Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

In competition

What Is Competition?

Competition in finance and economics refers to a market condition where various independent economic actors, such as firms or individuals, contend with each other to achieve a particular objective, typically by offering better prices, products, or services. It is a fundamental element of economic theory and market structure, influencing how resources are allocated and distributed within an economy. In a competitive environment, firms strive to attract consumers by differentiating their offerings or by operating more efficiently to lower pricing, which ultimately benefits consumers through greater choice, lower costs, and higher quality.

History and Origin

The concept of competition as a beneficial economic force gained prominence with the classical economists. Adam Smith, in his seminal 1776 work The Wealth of Nations, articulated how individual self-interest, when channeled through competition in a free market, could lead to societal prosperity as if guided by an "invisible hand."39 Smith posited that this natural tendency for individuals to pursue their own gain, in a system where they are "perfectly free to pursue his own interest in his own way," would inadvertently promote the public interest.38

However, the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States saw the rise of large industrial "trusts" that threatened competition.37 In response, the U.S. Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, marking the formal beginning of modern antitrust law.35, 36 This landmark legislation aimed to curb concentrations of market power and prevent unjustified monopolies by outlawing contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade and prohibiting monopolization.33, 34 The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division is the primary federal agency responsible for enforcing these laws.31, 32

A significant early application of the Sherman Act was the 1911 Supreme Court case Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States, which found Standard Oil guilty of anticompetitive practices and ordered its dissolution into 34 independent companies.25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 This case established the "rule of reason," holding that only "unreasonable" restraints on trade were unlawful.24

Key Takeaways

  • Competition drives businesses to offer better products and services at lower prices, benefiting consumers.
  • It encourages innovation and efficiency as firms strive to gain an edge.
  • Antitrust laws exist to prevent monopolies and anticompetitive practices that undermine market competition.
  • Competition is considered a cornerstone of market economies, fostering economic growth and prosperity.
  • Regulatory bodies actively monitor markets to ensure fair competition.

Formula and Calculation

Competition is a qualitative market condition rather than a quantitative metric that can be expressed by a single formula. However, economists use various measures to assess the degree of competition or market concentration within an industry. Common metrics include:

  • Market Share: The percentage of total sales within a specific market that is controlled by a particular company. A firm's market share relative to its competitors indicates its position in a competitive landscape.

  • Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI): A common measure of market concentration calculated by squaring the market share of each firm in the industry and summing the results. A higher HHI indicates lower competition and higher market concentration.

    HHI=i=1Nsi2HHI = \sum_{i=1}^{N} s_i^2

    Where:

    • (N) = the number of firms in the market
    • (s_i) = the market share of firm (i), expressed as a percentage (e.g., 25 for 25%)
  • Concentration Ratios (CR): These measure the combined market share of the largest firms (e.g., CR4 for the top four firms). A higher ratio suggests less competition.

These calculations help regulators and economists gauge the competitive intensity of a market and identify potential concerns related to market power or monopolistic tendencies.

Interpreting the Competition

Interpreting the level of competition in a market involves analyzing various factors beyond simple market share statistics. A highly competitive market is typically characterized by a large number of buyers and sellers, low barriers to entry for new firms, and a relatively homogenous product, approaching what economists call perfect competition. In such markets, individual firms have little influence over market prices. Conversely, markets with limited competition, such as an oligopoly or monopoly, allow dominant firms to exert significant control over prices and output.

Analysts consider factors like the ease with which new companies can enter an industry, the presence of substitute products, and the bargaining power of buyers and suppliers. Strong competition generally leads to lower prices, higher quality, and more innovation, benefiting consumers and contributing to overall economic efficiency. Weak competition, however, can result in higher prices, reduced product quality, and slower innovation, as dominant firms face fewer pressures to improve.

Hypothetical Example

Consider the market for smartphones. If only two companies, Alpha Tech and Beta Gadgets, produce smartphones, they face limited competition. Both companies might keep prices relatively high, offer similar features, and have less incentive to innovate rapidly.

Now, imagine several new companies, Gamma Devices, Delta Mobile, and Epsilon Electronics, enter the market. This influx of new players intensifies competition. To attract customers, Alpha Tech and Beta Gadgets might respond by lowering their prices, introducing new features, or improving customer service. Gamma Devices might focus on a niche market with specialized phones, while Delta Mobile might aim for affordability. Epsilon Electronics could invest heavily in innovation to create a breakthrough technology. This competitive environment forces all participants to continuously enhance their products and operating models, leading to a wider variety of phones, more competitive prices, and faster technological advancements for consumers.

