Skip to main content
← Back to J Definitions

Jumpstart our business startups act jobs

What Is Jumpstart our Business Startups Act (JOBS)?

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act is a U.S. federal law enacted on April 5, 2012, designed to encourage the funding of small businesses and startups by easing certain securities regulations. This legislation falls under the broader category of financial regulation, aiming to stimulate economic growth and job creation by making it easier for emerging companies to access capital68, 69. The JOBS Act introduced several key provisions that modified existing securities laws, most notably by expanding opportunities for crowdfunding and streamlining the initial public offering (IPO) process for smaller firms67.

History and Origin

The JOBS Act emerged in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, a period characterized by depressed economic activity and significant challenges for small businesses to secure funding65, 66. Prior to the Act, stringent securities regulations often made it difficult and costly for private companies to raise capital, particularly from a broad base of investors63, 64. The Securities Act of 1933, for instance, imposed extensive registration requirements for public offerings, which proved prohibitive for many smaller ventures62.

In response to these challenges and with bipartisan support, the JOBS Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama on April 5, 201261. The stated goal was to revitalize the small business sector, foster innovation, and put Americans back to work by reducing regulatory burdens and democratizing access to capital60. The Act allowed companies to raise capital in ways that were previously restricted, such as through broader public solicitation and by enabling non-accredited investors to participate in certain offerings59.

The implementation of the JOBS Act was staggered, with different titles becoming effective at various times. For example, Title II, which lifted the ban on general solicitation for certain private placements, was implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 23, 201358. The rules for Title III, known as Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF), which created a pathway for companies to use crowdfunding to issue securities to a wider public, went live on May 16, 201657.

Key Takeaways

  • The JOBS Act, enacted in 2012, aimed to simplify capital raising for small businesses and startups.
  • It loosened various securities regulations, including those related to general solicitation and public offerings for emerging companies.
  • A major impact of the JOBS Act was the facilitation of equity crowdfunding, allowing non-accredited investors to invest in startups56.
  • The Act created the category of "emerging growth companies" (EGCs), which benefit from reduced regulatory and disclosure requirements for a period after an IPO55.
  • While designed to spur job creation and economic activity, the JOBS Act also faced criticisms regarding potential risks to investor protection due to relaxed regulations54.

Interpreting the JOBS Act

The JOBS Act fundamentally altered how small businesses and startups can seek capital formation in the United States. Its core interpretation revolves around fostering an environment where smaller entities can more readily secure the necessary funds to grow and innovate, bypassing some of the traditional, more onerous requirements of public markets.

A key aspect is the shift towards enabling broader participation in early-stage investments. Before the JOBS Act, many private offerings were limited to accredited investors, typically individuals or entities with significant income or net worth53. The Act, particularly through Regulation Crowdfunding (Title III) and changes to Regulation A (Title IV, or Regulation A+), opened doors for non-accredited investors to participate, albeit with certain limits to mitigate risk52. This means that a wider pool of individuals can now directly invest in promising startups, potentially democratizing access to venture-style investments50, 51.

Furthermore, for companies designated as Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs), the JOBS Act provides a reduced regulatory burden, including less extensive financial reporting and disclosure requirements for a period49. This "IPO On-Ramp" is intended to make the path to becoming a public company more appealing and less costly for smaller firms, encouraging them to access public capital markets sooner48.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine "GreenTech Innovations," a hypothetical startup developing sustainable energy solutions. Before the JOBS Act, GreenTech Innovations would largely be limited to seeking funding from venture capital firms or angel investors, which often involved lengthy and exclusive negotiation processes. If they wanted to raise capital from a broader investor base, they would face the extensive and costly process of registering their securities with the SEC, similar to a large, established corporation.

With the JOBS Act in effect, GreenTech Innovations could leverage the provisions of Regulation Crowdfunding. They could establish an online offering through an SEC-registered funding portal, seeking to raise up to $5 million in a 12-month period from a large number of individual investors, regardless of their accredited status47. For example, they might seek $100 investments from 50,000 individuals who are passionate about renewable energy. This approach allows GreenTech Innovations to tap into a wider community of supporters and consumers, transforming them into investors and potentially building a strong, engaged shareholder base.

Alternatively, if GreenTech Innovations aimed to raise a larger sum, say $25 million, they could utilize Regulation A+ (Tier 2), which permits offerings of up to $75 million (originally $50 million) to both accredited and non-accredited investors, with fewer regulatory hurdles than a full IPO45, 46. This allows the company to reach a significant market without the full compliance burden and costs associated with a traditional public offering.

Practical Applications

The JOBS Act has several practical applications across the financial landscape:

  • Startup Funding: The most direct application is enabling startups and small businesses to raise capital through avenues like equity crowdfunding and expanded Regulation A offerings. This allows companies to bypass traditional funding sources such as venture capital or bank loans, accessing a broader base of investors43, 44.
  • Reduced Regulatory Burden: For "Emerging Growth Companies" (EGCs), the JOBS Act reduces certain disclosure and reporting requirements during and after their IPO, aiming to make going public a more attractive option42. This can lead to cost savings and a faster path to public listing.
  • General Solicitation: Title II of the JOBS Act lifted the ban on general solicitation and advertising for certain private placements, allowing companies to publicly market their offerings to accredited investors. This broadens the reach for companies seeking private capital40, 41.
  • Investor Access: For individual investors, especially those who are not accredited, the JOBS Act expanded opportunities to invest in early-stage private companies that were previously inaccessible39. This has facilitated a new asset class for a wider range of investors, though it comes with inherent investment risks38.
  • Financial Innovation: The Act has spurred the growth of online funding portals and platforms that connect businesses with potential investors, fostering innovation in the financial technology sector36, 37.

