Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to L Definitions

Lehman brothers adjustable rate mortgage index

Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index

The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index was a specialized benchmark index within the broader category of fixed-income indices that tracked the performance of agency-guaranteed securities with coupons that periodically adjusted based on a published index. This index provided a crucial measure for investors to gauge the performance and characteristics of a specific segment of the mortgage-backed securities (MBS) market. It was particularly relevant for understanding the dynamics of adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), which feature interest rates that change over time, unlike fixed-rate mortgages. The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index played a role in the landscape of bond market analysis before its dissolution following the 2008 financial crisis.

History and Origin

The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index was part of the extensive family of bond indices developed by Lehman Brothers, a prominent global investment banking firm. While Lehman Brothers launched its first fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities index in 1986, the U.S. Hybrid Adjustable-Rate Mortgage (ARM) Index, a component that would fall under the umbrella of broader Lehman indices related to ARMs, was specifically introduced on August 1, 2005. This creation was driven by the increasing relevance of hybrid ARMs and investor demand for a dedicated performance metric, reflecting a surge in their issuance and securitization activity between 2001 and 2005. At its inception, this index covered approximately $275 billion in outstanding agency hybrid ARMs, signifying their growing presence in financial markets.

However, the firm's deep involvement in the subprime mortgage market ultimately led to its downfall. Lehman Brothers had significantly expanded its mortgage origination business, acquiring lenders like Aurora Loan Services and BNC Mortgage LLC, and becoming a major force in the subprime sector by the early 2000s. By 2008, the firm held substantial positions in risky subprime and other lower-rated mortgage tranches. The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index, while a tool for measurement, existed within a market segment that was rapidly deteriorating. The climax of this crisis came on September 15, 2008, when Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, marking the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history and a defining moment of the Subprime Mortgage Crisis. Following the bankruptcy, Barclays acquired Lehman's North American investment banking and capital markets businesses, including its index family9. These indices were subsequently rebranded as Barclays Capital Indices and later, after an acquisition by Bloomberg in 2016, became part of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index series8.

Key Takeaways

  • The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index was a specialized benchmark for agency-guaranteed adjustable-rate mortgage securities.
  • It was developed to track the performance of ARMs, which gained significant market presence in the early 2000s.
  • The index's existence was tied to Lehman Brothers, an investment bank whose heavy exposure to the subprime mortgage market contributed to its collapse in 2008.
  • While the specific index no longer exists under the Lehman Brothers name, its underlying methodologies and components were absorbed into broader fixed-income benchmarks.
  • Its history underscores the rapid growth and subsequent risks associated with the adjustable-rate mortgage market leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.

Interpreting the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index

Interpreting the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index involved understanding its movements relative to broader fixed-income securities and other mortgage-backed security benchmarks. An upward trend in the index indicated strong performance of the underlying adjustable-rate mortgage securities, potentially driven by stable housing markets, low credit risk, and favorable interest rate environments. Conversely, a decline would signal weakening performance, often linked to rising defaults, prepayment risk, or increasing interest rate risk for investors holding these securities.

Given that the index focused on adjustable-rate mortgages, its performance was highly sensitive to changes in the underlying reference rates to which ARM coupons were tied, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or Treasury rates. Investors would analyze the index to assess the health of the ARM segment of the housing market, identify potential liquidity issues, or evaluate the relative attractiveness of ARMs compared to fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities within their portfolios. The index provided insights into the aggregate behavior of these dynamic mortgage products, helping financial professionals to assess market sentiment and risk exposures.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine it is mid-2007, and an investor is reviewing the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index. The index has been showing signs of volatility and a slight downward trend over the past few months.

  1. Initial Observation: The investor notes that the index's value has decreased by 2% over the last quarter, while a comparable fixed-rate MBS index has only declined by 0.5%.
  2. Underlying Analysis: They delve deeper and find that the primary reason for the decline in the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index is an uptick in delinquencies and foreclosures on subprime adjustable-rate mortgages. The adjusting interest rates on many of these loans have reset to higher levels, making payments unaffordable for many borrowers.
  3. Market Context: The investor also observes that housing prices in certain regions, which underpin the value of these mortgage-backed securities, are starting to stagnate or even fall. This contributes to negative equity for some homeowners, increasing the likelihood of default.
  4. Portfolio Impact: For a portfolio heavily weighted in securities tracked by the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index, this observation would signal increased credit risk and potential capital losses. This would prompt a re-evaluation of portfolio diversification and risk management strategies.

This hypothetical scenario illustrates how the index served as an early warning signal of stress within the adjustable-rate mortgage market, providing critical data points for investors to react to evolving conditions.

