Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Investment treaty

What Is an Investment Treaty?

An investment treaty is an international agreement between two or more countries that establishes the terms and conditions for private foreign direct investment (FDI) made by investors from one country into the territory of another. These treaties belong to the broader category of International Investment Law and are designed to promote and protect cross-border capital flows by providing a stable and predictable legal framework for foreign investors49.

Investment treaties grant foreign investors certain protections and benefits, including specific standards of treatment from host states and access to dispute resolution mechanisms48. Over 3,300 such agreements, often referred to as International Investment Agreements (IIAs), have been concluded worldwide47.

History and Origin

The concept of international agreements protecting foreign property dates back centuries, with provisions appearing in agreements as early as the late 18th century46. However, the modern form of investment treaties emerged more prominently in the post-World War II era44, 45. Following widespread nationalization of foreign assets and perceived weaknesses in customary international law regarding foreign investments, countries sought more explicit assurances42, 43.

The world's first bilateral investment treaty (BIT), a common type of investment treaty, was signed on November 25, 1959, between Germany and Pakistan41. This landmark agreement set a precedent for future treaties, which aimed to encourage and protect investments by establishing clear standards of conduct for governments in their treatment of foreign investors40. The proliferation of these agreements accelerated, particularly after 1990, driven by a desire to attract FDI and provide legal certainty for investors. Today, there are over 2,500 BITs in force globally, involving more than 150 countries.39 The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) maintains a comprehensive database of these agreements, known as the International Investment Agreements Navigator, which provides detailed information on their scope and application.38

Key Takeaways

  • An investment treaty is an international agreement setting terms for private cross-border investment.
  • These treaties aim to protect foreign investors and encourage foreign direct investment (FDI) by providing legal certainty.
  • Key protections include fair and equitable treatment, national treatment, most-favored-nation treatment, and protection against expropriation.
  • Most investment treaties include investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, allowing investors to pursue international arbitration against host states37.
  • The first modern investment treaty was signed in 1959 between Germany and Pakistan.

Interpreting the Investment Treaty

The interpretation of an investment treaty is primarily governed by the rules codified in Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT)34, 35, 36. Arbitral tribunals, when interpreting a treaty provision, first consider the "ordinary meaning of the terms" in their context and in light of the treaty's object and purpose31, 32, 33. This approach emphasizes the common intention of the signatory states, also known as the home state and the host state30.

Supplementary rules of interpretation, such as recourse to preparatory work of the treaty, may be used if the ordinary meaning is ambiguous or leads to an absurd result29. Furthermore, tribunals consider subsequent agreements between the parties regarding interpretation and any subsequent practice in the application of the treaty28. The unique hybrid nature of investor-state arbitration, where the parties to the dispute (investor and state) are not always the original parties to the treaty, requires careful application of these interpretive rules27.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine "InvestCo," a company from Country A, decides to build a large solar power plant in Country B. Before making this substantial investment, InvestCo's legal team reviews the existing investment treaty between Country A and Country B. The treaty includes provisions on fair and equitable treatment, protection against expropriation, and access to international arbitration in case of a dispute.

Several years after the plant is operational, Country B enacts a new environmental regulation that significantly curtails the plant's operations, leading to a substantial loss of revenue for InvestCo. InvestCo believes this new regulation amounts to an indirect expropriation of its investment, or at least a violation of the fair and equitable treatment standard promised in the investment treaty. Because the investment treaty specifies a mechanism for investor-state dispute settlement, InvestCo can initiate arbitration proceedings against Country B, seeking compensation for its losses, rather than being solely dependent on Country B's domestic court system.

