Skip to main content
← Back to I Definitions

Item 10 e of regulation s k

What Is Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K?

Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K is a specific rule set forth by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that governs how public companies disclose non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) financial measures in their filings with the SEC. It falls under the broader umbrella of financial reporting and aims to ensure that investors receive clear, comprehensive, and not misleading financial information. Item 10(e) requires companies to provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP counterparts and to present the GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence.63, 64, 65

History and Origin

The regulatory landscape around non-GAAP financial measures evolved significantly in the early 2000s, primarily driven by concerns about companies potentially using these metrics to obscure their true financial performance. In response to directives from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted two key rules in January 2003: Regulation G and the amendments to Regulation S-K, specifically adding Item 10(e).61, 62

Regulation G applies to any public disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures, whether in SEC filings or other public statements. Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, however, imposes more stringent requirements specifically for documents filed with the SEC, such as annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.58, 59, 60 The goal was to provide investors with more transparent and understandable financial data, particularly concerning metrics that deviate from standard accounting principles.57

Key Takeaways

  • Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K governs the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures in SEC filings.56
  • It mandates that non-GAAP measures be accompanied by a reconciliation to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.54, 55
  • GAAP measures must be presented with equal or greater prominence than non-GAAP measures.52, 53
  • The rule aims to enhance transparency and prevent misleading presentations of financial performance.51
  • Certain adjustments to non-GAAP measures are prohibited under Item 10(e).49, 50

Formula and Calculation

Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K does not prescribe a specific formula or calculation, as it is a disclosure regulation rather than a financial metric itself. Instead, it dictates how companies must present non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliation to GAAP. The core requirement is a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measure and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.47, 48

For instance, if a company presents "Adjusted EBITDA" (a common non-GAAP measure), it must reconcile this figure to its net income or operating income, which are GAAP measures.45, 46 This reconciliation helps users understand how the non-GAAP figure is derived from the standard, audited financial statements.

Interpreting Item 10(e)

Interpreting Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K requires understanding its intent: to prevent companies from selectively presenting financial information in a way that might mislead investors. When a company includes a non-GAAP financial measure in an SEC filing, Item 10(e) mandates several disclosures. These include a presentation, with equal or greater prominence, of the most directly comparable GAAP measure.44 Furthermore, a company must provide a statement explaining why management believes the non-GAAP measure offers useful information to investors regarding the company's financial condition and results of operations.43

The rule also prohibits certain adjustments. For example, a company generally cannot exclude charges or liabilities that require or will require cash settlement from non-GAAP liquidity measures, with the exception of EBIT and EBITDA.41, 42 Companies also cannot adjust a non-GAAP performance measure to eliminate or smooth items identified as non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual if such items are reasonably likely to recur within two years or have occurred in the prior two years.39, 40 These restrictions help ensure that non-GAAP measures provide a more realistic view of a company's ongoing performance.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Tech Innovations Inc." (TII), a publicly traded company that frequently uses "Adjusted Earnings" as a non-GAAP measure in its earnings releases and SEC filings. For its latest quarterly report, TII reports GAAP Net Income of $10 million. However, it also wants to highlight its "Adjusted Earnings" of $12 million, excluding a one-time restructuring charge of $2 million.

Under Item 10(e), TII must:

  1. Present GAAP Net Income prominently: In its filing, TII must show the $10 million GAAP Net Income with at least as much emphasis as the $12 million Adjusted Earnings.
  2. Provide a clear reconciliation: TII would include a table or clear statement showing:
    • Net Income (GAAP): $10 million
    • Add back: Restructuring Charge: $2 million
    • Adjusted Earnings (Non-GAAP): $12 million
  3. Explain the usefulness: TII must state why management believes "Adjusted Earnings" provides valuable insight, perhaps arguing it offers a clearer view of core operational profitability by removing non-recurring events.
  4. Disclose management's use: TII would also disclose if management uses "Adjusted Earnings" for internal performance evaluation or compensation decisions.

This example illustrates how Item 10(e) promotes transparency by requiring a direct comparison to GAAP and a clear explanation of non-GAAP adjustments.

