Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

International accounting standards

What Are International Accounting Standards?

International accounting standards are a set of principles and guidelines for how companies prepare and present their financial statements. These standards aim to ensure that financial information is consistent, transparent, and comparable across different countries, thereby enhancing global financial reporting quality. The most prominent and widely adopted international accounting standards today are the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). By providing a common framework, international accounting standards facilitate cross-border investment and improve the efficiency of global capital markets.

History and Origin

The journey toward global accounting harmonization began in 1973 with the establishment of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) by accounting bodies from ten countries. The IASC developed and issued a series of pronouncements known as International Accounting Standards (IAS). These early standards aimed to reduce the variations in accounting practices worldwide, though their adoption was not initially widespread or mandatory.

A significant turning point occurred in 2001 when the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was created, succeeding the IASC. The IASB, an independent body operating under the oversight of the IFRS Foundation, was tasked with developing a single set of high-quality, understandable, and enforceable global accounting standards. The IASB then began issuing new standards called International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The adoption of IFRS received a major boost in 2005 when the European Union mandated their use for the consolidated financial statements of publicly traded companies within its member states. This move significantly propelled IFRS to become the de facto international accounting standards for many major economies globally. The IFRS Foundation, the oversight body for the IASB, provides comprehensive information on its history and mission to foster globally accepted accounting standards.8

Key Takeaways

  • International accounting standards, primarily IFRS, provide a common framework for financial reporting globally, enhancing comparability and transparency.
  • The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) develops and issues International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
  • Over 140 jurisdictions worldwide have adopted or permit the use of IFRS for financial reporting.
  • The United States, through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), continues to require U.S. domestic public companies to use U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
  • Adopting international accounting standards can lead to increased cross-border investment and improved market efficiency.

Interpreting the International Accounting Standards

Interpreting financial statements prepared under international accounting standards, specifically IFRS, requires understanding their principles-based nature. Unlike more rules-based frameworks, IFRS often provides broad principles that necessitate significant professional judgment in their application. This emphasis on judgment means that while the goal is comparability, there can still be variations in how similar transactions are reported by different entities, particularly in complex areas.

Financial professionals interpreting IFRS statements typically analyze the key components such as the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement with a view toward the underlying economic substance of transactions. They assess how recognition, measurement, and disclosure choices align with the stated principles. The extensive disclosures required by IFRS provide additional context for interpretation, helping users understand the judgments made by management.

Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical multinational corporations, Alpha Corp. and Beta Ltd., operating in different countries. Alpha Corp. is based in a country that has fully adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), while Beta Ltd. is based in another country also using IFRS.

Both companies have similar operations involving significant long-term assets and liabilities. When Alpha Corp. reports its annual financial statements, it values its property, plant, and equipment using the revaluation model permitted under IFRS, regularly adjusting their carrying amounts to fair value. Beta Ltd., on the other hand, chooses the cost model for its similar assets, reporting them at historical cost less accumulated depreciation.

Despite using different accounting policies for property, plant, and equipment, both companies are compliant with IFRS, as the standard offers choices in certain accounting treatments. An analyst reviewing both companies' financial statements would need to understand these elected policies, which are clearly disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, to make appropriate adjustments for a truly comparable analysis. This example highlights how, even within IFRS, different acceptable accounting policies can lead to variations in reported financial figures, emphasizing the importance of detailed disclosures and a thorough understanding of the standards.

