Skip to main content
← Back to M Definitions

Marginal value at risk

What Is Marginal Value at Risk?

Marginal Value at Risk (Marginal VaR or MVaR) is a key metric in risk management that quantifies the change in a portfolio's overall Value at Risk (VaR) resulting from a small, incremental change in the allocation to a specific asset or sub-portfolio. It falls under the broader category of portfolio theory, providing insights into how individual components contribute to the total portfolio risk. MVaR helps investors and financial professionals understand the specific impact of adding or removing a marginal unit of an investment, aiding in more granular portfolio optimization and asset allocation decisions. This measure is crucial for assessing how a particular asset's inclusion or exclusion affects the portfolio's overall market risk, particularly considering its correlation with other assets within the portfolio.

History and Origin

The concept of Marginal VaR emerged as a refinement of Value at Risk (VaR), which gained prominence in the financial industry in the early 1990s. VaR itself was popularized by J.P. Morgan through its RiskMetrics system. In 1994, J.P. Morgan took the significant step of publicly releasing its methodology and data for calculating VaR, democratizing access to sophisticated risk measurement tools.22 This initiative was a direct response to a request from J.P. Morgan's then-chairman, Dennis Weatherstone, who sought a daily report summarizing the firm-wide risk within 15 minutes of market close.20, 21 As financial institutions adopted VaR as a standard for quantifying potential losses, the need arose to break down this aggregate risk into the contributions of individual assets or business units. Marginal VaR, along with Component VaR and Incremental VaR, developed as tools to disaggregate portfolio risk, allowing risk managers to identify and manage the specific drivers of overall VaR. This evolution enabled a more precise understanding of how each investment's returns and volatility influenced the portfolio's risk profile.

Key Takeaways

  • Marginal VaR measures the sensitivity of a portfolio's total Value at Risk to a small change in the allocation of a single asset or sub-portfolio.
  • It helps identify which assets contribute the most to the overall portfolio risk, guiding targeted risk reduction efforts.
  • Marginal VaR is a valuable tool for optimizing portfolio composition and making informed decisions about adding or divesting positions.
  • Its calculation often involves partial derivatives of the portfolio VaR with respect to individual asset weights.
  • While powerful, Marginal VaR, like other VaR measures, relies on certain assumptions and may not fully capture extreme market events.

Formula and Calculation

The Marginal VaR for a specific asset within a portfolio is formally defined as the partial derivative of the portfolio's Value at Risk with respect to the dollar amount or weight invested in that asset. This mathematical formulation highlights its nature as a sensitivity measure.

For a portfolio VaR, (VaR_P), dependent on the exposures to (n) assets, denoted by (a_i) for asset (i), the Marginal VaR for asset (i), (MVaR_i), is given by:

MVaRi=VaRPaiMVaR_i = \frac{\partial VaR_P}{\partial a_i}

In a simplified context, especially when assuming normally distributed risk factors, the Marginal VaR can be approximated and related to the asset's beta or its contribution to the portfolio's standard deviation. For a portfolio consisting of multiple assets, the sum of each asset's contribution (calculated by multiplying its Marginal VaR by its dollar exposure) should approximately equal the total portfolio VaR. This relationship, known as the Euler capital allocation principle, underscores the coherence of VaR when certain assumptions are met19.

Interpreting the Marginal VaR

Interpreting Marginal VaR involves understanding its sign and magnitude. A positive Marginal VaR for an asset indicates that increasing the allocation to that asset would increase the overall portfolio's VaR. Conversely, a negative Marginal VaR suggests that adding more of that asset could actually reduce the portfolio's total risk, often due to its diversification benefits or negative correlation with other portfolio components.

The magnitude of the Marginal VaR reveals the intensity of this contribution. A higher absolute value of Marginal VaR implies a greater sensitivity of the portfolio's VaR to changes in that specific asset's allocation. For instance, if asset A has a Marginal VaR of 0.5 and asset B has a Marginal VaR of 0.1, adding one dollar of asset A would increase the portfolio's VaR five times more than adding one dollar of asset B. This insight is critical for portfolio managers seeking to manage risk efficiently by adjusting their holdings. It allows them to prioritize which positions to scale down or increase to achieve a desired risk profile.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical investment firm, Diversified Capital, managing a portfolio of three asset classes: U.S. Stocks, International Bonds, and Real Estate. The current total portfolio VaR at a 99% confidence level over a one-day horizon is $10 million.

Diversified Capital's risk management team wants to understand how each asset class contributes to this total risk. They calculate the Marginal VaR for each:

  • U.S. Stocks: MVaR = 0.8 (meaning an additional $1 invested in U.S. Stocks would increase portfolio VaR by $0.80)
  • International Bonds: MVaR = 0.2 (meaning an additional $1 invested in International Bonds would increase portfolio VaR by $0.20)
  • Real Estate: MVaR = -0.1 (meaning an additional $1 invested in Real Estate would decrease portfolio VaR by $0.10, indicating diversification benefits)

If the firm is looking to marginally reduce its overall portfolio risk, this analysis immediately points to two strategies:

  1. Reducing exposure to U.S. Stocks, as they have the highest positive Marginal VaR, meaning they are the largest marginal contributors to portfolio risk.
  2. Consider slightly increasing exposure to Real Estate, as its negative Marginal VaR suggests it acts as a partial hedge against other portfolio risks.

This step-by-step evaluation using Marginal VaR helps the firm make targeted adjustments rather than broad-brush changes to its investment portfolio.

