Skip to main content

Are you on the right long-term path? Get a full financial assessment

Get a full financial assessment
← Back to I Definitions

Infrastructure as code

What Is Infrastructure as Code?

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is an approach within IT Operations that uses machine-readable definition files to automate the provisioning and management of IT infrastructure, rather than relying on manual processes. This includes networks, virtual machines, load balancers, databases, and other infrastructure elements. By treating infrastructure configurations like software code, IaC enables teams to apply software development best practices, such as version control and automated testing, to their infrastructure. Automation is a core tenet of IaC, allowing for consistent and repeatable deployments across various environments, from development to production25, 26.

History and Origin

The roots of Infrastructure as Code can be traced back to the early days of system administration in the 1990s, when tools like CFEngine (1993) emerged to automate server configuration management for UNIX-based systems. These early tools introduced the concept of declarative configurations, which focused on defining the desired state of a system rather than the sequence of steps to achieve it23, 24.

The concept of IaC gained significant traction with the rise of cloud computing platforms in the mid-2000s, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) EC2 in 2006, and the subsequent evolution of DevOps methodologies21, 22. As organizations increasingly adopted dynamic cloud environments, the need for automated, scalable, and reliable infrastructure provisioning became critical. Tools like Puppet (2005), Chef (2009), Ansible (2012), and most notably, HashiCorp Terraform (2014), built upon these foundations, providing more robust capabilities for defining and managing entire infrastructure stacks through code19, 20. This evolution allowed organizations to manage increasing complexity at scale, driving the widespread adoption of IaC as a fundamental practice in modern IT18.

Key Takeaways

  • Automation and Repeatability: IaC automates infrastructure provisioning, ensuring environments are set up identically every time, reducing human error and enabling faster, more efficient development17.
  • Consistency and Reliability: By defining infrastructure in code, IaC prevents configuration drift, where environments diverge over time, leading to greater consistency and reliability across development, testing, and production environments16.
  • Version Control and Collaboration: Infrastructure definitions can be stored in version control systems, allowing teams to track changes, revert to previous states, and collaborate on infrastructure modifications with full traceability15.
  • Faster Deployment and Scalability: IaC accelerates the process of provisioning new infrastructure, which is crucial for rapid deployment and for scaling resources up or down as needed14.
  • Cost Efficiency: By streamlining provisioning and ensuring consistency, IaC can lead to lower operational costs by reducing the time and effort required to deploy, manage, and maintain IT environments13.

Interpreting Infrastructure as Code

Infrastructure as Code is typically interpreted through either a declarative or imperative approach. In a declarative approach, which is common for modern IaC tools, the code defines the desired end state of the infrastructure. The IaC tool then figures out the necessary steps to transition the current state to the desired state. This contrasts with an imperative approach, where the code specifies the exact sequence of commands required to achieve a particular configuration.

The power of IaC lies in its ability to ensure consistency and reliability. If a team needs to provision a new environment for testing or to expand existing services, the IaC definition acts as a blueprint, allowing the exact same infrastructure to be provisioned repeatedly without manual errors. This capability is vital for maintaining scalability and ensuring that applications behave consistently across different stages of the development lifecycle, from initial coding through deployment to production.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a company, "FinTech Innovators," that needs to set up a new production environment for a high-frequency trading application. Traditionally, this might involve IT administrators manually configuring servers, setting up network rules, installing databases, and connecting various components. This process is time-consuming, prone to human error, and difficult to replicate precisely.

With Infrastructure as Code, FinTech Innovators defines their entire production environment in a text file using a tool like Terraform. This file specifies:

  • The number and type of virtual machines required.
  • Network configurations, including subnets and firewall rules.
  • Database instances, their versions, and initial settings.
  • Load balancers and their routing rules.
  • Monitoring and logging configurations.

Once the IaC file is written and reviewed, an engineer can execute a single command (e.g., terraform apply). The IaC tool reads the configuration file, communicates with the cloud provider's Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and automatically provisions all the specified resource management components exactly as defined. If the company needs to spin up an identical staging environment or a disaster recovery site, they can use the same IaC file, ensuring consistency and dramatically reducing setup time and potential inconsistencies.

Practical Applications

Infrastructure as Code is widely applied across various domains of IT and software development due to its ability to streamline operations and ensure consistency.

