Skip to main content
← Back to L Definitions

Lehman brothers municipal bond index

What Is the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index?

The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index was a prominent benchmark index within the fixed income sphere, specifically designed to measure the performance of the U.S. municipal bond market. It encompassed investment-grade, tax-exempt bonds with long-term maturities (typically greater than two years) and substantial issue sizes. This index was a key tool for investors and portfolio managers seeking to gauge the health and returns of a specific segment of the broader bond market.

History and Origin

Lehman Brothers began publishing municipal bond indices in January 1980, establishing comprehensive market performance benchmarks for the tax-exempt bond market.13 The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, like other Lehman Brothers bond indices, was rule-based and market-value weighted.12 To be included, bonds generally needed a minimum credit rating of at least Baa, an outstanding par value of at least $5 million, and had to be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million.11 The bonds also needed a remaining maturity of at least one year and were required to have been issued after December 31, 1990.10 Taxable municipal bonds, floating-rate bonds, and derivatives were excluded.9

The index's name, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, changed following the firm's collapse during the 2008 financial crisis. Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on September 15, 2008, a pivotal moment that significantly impacted global financial markets. Shortly thereafter, Barclays acquired the North American investment banking and capital markets businesses of Lehman Brothers, including its robust index business.8,7 Consequently, the index was rebranded as the Barclays Municipal Bond Index. This transition allowed for the continued operation and evolution of these crucial benchmarks. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York provides a comprehensive timeline detailing the policy responses to the global financial crisis.6

Years later, in 2016, Bloomberg completed its acquisition of Barclays Risk Analytics and Index Solutions (BRAIS) business, which included the fixed-income benchmark indices previously managed by Lehman Brothers and then Barclays.5 Following this acquisition, these indices were co-branded as "Bloomberg Barclays Indices" for an initial period of five years, before eventually becoming known solely as Bloomberg Indices.4

Key Takeaways

  • The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index was a significant benchmark for investment-grade, tax-exempt U.S. municipal bonds.
  • Its criteria for inclusion emphasized long-term maturities and substantial issue sizes.
  • The index's ownership and naming changed hands multiple times due to major financial industry events, first to Barclays and then to Bloomberg.
  • It served as a vital tool for understanding the performance of a specific segment of the bond market.
  • The index’s evolution reflects the dynamic nature of financial markets and the consolidation of financial data providers.

Interpreting the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index

When the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index was active, its movements and values were critical for understanding the performance and trends within the U.S. municipal bond sector. Investors utilized it to assess how their municipal bonds or municipal bond funds were performing relative to the broader market. A rising index value generally indicated that bond prices were increasing, suggesting favorable conditions for bondholders, such as declining interest rates or improved credit perceptions of municipal issuers. Conversely, a falling index value signaled decreasing bond prices, which could be due to rising interest rates or concerns about municipal credit quality.

Analysts would examine various metrics associated with the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, such as its yield to maturity and duration. These metrics provided insights into the income potential and interest rate sensitivity of the municipal bond market. For example, a higher yield to maturity implied greater potential income for new bond purchases, while a longer duration indicated higher price sensitivity to interest rate changes.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine a portfolio manager in 2005, tasked with overseeing a diversified portfolio of tax-exempt bonds for high-net-worth individuals. To evaluate the performance of the municipal bond portion of their client's portfolio, the manager would compare its returns against the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index.

Let's say the client's municipal bond holdings generated a total return of 3.5% for the year. By consulting historical data for the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, the manager finds that the index returned 4.0% over the same period. This comparison would indicate that the client's portfolio slightly underperformed the benchmark. This insight could prompt the manager to review their investment-grade bonds selection, assess their portfolio's duration relative to the index, or consider rebalancing their holdings to align more closely with the index's composition if their goal was passive market tracking.

Practical Applications

The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, and its successors, have practical applications across various facets of finance and investing.