Practical Applications

Marginal VaR is extensively used in financial practice across various domains:

  • Portfolio Management: It enables portfolio managers to identify and control the risk contribution of individual assets, helping them to rebalance portfolios to meet specific risk targets. By understanding the Marginal VaR of each holding, managers can make informed decisions about whether to add to or reduce positions to optimize the portfolio's risk-adjusted returns.
  • Risk Capital Allocation: Financial institutions use Marginal VaR to attribute risk across different trading desks or business units. This attribution is vital for setting appropriate capital requirements and performance benchmarks. For instance, if a specific trading desk shows a consistently high Marginal VaR, it might indicate a need for more stringent risk limits or a higher capital buffer.
  • Regulatory Compliance: While regulators have evolved beyond relying solely on traditional VaR, Marginal VaR can still be part of internal models used for regulatory reporting and capital adequacy assessments. The Basel Accords, which set international banking standards, initially embraced VaR for market risk capital requirements, although later revisions shifted towards Expected Shortfall.18 Understanding marginal contributions to risk remains a critical component of robust internal risk models.
  • Diversification Analysis: Marginal VaR helps illustrate that portfolio diversification does not always equate to risk diversification. An asset that appears risky on its own might have a low or even negative Marginal VaR if it is weakly or negatively correlated with the rest of the portfolio, thereby reducing overall portfolio risk. This concept is explored in detail by various financial research firms.17

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its utility, Marginal VaR has several limitations, largely inherited from the underlying Value at Risk methodology, and some specific to its incremental nature.

  • Reliance on Assumptions: Marginal VaR calculations often assume a linear relationship between asset changes and portfolio VaR, especially when derived from analytical methods. This linearity may not hold true for large changes in positions or for portfolios with complex derivatives, where non-linearities are significant.16 Furthermore, many models assume that asset returns follow a normal distribution, which frequently underestimates the probability of extreme losses or "tail events" in real-world markets.14, 15
  • Failure to Capture Tail Risk: Like VaR, Marginal VaR does not provide information about the magnitude of losses beyond the specified confidence level. It focuses on the potential loss at a certain percentile, but it does not quantify what could happen in the worst-case scenarios, known as tail risk.13 This limitation became starkly apparent during the 2008 global financial crisis, where actual losses far exceeded VaR estimates for many financial institutions, leading to calls for more comprehensive risk measures like Expected Shortfall.11, 12 The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report highlighted how a sole reliance on VaR provided a false sense of security regarding extreme, low-probability events.
  • Computational Intensity for Large Portfolios: While simplified formulas exist, calculating Marginal VaR accurately for very large and complex portfolios often requires significant computational resources, especially if full revaluation methods or Monte Carlo simulations are employed.
  • Sensitivity to Input Data: The accuracy of Marginal VaR is highly dependent on the quality and stability of the input data, including historical returns, volatilities, and correlations. Sudden shifts in market conditions or correlations can render past estimations less reliable.

To mitigate these limitations, risk management practices typically combine Marginal VaR with other tools, such as stress testing and scenario analysis, which are designed to assess the impact of extreme and unexpected market movements.

Marginal VaR vs. Incremental VaR

Marginal Value at Risk (Marginal VaR) and Incremental Value at Risk are often confused due to their similar objectives: understanding how individual components affect portfolio risk. However, they refer to subtly different concepts in their precise mathematical definitions and applications.

FeatureMarginal Value at Risk (MVaR)Incremental Value at Risk (IVaR)
DefinitionThe sensitivity of portfolio VaR to a small (marginal) change in an asset's position. It is typically represented as a partial derivative.9, 10The actual change in portfolio VaR when an entire position (or a discrete, non-marginal amount) is added to or removed from a portfolio.8
NatureFocuses on the rate of change; a derivative concept.Focuses on the absolute difference; a "before and after" calculation.7
CalculationOften derived using calculus or statistical approximations based on the asset's contribution to portfolio variance.6Calculated by re-evaluating the portfolio VaR after adding/removing the specific position and subtracting the original portfolio VaR.5
ApplicationUseful for fine-tuning asset weights in portfolio optimization where small adjustments are considered.Useful for assessing the impact of a new investment proposal or the divestment of an existing, significant holding.

While some sources may use "Incremental VaR" interchangeably with "Marginal VaR" or use Marginal VaR as an approximation for Incremental VaR3, 4, the more precise distinction lies in Marginal VaR being a measure of instantaneous sensitivity to an infinitesimal change, whereas Incremental VaR measures the discrete impact of a specific, often larger, position change.

FAQs

How does Marginal VaR help in portfolio diversification?

Marginal VaR helps in portfolio diversification by identifying which assets contribute disproportionately to the overall portfolio risk. Assets with low or negative Marginal VaR can enhance diversification by reducing total portfolio risk when added, even if they have high individual volatility. This guides managers in selecting assets that truly provide diversification benefits rather than just increasing the number of holdings.

Is Marginal VaR always a positive number?

No, Marginal VaR is not always a positive number. If adding a unit of an asset to a portfolio actually reduces the overall Value at Risk, the Marginal VaR for that asset will be negative. This typically occurs when the asset has a low or negative correlation with the existing assets in the portfolio, offering valuable diversification benefits.

What is the difference between Marginal VaR and Component VaR?

Component Value at Risk (Component VaR) is closely related to Marginal VaR. While Marginal VaR measures the sensitivity of portfolio VaR to a small change in an asset's exposure, Component VaR represents the actual dollar contribution of an individual asset to the total portfolio VaR. In many models, Component VaR for an asset is calculated by multiplying its Marginal VaR by the dollar value of the position in that asset. A key property of Component VaR is that the sum of all individual Component VaRs equals the total portfolio VaR1, 2.