Lifo method

LINK_POOL

What Is the LIFO Method?

The Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method is an inventory costing method used by companies to determine the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and the value of their remaining Inventory. As an inventory accounting approach, it assumes that the most recently purchased or produced items are the first ones to be sold. This means that for financial reporting, the costs associated with the newest inventory are expensed first, while older costs remain in the Ending Inventory balance on the Balance Sheet. The LIFO method is one of several ways to value inventory and significantly impacts a company's reported Net Income and Taxable Income.

History and Origin

The LIFO method gained prominence in the United States, particularly as businesses sought ways to manage the impact of inflation on their financial statements. While its precise origin date is debated among accounting historians, its widespread acceptance and codification largely occurred in the mid-20th century, especially following the Revenue Act of 1938. This act made LIFO available to a wider range of taxpayers for tax purposes. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) outlines acceptable accounting methods, including those for inventory, in publications like IRS Publication 538, reflecting the method's long-standing use within U.S. tax regulations.⁵

Key Takeaways

• The LIFO method assumes that the last items purchased or produced are the first ones sold.
• It directly impacts a company's reported Cost of Goods Sold, inventory valuation, and ultimately, its net income and tax liability.
• The LIFO method is permitted under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) but is prohibited under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
• During periods of rising costs (inflation), the LIFO method generally results in a higher Cost of Goods Sold and a lower taxable income, leading to lower current tax payments.
• Conversely, during periods of falling costs (deflation), LIFO would result in a lower Cost of Goods Sold and higher taxable income.

Formula and Calculation

The LIFO method does not have a single overarching formula as much as it has a procedural approach to calculating COGS and ending inventory. The core principle involves assigning the costs of the most recent purchases to the units sold.

To calculate the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) under LIFO, you identify the cost of the latest units acquired equal to the number of units sold. The remaining units in inventory are then valued using the costs of the earliest units purchased.

Consider the following:

Where:

• (\text{COGS}_{\text{LIFO}}) = Cost of Goods Sold using the LIFO method
• (\text{Ending Inventory}_{\text{LIFO}}) = Value of remaining inventory using the LIFO method
• (\text{Units Sold from Latest Purchases}) = The number of units sold, drawn from the most recent acquisitions.
• (\text{Cost of Latest Purchases}) = The per-unit cost of those most recent acquisitions.
• (\text{Remaining Units}) = The total number of units left in inventory after sales.
• (\text{Cost of Earliest Purchases}) = The per-unit cost of the oldest acquisitions that are considered to be still in inventory.

Interpreting the LIFO Method

Interpreting the LIFO method primarily involves understanding its impact on a company's financial statements, particularly the income statement and balance sheet. Because LIFO assumes that the latest costs are expensed first, during periods of rising prices (inflation), it results in a higher Cost of Goods Sold. This higher COGS leads to a lower reported gross profit and, consequently, a lower net income. While this might seem disadvantageous at first glance, a lower net income often translates to a lower taxable income, which can be a significant benefit for companies operating in high-tax jurisdictions.

Conversely, the ending inventory valued under LIFO during inflationary periods will consist of older, lower costs. This can result in the inventory balance on the balance sheet being significantly understated compared to the current replacement cost of the inventory. This can make comparing companies that use LIFO with those that use other inventory methods, especially the FIFO method, challenging without adjustments.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a small electronics retailer, "TechGadget Co.," which sells a popular smart home device.

Purchases:

• January 5: 100 units at $50 each
• January 15: 150 units at $55 each
• January 25: 80 units at $60 each

Total Available: 330 units
Total Cost: ((100 \times $50) + (150 \times $55) + (80 \times $60) = $5,000 + $8,250 + $4,800 = $18,050)

Sales:

• January 31: TechGadget Co. sells 200 units.

Now, let's apply the LIFO method to calculate the COGS and ending inventory:

Cost of Goods Sold (200 units):
Under LIFO, we assume the last units in are the first ones sold.

1. First, draw from the January 25 purchase: 80 units @ $60 = $4,800
2. Next, draw from the January 15 purchase: We need 120 more units (200 total units sold - 80 units from Jan 25). So, 120 units @ $55 = $6,600
   Total COGS: $4,800 (from Jan 25) + $6,600 (from Jan 15) = $11,400

Ending Inventory (130 units remaining):
The remaining units are from the earliest purchases.