Practical Applications

Competition plays a vital role across various aspects of finance and markets:

  • Investment Analysis: Investors assess the competitive landscape of an industry when evaluating potential investments. Companies operating in highly competitive markets may face thinner profit margins, while those in less competitive environments might enjoy greater profitability due to their market power. This influences decisions about capital allocation.
  • Antitrust Enforcement: Government bodies, like the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division, actively monitor markets to prevent anticompetitive practices such as price-fixing, market division, and unlawful mergers and acquisitions.22, 23 Their mission is to promote economic competition to benefit consumers through lower prices, better quality, and greater choice.21
  • Regulatory Policy: Regulators implement policies to foster competition, particularly in industries prone to natural monopolies, like utilities or telecommunications. The breakup of AT&T in 1984, for example, was an antitrust action that aimed to increase competition in the telecommunications sector.19, 20 This led to a surge in competition in the long-distance market and significantly restructured the industry.17, 18 Research indicates that increased competitive pressure in the telecommunications sector can lead to more employment, higher output, and faster network expansion.13, 14, 15, 16
  • International Trade: Global organizations, such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), advocate for competition policies to promote economic efficiency and inclusive growth worldwide.9, 10, 11, 12 The OECD, for instance, develops guidelines on competition law and policy that influence national regulations.6, 7, 8 The IMF highlights how competition and innovation are critical drivers of productivity gains and broad-based growth.5

Limitations and Criticisms

While competition is generally viewed as beneficial, it is not without limitations or criticisms. Extreme competition, sometimes referred to as "cutthroat competition," can lead to short-term thinking, reduced long-term investment in areas like research and development, and even market failures. In certain industries, the drive for lower prices can lead to a "race to the bottom" regarding quality or labor standards.

Moreover, the pursuit of competitive advantage can sometimes result in consolidation, where successful firms grow through mergers and acquisitions, potentially reducing the number of competitors over time. This can make it challenging for antitrust regulators to balance the benefits of scale and efficiency against the risks of reduced competition and increased market power. Some argue that current antitrust frameworks may not be adequate to address the unique challenges posed by digital markets and large technology companies, which often exhibit winner-take-all dynamics. Critics suggest that the initial success of antitrust actions, such as the AT&T breakup, was not always sustained due to later deregulation or a lack of consistent enforcement vision.3, 4

Competition vs. Monopoly

Competition and monopoly represent two ends of the market structure spectrum, fundamentally differing in their impact on consumers and the economy.

FeatureCompetitionMonopoly
Number of FirmsMany, or at least several, independent firms.Single firm dominates the entire market.
Product ControlFirms are price takers or have limited influence over pricing.The monopolist is a price maker, setting prices without direct competition.
Barriers to EntryLow, allowing new firms to easily enter the market.High, preventing or making it extremely difficult for new firms to enter.
InnovationDriven by the need to differentiate and gain market share, leading to continuous improvement.Limited, as there is no direct pressure from rivals to innovate or improve.
Consumer ImpactBenefits consumers through lower prices, higher quality, greater choice, and more innovation.Harms consumers through higher prices, lower quality, limited choice, and reduced innovation. May lead to consumer surplus loss.
Market OutcomeGenerally leads to efficient resource allocation and market equilibrium.Inefficient resource allocation, potential for deadweight loss, and exploitation of producer surplus.

While competition fosters dynamic and responsive markets, a monopoly, by definition, eliminates the rivalry that drives these benefits, allowing a single entity to control supply and dictate terms.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary benefit of competition for consumers?
A: The primary benefit of competition for consumers is typically lower prices, higher quality goods and services, and a greater variety of choices. Businesses must compete to attract customers, leading them to offer better value.

Q: How do governments promote competition?
A: Governments promote competition primarily through antitrust laws and regulation. These laws aim to prevent monopolies, cartels, and anticompetitive behaviors like price-fixing or abusive mergers. Regulatory bodies also oversee certain industries to ensure fair practices and market access.

Q: Can there be too much competition?
A: While competition is generally positive, excessive or "destructive" competition can, in rare cases, lead to negative outcomes such as unsustainable price wars, reduced long-term investment, or a decline in overall product quality as firms cut corners to survive. However, the benefits of competition typically outweigh these potential drawbacks in a well-regulated market.

Q: What is the "invisible hand" in relation to competition?
A: The "invisible hand" is a metaphor coined by Adam Smith, suggesting that in a free market, individuals pursuing their own self-interest, when interacting through competitive forces, inadvertently contribute to the overall economic well-being of society. It implies that a competitive market can effectively coordinate economic activity without central planning.1, 2