Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Internal training

What Is Dollar-Cost Averaging?

Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is an investment strategy within the broader field of portfolio management where an investor systematically invests a fixed amount of money into a particular asset at regular intervals, regardless of the asset's price fluctuations. This approach aims to reduce the overall average cost per share of the investment over time and helps mitigate the impact of market volatility. By committing to regular investments, dollar-cost averaging encourages disciplined accumulation of assets, transforming market downturns into opportunities to acquire more shares at lower prices.

History and Origin

The concept of dollar-cost averaging was popularized by renowned investor Benjamin Graham in his seminal 1949 book, The Intelligent Investor. Graham advocated for this systematic approach, emphasizing its ability to remove emotional decision-making from investing. He suggested that by investing a consistent sum of money monthly or quarterly, an individual would naturally purchase more shares when the market is low and fewer when it is high, leading to a satisfactory average cost for their holdings.10 This philosophy aligns with value investing principles, focusing on long-term accumulation rather than attempting to time market movements.9

Key Takeaways

  • Dollar-cost averaging involves investing a fixed sum of money at regular intervals.
  • It helps reduce the average cost per share over time by buying more units when prices are low and fewer when prices are high.
  • This strategy promotes investment discipline and reduces the influence of emotional responses to market fluctuations.
  • It is particularly useful for new investors or those accumulating wealth over a long-term investment horizon.
  • While it may not always yield the highest returns in consistently rising markets, it serves as a powerful risk management technique.

Formula and Calculation

While dollar-cost averaging doesn't involve a complex predictive formula, its effectiveness is based on the simple calculation of the average cost per share. This is determined by dividing the total amount of money invested by the total number of shares acquired over the investment period.

The average cost per share can be calculated as:

Average Cost Per Share=Total Amount InvestedTotal Number of Shares Purchased\text{Average Cost Per Share} = \frac{\text{Total Amount Invested}}{\text{Total Number of Shares Purchased}}

For example, if an investor consistently invests $100 each month, they might purchase a different number of shares depending on the price of the security. Over time, this consistent investment in varying market conditions smooths out the purchase price.

Interpreting Dollar-Cost Averaging

Dollar-cost averaging is primarily interpreted as a disciplined approach to building wealth, especially for those who contribute regularly to investment accounts like a 401(k)) or an individual retirement account (IRA). The core interpretation is that by making consistent investments, an investor avoids the pitfalls of market timing, which is the often-unsuccessful attempt to predict the best moments to buy or sell. This strategy is particularly valuable during periods of downward or volatile markets, as it allows investors to acquire more assets when prices are depressed, thereby potentially boosting returns when the market recovers. For instance, in a bear market, dollar-cost averaging means each fixed investment buys more shares.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor who decides to use dollar-cost averaging to invest $1,200 into a particular Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) over six months, investing $200 each month.

  • Month 1: ETF price is $10 per share. $200 buys 20 shares.
  • Month 2: ETF price drops to $8 per share. $200 buys 25 shares.
  • Month 3: ETF price falls further to $5 per share. $200 buys 40 shares.
  • Month 4: ETF price rebounds to $7 per share. $200 buys approximately 28.57 shares.
  • Month 5: ETF price rises to $9 per share. $200 buys approximately 22.22 shares.
  • Month 6: ETF price continues to $12 per share. $200 buys approximately 16.67 shares.

Over six months, the investor has invested a total of $1,200 and acquired approximately 152.46 shares (20 + 25 + 40 + 28.57 + 22.22 + 16.67).

The average cost per share is:

Average Cost Per Share=$1,200152.46 shares$7.87 per share\text{Average Cost Per Share} = \frac{\$1,200}{152.46 \text{ shares}} \approx \$7.87 \text{ per share}

The simple average of the monthly prices is ($10 + $8 + $5 + $7 + $9 + $12) / 6 = $8.50. Through dollar-cost averaging, the investor achieved a lower average purchase price than the simple average of the market prices due to buying more shares when prices were low. This demonstrates how the strategy leverages price fluctuations to an investor's advantage.

