Skip to main content
← Back to M Definitions

Means test

What Is Means Test?

A means test is a determination of whether an individual or family is eligible for government benefits or assistance based on their income and assets. It is a critical component within social welfare and public assistance programs, ensuring that support is directed towards those who demonstrate financial need. The concept contrasts with universal programs, which provide benefits to all individuals regardless of their economic status. Means testing is designed to prevent the allocation of public funds to those who possess sufficient resources to meet their own needs.

The term "means test" appears frequently in discussions about government support. For instance, programs like Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid are prominent examples of means-tested programs in the United States.63, 64 Eligibility for these programs hinges on applicants proving that their income and resources fall below specified thresholds.60, 61, 62 The aim is to create a more targeted approach to social support, allocating limited resources more efficiently.

History and Origin

The origins of means testing can be traced back to the Elizabethan poor laws in 17th-century England, which were brought to the American colonies. These early forms of "outdoor relief" involved local administrations providing aid to people in their homes, often requiring proof of need.59

The modern application of the means test in the United States gained significant traction during the Great Depression in the 1930s. The economic crisis highlighted the need for more structured public relief programs, as state and local governments, along with private charities, were overwhelmed.57, 58 This led to federal government involvement, starting with loans and grants to states for direct relief and work relief.56

A pivotal moment was the enactment of the Social Security Act of 1935. While the Act introduced social insurance programs like Social Security that were not means-tested, it also established federal grants-in-aid to states for means-tested programs such as Old-Age Assistance and Aid to the Blind.55 These programs were designed to supplement the incomes of those ineligible for or not sufficiently supported by Social Security.54 States retained considerable control over eligibility requirements and benefit levels for these means-tested welfare initiatives.53 In 1974, Congress consolidated public assistance for the indigent elderly, blind, and disabled into the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, which remains a key means-tested program today.52

Key Takeaways

  • A means test assesses an individual's or family's income and assets to determine eligibility for government benefits.
  • It aims to target social welfare support to those with demonstrated financial need.
  • Programs like Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid are examples of means-tested benefits.
  • Means testing can involve complex calculations of countable income and resources, with various exclusions and disregards.
  • Criticisms often point to administrative burdens, potential disincentives to work and save, and the exclusion of eligible individuals due to bureaucratic hurdles.

Formula and Calculation

There isn't a single universal formula for a means test, as the specific calculations vary significantly depending on the program and jurisdiction. However, the general principle involves comparing an applicant's "countable income" and "countable resources" against predefined limits.

The basic approach can be conceptualized as:

Eligibility={Eligibleif (Countable IncomeIncome Limit)(Countable ResourcesResource Limit)Not Eligibleotherwise\text{Eligibility} = \begin{cases} \text{Eligible} & \text{if } (\text{Countable Income} \le \text{Income Limit}) \land (\text{Countable Resources} \le \text{Resource Limit}) \\ \text{Not Eligible} & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}

Where:

  • Countable Income: This is the gross income minus specific exclusions and disregards. For instance, in SSI, the Social Security Administration (SSA) disregards the first $20 of most income and the first $65 of earned income, plus half of the remaining earned income.50, 51
  • Income Limit: The maximum allowable income to qualify for the benefit. This varies by program, family size, and state. For example, Medicaid income limits often relate to a percentage of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL).49
  • Countable Resources: This refers to assets that can be converted to cash and used for support, such as bank accounts or certain properties. Like income, many programs exclude specific assets, like a primary residence or one vehicle.47, 48 For SSI, the resource limit is typically $2,000 for an individual and $3,000 for a couple.46
  • Resource Limit: The maximum allowable value of countable resources.

The calculation of countable income and resources can be intricate, with different types of income (earned vs. unearned) and assets treated differently.

Interpreting the Means Test

Interpreting the results of a means test involves understanding whether an individual's financial situation aligns with the eligibility criteria of a particular program. If a household's countable income and resources fall below the established limits, they are generally considered financially eligible for the benefit. However, exceeding these limits, even marginally, can result in denial of benefits.

