Import substitution development strategy

What Is Import Substitution Development Strategy?

The import substitution development strategy (ISDS) is an economic policy approach employed primarily by developing countries to reduce their reliance on foreign imports by fostering domestic production of goods and services. This strategy falls under the broader category of development economics and aims to achieve industrialization and economic self-sufficiency. The core idea behind an import substitution development strategy is to protect nascent local industries from international competition through various trade policy measures, thereby allowing them to grow, mature, and eventually become competitive. This approach typically involves government intervention through tariffs, quotas, and subsidies to make domestically produced goods more attractive than imported ones.

History and Origin

The concept of import substitution industrialization (ISI) gained significant traction in the mid-20th century, particularly after World War II, as many newly independent nations and Latin American countries sought to achieve economic independence and address perceived structural disadvantages in the global economy. Before this period, many of these economies were primarily exporters of raw materials and importers of manufactured goods. A key intellectual underpinning for the import substitution development strategy came from economists like Raúl Prebisch and Hans Singer. Their "Prebisch-Singer hypothesis" posited that the terms of trade for primary commodities would tend to decline relative to those for manufactured goods over the long term, thereby hindering the development prospects of commodity-exporting nations. ¹⁴, ¹⁵This theory suggested that industrialization was crucial for sustained economic growth.

In response to these concerns and the severe disruptions to international trade during the Great Depression and World War II, many nations, especially in Latin America, began implementing ISI policies from the 1930s to the 1960s. Countries like Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico actively pursued ISI, aiming to build a more diversified and self-sufficient economic base.
¹³

Key Takeaways

• The import substitution development strategy (ISDS) aims to replace foreign imports with domestic production to foster industrialization and self-sufficiency.
• It typically involves protectionist measures such as tariffs, quotas, and government subsidies for local industries.
• The strategy was widely adopted by developing countries, particularly in Latin America, after World War II.
• Proponents believed it could shield nascent industries and improve terms of trade for primary-product exporters.
• Critics argue that ISDS can lead to inefficiencies, lack of competition, higher consumer prices, and a neglect of the agricultural sector.

Interpreting the Import Substitution Development Strategy

An import substitution development strategy is interpreted as a deliberate shift away from reliance on global markets for certain goods towards domestic production. When a country adopts ISDS, it signals a focus on internal market development and national self-reliance, often underpinned by a belief that external trade relationships can be disadvantageous or volatile. The success of an ISDS is generally evaluated by metrics such as the increase in domestic industrial output, the reduction in the import coefficient (imports as a share of total supply), and the creation of new industries capable of producing goods previously imported. ¹²However, the actual economic impact can be complex; while it might boost local manufacturing, it can also lead to higher production costs and a lack of global competitiveness if not managed carefully. The goal is to nurture industries until they can stand on their own without continued protectionism.

Hypothetical Example

Consider the hypothetical nation of "Agriland," an economy historically reliant on exporting agricultural products and importing almost all its consumer and capital goods. Agriland's government decides to implement an import substitution development strategy to foster domestic industrialization.

Step-by-step implementation:

1. Identify Target Industries: Agriland's government identifies textiles and basic electronics as initial targets, as these require relatively less advanced technology.
2. Impose Trade Barriers: To protect emerging domestic textile and electronics manufacturers, Agriland places high tariffs on imported clothing and electronic components. It also sets strict import quotas on finished foreign products.
3. Provide Incentives: The government offers low-interest loans, tax breaks, and direct subsidies to local entrepreneurs willing to invest in textile mills and electronics assembly plants.
4. Promote Domestic Consumption: A national campaign encourages citizens to "Buy Agriland Made" products, fostering a sense of national pride in domestically manufactured goods.

Initially, Agriland experiences a boom in its textile and electronics sectors, with new factories opening and jobs being created. Consumers begin buying locally produced items, even if they are slightly more expensive or of lower quality than the previously imported goods, due to the protective measures. This strategy aims to reduce Agriland's reliance on foreign exchange for these products, theoretically improving its balance of payments.

Practical Applications

The import substitution development strategy has been a prominent feature of economic policy in various regions, particularly during the mid-20th century. For instance, after gaining independence in 1947, India adopted an ambitious import substitution policy that continued until economic reforms in 1991. The objective was to produce a high proportion of its consumed manufactured goods domestically. ¹⁰, ¹¹Similarly, Brazil implemented ISI extensively from the 1930s, and by the 1960s, it had significantly transformed its economic structure into an industrial powerhouse.
⁹
Governments typically apply ISDS through a combination of measures designed to favor domestic industries. These include high import duties, quantitative restrictions on specific imported items, and direct financial support to local manufacturers. The goal is to create a sheltered market where new industries can develop without facing overwhelming competition from established foreign firms. ⁸However, the implementation often involves significant government intervention in the economy, which can lead to various challenges.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its initial appeal for fostering self-sufficiency, the import substitution development strategy has faced significant limitations and criticisms. One of the primary drawbacks is the tendency to create inefficient domestic industries. By shielding local producers from international competition through high protectionist measures, there is often little incentive for firms to innovate, improve productivity, or reduce costs. This can result in higher prices and lower quality products for consumers.
⁶, ⁷
Moreover, while ISDS aims to reduce foreign dependency, it often creates a new form of reliance, particularly on imported intermediate and capital goods necessary for domestic production. Countries implementing ISDS may find themselves needing to import essential machinery and raw materials, potentially leading to foreign exchange shortages if their exports do not generate sufficient revenue. ⁴, ⁵Argentina's long-term pursuit of import substitution policies, for example, is often cited as a contributing factor to its economic challenges, as it led to a highly closed economy with less competitive industries. ³By the late 1980s, many countries that had adopted ISDS policies began to abandon them, moving towards more open market-oriented approaches.

Import Substitution Development Strategy vs. Export-led Growth Strategy

The import substitution development strategy stands in contrast to the export-led growth strategy, which emphasizes integrating into global markets by producing goods for export. While ISDS focuses on developing domestic industries to satisfy internal demand by replacing imports, export-led growth prioritizes achieving economies of scale and global competitiveness by focusing on producing goods for international markets.

Confusion between these two strategies sometimes arises because both aim for industrial development and economic growth. However, their fundamental approaches to achieving these goals—one emphasizing domestic market protection and the other global market integration—are distinct.

¹, ²FAQs

What is the main objective of an import substitution development strategy?

The main objective of an import substitution development strategy is to foster domestic industrialization and reduce a country's reliance on foreign imports by encouraging the local production of goods and services.

How is import substitution typically implemented?

Import substitution is typically implemented through government policies such as imposing high tariffs on imported goods, setting import quotas (quantity restrictions), and providing subsidies or other incentives to domestic industries to make their products more competitive in the local market.

Which countries have historically used import substitution?

Many developing countries, particularly in Latin America (like Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico) and some in Asia (like India) and Africa, adopted import substitution policies extensively from the 1930s through the 1960s.

What are the criticisms of import substitution?

Criticisms of import substitution include that it can lead to inefficient domestic industries due to a lack of competition, result in higher prices and lower quality products for consumers, and create a new dependency on imported capital goods and raw materials. It can also divert resources away from areas where a country might have a comparative advantage.