Skip to main content
← Back to J Definitions

Joint products

What Are Joint Products?

Joint products are two or more distinct products that are simultaneously created from a single input or a common production process up to a certain point. This point is known as the split-off point, where the products become separately identifiable and can be sold or processed further. A core concept within cost accounting, joint products inherently share initial manufacturing costs until they diverge. The key characteristic of joint products is that they are all significant in terms of their respective sales values or physical output, making each a primary objective of the production.12

History and Origin

The concept of joint products has been a practical consideration for businesses as long as multi-output production processes have existed, particularly in industries dealing with natural resources or complex chemical transformations. For instance, early industrial processes like those in slaughterhouses or lumber mills naturally yielded multiple valuable outputs from a single primary raw materials input. The formalization of accounting for joint products and their associated joint costs developed with the rise of complex manufacturing and process industries in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Industries such as petroleum refining, chemical manufacturing, and food processing became increasingly sophisticated, necessitating methods to assign shared costs to multiple valuable outputs.11 The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) details how modern refineries separate crude oil into various components like gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, illustrating a contemporary example of joint product creation through a shared refining process.10 This simultaneous creation of multiple valuable products from a single input has consistently posed challenges for accurate cost determination and profit analysis.

Key Takeaways

  • Joint products are multiple valuable outputs from a single, common production process that cannot be produced separately.
  • All costs incurred before the products become individually identifiable are considered joint costs.
  • The "sell or process further" decision for joint products is crucial for maximizing profitability.
  • Joint product costing is a specialized area within managerial accounting that focuses on allocating shared costs.
  • Common industries that produce joint products include petrochemicals, meat packing, dairy, and lumber.

Formula and Calculation

While there isn't a single "formula" for joint products themselves, the primary calculation involves the allocation of joint costs to each product. This is crucial for inventory valuation, cost of goods sold, and profitability analysis. Two common methods for cost allocation are the sales value method and the physical quantities method.

1. Sales Value Method:
This method allocates joint costs based on the relative sales value of each product at the split-off point.

Joint Cost Allocated to Product A=Sales Value of Product A at Split-OffTotal Sales Value of All Joint Products at Split-Off×Total Joint Costs\text{Joint Cost Allocated to Product A} = \frac{\text{Sales Value of Product A at Split-Off}}{\text{Total Sales Value of All Joint Products at Split-Off}} \times \text{Total Joint Costs}

Where:

  • Sales Value of Product A at Split-Off: The selling price of Product A multiplied by its quantity at the split-off point.
  • Total Sales Value of All Joint Products at Split-Off: The sum of the sales values of all joint products at the split-off point.
  • Total Joint Costs: All costs incurred up to the split-off point.

2. Physical Quantities Method:
This method allocates joint costs based on a physical measure, such as pounds, gallons, or units, at the split-off point.

Joint Cost Allocated to Product A=Physical Units of Product A at Split-OffTotal Physical Units of All Joint Products at Split-Off×Total Joint Costs\text{Joint Cost Allocated to Product A} = \frac{\text{Physical Units of Product A at Split-Off}}{\text{Total Physical Units of All Joint Products at Split-Off}} \times \text{Total Joint Costs}

Where:

  • Physical Units of Product A at Split-Off: The quantity of Product A in physical units at the split-off point.
  • Total Physical Units of All Joint Products at Split-Off: The sum of the physical units of all joint products at the split-off point.
  • Total Joint Costs: All costs incurred up to the split-off point.

Interpreting Joint Products

Interpreting joint products primarily involves understanding how their shared costs are allocated and how decisions are made regarding their further processing or immediate sale. Since all joint products originate from a common input and process, their individual profitability cannot be determined without allocating the shared joint costs. Management must evaluate the market demand and potential revenue if a joint product is sold at the split-off point versus the additional revenue and incremental cost associated with further processing. This evaluation often involves differential analysis, focusing only on future revenues and costs relevant to the decision, not the sunk joint costs incurred before the split-off point.9 Effective interpretation helps companies optimize their production strategy and pricing for each joint product to maximize overall profitability.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a dairy farm that processes raw milk into two joint products: whole milk and cream. The costs incurred up to the split-off point, including the cost of raw milk, labor, and processing, total $10,000 for a batch. At the split-off point, the batch yields 8,000 liters of whole milk and 2,000 liters of cream.