Practical Applications

While the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index no longer exists in its original form, its historical role highlights several practical applications relevant to how bond indices are used in financial markets:

  • Performance Benchmarking: The primary use was to benchmark the performance of portfolios holding adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. Fund managers specializing in this sector would compare their returns against the index to evaluate their investment strategies.
  • Market Analysis: The index offered insights into the overall health and trends of the ARM segment of the mortgage-backed securities market, including indicators related to interest rate risk and prepayment risk.
  • Product Development: Data from such indices helped financial institutions design and price new mortgage-related products and structured finance instruments, understanding the risk and return characteristics of ARMs.
  • Risk Management: Investors used the index to monitor and manage their exposure to the adjustable-rate mortgage market, identifying potential vulnerabilities in their portfolios, especially during periods of economic stress.

Today, components similar to those once tracked by the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index are included within broader fixed-income benchmarks like the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. This successor index, now known as the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, tracks a wide array of U.S. investment-grade bonds, including mortgage-backed securities. Its methodology includes various bond types, providing a comprehensive view of the bond market, and reflecting the evolution of how these securities are categorized and analyzed7. The acquisition of the Lehman Brothers' index business by Barclays, and subsequently by Bloomberg, illustrates the ongoing consolidation and evolution of financial data providers6.

Limitations and Criticisms

The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index, like any specialized financial index, had inherent limitations, many of which became acutely apparent during the Subprime Mortgage Crisis.

One major criticism, retrospective in nature, was its focus on a market segment that proved to be systemically risky. The proliferation of subprime adjustable-rate mortgages with aggressive terms, often leading to payment shocks after initial low fixed-rate periods, contributed significantly to widespread defaults5. While the index itself merely measured performance, its very existence and the growth it tracked were indicative of the unchecked expansion of risky lending practices. The index's movements could reflect the deterioration of the underlying asset quality, but it did not, by its nature, predict the catastrophic failure of the market it represented.

Furthermore, the index's methodology, while transparent for its time, likely did not fully capture the nuanced credit risk embedded within the increasingly complex and often opaque structures of securitization that characterized the mortgage market in the mid-2000s. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, directly linked to its massive exposure to these troubled assets, underscored the severe misjudgment of risk by many market participants and financial institutions, including those relying on such indices for market insights. The crisis led to a severe economic recession and highlighted the need for more robust risk assessment and regulatory oversight in the housing and financial sectors4.

Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index vs. Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index

The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index was a highly specific benchmark, focused exclusively on agency-guaranteed adjustable-rate mortgage securities. Its scope was narrow, designed to provide granular insights into a particular segment of the mortgage-backed securities market.

In contrast, the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index (formerly the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index, then the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index) is a much broader and more comprehensive benchmark index. It tracks the performance of the entire U.S. investment-grade taxable bond market. This includes not only mortgage-backed securities (both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate components, albeit not isolated as a primary index focus as the Lehman Brothers ARM Index did) but also U.S. Treasury securities, government agency bonds, corporate bonds, and asset-backed securities3.

The key difference lies in their scope and purpose. The Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index served as a detailed gauge for a niche market within fixed income, providing specialized insights into ARM performance. The Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index, on the other hand, aims to represent the overall U.S. bond market, offering a macro view for portfolio managers seeking diversified fixed-income exposure. While the latter now encompasses various bond types, including MBS, it does not provide the specific, isolated focus on adjustable-rate mortgages that the former did. The lineage is direct, as the Bloomberg Aggregate Index inherited the methodologies and many of the constituents of the original Lehman Aggregate Index following acquisitions, demonstrating an evolution from specialized, fragmented indices to more comprehensive, aggregated benchmarks2.

FAQs

What was the primary purpose of the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index?
Its primary purpose was to serve as a benchmark index for tracking the performance of agency-guaranteed securities backed by adjustable-rate mortgages. It helped investors understand how this specific type of mortgage security was performing in the market.

Why is the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index no longer in use?
The index ceased to exist under the Lehman Brothers name after the firm declared bankruptcy in September 2008. Its index business, along with other assets, was acquired by Barclays and later by Bloomberg, which integrated its components into broader fixed-income benchmarks like the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index.

How did the index relate to the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
The index measured the performance of securities, including those linked to adjustable-rate mortgages, which were a significant factor in the Subprime Mortgage Crisis. While the index itself was a measurement tool, its movements reflected the deteriorating conditions of this market segment, which ultimately contributed to the widespread financial instability and the economic recession.

Did the Lehman Brothers Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Index track subprime mortgages?
The index tracked "agency-guaranteed securities"1. While the broader mortgage market, including subprime mortgages, was a major driver of Lehman Brothers' collapse, this specific index typically focused on agency-backed (e.g., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) adjustable-rate mortgage securities, which historically carried lower credit risk than pure subprime loans. However, the overall distress in the subprime market had a systemic impact across all mortgage-related assets.

How does an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) differ from a fixed-rate mortgage?
An adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) has an interest rate that changes periodically based on a predetermined index plus a margin, meaning the monthly payment can fluctuate over the loan's life. A fixed-rate mortgage, conversely, has an interest rate that remains constant for the entire loan term, providing predictable monthly payments. Understanding how an ARM's rate adjusts is crucial for borrowers.