million - $350 million = $130 million

Alpha Corp would record a $130 million goodwill impairment charge on its income statement, reducing its net income for the period and the carrying value of goodwill on its balance sheet from $200 million to $70 million.

Practical Applications

Impaired goodwill appears prominently in financial reporting, particularly for companies that frequently engage in mergers and acquisitions. Regulators like the SEC closely scrutinize goodwill impairment disclosures, often requiring detailed explanations of the factors leading to the charge and the methods used to determine fair value.16,15 For instance, General Electric (GE) faced significant scrutiny after recording a substantial goodwill impairment charge of approximately $22 billion to $23 billion related to its Power business in 2018. This charge primarily reflected a loss in value of assets related to its 2015 acquisition of Alstom's energy business, highlighting the impact of market changes and internal performance issues on goodwill.14,13,12 Similarly, Hewlett-Packard (HP) took an $8.8 billion impairment charge in 2012 related to its acquisition of Autonomy, citing "serious accounting improprieties" at Autonomy prior to the deal.11,10 These cases underscore how impaired goodwill serves as a critical indicator for investors and analysts to assess the success of past acquisitions and the current health of a company's business units.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its intended purpose of providing relevant financial information, the accounting for goodwill impairment faces several limitations and criticisms. One primary concern is the inherent subjectivity involved in determining the fair value of a reporting unit. Management's estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and discount rates can significantly influence the outcome of the impairment test, potentially allowing for a degree of discretion in the timing and recognition of losses.9,8 Critics argue that this subjectivity can lead to "earnings management," where companies might delay recognizing an impairment to meet financial targets or take a larger "big bath" write-off in a bad year to clear the decks for future periods.7,6

Another point of contention is that goodwill impairment charges are backward-looking; they reflect a decline in value that has already occurred, rather than predicting future performance. Furthermore, the impairment-only model, in contrast to the prior amortization approach, means that goodwill remains on the balance sheet at its initial value unless a decline is explicitly identified and quantified through an impairment test. This can lead to a build-up of goodwill on corporate balance sheets, which may not always reflect its true underlying value, particularly in industries undergoing rapid technological or economic shifts.

Impaired Goodwill vs. Goodwill Amortization

The primary distinction between impaired goodwill and goodwill amortization lies in their accounting treatment and the events that trigger their recognition. Goodwill amortization involves the systematic reduction of goodwill's carrying value over its estimated useful life, treating goodwill much like other depreciable assets. This method was widely used before the adoption of current U.S. GAAP standards. It results in a recurring, predictable expense on the income statement, regardless of whether the underlying value of the acquired business has actually declined.

In contrast, impaired goodwill is a non-recurring, event-driven reduction in goodwill's value. It is recognized only when a formal impairment test determines that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. This "impairment-only" approach aims to reflect economic reality more accurately by only writing down goodwill when its value has genuinely diminished. While amortization spreads the cost of goodwill over time, impairment recognizes the entire loss at once when a decline in value is identified.

FAQs

Q: Does impaired goodwill affect a company's cash flow?
A: No, impaired goodwill is a non-cash expense. It reduces a company's net income on the income statement but does not involve any actual cash outflow.5

Q: How often is goodwill tested for impairment?
A: Companies are required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually. However, they must also perform an interim impairment test if a "triggering event" or change in circumstances indicates that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying amount.4,3

Q: What are common triggering events for goodwill impairment?
A: Common triggering events include a significant decline in a company's stock price or market capitalization, adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors, a decline in projected financial performance, or the loss of key personnel.2,1

Q: Can impaired goodwill be reversed in future periods?
A: No, once a goodwill impairment loss is recognized under U.S. GAAP, it cannot be reversed in future periods, even if the fair value of the reporting unit subsequently recovers.

Q: Why is goodwill impairment important to investors?
A: Impaired goodwill can signal to investors that an acquisition has not performed as expected or that the underlying economic assumptions supporting the initial valuation of an acquired business are no longer valid. It can highlight financial distress or strategic missteps, influencing investment decisions.