Skip to main content
← Back to M Definitions

Marketplace facilitators

What Are Marketplace Facilitators?

Marketplace facilitators are entities that own, operate, or control a physical or electronic marketplace and facilitate the sale of a third-party seller's products or services. In the context of taxation, particularly sales and use tax, these facilitators are typically responsible for collecting and remitting sales tax on behalf of the individual sellers who use their platforms. This shifts the tax compliance burden from potentially thousands of individual sellers to a single, larger entity.

These platforms enable e-commerce and other transactions by providing various services, such as listing products, processing payments, and sometimes handling order fulfillment. The rise of marketplace facilitators has significantly impacted state revenue collection, leading to new financial regulations aimed at streamlining the sales tax collection process.

History and Origin

The concept of marketplace facilitators assuming sales tax responsibilities gained significant traction following a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision. Historically, states could only require businesses to collect sales tax if they had a physical presence, or "nexus," within the state. This precedent was established in cases like National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue of Illinois and Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. However, with the explosion of e-commerce, many online sellers lacked a physical presence in the states where their customers resided, leading to a substantial loss of sales tax revenue for states.

The landscape dramatically shifted with the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. The Court overturned the long-standing physical presence rule, determining that a state could impose sales tax collection obligations on out-of-state sellers based on their economic activity, or "economic nexus," within the state7. This decision effectively allowed states to require remote sellers to collect and remit sales taxes.

Following Wayfair, many states quickly enacted legislation to implement economic nexus provisions. Concurrently, they introduced marketplace facilitator laws. These laws specifically designated the platform facilitating the sale—rather than each individual marketplace seller—as the party responsible for collecting and remitting sales tax. This approach was largely influenced by efforts from organizations like the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), which developed model legislation to guide states in creating uniform tax reporting requirements for these entities.

#6# Key Takeaways

  • Marketplace facilitators are platforms that facilitate sales for third-party sellers, often handling listings, payments, and sometimes logistics.
  • They are generally responsible for collecting and remitting sales tax on behalf of their marketplace sellers in states where such laws are enacted.
  • The legal basis for these laws stems from the 2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. Supreme Court decision, which established "economic nexus."
  • These laws aim to simplify tax compliance for states and create a more level playing field between online and brick-and-mortar retailers.
  • Thresholds, typically based on sales volume or transaction count, determine when a marketplace facilitator must begin collecting taxes in a particular state.

Interpreting the Marketplace Facilitators' Role

The role of marketplace facilitators fundamentally alters the landscape of tax compliance for online transactions. In essence, a marketplace facilitator acts as an intermediary, assuming the sales tax liability that would otherwise fall on potentially numerous individual marketplace sellers. This means that when a consumer purchases an item from a third-party seller on a platform like a large online retail site, it is the platform—the marketplace facilitator—that calculates, collects, and remits the applicable sales tax to the relevant state tax authority.

This interpretation streamlines the process for both the states, which can collect from fewer, larger entities, and for many smaller businesses, which no longer need to manage complex multi-state sales tax obligations for transactions made through the facilitator. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for both consumers and businesses operating within the e-commerce ecosystem.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "CraftyCorner," an online marketplace where independent artisans sell handmade goods. CraftyCorner itself doesn't make the items; instead, individual artisans (marketplace sellers) list their products, set prices, and manage their storefronts on the platform.

Sarah, an artisan from Oregon, sells her pottery through CraftyCorner. A customer, David, in California, purchases a ceramic mug from Sarah's shop on CraftyCorner. Under California's marketplace facilitator law, CraftyCorner, as the facilitator, is responsible for collecting the appropriate California sales tax on David's purchase. CraftyCorner adds the sales tax to David's total at checkout, processes the full payment, and then remits the sales tax portion directly to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA). Sarah, the artisan, receives her portion of the sale price (minus CraftyCorner's fees) and does not have to worry about collecting or remitting California sales tax for that specific transaction facilitated by CraftyCorner. This simplifies Sarah's tax compliance efforts related to retail sales made through the platform.

Practical Applications

Marketplace facilitators primarily show up in the realm of taxation and financial regulations, particularly concerning e-commerce. Their emergence has redefined tax compliance for businesses involved in online retail sales. Major online platforms like Amazon, eBay, and Etsy operate as marketplace facilitators, managing vast numbers of transactions for third-party sellers.