Suppose the market value at the split-off point is:

  • Whole milk: $1.25 per liter
  • Cream: $3.00 per liter

Using the sales value method to allocate the $10,000 in joint costs:

  1. Calculate total sales value at split-off:

    • Whole Milk Value = 8,000 liters * $1.25/liter = $10,000
    • Cream Value = 2,000 liters * $3.00/liter = $6,000
    • Total Sales Value = $10,000 (Whole Milk) + $6,000 (Cream) = $16,000
  2. Allocate joint costs:

    • Joint Cost Allocated to Whole Milk = ($10,000 / $16,000) * $10,000 = $6,250
    • Joint Cost Allocated to Cream = ($6,000 / $16,000) * $10,000 = $3,750

Now, if the farm considers processing the cream further into butter, which would incur an additional processing cost (incremental cost) of $1,000 and result in butter with a sales value of $5,500. The decision would be whether the incremental revenue ($5,500 - $6,000 = -$500 if comparing directly to cream value; or $5,500 new product revenue vs. $6,000 for selling cream at split-off) from butter outweighs the incremental cost of $1,000. In this case, selling the cream at the split-off point might be more profitable than processing it into butter, as the additional processing incurs a cost greater than the potential increase in revenue.

Practical Applications

Joint products are prevalent across various industries, impacting decision-making in production, cost accounting, and supply chain management.

  • Petroleum Refining: One of the most classic examples, crude oil undergoes a complex refining process to yield a range of joint products, including gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, and asphalt. Each of these products has significant market value. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) provides detailed data on U.S. refinery capacity, which often involves the simultaneous production of these various fuels to meet market demand.8
  • Meat Processing: When livestock is slaughtered, it produces numerous joint products, such as various cuts of meat, hides, and bones, all of which have commercial value.
  • Dairy Industry: Raw milk can be processed into joint products like whole milk, cream, cheese, and butter. The decision to further process any of these products (e.g., cream into butter) depends on additional costs and expected revenue.
  • Lumber Mills: A single log can yield different grades of lumber, plywood, and wood chips, each with distinct market applications. These are all considered joint products of the milling process, influencing the company's production efficiency and pricing strategies.

In these industries, managing joint costs and deciding whether to sell products at the split-off point or incur additional costs for further processing is a critical aspect of financial management.

Limitations and Criticisms

While necessary for internal financial reporting and decision-making, the allocation of joint costs to joint products faces certain limitations and criticisms. A primary critique is that any method of allocating joint costs is inherently arbitrary because these costs are indivisible until the split-off point. The costs are incurred to produce all products simultaneously, not any single one.7

This arbitrary allocation can lead to misleading information for internal decision-making. For example, if joint costs are allocated based on a method that makes one joint product appear unprofitable, management might mistakenly decide to cease its production. However, because joint products are inseparable prior to the split-off point, stopping one product's production would mean stopping all of them, which would likely be detrimental to overall profitability.6

Therefore, when making decisions like whether to "sell or process further" a joint product, it's crucial to disregard the allocated joint costs. Instead, decision-makers should focus only on the incremental revenues and incremental cost associated with the post-split-off processing.5 Overreliance on allocated joint costs for individual product profitability assessments can lead to suboptimal strategic choices, potentially impacting resource allocation and long-term capital expenditures.

Joint Products vs. By-products

The distinction between joint products and by-products is crucial in cost accounting and hinges on their relative economic significance. Joint products are outputs of a common production process, all of which are considered equally or similarly important in terms of their sales value or quantity. The primary goal of the production process is to create all these joint products. For example, in crude oil refining, gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel are all highly valued and intended outputs of the same process.4

In contrast, by-products are incidental outputs of a production process that have relatively low sales value compared to the main product(s). While they have some sales value, they are not the primary reason for initiating the production process. For instance, in the timber industry, if high-grade lumber is the main product, wood chips or sawdust might be considered by-products, even if they can be sold. The accounting treatment differs significantly: joint costs are allocated among joint products, whereas by-products typically have minimal or no joint costs allocated to them, and their revenue is often treated as a reduction in the cost of the main product or as "other income."3

FAQs

What is a "split-off point"?

The split-off point is the stage in a production process where joint products become separately identifiable. Prior to this point, all costs are shared and apply to the collective output. After the split-off point, products can be sold as is or undergo further individual processing.2

Why is cost allocation important for joint products?

Cost allocation for joint products is essential for several reasons: it's required for inventory valuation on the balance sheet, for calculating the cost of goods sold on the income statement, and for internal decision-making, such as setting prices or evaluating product-line profitability. While the allocation itself can be arbitrary, it is necessary for proper financial reporting.

How do companies decide whether to process a joint product further?

Companies use differential analysis to decide whether to sell a joint product at the split-off point or process it further. This involves comparing the incremental revenue from further processing against the additional incremental cost incurred for that processing. Only these future, relevant costs and revenues are considered, not the joint costs already incurred.1