Practical Applications

Investment treaties are fundamental to structuring and safeguarding international investments across various sectors. They appear in global finance and international trade law in several key areas:

  • Protection of Foreign Investment: Investment treaties protect investors from a range of governmental actions, including direct or indirect expropriation without compensation, discriminatory treatment, and unfair administrative actions25, 26. These protections aim to create a secure environment for long-term investments.
  • Encouraging Capital Flows: By providing legal assurances, investment treaties aim to reduce political risk for foreign investors, thereby encouraging companies and individuals to invest in countries that have signed such agreements24.
  • Dispute Resolution: A critical component of almost all investment treaties is the provision for investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). This mechanism allows investors to bring claims directly against a host state before an independent international arbitral tribunal, often under the auspices of bodies like the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), an institution of the World Bank Group.22, 23 This bypasses domestic courts, which may be perceived as less impartial.
  • Shaping Investment Policy: Governments consider their investment treaty obligations when formulating new laws or regulations that could impact foreign investors. This influences policy decisions across various sectors, from environmental regulations to taxation21. A significant resource for understanding these agreements and their implications is the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) database of investment treaties.20

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their widespread adoption, investment treaties face various limitations and criticisms:

  • Constraint on Policy Space: A significant criticism is that investment treaties can limit a government's "policy space" or its ability to regulate in the public interest, such as for environmental protection, public health, or social welfare, without facing costly investor-state dispute settlement claims18, 19. Critics argue that some treaty provisions are broadly interpreted, allowing investors to challenge legitimate regulatory measures16, 17.
  • High Costs of Disputes: Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) proceedings can be very expensive for states, with average combined costs for claimant and respondent parties reaching millions of dollars15. Even the mere initiation of an ISDS claim can negatively impact a country's reputation and potentially lead to a drop in foreign direct investment14.
  • Inconsistency in Interpretation: Arbitration tribunals are not strictly bound by precedent, which can lead to inconsistencies in the interpretation of similar treaty provisions across different cases13. This can create unpredictability in the application of international law12.
  • Asymmetrical Obligations: Investment treaties primarily place enforceable obligations on states, not investors, which some argue creates an imbalance11. The Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) provides analysis on the costs and benefits of these treaties, highlighting the growing concern regarding potential limitations on state sovereignty.10
  • Unproven Benefits: Empirical evidence on whether investment treaties actually lead to increased capital flows or foreign investment is inconclusive, with some studies suggesting no clear link between signing a treaty and higher investment flows7, 8, 9.

Investment Treaty vs. Bilateral Investment Treaty

While often used interchangeably, "investment treaty" is a broader term encompassing various international agreements related to investment, whereas a "Bilateral Investment Treaty" (BIT) is a specific and common type of investment treaty.

An investment treaty is any bilateral treaty or multilateral treaty between countries that addresses issues relevant to cross-border investments, typically for their protection, promotion, and liberalization. This includes BITs, investment chapters within free trade agreements (FTAs), and other specialized agreements.

A Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) is an international agreement specifically between two countries that establishes the terms and conditions for private investment by nationals and companies of one country in the territory of the other6. BITs are the most prevalent form of investment treaty, forming the vast majority of the global network of investment agreements5. They typically focus on the admission, treatment, and protection of foreign investment between the two signatory states. The core difference lies in their scope: all BITs are investment treaties, but not all investment treaties are BITs. For instance, a regional trade agreement like NAFTA that includes an investment chapter would be an investment treaty, but not a stand-alone BIT.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary purpose of an investment treaty?
A: The primary purpose of an investment treaty is to promote and protect foreign investment by providing a stable and predictable legal framework for investors and outlining the standards of treatment they can expect from a host state.

Q: Do investment treaties apply to all types of investments?
A: Most investment treaties cover foreign direct investment (FDI), and many also include portfolio investment. However, the specific definition of "investment" can vary between treaties, so it is crucial to examine the particular treaty's scope.

Q: How are disputes resolved under investment treaties?
A: Disputes under investment treaties are typically resolved through investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), which involves international arbitration. This allows an investor to bring a claim directly against a host state before an independent arbitral tribunal3, 4.

Q: Are investment treaties always beneficial for signatory countries?
A: While designed to attract investment, the benefits of investment treaties, particularly in terms of increased capital flows, are debated and evidence is often inconclusive. Some critics also point to potential limitations on a state's ability to regulate in the public interest without facing expensive disputes2.

Q: What is "fair and equitable treatment" in an investment treaty?
A: "Fair and equitable treatment" is a common provision in investment treaties that generally obligates the host state to treat foreign investments fairly, transparently, and predictably, in accordance with international law. This standard aims to protect investors from arbitrary or discriminatory actions by the government1.