Skip to main content
← Back to L Definitions

Legal remedies

What Are Legal Remedies?

Legal remedies are judicial measures intended to compensate a party for a loss or injury suffered due to another's wrongful act, typically in the context of civil disputes. These remedies primarily originate from the common law tradition and often involve monetary compensation, aiming to restore the injured party to the financial position they would have been in had the wrong not occurred. As a core component of the broader legal system, legal remedies play a critical role in contract law, tort law, and various regulatory frameworks, ensuring accountability and fairness within the civil justice system. Parties seeking a legal remedy typically initiate a civil suit to enforce their right and obtain appropriate monetary relief.

History and Origin

The concept of legal remedies is deeply rooted in the historical development of the English common law system. Originally, common law courts provided remedies that were largely rigid and limited, primarily offering monetary compensation, known as damages, to redress injuries27. The common law system operated through specific "writs" for different types of claims, and if a plaintiff's grievance did not fit an existing writ, no remedy was available, regardless of the merits of the claim25, 26.

This rigidity and the inability of common law courts to provide flexible solutions led to the emergence of a parallel system of justice known as equity. Litigants who found no adequate recourse in common law courts began petitioning the King, who delegated these matters to the Lord Chancellor23, 24. This process evolved into the Court of Chancery, which developed a new set of judicial remedies, known as equitable remedies, to provide more flexible and discretionary relief, such as injunctions or specific performance22. Despite the eventual merger of law and equity courts in many jurisdictions, the distinction between legal and equitable remedies remains significant, with legal remedies typically referring to monetary awards and equitable remedies to non-monetary court orders.

Key Takeaways

  • Legal remedies are primarily concerned with providing monetary compensation to an injured party.
  • They aim to restore the plaintiff to the position they would have occupied had the wrong not occurred.
  • Common examples include various forms of damages, such as compensatory damages and punitive damages.
  • Legal remedies are considered a "right" if a wrong is proven, unlike equitable remedies which are granted at the court's discretion.

Interpreting Legal Remedies

Interpreting legal remedies involves understanding the specific type and amount of compensation awarded to a wronged party. The primary goal of legal remedies, particularly in areas like contract law, is to make the non-breaching party "whole" or to put them in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed as agreed20, 21. This is often achieved through an award of monetary damages.

For instance, in a case of breach of contract, a court will assess the financial loss directly attributable to the breach. This might include lost profits, expenses incurred due to the breach, or the difference in value of the promised performance versus the received performance. The interpretation focuses on the quantifiable financial impact on the plaintiff, rather than compelling specific actions from the defendant.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a scenario where Sarah, a small business owner, enters into a contract with Tech Solutions Inc. for custom software development. The contract specifies a delivery date of June 1st and a price of $50,000. Sarah has already paid $20,000 as a down payment.

Tech Solutions Inc. fails to deliver the software by June 1st and subsequently announces they are unable to complete the project, constituting a breach of contract. Due to this delay, Sarah loses out on a major client contract worth $30,000, which she could have secured with the new software. She also has to hire another developer, incurring an additional $10,000 in costs to get the software developed elsewhere.

In a civil suit, Sarah would seek legal remedies. The court would likely award her:

  1. Refund of Down Payment: The $20,000 she paid to Tech Solutions Inc.
  2. Consequential Damages: The $30,000 in lost profits from the client contract, as this loss was a foreseeable consequence of the breach.
  3. Incidental Damages: The $10,000 extra cost to hire a new developer.

The total legal remedy awarded to Sarah would be $20,000 + $30,000 + $10,000 = $60,000. This monetary award aims to put Sarah in the financial position she would have been in had Tech Solutions Inc. fulfilled its contractual obligations.

Practical Applications

Legal remedies are widely applied across various domains of finance and commerce. In the financial markets, they are crucial for maintaining integrity and protecting participants. For instance, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) frequently employs legal remedies in its enforcement actions against violations of securities law. The SEC can seek various forms of monetary relief, including disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and civil penalties, to address misconduct and deter future violations17, 18, 19. These actions underscore the commitment to investor protection by ensuring that those who violate regulations are held financially accountable16.