For example, for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), individuals must have "limited income and resources."45 In 2024, the SSI federal benefit rate was $943 for an individual and $1,415 for a couple, but benefits are reduced based on countable income.44 Similarly, Medicaid eligibility often hinges on income being below a certain percentage of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), though this can vary by state and category (e.g., pregnant women, children, adults with disabilities).42, 43 In Pennsylvania, for example, adults under 65 can qualify for Medicaid with incomes up to 138% of the FPL.41

The interpretation also considers the specific "disregards" or exemptions applied to income and assets. For instance, for SSI, the value of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits or income tax refunds are not counted as income.40 Understanding these nuanced rules is crucial for accurately interpreting eligibility.

Hypothetical Example

Consider Maria, a 67-year-old living alone, who is applying for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The SSI individual resource limit is $2,000. Maria has a checking account with $1,500 and a savings account with $800. She also owns her home and a car, neither of which are typically counted as countable resources for SSI purposes.39

First, let's calculate her total resources:

Total Resources=Checking Account+Savings Account=$1,500+$800=$2,300\text{Total Resources} = \text{Checking Account} + \text{Savings Account} = \$1,500 + \$800 = \$2,300

Since Maria's total countable resources of $2,300 exceed the SSI resource limit of $2,000, she would not be eligible for SSI based on her current assets. To become eligible, Maria would need to "spend down" her excess resources to bring them below the $2,000 limit. This might involve using the extra $300 to pay for medical expenses or other essential needs.

Next, let's consider her income. Suppose Maria receives $300 a month from a small pension. For SSI, the first $20 of unearned income is disregarded.

Countable Unearned Income=PensionUnearned Income Disregard=$300$20=$280\text{Countable Unearned Income} = \text{Pension} - \text{Unearned Income Disregard} = \$300 - \$20 = \$280

The SSA would subtract this countable unearned income from the maximum federal SSI benefit amount. If the maximum SSI benefit is $943, her potential benefit would be $943 - $280 = $663. However, given her current resources, she would not qualify until those resources are reduced. This example illustrates the dual criteria of income and assets in a means test.

Practical Applications

Means tests are widely applied across various government and social programs to allocate resources efficiently and ensure that assistance reaches those most in need.

  • Social Welfare Programs: The most direct application is in social welfare, including programs like Supplemental Security Income (SSI), which provides financial assistance to aged, blind, and disabled individuals with limited income and resources.37, 38 Another significant example is Medicaid, which offers healthcare coverage to low-income individuals and families.34, 35, 36
  • Food and Housing Assistance: Programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, and Section 8 housing vouchers utilize means tests to determine eligibility for food and housing aid.33
  • Education Funding: Many forms of financial aid for higher education, including Pell Grants, Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants, and direct subsidized student loans, are means-tested to ensure that support goes to students with demonstrated financial need.
  • Bankruptcy Proceedings: In the United States, a means test is also used in bankruptcy law to determine whether debtors have sufficient financial capacity to repay a portion of their debts under Chapter 13 bankruptcy, as opposed to Chapter 7 liquidation.
  • Tax Credits and Deductions: Certain tax credits and deductions, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the child tax credit, are effectively means-tested as their benefits phase out as income rises.32

These applications highlight how the means test serves as a gatekeeper, directing assistance to specific populations based on their financial standing. For instance, states like Pennsylvania outline specific income and asset requirements for their Medicaid programs, reflecting the state-level variations in means-tested benefits.30, 31

Limitations and Criticisms

While means testing is designed to target benefits efficiently, it faces several limitations and criticisms. One significant concern is the potential for creating disincentives to work and save. As individuals' incomes approach or exceed program thresholds, their benefits may be reduced, effectively imposing a high implicit marginal tax rate on their earnings.27, 28, 29 This can discourage recipients from increasing their income or accumulating savings, potentially trapping them in a cycle of dependency.26

