What Is the Market Reform Act of 1990?
The Market Reform Act of 1990 is a landmark piece of U.S. legislation within the broader field of securities regulation designed to enhance the stability and integrity of American financial markets. Enacted following significant periods of market volatility, particularly the stock market crash of 1987, the Market Reform Act granted the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) expanded authority to oversee and intervene in securities trading during times of market stress. Its primary objectives included strengthening regulatory oversight, improving the supervision of market participants, and enhancing the efficiency of market mechanisms to protect investor protection.
History and Origin
The origins of the Market Reform Act of 1990 are deeply rooted in the need to address vulnerabilities exposed by the "Black Monday" stock market crash of October 1987. This event, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummet by over 22% in a single day, highlighted deficiencies in market oversight and coordination. In response to the crash, President Reagan's administration formed the Task Force on Market Mechanisms, also known as the Brady Commission, to investigate the causes and recommend solutions. The commission's findings underscored the interconnectedness of various financial markets and the need for regulators to possess greater emergency authority to respond to systemic shocks.
Building on these recommendations, the Market Reform Act was introduced as H.R. 3657 and subsequently signed into law by President George H.W. Bush on October 16, 1990, as Public Law 101-432.28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 President Bush stated that the bill addressed concerns regarding the stability of U.S. securities markets, citing the extraordinary volatility of 1987 and a less severe break in 1989.27 The legislation aimed to empower the SEC to better manage market crises and prevent future widespread disruptions.
Key Takeaways
- The Market Reform Act of 1990 (MRA) significantly expanded the SEC's authority to intervene during periods of extreme market volatility.
- It mandated a large traders reporting system to enhance market transparency and enable the SEC to monitor significant trading activity.
- The Act required risk assessments for holding company systems, aiming to identify and mitigate risks posed to regulated firms by their affiliates.
- It promoted the establishment of a coordinated national clearing system for securities transactions, improving the safety and efficiency of trade settlement.
- The MRA was a direct response to the 1987 stock market crash, seeking to bolster market stability and investor confidence.
Interpreting the Market Reform Act of 1990
The Market Reform Act of 1990 can be interpreted as a critical shift in the SEC's regulatory posture, moving towards a more proactive and interventionist role during periods of financial stress. Prior to the Act, the SEC's powers were somewhat constrained in its ability to respond swiftly to widespread market disruptions. The legislation explicitly granted the SEC the authority to summarily suspend trading in any security or on any national exchange for specified periods if deemed necessary for the public interest and investor protection.24, 25, 26
Furthermore, the Act's provisions regarding risk assessments for holding company systems reflected a recognition that risks originating outside of direct broker-dealers could still pose significant threats to the overall financial stability of the market. This expanded view of interconnected risk underscored the evolving complexity of financial institutions and the need for broader regulatory oversight.
Hypothetical Example
Imagine a hypothetical scenario where an unforeseen global event triggers extreme, rapid declines across major U.S. stock exchanges, threatening to destabilize the entire financial system. Prior to the Market Reform Act of 1990, the SEC's ability to act quickly might have been limited to requesting voluntary halts or relying on existing, less comprehensive rules.
Under the authority granted by the Market Reform Act, the SEC could, in this emergency situation, invoke its special powers. For instance, it could issue an order to summarily suspend all trading on national securities exchanges for a period not exceeding 90 calendar days, with presidential notification.22, 23 Concurrently, it could require large traders to submit detailed reports of their activities to identify potential sources of destabilizing trading practices, helping to understand and mitigate the crisis. The Act's provisions for coordinating clearing system operations would also help ensure that existing trades are settled efficiently, preventing a breakdown in the post-trade infrastructure even amidst severe market turmoil. This swift, decisive action, enabled by the Market Reform Act, could help prevent a cascading failure and restore confidence.
Practical Applications
The Market Reform Act of 1990 has several practical applications in modern financial markets and securities regulation:
- Emergency Market Management: The Act's core provision granting the SEC emergency authority remains a crucial tool for regulators to manage unforeseen crises. This includes the power to suspend trading in specific securities or across entire exchanges to prevent market volatility from spiraling out of control. The concept of emergency powers for the President and agencies is part of broader U.S. law.21
- Large Trader Oversight: The requirement for large traders to report their activities to the SEC provides an essential mechanism for market surveillance. This data allows the SEC to identify patterns of trading that could contribute to excessive volatility or potential manipulation, enabling targeted regulatory responses.
- Risk Assessment of Financial Conglomerates: The mandate for risk assessments within holding company structures is particularly relevant in today's interconnected financial landscape. It helps the SEC understand and mitigate systemic risks that may arise from the diverse activities of large financial institutions and their affiliates, extending oversight beyond traditional broker-dealers.
- Clearance and Settlement Enhancements: The Act's focus on a coordinated clearing system has contributed to the robustness of post-trade processing, which is vital for maintaining market integrity and preventing systemic failures, especially during periods of stress.
Limitations and Criticisms
While the Market Reform Act of 1990 significantly strengthened the SEC's powers, it has faced some limitations and criticisms over the years. One notable area of discussion revolves around the practical exercise of its emergency authority. While the power to halt trading is substantial, its actual implementation must be carefully considered to avoid unintended consequences, such as eroding market liquidity or disrupting normal market functions. Critics sometimes argue that overly broad use of such powers could interfere with efficient market mechanisms.
Furthermore, as financial technology and trading strategies evolve, questions arise about the Act's applicability to new phenomena like high-frequency trading. Some, like Congressman Edward Markey, have urged the SEC to utilize the powers granted by the Market Reform Act to address concerns related to high-frequency trading and its potential impact on market stability.20 This suggests that while the Act provides a framework, its interpretation and application must adapt to the changing landscape of securities laws and market structure. There is also the ongoing challenge of interagency coordination, as the Act called for collaboration among various regulatory bodies, which can be complex in practice.19
Market Reform Act of 1990 vs. Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990
The Market Reform Act of 1990 (MRA) and the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 were two distinct pieces of legislation signed into law around the same time in October 1990, both aiming to strengthen U.S. securities laws but with different primary focuses.
The Market Reform Act (Public Law 101-432) primarily focused on improving the stability and integrity of the overall U.S. securities markets by granting the SEC expanded powers related to1[2](https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/filter/in-letter-to-sec-rep-markey-says-use-market-reform-act-of-1990-to-limit-high-frequ[16](https://globalregulatoryinsights.com/legal-resources-post/market-reform-act-of-1990/), 17, 18ency-trading/), 34, 5, 6[7](https://globa[11](https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/senate-bill/647), 12, 13, 14, 15lregulatoryinsights.com/legal-resources-post/market-reform-act-of-1990/), 89, 10