  • Performance Benchmarking: It served as a vital benchmark index for portfolio managers and individual investors to evaluate the performance of their municipal bond holdings against a standard market measure. This allowed for informed decisions regarding investment strategy and manager selection.
  • Market Analysis: Economists and financial analysts used the index to gauge the health and trends of the municipal bond market. Its movements could signal shifts in interest rates, credit perceptions, or investor sentiment towards state and local government debt.
  • Product Development: Financial product developers utilized the index's methodology to create municipal bond funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and other investment vehicles designed to track or outperform the municipal bond market.
  • Academic Research: The historical data of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index provided valuable insights for academic studies on bond market behavior, interest rate dynamics, and the impact of economic events on fixed-income asset classes.
  • Risk Management: Financial institutions and investors incorporated the index data into their risk management frameworks to understand and quantify their exposure to interest rate risk and credit rating risk within their fixed-income portfolios.

Today, the lineage of this index is continued by the Bloomberg Municipal Index, which measures the performance of the U.S. municipal bond market, covering U.S. dollar-denominated long-term tax-exempt bonds across various sectors. T3his ongoing measurement provides continuity for practical applications in the market.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index was a widely accepted benchmark, like all indices, it had certain limitations. A primary consideration was its focus on investment-grade bonds with larger issue sizes. This meant it did not fully represent the entire municipal bond market, particularly excluding smaller issues or high-yield municipal debt, which can behave differently. Therefore, a portfolio heavily invested in these excluded segments might not have been accurately benchmarked against the index.

Another limitation was its historical context. The index's naming and ownership changes following the 2008 financial crisis underscore the fragility of market benchmarks tied to single institutions, particularly during periods of systemic stress. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers highlighted the interconnectedness of financial markets and the potential for severe disruptions. While the index business was successfully transitioned to Barclays and then Bloomberg, the initial uncertainty could have created temporary challenges for portfolio managers relying solely on that specific brand of index. The crisis led to broader discussions about the need for resilience in financial infrastructure and the critical role of organizations like the Federal Reserve in providing liquidity to money market funds and other financial sectors.

2Furthermore, any market-value-weighted index, including the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, inherently assigns a greater weight to larger bond issues and issuers with more outstanding debt. This can lead to a concentration risk, where the index's performance is heavily influenced by a few large entities or by overall market issuance trends rather than a pure representation of the opportunity set for all investors. Investors seeking broad diversification might need to look beyond the index's direct composition.

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index vs. Bloomberg Municipal Index

The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index served as a foundational benchmark for the U.S. municipal bond market. However, due to significant shifts in the financial landscape, it is no longer actively maintained under the Lehman Brothers name. Its direct successor and the most commonly referenced benchmark today is the Bloomberg Municipal Index.

The key difference lies in their current status and ownership. The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index represents a historical series, while the Bloomberg Municipal Index is the live, continuously calculated benchmark. The transition occurred in phases: following Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy in 2008, Barclays acquired the index business, rebranding it. Subsequently, in 2016, Bloomberg acquired Barclays' index business, leading to the current Bloomberg Municipal Index branding. While the underlying methodology for tracking investment-grade, tax-exempt bonds remains largely consistent with its historical roots, the ownership and branding are distinct. Investors and analysts today primarily refer to the Bloomberg Municipal Index for current market performance and characteristics.

FAQs

What types of bonds did the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index include?

The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index primarily included investment-grade bonds, tax-exempt bonds, and fixed-rate bonds issued by U.S. states and municipalities. These bonds typically had maturities greater than two years and met certain minimum issue size requirements.

1### Why is the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index no longer in use?
The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is no longer in use under its original name because Lehman Brothers, the investment bank that created and maintained it, declared bankruptcy in 2008. Its index business was subsequently acquired by Barclays and later by Bloomberg, leading to its rebranding as the Bloomberg Municipal Index.

What is the modern equivalent of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index?

The modern equivalent and direct successor to the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is the Bloomberg Municipal Index. This index continues to track the performance of the broad U.S. investment-grade, tax-exempt municipal bond market.

How did the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index help investors?

The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index provided a consistent and widely recognized benchmark index against which investors could measure the performance of their municipal bond portfolios. It helped in assessing investment strategies, understanding market trends, and making informed decisions within the fixed income market.