Nominal budget planning

What Is Nominal Budget Planning?

Nominal budget planning is a method of financial planning where financial figures, such as income, expenses, and revenue, are expressed in current monetary units without adjusting for changes in purchasing power due to inflation. It operates on the assumption that the value of money remains constant over the budget period. This approach is fundamental to traditional budgeting within the broader category of financial management.

In nominal budget planning, all projections and actual results are recorded at their face value, or nominal value, at the time they occur. While this offers simplicity, it means that the budget does not explicitly account for how rising prices might erode the real value of funds or increase the cost of goods and services over time. For businesses and individuals, nominal budget planning provides a straightforward snapshot of financial expectations based on current or historical monetary amounts.

History and Origin

The concept of budgeting itself has deep historical roots, evolving significantly over centuries. The term "budget" is derived from the Old French word "bougette," meaning a small leather bag, which later referred to the contents of the bag and then to a financial statement²², ²³. The practice of a national budget emerged in England around 1760, when the Chancellor of the Exchequer would present the nation's financial plan to Parliament, primarily to control public spending and taxation²⁰, ²¹. This marked a pivotal moment in governmental financial accountability.

In the United States, government budgeting began in the early 20th century, with President William Howard Taft advocating for a proper U.S. government budget in 1911¹⁸, ¹⁹. The shift from governmental to corporate budgeting gained prominence through figures like Donaldson Brown at DuPont and General Motors, who pioneered flexible budgeting systems in the 1920s¹⁷. Traditional budgeting, which often aligns with nominal budget planning due to its focus on current monetary values and annual cycles, became a standard practice in organizations as a tool for planning and control¹⁶.

Key Takeaways

• Nominal budget planning presents financial figures in current monetary terms without adjusting for inflation.
• It is a traditional approach to budgeting, offering simplicity in its direct presentation of monetary values.
• A key limitation of nominal budget planning is its failure to account for changes in purchasing power over time due to inflation.
• While useful for short-term financial management, it can lead to inaccuracies in long-term forecasting in inflationary environments.
• Interpreting a nominal budget requires an awareness of the prevailing economic conditions and potential impacts of price changes.

Formula and Calculation

Nominal budget planning does not involve a specific formula to calculate a "nominal budget" as it inherently deals with face values. Instead, it refers to the practice of recording and projecting income and expenses directly in the monetary units of the period, without applying any adjustment for inflation.

However, it is crucial to understand how nominal values relate to real values, especially when comparing financial figures across different time periods or in inflationary environments. The relationship between nominal and real values can be expressed in the following way:

or, to find the nominal value if you have the real value and inflation rate:

Where:

• Nominal Value represents the unadjusted monetary amount (the figure used in nominal budget planning).
• Real Value represents the value adjusted for inflation, reflecting its purchasing power.
• Inflation Rate is the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services is rising, and subsequently, purchasing power is falling.

For example, if a company budgets for $100,000 in expenses in the coming year, that $100,000 is the nominal expense figure. If inflation is 3%, the real value of that $100,000 in terms of today's purchasing power would be lower at the end of the year. This distinction is particularly relevant in areas like capital budgeting where future cash flows are discounted using a nominal or real discount rate consistent with the nature of the cash flows¹⁵.

Interpreting the Nominal Budget Planning

Interpreting a nominal budget requires an understanding of its inherent limitations, particularly in economic environments characterized by inflation. Since nominal budget planning does not account for changes in the purchasing power of money, a nominal budget might appear consistent on paper over time, but its real-world implications can diverge significantly.

For instance, if a household's nominal income remains constant year-over-year, but the cost of living increases due to inflation, their ability to afford the same basket of goods and services diminishes¹⁴. Similarly, a business operating under nominal budget planning might find its projected expenses are underestimated in real terms, or its nominal revenues, while appearing stable, are yielding less real purchasing power for investment or growth. Therefore, effective interpretation of a nominal budget necessitates a continuous awareness of current and projected inflation rates to gauge the true financial health and capacity it represents. This helps in more accurate forecasting and decision-making.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "TechSolutions Inc.," a small software development firm. For the upcoming fiscal year, the finance department uses nominal budget planning.

Scenario:

• Projected Nominal Revenue: $1,200,000
• Projected Nominal Operating Expenses: $700,000 (includes salaries, rent, software licenses)
• Projected Nominal Profit: $500,000

The budget is set in December for the year beginning January 1st. However, midway through the year, due to unexpected economic factors, the annual inflation rate rises to 5%.

Mid-year Review:
While the company is on track to meet its nominal revenue and expenses targets, the management begins to feel a squeeze. The cost of renewing software licenses has increased by 5%, and general office supplies are noticeably more expensive. Employees, whose salaries are fixed nominally for the year, express concerns about their diminished purchasing power.

Although the nominal budget shows a $500,000 profit, the real value of this profit is less than anticipated at the start of the year. The company's original budget did not factor in this inflationary pressure. If TechSolutions Inc. had aimed for a certain real profit margin (e.g., in terms of what that profit could buy in new equipment or talent), they might be falling short despite meeting nominal targets. This highlights how nominal budget planning, while simple, can obscure the true economic impact of financial figures without considering inflation. It also impacts the company's cash flow as actual costs rise.