The SEC continues to monitor and update the rules stemming from the JOBS Act to adapt to market conditions and ensure its objectives are met35.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its stated goals of fostering job creation and economic growth by easing regulatory burdens for small businesses, the JOBS Act has faced notable limitations and criticisms. A primary concern among critics is the potential for reduced investor protection due to the relaxed disclosure and oversight requirements34. Opponents argued that the loosened regulations could increase the risk of fraud and make it more difficult for investors to obtain reliable information about the companies they are funding32, 33.

For instance, while Title III (Regulation Crowdfunding) opened doors for non-accredited investors, concerns were raised about the cap on investment amounts and the sufficiency of disclosures for smaller startups31. Critics also highlighted that the SEC, despite being solely responsible for policing this new market, might lack adequate funding and resources to effectively monitor these relatively small, localized securities offerings30.

Some analyses have questioned the overall impact of the JOBS Act on job creation, innovation, and entrepreneurship, suggesting that it may not have gone far enough to support small businesses or that alternative funding mechanisms, such as traditional private placements, remain more prevalent29. Additionally, the complexity and implementation of certain titles, such as the initial rules for Regulation Crowdfunding, were seen as cumbersome, potentially making them unworkable for very small businesses28.

Concerns also extend to the "IPO On-Ramp" provisions, with some arguing that by reducing regulatory requirements for "emerging growth companies," the Act could lead to less transparency in the public markets, potentially harming investor confidence26, 27. The debate continues regarding whether the benefits of increased capital access for startups outweigh the potential drawbacks related to diminished investor safeguards.

Jumpstart our Business Startups Act (JOBS) vs. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) are both significant pieces of U.S. legislation that influenced businesses, but they differ fundamentally in their primary objectives and mechanisms.

FeatureJumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) ActTax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)
Primary ObjectiveTo ease securities regulations for small businesses and startups to facilitate capital formation and job creation.24, 25To reform the U.S. tax code by reducing corporate and individual income tax rates and simplifying tax filings.22, 23
CategoryFinancial Regulation, Securities LawTax Law, Fiscal Policy
Enactment DateApril 5, 2012December 22, 201721
Key MechanismsExpanded crowdfunding (e.g., Reg CF), revised Regulation A (Reg A+), loosened IPO requirements for EGCs, lifted general solicitation ban.18, 19, 20Lowered corporate tax rate (from 35% to 21%), reduced individual income tax rates, increased standard deduction, limited state and local tax (SALT) deductions, introduced qualified business income (QBI) deduction.16, 17
FocusHow businesses raise money from investors.How businesses and individuals are taxed on their income.
ImpactAimed to democratize access to private equity and public markets for smaller companies, and provide new investment opportunities for a broader range of investors.13, 14, 15Sought to stimulate economic activity by reducing the tax burden on corporations and individuals, influencing after-tax income and corporate investment decisions.11, 12

While both acts aimed to stimulate economic growth, the JOBS Act focused on removing regulatory barriers related to raising capital and going public, while the TCJA primarily addressed tax liabilities and incentives for businesses and individuals9, 10. The JOBS Act affects the process of securities offerings, whereas the TCJA directly impacts taxable income and deductions.

FAQs

What does the JOBS Act primarily aim to achieve?

The JOBS Act primarily aims to encourage the growth of small businesses and startups by easing various securities regulations, thereby making it easier for these companies to raise capital and create jobs8.

How does the JOBS Act affect everyday investors?

The JOBS Act, particularly through Title III (Regulation Crowdfunding) and Title IV (Regulation A+), allows everyday, non-accredited investors to invest in early-stage companies and startups, which was largely restricted prior to the Act7.

What is an "Emerging Growth Company" under the JOBS Act?

An Emerging Growth Company (EGC) is a classification created by the JOBS Act for companies with less than $1.07 billion in annual gross revenues during their most recently completed fiscal year. EGCs benefit from reduced reporting and disclosure requirements during their IPO process and for up to five years thereafter6.

Does the JOBS Act eliminate all regulations for startups?

No, the JOBS Act does not eliminate all regulations. Instead, it provides exemptions and eases certain regulatory burdens to make capital raising more efficient for small businesses, while still maintaining some investor protections and oversight by the SEC5. For instance, companies raising funds through Regulation Crowdfunding must use an SEC-registered intermediary3, 4.

Is crowdfunding the only provision of the JOBS Act?

No, while crowdfunding is a significant and well-known provision, the JOBS Act consists of several titles, each addressing different aspects of capital formation. Other key provisions include changes to Regulation A (Regulation A+), the lifting of the general solicitation ban for certain private placements, and modified IPO rules for Emerging Growth Companies1, 2.