  • Cloud Provisioning: IaC is fundamental to provisioning and managing resources in public and private cloud environments. Organizations use IaC tools to define and deploy virtual servers, storage, networking, and platform services with precision and repeatability12.
  • Disaster Recovery: By codifying an entire infrastructure, organizations can rapidly rebuild environments in the event of a disaster. Instead of manual recovery processes, IaC allows for the automated restoration of services, significantly reducing recovery time objectives (RTOs)11.
  • Environment Replication: IaC enables the creation of identical development, testing, staging, and production environments, eliminating "it works on my machine" issues and ensuring consistent application behavior across all stages.
  • Security and Compliance: Security policies and compliance requirements can be embedded directly into IaC templates. This "policy-as-code" approach ensures that all deployed infrastructure adheres to predefined security standards and regulatory guidelines automatically9, 10.
  • Orchestration of Complex Deployments: For complex microservices architectures or multi-tier applications, IaC tools can orchestrate the provisioning and linking of numerous interconnected components, managing dependencies and ensuring the correct order of deployment.

Leading IaC tools include HashiCorp Terraform, AWS CloudFormation, Azure Resource Manager, and Ansible. These tools allow developers and operations teams to define their infrastructure using various domain-specific languages or general-purpose programming languages7, 8.

Limitations and Criticisms

While Infrastructure as Code offers significant benefits, it also presents certain limitations and criticisms that organizations must consider. One primary challenge is the initial learning curve and complexity. Adopting IaC requires teams to learn new tools, syntax, and a shift in mindset from manual operations to a code-driven approach, which can be a substantial undertaking6.

Security risks related to misconfigurations are another significant concern. If IaC templates contain vulnerabilities or misconfigurations, these flaws can be rapidly propagated across all environments provisioned by the code, potentially exposing sensitive data or creating attack vectors at scale4, 5. Ensuring the efficiency of security scanning and validation processes for IaC templates is crucial to mitigate this risk2, 3.

Managing the "state" of infrastructure can also be complex. Many IaC tools maintain a state file that maps the real-world infrastructure to its coded representation. If this state file becomes corrupted or out of sync with the actual infrastructure, it can lead to deployment failures or unintended changes. Furthermore, the declarative nature of some IaC tools can make debugging challenging when the desired state is not achieved as expected. Adherence to compliance regulations requires diligent management of these codebases, as any deviation can lead to non-compliance across an entire infrastructure1.

Infrastructure as Code vs. Configuration Management

While often used in similar contexts and sometimes with overlapping tools, Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and Configuration Management (CM) serve distinct primary purposes in IT operations.

Infrastructure as Code focuses on the provisioning and management of the underlying infrastructure itself. This involves defining and creating servers, virtual machines, networks, databases, and other cloud or physical resources from a blank slate. IaC ensures that the infrastructure itself is reproducible and consistent every time it is deployed. Tools like Terraform and AWS CloudFormation are prime examples, focusing on the lifecycle of the infrastructure resource, from creation to destruction.

Configuration Management, on the other hand, deals with the configuration of software and settings within existing infrastructure components. Once a server or virtual machine is provisioned, CM tools ensure that the operating system, installed applications, services, and their settings are maintained in a desired state. Tools like Ansible, Chef, and Puppet are commonly used for CM, focusing on patching, software updates, and applying specific configurations to operating systems or applications.

While IaC might provision a server, CM would then configure the web server software (e.g., Apache or Nginx) and deploy the application code onto that server. Many modern DevOps practices integrate both IaC and CM to achieve full automation from infrastructure provisioning to application deployment.

FAQs

What are the main benefits of Infrastructure as Code?

The primary benefits of Infrastructure as Code include increased automation, enhanced consistency and repeatability across environments, reduced manual errors, faster deployment times, and improved version control and collaboration among teams. It allows infrastructure to be treated with the same rigor as application code.

Is Infrastructure as Code difficult to learn?

Learning Infrastructure as Code involves understanding new tools, declarative languages, and a shift in operational mindset. While there can be an initial learning curve, particularly for those accustomed to manual infrastructure management, many IaC tools offer extensive documentation and community support to help beginners. The benefits of improved efficiency often outweigh the initial learning investment.

What are some common tools used for Infrastructure as Code?

Popular tools for Infrastructure as Code include HashiCorp Terraform, which is cloud-agnostic and supports multiple cloud providers; AWS CloudFormation, specifically for Amazon Web Services; Azure Resource Manager for Microsoft Azure; Google Cloud Deployment Manager for Google Cloud; and Ansible, which can perform both IaC and configuration management tasks. Additionally, newer approaches like Pulumi allow IaC to be written in general-purpose programming languages.

Can Infrastructure as Code be used for serverless computing environments?

Yes, Infrastructure as Code is highly effective for managing serverless computing environments. Tools like AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM) or Terraform can define and deploy serverless functions, APIs, and other related resources, ensuring consistency and ease of management for these highly dynamic cloud components.

AI Financial Advisor

Get personalized investment advice

  • AI-powered portfolio analysis
  • Smart rebalancing recommendations
  • Risk assessment & management
  • Tax-efficient strategies

Used by 30,000+ investors