Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to I Definitions

Impairment testing

What Is Impairment Testing?

Impairment testing is an accounting procedure used to assess whether the value of a company's asset has decreased below its carrying amount on the balance sheet. This process falls under financial reporting and accounting standards, ensuring that assets are not overstated in a company's financial statements. When an asset's future economic benefits are no longer expected to cover its recorded value, an impairment loss is recognized, reducing the asset's value and impacting the company's profitability. Impairment testing is crucial for maintaining transparency and accuracy in financial reporting, particularly for assets like goodwill and intangible assets.

History and Origin

The concept of impairment testing evolved to ensure that financial statements accurately reflect the true economic value of a company's assets. Historically, goodwill, an intangible asset arising from business combinations, was typically amortized over a period of up to 40 years. However, this approach was criticized for not accurately reflecting economic reality. In the United States, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in June 2001, which eliminated the systematic amortization of goodwill and instead required companies to perform annual impairment testing. This shift aimed to provide more useful information by recognizing impairment losses only when they occurred34, 35, 36.

Globally, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) adopted IAS 36, "Impairment of Assets," in April 2001 (originally issued in 1998 by its predecessor), which consolidated requirements on how to assess the recoverability of an asset. IAS 36 applies to most assets and mandates the recognition of an impairment loss when the recoverable amount of an asset falls below its carrying amount. The standard was reissued in March 2004 and applies to goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations from March 31, 2004, onwards32, 33. The core principle of IAS 36 is that an asset must not be carried in the financial statements at more than the highest amount that can be recovered through its use or sale31.

Key Takeaways

  • Impairment testing assesses whether an asset's recorded value exceeds its recoverable amount.
  • It is a critical component of GAAP and IFRS, ensuring fair representation of asset values.
  • An impairment loss is recorded when the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its fair value less costs to dispose or its value in use.
  • For goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, impairment testing is generally performed at least annually.
  • Triggering events, such as significant declines in market value or adverse changes in business conditions, can necessitate interim impairment testing28, 29, 30.

Formula and Calculation

The approach to impairment testing varies slightly between different asset types and accounting standards (GAAP vs. IFRS).

For Long-Lived Assets (Under U.S. GAAP - ASC 360):

Impairment testing for long-lived assets (e.g., property, plant, and equipment) involves a two-step process:

  1. Recoverability Test: The carrying amount of the asset (or asset group) is compared to the sum of its undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.

    • If Undiscounted Future Cash Flows < Carrying Amount, then the asset is considered impaired, and the second step is performed26, 27.
    • If Undiscounted Future Cash Flows ≥ Carrying Amount, no impairment exists.

  2. Measurement of Impairment Loss: If the asset is deemed unrecoverable, an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset (or asset group) exceeds its fair value.

    • Impairment Loss=Carrying Amount−Fair Value\text{Impairment Loss} = \text{Carrying Amount} - \text{Fair Value}

    This loss is recognized in operating income.
    25
    For Goodwill (Under U.S. GAAP - ASC 350):

Goodwill impairment testing involves a qualitative assessment (Step 0) followed by a quantitative test if necessary. The quantitative test (historically a two-step process, now simplified) primarily involves comparing the fair value of a reporting unit (or entity) to its carrying amount, including goodwill.

  • If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
    23, 24
    Under IFRS (IAS 36) for all assets (including goodwill and intangibles):

An asset is impaired if its carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to dispose and its value in use.
21, 22* Impairment Loss=Carrying Amount−Recoverable Amount \text{Impairment Loss} = \text{Carrying Amount} - \text{Recoverable Amount}
Where:
* Recoverable Amount = Max(Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal, Value in Use)
* Value in Use = Present Value of Future Cash Flows (discounted using an appropriate discount rate)

20## Interpreting Impairment Testing

Interpreting the results of impairment testing involves understanding the financial health and future prospects of a company's assets. When an impairment loss is recognized, it signals that the economic value of an asset has declined, often due to adverse market conditions, technological obsolescence, or poor operational performance. This reduction directly lowers the asset's carrying amount on the balance sheet and reduces net income in the period it's recognized.

A significant impairment charge can alert investors and creditors to potential issues within the company, impacting investor confidence and potentially affecting credit ratings. For instance, a write-down of goodwill suggests that the synergy or future benefits expected from a past acquisition did not materialize as anticipated. Management uses impairment testing results to re-evaluate business strategies, reallocate resources, and make informed decisions about asset utilization and investment. 19The inability to write up an asset's value after an impairment loss, even if conditions improve, further underscores the significance of these tests.
18

Hypothetical Example

Consider Tech Innovations Inc., a publicly traded company that acquired a smaller software firm, "CodeGenius," three years ago for $500 million. As part of the acquisition, Tech Innovations recorded $200 million in goodwill on its balance sheet, representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of CodeGenius's identifiable net assets.

Fast forward to the current year: A new competitor emerges with a superior product, causing CodeGenius's sales and market share to decline significantly. This market shift acts as a triggering event, prompting Tech Innovations to perform an impairment test on the goodwill associated with CodeGenius.

Steps for Impairment Testing (Simplified Goodwill Example under U.S. GAAP):

  1. Qualitative Assessment (Step 0): Tech Innovations' management first performs a qualitative assessment, considering factors like the declining market share, increased competition, and lower-than-expected revenue from CodeGenius. These indicators suggest that it is "more likely than not" that the fair value of the CodeGenius reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.

  2. Quantitative Test:

    • Determine Carrying Amount of CodeGenius Reporting Unit: Assume the carrying amount of the CodeGenius reporting unit (including all assets and liabilities allocated to it, and the $200 million goodwill) is $450 million.
    • Determine Fair Value of CodeGenius Reporting Unit: Tech Innovations hires an independent valuation expert who estimates the current fair value of the CodeGenius reporting unit to be $300 million, based on discounted future cash flow projections and market multiples.

