Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to L Definitions

Land equivalent

What Is Land Equivalent Ratio?

The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) is an agricultural metric used to compare the productivity of mixed cropping systems, known as polyculture or intercropping, with that of growing crops separately in a monoculture system. Within the broader field of investment analysis related to real assets, understanding LER can be crucial for evaluating the efficiency and potential returns of agricultural land investments that involve diverse planting strategies. This ratio quantifies how much more (or less) efficient a polyculture system is in utilizing land compared to monoculture, providing a benchmark for sustainable land management and potentially higher overall yield from a given area.

History and Origin

The concept of the Land Equivalent Ratio emerged from agricultural research focused on optimizing land use and maximizing food production, particularly in the context of increasing global populations and finite arable land. Its development reflects a growing interest in understanding the ecological and economic advantages of growing multiple crops together. Researchers and farmers in the early to mid-20th century explored various methods to enhance agricultural productivity and resource efficiency. The LER was formalized as a key quantitative tool to assess the advantages of intercropping systems. It gained prominence as a standard measure for evaluating the biological efficiency of intercropping, demonstrating how complementary resource use by different plant species could lead to higher overall output from the same unit of land. The Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education (SARE) program, a part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), provides extensive resources on intercropping and metrics like LER, highlighting its role in modern sustainable agricultural practices.4

Key Takeaways

  • The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) measures the productivity advantage of growing multiple crops together (polyculture) versus growing them separately (monoculture).
  • An LER greater than 1.0 indicates that the intercropping system is more efficient in land use than cultivating the crops individually.
  • LER helps farmers and investors evaluate sustainable farming practices that can lead to increased output and potentially higher income from agricultural land.
  • It is a biological efficiency metric and does not directly account for economic factors like labor costs or market prices, which are essential for overall profitability.
  • LER is a foundational concept in agroecology and sustainable agriculture, guiding decisions on crop rotation and diversified farming systems.

Formula and Calculation

The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) for an intercropping system with (n) different crops is calculated as the sum of the relative yields of each individual crop.

For two crops (Crop A and Crop B), the formula is:

LER=Yintercrop,AYsole,A+Yintercrop,BYsole,BLER = \frac{Y_{intercrop, A}}{Y_{sole, A}} + \frac{Y_{intercrop, B}}{Y_{sole, B}}

Where:

  • (Y_{intercrop, A}) = Yield of Crop A when grown in the intercropping system.
  • (Y_{sole, A}) = Yield of Crop A when grown as a monoculture on the same area.
  • (Y_{intercrop, B}) = Yield of Crop B when grown in the intercropping system.
  • (Y_{sole, B}) = Yield of Crop B when grown as a monoculture on the same area.

For a system with (n) crops, the general formula is:

LER=∑i=1nYintercrop,iYsole,iLER = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{Y_{intercrop, i}}{Y_{sole, i}}

Each fraction ((Y_{intercrop, i} / Y_{sole, i})) represents the partial LER for that specific crop, indicating the proportion of land required under monoculture to achieve the same yield as in the intercrop. The sum of these partial LERs gives the total Land Equivalent Ratio. A total LER greater than 1.0 signifies a land-use advantage of the intercropping system.

Interpreting the Land Equivalent Ratio

The interpretation of the Land Equivalent Ratio centers on its numerical value relative to 1.0. An LER equal to 1.0 suggests that the intercropping system provides the same total yield as growing the component crops separately on an equivalent area of land. In such a scenario, there is no particular advantage or disadvantage to intercropping in terms of land use efficiency.

When the LER is greater than 1.0, it indicates that the intercropping system is more productive per unit of land than the monoculture system. For example, an LER of 1.25 means that 1 hectare of intercropped land produces as much as 1.25 hectares would if the crops were grown separately. This positive LER suggests that the different crops in the polyculture system are utilizing resources like sunlight, water, and nutrients more efficiently due to complementary growth habits or reduced competition. This efficiency can translate to higher overall output from a finite land resource, which is a key consideration for sustainable investing in agriculture.

Conversely, an LER less than 1.0 suggests that the intercropping system is less efficient than monoculture, meaning a larger area of intercropped land would be needed to achieve the same yield as a smaller area of monoculture. This could happen if there is significant competition between the intercropped species, or if the chosen combination is not well-suited for the environment. Therefore, the Land Equivalent Ratio serves as a vital indicator for assessing the ecological advantages of diversified cropping systems and informing decisions about asset allocation in agricultural ventures.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a farmer, Sarah, who is evaluating the productivity of her corn and bean fields. She wants to see if intercropping them would be more efficient than growing them separately.

Scenario 1: Monoculture

  • Sarah grows corn on 1 acre and harvests 100 bushels of corn.
  • She grows beans on another 1 acre and harvests 50 bushels of beans.

Scenario 2: Intercropping

  • Sarah intercrops corn and beans on a single 1-acre plot.
  • From this 1 acre, she harvests 70 bushels of corn and 35 bushels of beans.

To calculate the Land Equivalent Ratio:

  1. Partial LER for Corn:
    (Y_{intercrop, Corn} / Y_{sole, Corn} = 70 \text{ bushels} / 100 \text{ bushels} = 0.7)

  2. Partial LER for Beans:
    (Y_{intercrop, Beans} / Y_{sole, Beans} = 35 \text{ bushels} / 50 \text{ bushels} = 0.7)

  3. Total LER:
    (LER = 0.7 + 0.7 = 1.4)

In this hypothetical example, the Land Equivalent Ratio of 1.4 indicates that Sarah's intercropped corn and bean field is 40% more productive in terms of land use than if she had grown the two crops separately. This highlights a significant diversification benefit from the combined cultivation, making more efficient use of her available land.

Practical Applications

The Land Equivalent Ratio finds significant practical application in modern agriculture, particularly in promoting and evaluating sustainable agriculture practices. Farmers utilize LER to make informed decisions about implementing intercropping systems, which can enhance overall farm productivity and resilience. For instance, LER helps assess the efficiency of combining crops like maize and soybeans, revealing combinations that maximize outputs per unit of land.3

Beyond direct farming, LER is relevant in the context of alternative investments, specifically in real estate investment involving agricultural assets. Investors and land managers can use LER as a key financial metric to evaluate the potential of different farming strategies to generate higher returns from a given parcel of land. By identifying intercropping systems with an LER greater than 1.0, investors can target agricultural operations that demonstrate superior land utilization efficiency, potentially leading to increased farm income and improved financial performance. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service (ERS) tracks and reports on farm income and wealth, providing broader context for how efficient land use, as measured by LER, contributes to the economic viability of agricultural enterprises.2

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) is a valuable tool for assessing the biological efficiency of intercropping systems, it has certain limitations. One primary criticism is that LER focuses solely on yield and biological productivity, often overlooking critical economic and management factors. For instance, a high LER might not necessarily translate into higher economic net income for a farmer. The profitability of an intercropping system also depends on factors like labor costs, input prices (e.g., seeds, fertilizers), market demand, and the relative market prices of the individual crops. An intercropping system might require more intensive labor or specialized equipment, which could offset the yield advantage indicated by a high LER.

Furthermore, LER does not account for the potential for reduced risk through diversification or other ecological benefits, such as improved1