Practical Applications

Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K is a cornerstone of corporate governance and financial disclosure for public companies in the United States. Its primary application is in SEC filings, including:

  • Annual Reports (Form 10-K): Companies routinely present non-GAAP financial measures in their Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section. Item 10(e) mandates the required reconciliation and prominence for these disclosures.
  • Quarterly Reports (Form 10-Q): Similar to annual reports, quarterly filings that include non-GAAP measures must adhere to Item 10(e) requirements.
  • Proxy Statements: When proxy statements discuss executive compensation tied to non-GAAP performance metrics, the underlying measures and their reconciliation must comply with Item 10(e).37, 38 This links to the concept of "Say on Pay" votes, where shareholders have an advisory vote on executive compensation.36
  • Registration Statements: Companies going public or issuing new securities (e.g., in an initial public offering (IPO)) that include non-GAAP measures in their prospectus must comply with Item 10(e).35

The rule ensures that investors, analysts, and other stakeholders can evaluate a company's financial performance using both GAAP and non-GAAP metrics with appropriate context. The SEC consistently provides guidance and updates to Item 10(e) to address evolving disclosure practices and maintain investor protection.33, 34

Limitations and Criticisms

While Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K aims to enhance transparency, it faces certain limitations and criticisms. One challenge lies in the inherent flexibility of non-GAAP measures. Despite the reconciliation requirements, companies still have discretion in defining and adjusting these metrics, which can lead to inconsistencies across different companies or even within the same company over time. This variability can make direct comparisons difficult for investors, potentially hindering effective financial analysis.

Furthermore, critics argue that while Item 10(e) mandates disclosure and reconciliation, it doesn't entirely prevent companies from emphasizing non-GAAP figures that paint a more favorable picture of performance than their GAAP counterparts. Even with equal or greater prominence for GAAP measures, the narrative surrounding the non-GAAP figures can still influence investor perception. Some studies on the broader impact of "Say on Pay," which is related to executive compensation disclosures under SEC rules, have shown mixed results regarding its effectiveness in curbing excessive executive pay or directly linking pay to performance.29, 30, 31, 32

Another limitation is the ongoing effort required by the SEC to provide interpretive guidance as new non-GAAP measures emerge or companies adopt different disclosure practices. The dynamic nature of financial reporting means that regulators must continually refine and clarify the application of Item 10(e) to address potential loopholes or misleading presentations.28 This constant evolution highlights the challenge of perfectly regulating the presentation of alternative financial metrics.

Item 10(e) vs. Regulation G

Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and Regulation G are both rules by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that govern the use of non-GAAP financial measures, but they differ in their scope and stringency.

FeatureItem 10(e) of Regulation S-KRegulation G
ApplicabilityApplies specifically to non-GAAP financial measures included in SEC filings.26, 27Applies to any public disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures, written or oral, including press releases and earnings calls.24, 25
ProminenceRequires the most directly comparable GAAP measure to be presented with equal or greater prominence.22, 23Requires presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP measure, but does not specify prominence.21
Additional DisclosuresMandates detailed disclosures, including reasons for usefulness to investors and management's additional uses.19, 20Primarily focuses on reconciliation and not being materially misleading.17, 18
Prohibited AdjustmentsContains specific prohibitions on certain adjustments to non-GAAP measures (e.g., excluding cash-settled charges from liquidity measures, smoothing recurring items).15, 16Prohibits the use of materially misleading non-GAAP financial measures.14

While Regulation G provides a foundational set of rules for all public disclosures of non-GAAP measures, Item 10(e) imposes more rigorous and detailed requirements specifically for information contained in documents filed with the SEC.13 This distinction is crucial for public companies as they navigate their financial reporting obligations.

FAQs

What is a non-GAAP financial measure?

A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's financial performance, financial position, or cash flows that either excludes amounts that would otherwise be included in, or includes amounts that would otherwise be excluded from, the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).12 Common examples include "Adjusted EBITDA" or "Free Cash Flow."10, 11

Why do companies use non-GAAP financial measures?

Companies often use non-GAAP financial measures to provide what they believe is a clearer picture of their core business operations or performance by excluding certain items that they consider non-recurring, unusual, or not indicative of ongoing results. The intent is to offer investors supplemental insights beyond traditional GAAP metrics.9

What is the purpose of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K?

The purpose of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K is to ensure that when public companies disclose non-GAAP financial measures in their SEC filings, they do so in a way that is transparent, not misleading, and provides adequate context for investors. It mandates reconciliation to GAAP and equal or greater prominence for GAAP measures to help investors make informed decisions.6, 7, 8

Does Item 10(e) apply to all public communications?

No, Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K specifically applies to disclosures of non-GAAP financial measures in documents filed with the SEC, such as annual reports (Form 10-K), quarterly reports (Form 10-Q), and registration statements.3, 4, 5 Public communications not filed with the SEC, like press releases or investor conference calls, are subject to the broader requirements of Regulation G.2

What happens if a company violates Item 10(e)?

Violations of Item 10(e) can lead to SEC enforcement actions, including deficiency letters requiring amendments to filings, and potentially more severe penalties if the violations are deemed material or intentional. The SEC actively reviews company filings for compliance with these disclosure rules.1