Skip to main content
← Back to L Definitions

Layoffs and discharges

What Are Layoffs and Discharges?

Layoffs and discharges refer to involuntary separations from employment initiated by the employer, encompassing a crucial aspect of the labor market within the broader field of Labor Economics. Layoffs typically occur due to economic factors, such as a company's financial downturn, a need for corporate restructuring, or reduced demand for products or services. These are generally not performance-related. Discharges, conversely, are involuntary separations that occur for cause, such as poor employee performance, misconduct, or policy violations. While distinct in their underlying reasons, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) groups "layoffs and discharges" together in its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) to track employer-initiated separations.

History and Origin

The concept of employer-initiated separations has existed as long as formalized employment. However, the systematic tracking and legal frameworks surrounding mass involuntary job losses gained prominence in modern industrial economies. Mass layoffs became a more frequent and visible feature of the economic landscape, particularly in the latter half of the 20th century, often in response to economic downturns, global competition, and shifts in corporate strategy.

A significant development in the United States was the enactment of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act in 1988. This federal law was designed to protect workers, their families, and communities by requiring most employers with 100 or more employees to provide 60 calendar days' advance notice of plant closings and mass layoffs. The WARN Act aims to give affected employees sufficient time to prepare for job loss, seek new employment, or pursue retraining opportunities.19, 20 Prior to such legislation, large-scale job eliminations often occurred with little to no notice, exacerbating the financial and social impact on affected individuals. The increasing frequency of mass layoffs has led to extensive research on their profound and lasting "scarring effects" on workers' lifetime earnings and overall well-being.18

Key Takeaways

  • Layoffs and discharges are employer-initiated separations from employment.
  • Layoffs are typically driven by economic or business restructuring, while discharges are for performance or conduct reasons.
  • They are a key economic indicator, reflecting the health of the business cycle and labor market.
  • The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act requires advance notice for certain mass layoffs and plant closings in the U.S.17
  • High rates of layoffs and discharges can signal economic contraction and lead to decreased consumer spending and broader economic slowdowns.

Interpreting Layoffs and Discharges

The number and rate of layoffs and discharges provide valuable insights into the state of the economy and the health of the job market. When these numbers are low, it generally indicates a strong economy with high job security and robust employer demand for labor. Conversely, a significant increase in layoffs and discharges often signals an impending or ongoing economic downturn, as businesses shed workers to cut costs in response to reduced demand or uncertainty.

Economists and policymakers closely monitor data on layoffs and discharges, such as that provided by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) through its JOLTS report.15, 16 This data helps assess labor market dynamics, identify trends in employer behavior, and forecast broader economic performance, including potential shifts in the unemployment rate. For example, a recent BLS report indicated that layoffs and discharges were largely unchanged in June 2025 at 1.6 million, following a slight decrease from May, suggesting a gradually cooling but resilient labor market.13, 14

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Tech Solutions Inc.," a hypothetical software development company. Facing an unexpected decline in demand for its primary product and increased operating costs, the company decides to reduce its workforce to maintain profitability. Management determines that 15% of its 400 employees, or 60 individuals, must be let go.

Since the number of affected employees (60) is more than 50 and constitutes more than 33% of its workforce, and assuming Tech Solutions Inc. meets the employee threshold of 100 or more, the company would be required under the WARN Act to provide at least 60 days' advance notice to these employees. This action is classified as a mass layoff, an example of employer-initiated separation due to economic conditions rather than individual employee performance. Employees who are laid off might receive a severance package to help with the transition.

Practical Applications

Layoffs and discharges have practical implications across various financial and economic domains:

  • Economic Analysis: As part of the JOLTS data, layoffs and discharges are a key component for analysts tracking labor market fluidity and the overall pace of economic activity. A rise in these numbers can indicate weakening supply and demand for labor.12
  • Corporate Strategy: Businesses utilize layoffs as a tool for cost control, efficiency improvement, and corporate restructuring during challenging periods or strategic shifts. This directly impacts a firm's balance sheet.
  • Individual Financial Planning: For individuals, understanding the risks associated with involuntary job loss is crucial for developing robust personal finance strategies, including emergency savings and unemployment insurance considerations.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Companies must adhere to federal and state regulations, such as the WARN Act, when conducting large-scale layoffs to avoid legal penalties.11 Additionally, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment, ensuring that discharges are not based on protected characteristics like race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability.9, 10

Limitations and Criticisms

While sometimes deemed necessary for business survival or efficiency, layoffs and discharges carry significant limitations and criticisms. From an economic perspective, mass layoffs can create a "scarring effect" on affected workers, leading to long-term reductions in earnings and career progression, even for those who eventually find new employment.8 Beyond the direct financial impact, there can be substantial non-economic costs, including psychological distress for laid-off individuals.

Furthermore, mass layoffs can negatively impact the employee morale and productivity of the remaining workforce, as fear of future job cuts can lead to reduced engagement and increased stress. Critics argue that short-term cost savings from layoffs often come at the expense of long-term organizational knowledge, human capital, and reputation. Some analyses suggest that mass layoffs, particularly in the U.S., have become a more accepted practice even in strong economic times, driven in part by pressures to boost shareholder value.7 This approach can be seen as undermining stable employment opportunities, which some argue is a foundational element of modern democratic societies.6

Layoffs and Discharges vs. Quits

The primary distinction between layoffs and discharges and Quits lies in who initiates the separation from employment.

FeatureLayoffs and DischargesQuits
InitiatorEmployerEmployee
ReasonEconomic reasons, restructuring, performance, misconductVoluntary resignation, new job opportunity, dissatisfaction
Implication (Labor)Indicates weakening demand for labor, economic contractionIndicates worker confidence, strong labor market, wage growth

Layoffs and discharges are involuntary separations, representing instances where an employer ends the employment relationship. Quits, on the other hand, are voluntary separations, indicating an employee's decision to leave a job. A high number of quits often signals a robust job market, where workers feel confident in finding new or better opportunities, whereas a rise in layoffs and discharges suggests a tightening market or economic uncertainty.

FAQs

What is the difference between a layoff and a firing?

A layoff typically occurs when a company eliminates a position or reduces its workforce due to economic conditions, restructuring, or other business reasons, not due to the employee's performance. A firing, or discharge, is an involuntary termination specifically due to an employee's performance, conduct, or violation of company policy.

How are layoffs and discharges measured?

In the United States, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) collects and reports data on layoffs and discharges as part of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). This data provides insights into the dynamics of the labor market by tracking employer-initiated separations.5

What rights do employees have during a layoff?

Employee rights during a layoff can vary by jurisdiction and company policy. In the U.S., the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act requires certain employers to provide advance notice of mass layoffs or plant closings.4 Employees may also be entitled to a severance package, continuation of benefits, or unemployment insurance. Discrimination laws, enforced by agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), also protect employees from discriminatory layoffs or discharges.3

Do layoffs always indicate a bad economy?

While a significant increase in layoffs and discharges often signals an economic slowdown or recession, isolated layoffs by individual companies may occur due to specific business challenges or strategic changes, even in an otherwise healthy economy. However, widespread increases across multiple sectors are a strong economic indicator of broader economic weakness.

How do layoffs impact the overall economy?

Mass layoffs can lead to reduced consumer spending as unemployed individuals cut back on expenditures, which can then slow down economic growth. They can also increase demand for social services and negatively affect local communities, and may even depress wages for those who remain employed due to reduced bargaining power.1, 2