Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Imputation tax system

What Is an Imputation Tax System?

An imputation tax system is a corporate taxation framework designed to alleviate the issue of double taxation on company profits distributed as dividends to shareholders. Under this system, some or all of the corporation tax paid by a company on its corporate profits is effectively passed on to shareholders through a tax credit. This credit reduces the individual shareholder's personal income tax liability on the received dividend income, ensuring that the total tax burden on the profit is aligned more closely with the shareholder's individual marginal tax rate. This system falls under the broader category of Corporate Taxation and aims to integrate corporate and individual tax burdens.

History and Origin

The concept of an imputation tax system emerged as a response to the "classical" system of corporate taxation, which inherently resulted in the double taxation of distributed profits: once at the corporate level and again when shareholders received dividends. Various countries adopted imputation systems to encourage equity financing and reduce the tax-driven distortion against distributing profits.

A notable example is the United Kingdom, which introduced a partial imputation system in 1973. This system allowed shareholders to claim a tax credit reflecting advance corporation tax paid by the company on its distributions5, 6. This reform significantly impacted the UK stock market by providing tax incentives for institutional investors like pension funds to allocate capital to domestic equities4. Germany also operated an imputation system until 2000, and France until 2004. Australia and New Zealand introduced their dividend imputation systems in 1987 and 1989, respectively, with New Zealand's operating on similar principles to Australia's.

Key Takeaways

  • An imputation tax system aims to mitigate the double taxation of corporate profits distributed as dividends.
  • It provides shareholders with a tax credit for the corporate tax already paid on those profits.
  • This system ensures the combined corporate and individual tax on distributed earnings is closer to the shareholder's personal income tax rate.
  • Countries like Australia and New Zealand currently operate full imputation systems, while Canada employs a partial imputation system.
  • The system can influence tax policy and investment behavior, including the attractiveness of equity financing.

Interpreting the Imputation Tax System

The primary interpretation of an imputation tax system revolves around its ability to provide relief from the double taxation of corporate earnings. When a company pays its corporation tax, a portion of this tax is effectively "imputed" or attributed to the shareholder receiving a dividend. This imputed tax is represented by a tax credit, which the shareholder can use to offset their personal income tax liability on that dividend.

For a shareholder, this means that their total tax payable on dividend investment income is calculated by adding the gross dividend (dividend received plus the imputed tax credit) to their other income, calculating the tax on that total, and then subtracting the tax credit. In essence, the imputation tax system treats the distributed profit as if it were taxed only once at the shareholder's marginal rate, thereby promoting tax neutrality between retained and distributed earnings.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical company, "DiversiCo," operating in a country with a full imputation tax system. DiversiCo earns $1,000 in pre-tax profit and pays corporation tax at a rate of 30%. It decides to distribute $700 of its after-tax profit as a dividend to a shareholder, Jane.

  1. Corporate Tax Paid: DiversiCo pays ( $1,000 \times 0.30 = $300 ) in corporation tax.
  2. After-Tax Profit: DiversiCo's after-tax profit is ( $1,000 - $300 = $700 ).
  3. Dividend Distribution: DiversiCo distributes the entire ( $700 ) as a dividend to Jane.
  4. Imputation Credit: The tax system attributes the corporate tax paid on this distributed profit to Jane. The equivalent gross dividend (before corporate tax) that yielded ( $700 ) after a 30% corporate tax would be ( $700 / (1 - 0.30) = $1,000 ). The imputation tax credit is the difference between the gross and net dividend, which is ( $1,000 - $700 = $300 ).
  5. Jane's Income Tax Calculation: Jane receives a cash dividend of ( $700 ) and an imputation tax credit of ( $300 ). For tax purposes, her taxable dividend income is treated as ( $700 + $300 = $1,000 ).
    • If Jane's personal income tax rate is 20%, her tax liability on this ( $1,000 ) would be ( $1,000 \times 0.20 = $200 ).
    • Since she has an imputation tax credit of ( $300 ), she subtracts this credit from her ( $200 ) tax liability. In this case, her tax liability is fully covered, and she might even receive a refund of ( $100 ) if the credits are refundable, or her tax liability reduces to zero.
    • If Jane's personal income tax rate was 40%, her tax liability on ( $1,000 ) would be ( $1,000 \times 0.40 = $400 ). After applying the ( $300 ) tax credit, she would owe an additional ( $400 - $300 = $100 ) in income tax.

This example illustrates how the imputation tax system aims to tax the company's distributed profit only once, at the shareholder's individual income tax rate.

Practical Applications

Imputation tax systems are primarily applied within a country's domestic taxation framework to manage the taxation of corporate earnings. They significantly influence corporate financial decisions, encouraging dividend payouts by reducing the tax penalty on distributions compared to retained earnings.