Practical Applications

Dollar-cost averaging is widely applied in various aspects of personal finance and investment planning. It is a fundamental component of many retirement planning strategies, where individuals make regular contributions to their employer-sponsored plans or personal investment accounts. This consistent, automated approach simplifies the investment process and removes the need for investors to make active buy decisions.8

The strategy is also popular for investing in diversified vehicles such as mutual funds and index funds, where the focus is on broad market exposure rather than individual stock picking. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) highlights dollar-cost averaging as a method to manage risk by maintaining a consistent investment pattern over time.7 This practice is particularly beneficial for long-term goals like saving for a down payment on a house or funding a child's education, promoting consistent savings habits and allowing the power of compounding to work effectively.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its popularity and benefits for behavioral discipline, dollar-cost averaging has faced academic criticism. Studies suggest that in consistently rising markets, dollar-cost averaging may result in lower overall returns compared to lump-sum investing. This is because a lump sum invested immediately captures the full market upside from the outset.6 Academics have often attributed the strategy's widespread popularity to investor behavioral biases rather than its optimal financial efficiency in all market conditions.5

For example, some research points out that while dollar-cost averaging reduces volatility, it often comes at the cost of lower expected returns, leading to lower Sharpe ratios in many cases.4 Critics argue that holding a portion of investable cash on the sidelines while implementing dollar-cost averaging can represent an opportunity cost in an upward-trending market. Furthermore, if an investor uses dollar-cost averaging on highly volatile single stocks, there's a risk of substantial loss if the stock continues to decline and never recovers, underscoring the importance of applying the strategy to diversified assets.3

Dollar-Cost Averaging vs. Lump-Sum Investing

The primary alternative to dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is lump-sum investing (LSI), where an entire sum of money is invested at once. The fundamental difference lies in the timing and distribution of capital.

FeatureDollar-Cost AveragingLump-Sum Investing
Investment TimingFixed amounts invested at regular intervalsEntire sum invested at once
Risk ExposureSpreads out risk over time, mitigating market entry riskFull market exposure immediately, higher initial risk
Average CostPotentially lower average cost per share in volatile marketsPurchase at a single price point
Behavioral ImpactReduces emotional decision-making, promotes disciplineRequires comfort with immediate, full market exposure
Return PotentialMay yield lower returns in consistently rising marketsHistorically higher returns in consistently rising markets2

While DCA aims to smooth out the entry price and reduce the risk of investing at a market peak, LSI aims to maximize exposure to potential market gains by putting all capital to work immediately. The choice between the two often depends on an investor's risk tolerance, investment goals, and market outlook.

FAQs

Is dollar-cost averaging suitable for all investors?

Dollar-cost averaging is particularly suitable for investors who have a steady stream of income they wish to invest, lack the behavioral discipline to invest regularly, or are concerned about short-term market fluctuations. It's less about optimizing returns in every scenario and more about consistent, disciplined investing.

Can dollar-cost averaging guarantee profits?

No, dollar-cost averaging cannot guarantee profits or protect against losses. While it can help reduce the average cost of your investments over time, the overall success of the strategy still depends on the long-term performance of the underlying assets and the broader market. It's a method for managing entry risk, not eliminating investment risk entirely.

Does dollar-cost averaging work better in a bull market or a bear market?

Dollar-cost averaging typically shows greater advantages in volatile or declining (bear) markets because it allows investors to buy more shares at lower prices. In a consistently rising (bull) market, lump-sum investing often outperforms DCA because all capital is invested earlier, benefiting from continuous growth.

Should I use dollar-cost averaging for a large sum of money, like an inheritance?

For a large sum, the decision between dollar-cost averaging and lump-sum investing is debated. Historically, investing a lump sum immediately has often yielded higher returns over the long term, given the market's general upward trend. However, dollar-cost averaging can reduce the psychological stress and potential regret of investing a large sum right before a market downturn, making it a viable option for risk-averse individuals or those who prioritize peace of mind.1

How frequently should I implement dollar-cost averaging?

The frequency of dollar-cost averaging (e.g., weekly, monthly, quarterly) is less critical than the consistency of the investment. Many investors choose monthly contributions, aligning with paychecks or other regular income flows. The key is to establish a fixed schedule and adhere to it regardless of market conditions, fostering a disciplined investment habit.