Practical Applications

International accounting standards are fundamental to global finance, impacting various areas:

  • Cross-Border Investment: By standardizing financial reporting, IFRS makes it easier for investors to compare companies across different countries, encouraging international capital flows. This enhanced financial reporting quality attracts more investors to global capital markets. According to the IFRS Foundation, its standards are used in over 140 jurisdictions, fostering greater understanding and trust in financial information globally.7
  • Multinational Corporations: Companies operating in multiple countries benefit significantly from a single set of international accounting standards, streamlining their consolidation processes and reducing compliance costs associated with preparing financial statements under various national rules.
  • Mergers and Acquisitions: When companies from different countries consider mergers or acquisitions, IFRS provides a common language for financial due diligence, simplifying the valuation and integration processes.
  • Regulatory Oversight: Regulators worldwide rely on IFRS to oversee publicly listed companies and ensure consistent and reliable financial disclosures, promoting market integrity. The goal is to enhance the overall regulatory environment.
  • Financial Analysis: Analysts use IFRS-compliant financial statements to perform comparable assessments of companies operating in different regions, enabling more informed investment decisions based on consistent equity and debt figures.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their widespread adoption and benefits, international accounting standards, specifically IFRS, face certain limitations and criticisms:

  • Complexity and Interpretation: While principles-based, IFRS can be highly complex, leading to challenges in consistent interpretation and application across different entities and industries. This subjectivity can sometimes undermine the very goal of comparability.6
  • Implementation Costs: The transition to IFRS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant investment in system overhauls, staff training, and external consultation, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises.5
  • Lack of Universal Adoption: The absence of universal adoption, notably by the United States for its domestic public companies, creates reconciliation challenges for multinational corporations and investors dealing with both IFRS and other national standards.4
  • Frequent Updates: The IASB regularly updates IFRS, which can impose ongoing compliance burdens on companies needing to adapt to new requirements.3
  • Focus on Fair Value: IFRS places a greater emphasis on fair value accounting for certain assets and liabilities, which can introduce volatility into financial statements if market values fluctuate significantly. This approach sometimes contrasts with historical cost accounting.
  • Criticism of Standard-Setting Process: Some industry commentators have criticized the IASB's standard-setting process itself, citing concerns over the quality of final standards, slow responsiveness, and frequent amendments that may hurt credibility.2

International Accounting Standards vs. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

The primary distinction in the world of financial reporting lies between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), particularly U.S. GAAP. While both frameworks aim to provide transparent and relevant financial information, they differ fundamentally in their approach:

FeatureInternational Accounting Standards (IFRS)U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
ApproachPrimarily principles-based, focusing on broad guidelines and professional judgment.More rules-based, providing detailed guidance for specific transactions.
Inventory ValuationDoes not permit the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method.Permits LIFO, First-In, First-Out (FIFO), and weighted-average methods.
Fixed AssetsAllows revaluation model (assets can be revalued to fair value).Generally requires historical cost less depreciation (revaluation is prohibited).
Extraordinary ItemsDoes not define or present extraordinary items separately.Historically identified and reported extraordinary items separately (though less common now).
Development CostsCapitalizes development costs once certain criteria are met.Generally expenses development costs as incurred.
Scope of UsersGlobal adoption, focused on international comparability for various stakeholders.Primarily used in the United States, focused on U.S. stakeholders.

Confusion often arises because both systems aim for clear financial reporting, but their underlying philosophies lead to different treatments for similar transactions. For instance, the differing treatment of inventory valuation methods or the revaluation of fixed assets can significantly impact reported net income and asset values. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. permits foreign private issuers to use IFRS but requires domestic public companies to use U.S. GAAP.1 While efforts have been made toward convergence between IFRS and U.S. GAAP over the years, a complete adoption of IFRS by the U.S. has not occurred.

FAQs

What is the main goal of international accounting standards?

The main goal of international accounting standards, particularly IFRS, is to provide a common global language for business, making financial statements more comparable and transparent across different countries. This helps investors and other stakeholders make informed decisions.

Who issues International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)?

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), which is an independent, private-sector body.

Are international accounting standards mandatory everywhere?

While over 140 jurisdictions worldwide have adopted or permit the use of IFRS, they are not mandatory everywhere. Notably, the United States requires its domestic public companies to follow U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

How do international accounting standards benefit investors?

International accounting standards benefit investors by increasing the comparability of financial information across different countries. This allows investors to more easily evaluate investment opportunities globally and understand the financial health of multinational companies, fostering better cross-border investment decisions.