Skip to main content
← Back to L Definitions

License to operate

What Is Social License to Operate (SLO)?

Social License to Operate (SLO) refers to the ongoing acceptance and approval of a company's activities by the local community and other stakeholders. This unwritten, non-legal agreement is critical in the realm of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR). While a company may possess all the necessary legal permits and regulatory compliance to operate, its true capacity to conduct business effectively hinges on the trust and widespread acceptance from the communities and public it impacts. The Social License to Operate reflects a company's commitment to ethical behavior, transparent communication, and sustainable practices, which collectively influence its public perception and ability to thrive.

History and Origin

The concept of Social License to Operate emerged primarily in the extractive industries, such as mining and forestry, during the late 20th and early 21st centuries. These industries often operate in remote or indigenous communities, making the approval of local populations crucial for project success. As global awareness of environmental and social impacts grew, companies realized that formal permits alone were insufficient to guarantee smooth operations. Community opposition, even without legal backing, could lead to significant project delays, increased costs, and reputational damage. The Stockholm Environment Institute highlights how the concept originated in the extractive industry and has since evolved to be applied more broadly, even to social acceptance in renewable energy projects.7 This shift necessitated a new framework for engagement that went beyond mere compliance, focusing on building genuine relationships based on trust, fairness, and mutual benefit.

Key Takeaways

  • Social License to Operate (SLO) is the implicit acceptance of a company's operations by stakeholders and communities.
  • It extends beyond legal and regulatory permits, relying on trust and credibility.
  • SLO is dynamic and can be gained, lost, or regained based on a company's ongoing actions.
  • Maintaining a strong SLO mitigates reputational risk and reduces operational disruptions.
  • It is a core component of effective environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies.

Formula and Calculation

The Social License to Operate is not a quantitative metric that can be calculated using a specific formula. Instead, it is a qualitative assessment of a company's social standing and community acceptance. There is no universally accepted formula; rather, its strength is evaluated through various indicators related to community engagement, transparency, ethical practices, and perceived benefits to the community. These indicators might include surveys of local sentiment, frequency and quality of dialogue with community leaders, and the absence of protests or significant opposition. Its evaluation relies heavily on qualitative data, stakeholder feedback, and the absence of negative incidents.

Interpreting the Social License to Operate

Interpreting the Social License to Operate involves assessing the level of trust and support a company has earned from its stakeholders. A strong SLO suggests that a company's operations are viewed positively, aligning with community values and expectations. This high level of acceptance can translate into smoother operations, easier permitting processes, and a more resilient business environment. Conversely, a weak or eroding Social License to Operate signals distrust, potential opposition, and increased operational challenges, which can impact financial performance. Companies with a robust SLO often benefit from greater social capital and a stronger ability to navigate unforeseen challenges, contrasting with those that face constant scrutiny and public resistance. The level of acceptance can vary, existing on a spectrum from full approval to outright rejection, and is continuously influenced by a company's actions and perceived sustainability efforts.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "GreenHarvest Foods," a large agricultural corporation planning to expand its operations into a new rural area. Before initiating the project, GreenHarvest engages in extensive community outreach. They host public forums, conduct town hall meetings, and establish a local advisory committee comprising residents, environmental groups, and business owners. During these interactions, they openly discuss their farming practices, water usage, and employment opportunities, addressing concerns about environmental impact and local economic benefits.

They commit to hiring local workers, investing in community infrastructure, and implementing sustainable water management systems beyond regulatory requirements. By demonstrating genuine care for the community's well-being and actively seeking input, GreenHarvest Foods secures a strong Social License to Operate. Even without a formal vote, the community's positive sentiment and lack of significant opposition enable the company to proceed with its expansion smoothly, minimizing potential delays and fostering a cooperative environment. This proactive approach significantly reduces the risk of future disputes or protests that could hinder their business operations.

Practical Applications

Social License to Operate applies across various sectors, impacting investing, market dynamics, and regulatory interactions. In investment analysis, a company's SLO can be an indicator of its non-financial risks and long-term viability. Investors increasingly consider a company's relationship with its communities as part of their due diligence, particularly for firms in industries with significant environmental or social footprints. A strong Social License to Operate can enhance investor relations and contribute to sustained shareholder value.