    Since the fair value ($300 million) is less than the carrying amount ($450 million), goodwill is impaired. The impairment loss is calculated as the difference:

    Impairment Loss=Carrying Amount−Fair Value\text{Impairment Loss} = \text{Carrying Amount} - \text{Fair Value} Impairment Loss=$450 million−$300 million=$150 million\text{Impairment Loss} = \$450 \text{ million} - \$300 \text{ million} = \$150 \text{ million}

Tech Innovations Inc. would record an impairment loss of $150 million, reducing the goodwill attributed to CodeGenius from $200 million to $50 million on its balance sheet. This non-cash charge would directly reduce Tech Innovations' net income for the period.

Practical Applications

Impairment testing is routinely applied across various sectors to ensure that asset values presented on the balance sheet are not overstated. It is a critical aspect of financial reporting for publicly traded and privately held companies alike.

  • Corporate Acquisitions and Mergers: After a business combination, the acquired goodwill and other intangible assets are subject to regular impairment testing. Companies must demonstrate that the value derived from the acquisition continues to support the recorded goodwill.
  • Real Estate and Property: Real estate holding companies or businesses with significant property, plant, and equipment perform impairment testing when there are indications of a decline in market value or changes in usage, such as widespread vacancies or significant structural damage.
    17* Technology and Manufacturing: Companies in these sectors frequently assess their machinery, equipment, patents, and software for impairment due to rapid technological advancements or shifts in consumer demand, which can render older assets obsolete.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Regulatory bodies, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), actively monitor companies' adherence to impairment testing standards. Enforcement actions can be taken against companies that fail to take timely and appropriate impairment charges, leading to misstated financial statements and misleading investors. For example, the SEC charged Sequential Brands Group, Inc. for failing to take timely goodwill impairment charges despite clear evidence of impairment, resulting in an overstatement of assets and understatement of expenses. 16Similarly, the SEC has pursued actions against investment advisers for inaccurate application of impairment policies leading to excess management fees. 14, 15This highlights the importance of accurate and transparent impairment testing practices in compliance with GAAP and regulatory requirements.

Limitations and Criticisms

While impairment testing serves a vital role in financial transparency, it is not without limitations and criticisms. One significant challenge lies in the subjectivity inherent in determining the fair value and future cash flow projections used in the tests. These estimates can be influenced by management's assumptions and may be overly optimistic, potentially delaying or understating necessary impairment charges. 12, 13The complexity of these valuations, particularly for goodwill and other intangible assets, often requires extensive judgment and can be prone to manipulation.
10, 11
Critics also point to the "impairment-only" approach for goodwill (as opposed to systematic amortization) as a source of concern. Some argue that because goodwill is not regularly reduced through amortization, its carrying amount can remain inflated on the balance sheet until a major event triggers an impairment, which may not always be timely. 8, 9This can lead to less volatile earnings in the short term but larger, sudden impairment charges when they do occur, potentially surprising investors. Furthermore, the prohibition on reversing an impairment loss for goodwill once recognized, even if circumstances improve, is another point of contention, contrasting with the treatment of other impaired assets under IFRS.
7
Auditors face challenges in scrutinizing management's assumptions, and deficiencies in impairment testing have been noted in inspection reports of major accounting firms. 6The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and other regulatory bodies continuously emphasize the need for robust controls and accurate methodologies in impairment assessments to prevent misstatements in financial statements.

Impairment Testing vs. Goodwill Amortization

Impairment testing and goodwill amortization represent two distinct accounting treatments for goodwill, an intangible asset recognized in a business combination. The primary difference lies in their approach to valuing goodwill over time.

Prior to 2001 in the U.S., goodwill was systematically amortized, meaning its value was expensed gradually over its estimated useful life, typically up to 40 years. This process reduced the carrying amount of goodwill on the balance sheet and consistently impacted operating income through a non-cash depreciation-like expense. The rationale was that goodwill diminishes in value over time.

In contrast, the impairment-only approach, adopted by U.S. GAAP and IFRS in the early 2000s, eliminates this systematic amortization for goodwill with an indefinite useful life. Instead, goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if triggering events indicate a potential loss in value. An impairment loss is recognized only when the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned falls below its carrying amount. This means that if goodwill is not impaired, its value remains unchanged on the balance sheet for extended periods, and there is no recurring expense to net income. The confusion often arises because both methods aim to ensure goodwill is not overstated, but they do so through fundamentally different mechanisms—one through systematic reduction and the other through event-driven revaluation.

FAQs

Q1: What assets are subject to impairment testing?

A1: Most long-lived assets on a company's balance sheet are subject to impairment testing, including property, plant, and equipment, as well as intangible assets like patents, trademarks, and particularly goodwill. Certain assets, such as inventories, deferred tax assets, and most financial assets, are typically excluded as they are covered by other specific accounting standards.

#4, 5## Q2: How often is impairment testing performed?

A2: For goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, impairment testing is required at least annually. For other long-lived assets, an impairment test is performed only when there is an indication that the asset may be impaired, known as a "triggering event." These events can include significant declines in market value, changes in the asset's use, or adverse economic conditions.

#2, 3## Q3: What happens if an asset is impaired?

A3: If an asset is found to be impaired, its carrying amount on the balance sheet is reduced to its recoverable amount (under IFRS) or its fair value (under GAAP), and an impairment loss is recognized. This loss is typically recorded as an expense on the income statement, reducing the company's net income for the period. For most assets under GAAP, this write-down is permanent, meaning the asset's value cannot be written back up even if its fair value later increases.1