Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Inclusionary zoning

Inclusionary zoning is a regulatory tool employed by local governments within the broader category of Real Estate Finance and urban planning. It aims to address housing affordability by requiring or incentivizing developers to include a certain percentage of affordable housing units within new residential developments. This policy generally applies to projects exceeding a specified number of units or a particular scale, ensuring that a portion of new construction caters to households with low to moderate incomes.

What Is Inclusionary Zoning?

Inclusionary zoning refers to municipal ordinances that encourage or mandate that a specific share of newly constructed residential units be reserved for sale or rent at below-market rates, targeting households earning a certain percentage of the Area Median Income. The primary objective of inclusionary zoning is to foster economic diversity within neighborhoods and create opportunities for diverse income levels to reside in communities where they might otherwise be priced out. These policies often integrate with existing zoning laws, influencing land use and the overall housing market.

History and Origin

The concept of inclusionary zoning emerged in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s, largely as a response to perceived exclusionary zoning practices that contributed to economic and racial segregation. While Fairfax County, Virginia, drafted an early policy in 1971 that was later struck down by state courts, the movement gained significant traction. In 1974, Montgomery County, Maryland, enacted what is widely recognized as the nation's first successful inclusionary housing program, known as the Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit (MPDU) program. This program required real estate development projects of a certain size to set aside a percentage of units as affordable, integrating them directly into market-rate developments. Decades later, the MPDU program remains active and has served as a model for over 800 similar programs across various states and the District of Columbia, demonstrating how to create affordable housing within growing communities without sacrificing quality or neighborhood character.13,12

Key Takeaways

  • Inclusionary zoning is a local government policy requiring or incentivizing developers to build affordable units alongside market-rate housing.
  • It aims to promote socioeconomic diversity and increase the supply of affordable housing without direct public funding outlays.
  • Programs often include developer incentives, such as density bonuses or fee waivers, to offset costs.
  • Criticisms include concerns about potentially increasing overall housing costs or reducing the total housing supply.
  • The effectiveness of inclusionary zoning programs can vary significantly based on local market conditions and policy design.

Interpreting Inclusionary Zoning

Inclusionary zoning policies are interpreted based on their specific requirements, which vary considerably by jurisdiction. Typically, a policy specifies the percentage of units that must be affordable (e.g., 10% or 15%), the income levels these units must serve (e.g., households earning 50% or 80% of the Area Median Income), and the duration for which these units must remain affordable. Programs may be mandatory, requiring compliance for all qualifying developments, or voluntary, offering economic incentives like increased development density or expedited permitting processes in exchange for providing affordable units. The interpretation also involves understanding how these policies influence property values and the overall dynamics of housing supply and demand in a given area.

Hypothetical Example

Consider the city of Metropolis, which has implemented an inclusionary zoning policy for all new residential developments with 50 or more units. The policy mandates that 10% of the units must be affordable to households earning up to 80% of the Area Median Income.

A developer, Urban Living Inc., plans to construct a new apartment complex with 200 units. Under Metropolis's inclusionary zoning ordinance, Urban Living Inc. must set aside 10% of these 200 units as affordable.

Calculation:
(
200 \text{ total units} \times 0.10 \text{ (10% set-aside)} = 20 \text{ affordable units}
)

Urban Living Inc. will develop 20 affordable units and 180 market-rate housing units within the same complex. To offset some of the costs associated with the affordable units, Metropolis offers a density bonus, allowing Urban Living Inc. to build an additional 10 market-rate units beyond the original zoning limits for the parcel. This provides a potential trade-off for the developer, making the project more financially viable while still achieving the city's affordable housing goals. The affordable units are integrated into the development, often indistinguishable from the market-rate units in terms of design and quality, promoting a mixed-income community.

Practical Applications

Inclusionary zoning is applied in diverse urban and suburban settings to address housing challenges. It is a widely used tool in cities experiencing rapid population growth and escalating housing costs, where it can contribute to the creation of housing for essential workers, seniors, and young families.11 These policies are particularly effective in "hot" housing markets where there is significant demand for new construction, allowing municipalities to leverage private capital investment for public benefit. For instance, in areas like San Francisco and suburban Boston, studies have shown that inclusionary zoning policies can lead to a modest but measurable increase in affordable housing units.10 Moreover, by integrating affordable units into market-rate developments, inclusionary zoning can help reduce residential segregation and promote socioeconomic diversity, offering low-income residents better access to opportunities in higher-income neighborhoods, including improved educational outcomes and economic mobility.9,8

Limitations and Criticisms

While inclusionary zoning is a popular policy tool, it faces several limitations and criticisms. A common concern is that by imposing additional costs on developers, these policies may ultimately increase the price of market-rate homes or reduce the overall supply of new housing, as developers might build fewer units or pass on costs to other buyers.7,6 Some critics argue that the burden of creating affordable housing is unfairly placed on developers rather than being a broader public responsibility.5

Furthermore, the number of affordable units produced by inclusionary zoning programs can be relatively small compared to the overall need. One report estimated that the average program creates only a limited number of affordable units per year, suggesting it can only be a minor component of comprehensive affordable housing strategies.4,3 In certain market conditions, particularly in slower-growing communities, the administrative complexity of managing such programs might outweigh the number of new affordable homes created.2 Legal challenges have also arisen, with some states prohibiting mandatory inclusionary housing due to concerns about it being a form of rent control or exceeding local statutory authority.1

Inclusionary Zoning vs. Exclusionary Zoning

Inclusionary zoning and exclusionary zoning represent contrasting approaches to land use regulation, though they are inherently linked in their historical context. Exclusionary zoning refers to local government practices that, often unintentionally, restrict the development of affordable housing and perpetuate socioeconomic segregation. Historically, this has involved regulations such as large minimum lot sizes, restrictions on multi-family dwellings, or limitations on building heights, which collectively raise the cost of housing and make it inaccessible to lower-income households. The aim of exclusionary zoning was sometimes to preserve neighborhood character or property values, but it often resulted in homogenous, high-income communities.

In contrast, inclusionary zoning was specifically developed to counteract the effects of exclusionary zoning by proactively promoting housing affordability and diversity. Rather than preventing certain types of housing, it mandates or encourages the integration of affordable units within new developments. While exclusionary zoning limits housing options, inclusionary zoning seeks to expand them within existing or developing communities.

FAQs

What is the main goal of inclusionary zoning?

The main goal of inclusionary zoning is to increase the supply of affordable housing and promote socioeconomic diversity within communities by requiring or incentivizing developers to include a percentage of affordable units in new residential projects.

Are all inclusionary zoning policies mandatory?

No, inclusionary zoning policies can be either mandatory or voluntary. Mandatory programs require developers to include affordable units, while voluntary programs offer incentives like tax abatements or density bonuses to encourage the provision of affordable units.

How does inclusionary zoning affect developers?

Inclusionary zoning can impact developers by requiring them to sell or rent a portion of units at below-market rates, which can affect project feasibility and profitability. To mitigate this, many programs offer cost offsets such as density bonuses, fee waivers, or expedited permitting, aiming to achieve a balance between public good and private interests.

Does inclusionary zoning increase housing prices for market-rate units?

The impact of inclusionary zoning on market-rate housing prices is a subject of debate. Some studies suggest that the added costs on developers may be passed on to market-rate buyers, potentially increasing prices or reducing the overall housing supply. Other research indicates that with appropriate cost offsets, the impact can be modest or negligible.