For example, when considering the impact of regulatory bodies, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets standards that businesses must follow concerning pollution and environmental harm.6 Compliance with these regulations is essential, and the EPA conducts inspections and can impose fines or other penalties for non-compliance.5 A company that demonstrates proactive adherence to these regulations, even exceeding minimum requirements, often strengthens its Social License to Operate by showing genuine commitment to environmental stewardship.4 This proactive approach goes beyond mere legal obedience, fostering trust and acceptance from the public, which is critical for smooth and uninterrupted operations.

Limitations and Criticisms

While vital, the Social License to Operate is not without its limitations and criticisms. One significant challenge is its inherent subjectivity; it is an intangible concept, not a quantifiable legal document, making it difficult to measure and maintain consistently. Critics argue that companies might engage in "greenwashing" or superficial gestures of corporate philanthropy to appear socially responsible without fundamental changes to their core practices. This can lead to a perception of insincerity, ultimately eroding the very trust the SLO aims to build.

Furthermore, defining "the community" and achieving consensus among diverse stakeholder groups can be complex, as different groups may have conflicting interests or varying levels of influence. The Social License to Operate is often described as dynamic and impermanent, subject to constant re-evaluation by local community members based on a company's ongoing activities.3 If a company's actions contradict its stated values or if incidents occur that violate public trust, the SLO can be quickly revoked, leading to severe consequences. The Wells Fargo fake accounts scandal, where the bank faced billions in fines and significant reputational damage due to widespread unauthorized accounts, serves as a stark example of how a loss of public trust can severely impact a company's ability to operate effectively, even with formal licenses.2 The scandal led to resignations and pledges for reform, highlighting the tangible impact of a lost Social License to Operate.1

Social License to Operate vs. Regulatory Compliance

The Social License to Operate (SLO) and regulatory compliance are distinct but interconnected concepts. Regulatory compliance refers to a company's adherence to formal, legally binding rules, laws, and permits issued by government agencies and regulatory bodies. These are explicit requirements, and failure to meet them can result in legal penalties, fines, or even forced cessation of operations. For example, a company needs a permit from the EPA to discharge wastewater, and it must meet specific quality standards.

In contrast, the Social License to Operate is an implicit, non-legal agreement based on the broader acceptance and approval of a company's activities by the community and other stakeholders. It is earned through ethical conduct, transparency, and a demonstrated commitment to social and environmental responsibility, rather than mandated by law. While a company can be fully compliant with all regulations, it may still lack a strong Social License to Operate if it fails to address community concerns, build trust, or align with societal values. The key difference lies in the source of authority: one is granted by law, the other by society.

FAQs

How does Social License to Operate differ from a formal business license?

A formal business license is a legal document issued by a government entity that grants a company permission to conduct specific operations. It is a mandatory, legal requirement. The Social License to Operate, however, is an unwritten, informal acceptance from the community and public opinion, built on trust and ethical behavior, and is not legally enforceable but crucial for smooth operations.

Why is Social License to Operate important for businesses?

SLO is important because it mitigates non-financial risks such as community protests, boycotts, and negative publicity, which can cause significant operational delays, increased costs, and damage to a company's brand reputation. A strong SLO allows a company to operate more efficiently, gain community support for expansion, and attract ethical investing.

Can a company lose its Social License to Operate?

Yes, a company can lose its Social License to Operate. This often happens if the company's actions are perceived as unethical, harmful to the environment, or detrimental to the community, even if technically legal. Loss of trust, transparency breaches, or failure to address stakeholder concerns can quickly erode public acceptance, leading to significant challenges.

Is Social License to Operate only relevant to large corporations or specific industries?

While the concept originated in resource-intensive industries, Social License to Operate is relevant to companies of all sizes and sectors. Any business that interacts with communities, impacts the environment, or relies on public trust (e.g., financial institutions, technology companies, consumer goods manufacturers) implicitly operates under a social license. For example, even small local businesses depend on community goodwill and acceptance to thrive.