Another major critique revolves around the administrative burden and bureaucratic complexities involved in applying for and maintaining means-tested benefits. The process often requires extensive documentation and reporting of income, assets, and living situations, which can be challenging for vulnerable populations.25 This administrative burden can lead to a "non-participation problem," where eligible individuals do not apply or fail to re-certify for benefits due to the arduous process, effectively excluding deserving people from aid.23, 24 For example, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program's administrative costs are substantially higher than Social Security due to its complex rules.22

Furthermore, critics argue that means testing can foster a "cliff effect," where a small increase in income results in a disproportionately large loss of benefits, leading to a net financial disadvantage for the recipient. The debate also extends to what constitutes "means." Focusing solely on income might disadvantage wealthy individuals with low current income, particularly among the elderly who may have substantial assets but limited liquid income.21

The political vulnerability of means-tested programs is also a point of contention. Some argue that because these programs are often perceived as only benefiting a specific segment of the population, they are more susceptible to cuts and rollbacks compared to universal programs.20 Despite these criticisms, means testing remains a central feature of many welfare systems, often viewed as a necessary tool for fiscal responsibility and targeted aid.

Means Test vs. Social Insurance

The primary distinction between a means test and social insurance lies in their eligibility criteria and fundamental philosophy.

FeatureMeans TestSocial Insurance
EligibilityBased on financial need (income and assets).Based on contributions (e.g., payroll taxes) or fixed criteria (e.g., age).
PurposeTo provide a safety net for those with limited means.To provide earned benefits and protection against common life risks.
FundingTypically funded by general tax revenues.Often funded by dedicated taxes or premiums.
ExamplesSupplemental Security Income (SSI), Medicaid, SNAP.Social Security (Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance), Medicare.
Work HistoryGenerally not required.Often requires a significant work history and contributions.
StigmaCan be associated with a "welfare" stigma.Generally viewed as an earned right or entitlement.

A means test determines eligibility for programs like Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Medicaid by assessing whether an individual or family possesses the financial resources to do without or with less government assistance.17, 18, 19 The goal is to ensure that benefits are targeted to those who demonstrate genuine financial hardship.

In contrast, social insurance programs, such as Social Security and Medicare, are not means-tested.15, 16 Eligibility for these programs is typically based on an individual's prior contributions, usually through payroll taxes paid during their working lives, or meeting specific non-financial criteria like age or disability.13, 14 These programs are generally seen as an earned benefit, providing protection against common life risks like old age, disability, or unemployment, regardless of one's current financial status. While Social Security and Medicare are not means-tested, discussions about subjecting them to means testing have arisen as a way to potentially address long-term funding gaps.11, 12

FAQs

What is the main purpose of a means test?

The main purpose of a means test is to ensure that government benefits and assistance programs are directed toward individuals and families who demonstrate a genuine financial need.10 This approach helps to optimize the allocation of public funds.

What are some common examples of means-tested programs?

Common examples of means-tested programs in the United States include Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and various housing assistance programs like Section 8.8, 9

How does a means test differ from a universal benefit?

A means test determines eligibility based on an applicant's income and assets, meaning only those below specific financial thresholds qualify.7 In contrast, a universal benefit is available to all individuals who meet broad criteria (e.g., age, residency), regardless of their income or wealth.

Can a means test discourage work or saving?

Yes, a common criticism of means tests is that they can create disincentives to work or save. If earning more income or accumulating assets leads to a significant reduction or loss of benefits, individuals may be less motivated to improve their financial situation.5, 6 This is often referred to as a "poverty trap."4

Are Social Security and Medicare means-tested?

No, Social Security (Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance) and Medicare are generally considered social insurance programs, not means-tested programs.2, 3 Eligibility for these benefits is based on an individual's work history and contributions, rather than their current income or assets.1