From a regulatory standpoint, these laws simplify the collection of sales tax for states by centralizing the responsibility. Instead of tracking and auditing thousands of individual marketplace sellers, state tax authorities can focus on fewer, larger marketplace facilitators. For instance, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) provides specific guidance for marketplace facilitators detailing their responsibilities in collecting and remitting sales and use tax for sales made to California purchasers. This s5hift also impacts businesses by changing their tax liability and simplifying their tax reporting obligations for sales made through these platforms. The adoption of such laws across nearly all states with a sales tax demonstrates a widespread move towards ensuring tax fairness and efficiency in the digital economy.

Li4mitations and Criticisms

Despite their benefits in streamlining sales tax collection, the implementation of marketplace facilitator laws has presented several limitations and criticisms. One primary concern is the lack of uniformity across state regulations. While many states have aligned their "economic nexus" thresholds (e.g., $100,000 in sales or 200 transactions), there are still variations in definitions of a marketplace facilitator, the types of sales covered (tangible personal property, services, digital goods), and specific reporting requirements. This p3atchwork of diverse laws can create significant compliance burdens for marketplace facilitators that operate nationally.

Anoth2er criticism revolves around the practical challenges for smaller marketplace facilitators or those with complex business models. Adapting their payment processing systems to handle varying state tax rates, local tax jurisdictions, and differing product taxability rules can be costly and technically demanding. Furthermore, questions arise concerning the flow of information between facilitators and sellers, especially regarding tax-exempt sales or specific product classifications. Some argue that the extensive data required for precise tax compliance can be burdensome for both parties. The Tax Foundation, for example, has highlighted the complexities and compliance costs faced by marketplace facilitators due to the lack of uniformity in post-Wayfair laws, advocating for greater coordination among states to simplify the system.

Ma1rketplace Facilitators vs. Remote Sellers

The terms marketplace facilitators and remote sellers are often confused but refer to distinct entities, particularly in the context of sales tax obligations.

A remote seller is a business that sells goods or services into a state where it does not have a physical presence, but where it meets the state's economic nexus threshold, thereby obligating it to collect and remit sales tax. Before marketplace facilitator laws, individual remote sellers were solely responsible for their sales tax collection duties in such states.

A marketplace facilitator, on the other hand, is an entity that provides the platform for remote sellers to sell their products to consumers. The key distinction is that the marketplace facilitator is typically mandated by law to collect and remit the sales tax on behalf of its third-party sellers. While a marketplace facilitator might also be a remote seller for its own direct sales, its defining characteristic under these laws is its role in facilitating and taxing transactions for other businesses. This distinction means that a marketplace facilitator assumes the sales tax burden that would otherwise fall on hundreds or thousands of individual remote sellers using its platform.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary responsibility of a marketplace facilitator?

A1: The primary responsibility of a marketplace facilitator is to collect and remit sales tax on behalf of the third-party sellers who use their platform to sell goods or services. This duty applies in states where specific marketplace facilitator laws have been enacted.

Q2: How did marketplace facilitator laws come about?

A2: These laws emerged after the 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., which allowed states to require businesses without a physical presence to collect sales tax if they met certain economic thresholds (economic nexus). States then created marketplace facilitator laws to streamline this collection process by shifting the responsibility to the platforms facilitating the sales.

Q3: Do all online sellers need to collect sales tax if they sell through a marketplace facilitator?

A3: Generally, if you are a marketplace seller making sales exclusively through a marketplace facilitator that is collecting and remitting sales tax on your behalf, you may not need to separately register or collect sales tax for those specific transactions in states with marketplace facilitator laws. However, sellers should always verify their specific tax liability and tax compliance requirements, especially if they also make sales through other channels or have their own economic nexus in a state independent of the marketplace.

Q4: Are fees charged by marketplace facilitators subject to sales tax?

A4: The taxability of fees charged by marketplace facilitators varies by state and the specific nature of the fee. Some states may consider certain payment processing fees or listing fees as taxable services, while others may not. It's important for businesses to understand the tax treatment of these fees in the jurisdictions where they operate.

Q5: What is "economic nexus" in relation to marketplace facilitators?

A5: Economic nexus refers to the legal threshold of business activity in a state that obligates a company to collect and remit sales tax, even if it lacks a physical presence. For marketplace facilitators, this threshold is typically based on a certain dollar amount of sales or a number of transactions facilitated into a state annually, after which they are required to begin collecting sales tax on behalf of their marketplace sellers.