Beyond regulatory enforcement, legal remedies are fundamental in commercial disputes. In cases of breach of contract, such as those involving supply agreements, mergers and acquisitions, or financial instruments, legal remedies like compensatory damages are routinely awarded to compensate the non-breaching party for their quantifiable losses14, 15. The goal is not to punish the breaching party but to restore the injured party to the financial state they would have achieved had the agreement been honored13. This practical application of legal remedies provides a crucial framework for risk management and dispute resolution in business transactions. The Securities and Exchange Commission's remedies for enforcement actions can include civil penalties and disgorgement, as discussed in a speech by a Co-Director of the Division of Enforcement12.

Limitations and Criticisms

While essential for justice, legal remedies have certain limitations. A primary criticism is that monetary compensation cannot always fully address the harm suffered, especially when the loss is non-financial or unique10, 11. For instance, a breach of contract involving a unique piece of art or a specialized service might cause harm that is not fully repairable by money alone. In such cases, equitable remedies might be more appropriate.

Furthermore, legal remedies are generally restricted by principles like foreseeability and certainty. To recover damages, the losses must typically have been a foreseeable consequence of the wrongful act, and their amount must be proven with reasonable certainty8, 9. This can sometimes leave parties unable to recover for losses that are speculative or indirect, even if they genuinely resulted from the other party's conduct. The pursuit of legal remedies can also be costly and time-consuming, potentially discouraging smaller parties from seeking redress7.

Another limitation lies in the concept of efficient breach, where a party might intentionally breach a contract if the financial gain from the breach, even after paying damages, outweighs the cost of performance5, 6. While legally permissible, this concept highlights that legal remedies often act as a price for non-performance rather than a deterrent against it. Nicholas B. Cornell, in "What Do We Remedy?", discusses how remedies are not exclusively responsive to primary rights violations, implying that the selection and quantum of relief are influenced by various ex-post facts beyond just the initial wrong, which can be seen as a limitation on the direct linkage between wrong and remedy4.

Legal Remedies vs. Equitable Remedies

Legal remedies and equitable remedies represent two distinct categories of relief available in a legal system, stemming from the historical division between common law courts and courts of equity. The key distinction lies in their nature and availability.

FeatureLegal RemediesEquitable Remedies
Primary FormMonetary compensation (damages)Non-monetary orders (e.g., injunction, specific performance)
AvailabilityAvailable as a matter of right upon proving a legal wrongDiscretionary, granted only when monetary damages are inadequate
PurposeTo compensate for quantifiable losses, make the party "whole" financiallyTo compel or prohibit specific actions, prevent irreparable harm, or achieve fairness beyond monetary compensation
Historical OriginCommon law courtsCourt of Chancery (equity courts)

Confusion often arises because modern legal systems have largely merged the courts of law and equity, meaning a single court can now grant both types of remedies. However, the fundamental principles governing when each type of remedy is appropriate still apply. A party seeking a legal remedy primarily aims for financial redress, while a party seeking an equitable remedy typically desires a specific action or cessation of an action, especially when financial compensation would be insufficient or inappropriate to rectify the harm3.

FAQs

What is the main purpose of legal remedies?

The main purpose of legal remedies is to compensate an injured party for financial losses or injuries they have sustained due to another party's wrongful act, aiming to restore them to the position they would have been in had the wrong not occurred2.

Are all legal remedies monetary?

Yes, legal remedies are predominantly monetary, typically taking the form of various types of damages. Non-monetary forms of relief, such as forcing a party to perform an action or stop an action, fall under the category of equitable remedies.

Can I choose between a legal remedy and an equitable remedy?

Whether you can choose depends on the nature of the harm and the specific circumstances of your case. Generally, legal remedies are sought first. If monetary relief is deemed insufficient to make you whole, a court may then consider granting an equitable remedy, which is discretionary1.

What are some common examples of legal remedies?

Common examples of legal remedies include compensatory damages (to cover actual losses), punitive damages (to punish egregious conduct), and nominal damages (a small sum awarded when a right is violated but no substantial loss occurred). These are all forms of financial compensation.