Practical Applications

Nominal budget planning finds its primary practical applications in situations where the impact of inflation is considered negligible or where the budget period is very short, minimizing the effects of price changes. Businesses often use nominal figures for short-term operational budgets, typically for a fiscal quarter or a single year, where significant shifts in economic conditions are not anticipated. This approach simplifies the budgeting process by avoiding complex inflation adjustments, making it easier to prepare and understand financial statements based on actual cash transactions.

For example, a small business creating a monthly or quarterly budget for its day-to-day expenses and income might utilize nominal budget planning. The assumption here is that within such a brief timeframe, price fluctuations will not materially affect the accuracy of the financial projections. Similarly, for internal performance evaluation against immediate targets, nominal figures can provide a clear benchmark. However, even in these scenarios, sustained inflationary pressures can significantly impact a business's capacity to maintain its purchasing power and meet its financial goals¹³.

Limitations and Criticisms

The primary limitation of nominal budget planning stems from its failure to account for changes in the purchasing power of money due to inflation. This can lead to several significant drawbacks:

• Inaccurate Forecasting: By neglecting inflation, nominal budgets can quickly become unrealistic, particularly over longer periods or in volatile economic climates¹¹, ¹². Projected costs may be underestimated, and anticipated revenues might not retain their expected real value, leading to a disconnect between the budget and actual financial reality¹⁰.
• Erosion of Purchasing Power: Even if nominal income targets are met, inflation means that the same amount of money buys fewer goods and services over time⁹. This effectively reduces the real resources available to an organization or individual, impacting strategic decisions and future growth capacity.
• Poor Strategic Planning: When budgets are based purely on nominal figures, long-term strategic planning can be flawed. Investments that appear profitable in nominal terms might yield poor real returns once inflation is factored in. This can hinder effective resource allocation and risk management.
• Lack of Flexibility: Traditional budgeting, often aligned with nominal approaches, can be rigid and time-consuming, making it difficult for organizations to adapt quickly to changing market conditions or unforeseen events⁷, ⁸. This rigidity can lead to a budget that is out of sync with operational needs and market realities.

Critics argue that sticking solely to nominal budget planning in an inflationary environment is akin to running a race without adjusting for headwinds – the effort might be the same, but the actual progress is diminished.

Nominal Budget Planning vs. Real Budget Planning

The core distinction between nominal budget planning and real budget planning lies in their treatment of inflation.

Nominal budget planning records and projects income and expenses in the actual dollars expected to be received or paid out. For example, if a company expects to sell a product for $100 next year, the nominal budget will show $100. Conversely, real budget planning adjusts these figures to reflect their value in a constant currency, typically a base year. If the $100 product sale is expected next year, but there's 5% inflation, the real budget might express that sale as approximately $95.24 in today's dollars ($100 / 1.05). This allows for a more accurate comparison of financial performance and resource availability over time, especially in periods of fluctuating prices. While nominal figures are the "face value" amounts, real figures reveal the underlying economic substance after accounting for the erosive effect of inflation on purchasing power.
⁶

FAQs

Q1: Why is nominal budget planning used if it doesn't account for inflation?

Nominal budget planning is often used for its simplicity and for short-term budgeting periods, typically a year or less. In such short timeframes, the impact of inflation might be considered minimal, or the organization might prefer a straightforward accounting of income and expenses without complex adjustments. It provides a clear, immediate picture of expected cash flows.

Q2: How does inflation specifically impact a nominal budget?

Inflation directly impacts a nominal budget by reducing the purchasing power of the budgeted funds over time. If expenses rise due to inflation but the nominal budget remains unchanged, the organization may find itself with insufficient funds to cover actual costs, or its planned investments may buy less than anticipated. This can lead to budget shortfalls and unexpected financial strain.
⁴, ⁵

Q3: Can nominal budget planning be effective for personal finance?

For day-to-day personal financial planning and short-term tracking of monthly cash flow, nominal budget planning can be effective. It helps individuals monitor their current income and expenses. However, for long-term goals like retirement planning or saving for large purchases, ignoring inflation in a purely nominal budget can lead to significant underestimation of future financial needs.

Q4: What is the main drawback for businesses using nominal budget planning?

The main drawback for businesses is that nominal budget planning can lead to distorted financial perceptions, particularly in periods of high or fluctuating inflation. It can cause misjudgments in resource allocation, make performance evaluation against targets less meaningful, and undermine effective strategic planning by not reflecting the true economic cost or value of activities over time.
², ³

Q5: How can the limitations of nominal budget planning be mitigated?

To mitigate the limitations, organizations can complement nominal budget planning with tools that consider inflation, such as real budget planning for long-term projections or implementing rolling forecasts. Regularly reviewing and adjusting the nominal budget based on actual inflation rates and market conditions can also help maintain its relevance and accuracy.¹