  • Corporate Finance: Companies operating under an imputation tax system may be more inclined to distribute profits as dividends, as the system reduces the effective tax burden on shareholders, making dividends more attractive as a form of return on investment.
  • Shareholder Returns: For individual investors, the imputation tax system impacts the net return on their stock investments. The dividend tax credit received can significantly reduce or eliminate their personal income tax on dividends, enhancing the overall yield. Countries like Australia currently utilize a full imputation system, where shareholders can receive a refund if their imputation credits exceed their tax liability [Australian Taxation Office].
  • International Investment: For foreign investors, the benefits of an imputation system can vary. Often, non-residents may not be able to fully utilize the tax credits, potentially making investments in imputation countries less tax-efficient than for domestic residents, unless specific tax treaties are in place. Canada operates a partial imputation system through its dividend tax credit mechanism, where Canadian residents receive a credit that accounts for a portion of the corporate tax paid [Canada Revenue Agency].
  • Government Revenue: From a government perspective, the imputation system seeks a fair and progressive taxation of corporate profits while potentially influencing capital allocation within the economy. The UK's experience, for instance, showed how changes to the dividend tax credit system could lead to significant shifts in pension fund investment patterns away from domestic equities3.

Limitations and Criticisms

While designed to eliminate double taxation, imputation tax systems face several limitations and criticisms:

  • Complexity: Imputation systems can add significant complexity to a country's tax code, making it difficult for taxpayers to understand their true tax burden on dividends. The partial abolition of the UK's imputation system, for example, left behind complexities in its tax legislation2.
  • International Investment Disparities: One major criticism is the potential for discrimination against non-resident investors. Foreign shareholders typically cannot utilize the domestic tax credits, leading to a higher effective tax rate for them compared to resident shareholders. This can deter foreign direct investment and create an unlevel playing field for cross-border capital flows.
  • Revenue Impact: For governments, maintaining an imputation system can lead to lower overall tax revenue from corporate profits, particularly if tax credits are fully refundable, impacting the fiscal budget. Historically, the repayment of dividend tax credits to tax-exempt entities like pension funds in the UK was a significant feature, which was later restricted1.
  • Potential for Tax Avoidance: Like any complex tax system, imputation systems can present opportunities for tax planning or avoidance strategies, requiring robust anti-avoidance provisions.
  • Capital Gains vs. Dividends: While imputation systems address the double taxation of dividends, they often do not fully integrate the tax treatment of dividends with capital gains. This can still create distortions, favoring capital gains over dividend income, especially if capital gains are taxed at lower rates or are exempt.

Imputation Tax System vs. Classical Tax System

The imputation tax system is most clearly understood when contrasted with the classical tax system.

FeatureImputation Tax SystemClassical Tax System
Double TaxationMitigates or eliminates double taxation of dividends.Results in economic double taxation of dividends.
Corporate Tax ImpactCorporate tax is effectively attributed to shareholders.Corporate tax is a final tax on company profits.
Shareholder TreatmentShareholders receive a tax credit for corporate tax paid.Shareholders pay full income tax on dividends received.
Withholding TaxMay still apply, but credit mitigates overall burden.Often applied, with no credit for underlying corporate tax.
IntegrationAims for greater integration between corporate and individual taxation.Maintains a distinct separation between corporate and individual taxation.

In the classical system, a company pays corporation tax on its profits, and then shareholders pay income tax on the dividends they receive from the after-tax profits. This means the same profit is taxed twice. The imputation tax system, by providing a tax credit, attempts to integrate the two levels of taxation, effectively taxing the distributed profit once at the shareholder's personal income tax rate.

FAQs

What is the main purpose of an imputation tax system?

The main purpose is to eliminate or reduce the economic double taxation of corporate profits when they are distributed as dividends to shareholders. It ensures that the profit is taxed more closely to the shareholder's personal income tax rate rather than being taxed at both the corporate and individual levels.

Which countries currently use an imputation tax system?

As of recent times, countries like Australia, Malta, and New Zealand operate full imputation systems. Canada employs a partial imputation system. Historically, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France also utilized imputation systems but have since moved away from them.

How does a tax credit work in an imputation system?

When a company pays a dividend under an imputation system, it also attributes a tax credit to the shareholder. This tax credit represents a portion of the corporation tax already paid by the company on the profits from which the dividend was sourced. The shareholder includes the dividend plus the tax credit in their taxable income and then uses the tax credit to reduce their final income tax liability. This mechanism prevents the same profit from being taxed fully at both the corporate and individual shareholder levels, providing a form of tax relief.

Does an imputation tax system affect retained earnings?

Yes, indirectly. By reducing the tax burden on distributed profits, an imputation tax system can make paying dividends more attractive relative to retaining earnings, as it lessens the tax disincentive to distribute. This can influence a company's dividend policy and its decisions regarding capital allocation between reinvestment and shareholder payouts.

Is an imputation system fairer than a classical system?

Proponents argue that an imputation system is fairer because it aligns the total tax burden on distributed corporate profits with the shareholder's individual tax rate, thereby promoting horizontal equity among taxpayers. It also reduces the tax bias against distributing profits, which can encourage more efficient capital allocation. However, critics point to its complexity and potential for international tax discrimination.