1. All 100 units from January 5 are left: 100 units @ $50 = $5,000
2. Remaining from January 15: 150 units - 120 units sold = 30 units @ $55 = $1,650
   Total Ending Inventory: $5,000 (from Jan 5) + $1,650 (from Jan 15) = $6,650

Verification:
Total Cost of Goods Available for Sale = COGS + Ending Inventory
$18,050 = $11,400 + $6,650. The calculation balances.

This example illustrates how the LIFO method impacts the reported cost of goods sold, directly affecting the company's profitability for the accounting period.

Practical Applications

The LIFO method finds its primary practical application in the United States, largely due to its potential tax advantages, especially during periods of inflation. By matching the most recent, higher costs with current revenues, companies can report a higher Cost of Goods Sold, which results in a lower reported gross profit and, consequently, a lower taxable income. This can lead to a reduced current tax liability for the business. This tax deferral benefit is a significant incentive for many U.S. companies to adopt the LIFO method. The IRS governs the acceptable accounting periods and methods for taxpayers.⁴

However, the application of LIFO is limited to specific types of inventory, such as raw materials, work-in-progress, and finished goods, where the physical flow of goods might not align with the accounting assumption. It is a strategic choice influenced by tax codes and economic conditions.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its tax advantages, the LIFO method faces several significant limitations and criticisms:

• Lack of Economic Reality: For many businesses, LIFO does not reflect the actual physical flow of goods. Companies typically sell their oldest inventory first to avoid spoilage, obsolescence, or simply to clear shelf space. For instance, a grocery store would sell the milk that expires soonest (FIFO), not the milk that just arrived. This discrepancy means the ending inventory under LIFO is often valued at older, potentially historical costs, which may be significantly different from current market values, especially in inflationary environments.³
• Prohibition Under IFRS: A major limitation is that the LIFO method is not permitted under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are used by most countries worldwide. This creates a significant challenge for international companies or those with global operations, as they must maintain two sets of records—one for U.S. GAAP and another for IFRS—or convert their financial statements for comparability. This lack of global acceptance hinders cross-border financial analysis and comparability.
• ² LIFO Liquidation: A critical issue arises when a company drastically reduces its inventory levels, selling off more units than it purchases. This is known as LIFO liquidation. When this happens, the company may be forced to draw from older, lower-cost inventory layers that have been sitting on the books. This can result in an artificially low Cost of Goods Sold and an inflated reported gross profit and net income, leading to a higher tax bill in the period of liquidation. Companies are typically required to disclose the impact of LIFO liquidation in their financial footnotes.
• ¹ Distortion of Financial Ratios: Because LIFO can result in an understated inventory value on the balance sheet and a fluctuating Cost of Goods Sold on the income statement (depending on purchasing patterns and inflation), it can distort various financial ratios, making it harder for analysts to accurately assess a company's true performance and financial position.

LIFO Method vs. FIFO Method

The LIFO method and the FIFO method are the two most common inventory costing approaches, differing fundamentally in their assumptions about which inventory items are sold first. This difference leads to distinct impacts on financial statements.

The choice between the LIFO method and the FIFO method significantly impacts a company's reported financial performance and its tax obligations. Companies typically choose the method that best aligns with their inventory management practices and provides the most favorable tax outcome, considering the prevailing economic environment.

FAQs

Why do companies choose to use the LIFO method?

Companies primarily choose the LIFO method for potential tax benefits in periods of inflation. By expensing the most recent, higher costs first, LIFO leads to a higher Cost of Goods Sold, which results in a lower reported Taxable Income and, consequently, lower tax payments in the current period.

Is the LIFO method allowed in all countries?

No, the LIFO method is not allowed in all countries. While it is permitted under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), it is prohibited under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are widely adopted globally. This difference can complicate financial comparisons for multinational corporations.

How does the LIFO method affect a company's reported profit?

During periods of rising costs, the LIFO method results in a higher Cost of Goods Sold because it assumes the most expensive items are sold first. This higher expense reduces the company's reported Gross Profit and Net Income on the income statement. Conversely, during periods of falling costs, LIFO would lead to a lower Cost of Goods Sold and a higher reported profit.