Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to N Definitions

Non obviousness

What Is Non-Obviousness?

Non-obviousness, while primarily a concept from patent law, refers to a quality of an idea, invention, or insight that is not readily apparent or easily deducible by a person skilled in the relevant art or field. In the realm of finance and investment strategy, non-obviousness describes the identification of investment opportunities or market insights that are not widely recognized or immediately apparent to the average market participant. It implies a deeper, more nuanced understanding of information or market dynamics that allows for the discovery of disproportionate returns or unique competitive advantage. Successful application of non-obviousness in investing often involves looking beyond surface-level data or conventional wisdom to uncover hidden value or impending shifts in the market.

History and Origin

The concept of non-obviousness has its strongest historical roots in intellectual property law, specifically U.S. patent law. It was formally codified as a requirement for patentability in the Patent Act of 1952, under 35 U.S.C. §103. Prior to this, courts had developed the "flash of genius" test, which required an invention to be the result of a sudden, unexpected revelation, but this was replaced by the more objective standard of non-obviousness. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) evaluates whether an invention, at the time it was made, would have been obvious to a "person having ordinary skill in the art" (PHOSITA). This criterion ensures that patents are granted only for genuine advancements, not merely for trivial modifications or combinations of existing knowledge.
4
A landmark Supreme Court case, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (2007), significantly shaped the modern interpretation of non-obviousness. The Court reinforced a flexible, common-sense approach to the obviousness inquiry, moving away from a rigid test that required an explicit "teaching, suggestion, or motivation" to combine prior art elements. The unanimous decision underscored that an invention could be deemed obvious if the combination of elements was "obvious to try" or if the solution was known in the field, even without a direct suggestion. 3While its origins are legal, the principle of non-obviousness resonates in financial markets, particularly in discussions around market efficiency and the pursuit of alpha, where investors seek insights that are not easily discernible to the broader investing public.

Key Takeaways

  • Non-obviousness refers to insights or inventions that are not easily deduced by someone skilled in the field.
  • In finance, it relates to identifying unique investment opportunities or market advantages not widely recognized.
  • It is a core requirement in U.S. patent law, ensuring true innovation is protected.
  • Achieving non-obvious insights in investing often requires deep due diligence and critical analysis beyond conventional methods.
  • Its antithesis in finance is information that is already "priced in" by efficient markets.

Interpreting Non-Obviousness

In financial markets, interpreting non-obviousness involves discerning information or patterns that are not reflected in current asset prices. This goes beyond readily available public data that most analysts would incorporate into their models. For instance, while fundamental analysis scrutinizes financial statements and economic indicators, a non-obvious insight might emerge from understanding niche industry dynamics, proprietary data sources, or behavioral biases affecting specific market segments.

Identifying something non-obvious often means challenging prevailing narratives or widely accepted assumptions. It requires an ability to connect disparate pieces of information, anticipate second-order effects, or recognize emerging trends before they become mainstream knowledge. Investors seeking non-obvious opportunities might focus on identifying instances of market mispricing where the market has overlooked certain factors or misinterpreted their significance.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor analyzing the semiconductor industry. An obvious observation might be that Company A is a leader in chip manufacturing with strong quarterly earnings. A non-obvious insight, however, might involve looking deeper.

Suppose the investor discovers that Company A, despite its current success, heavily relies on a single, obscure, and highly specialized component supplied by a small, privately-held company, "ComponentCo." Furthermore, through extensive research and conversations with industry experts, the investor uncovers that ComponentCo holds a unique, difficult-to-replicate manufacturing process for this critical part and faces no direct competition. The investor also learns that ComponentCo is quietly pursuing a patent for a next-generation version of this component that would dramatically reduce production costs for Company A's future chips, but this information is not yet public.

This insight into ComponentCo's vital role, its unique technology, and its impending cost-saving innovation for Company A is non-obvious. It's not found in Company A's public filings or analyst reports. Based on this, the investor might develop an investment thesis to invest in Company A (assuming it can acquire ComponentCo or secure long-term exclusive supply) or seek out opportunities related to ComponentCo if it were to go public or be acquired. This goes beyond standard technical analysis or widely available news.

Practical Applications

Non-obviousness, as an analytical approach, has several practical applications in finance and investing, particularly for those seeking an edge in competitive markets.

  • Alpha Generation: Skilled investors aim to generate "alpha," which is returns exceeding what would be expected given the risk. This often stems from insights that are non-obvious to the broader market. Discovering undervalued assets or anticipating shifts in market sentiment before they become consensus views are direct applications.
  • Venture Capital and Private Equity: In these fields, identifying disruptive technologies or business models early on requires an eye for the non-obvious. Many successful startups initially seem counter-intuitive or too niche to mainstream investors until their non-obvious potential materializes.
  • Information Arbitrage: While true arbitrage opportunities (risk-free profits) are rare in efficient markets, investors sometimes find informational arbitrage opportunities by uncovering and acting on non-obvious information before it is fully incorporated into prices.
  • Competitive Advantage in Data: In an age of abundant data, the true competitive advantage lies not just in collecting data but in extracting non-obvious insights from it. This can involve combining traditional financial data with alternative datasets (e.g., satellite imagery for retail foot traffic, shipping data for global trade patterns) to derive unique predictive signals. For instance, focusing on "extra-financial data" can provide deeper insights beyond what is typically found in standard financial statements.
    2* Risk Management: Identifying non-obvious risks, such as latent geopolitical tensions, supply chain vulnerabilities, or emerging regulatory threats that are not yet priced into securities, is crucial for effective risk management and portfolio protection.

Limitations and Criticisms

While seeking non-obvious insights can lead to significant investment gains, there are considerable limitations and criticisms. The primary challenge lies in the subjective nature of what constitutes "non-obvious." What might appear non-obvious to one investor could be common knowledge to another specializing in a different niche.

One major critique comes from the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), particularly its stronger forms, which posit that all available information is already reflected in asset prices. If markets are truly efficient, consistently finding non-obvious, profitable insights would be impossible. Eugene Fama's work on efficient markets suggests that competition among investors quickly drives prices to reflect all public and even some private information. 1This implies that any perceived non-obvious opportunity is either merely noise, a reflection of higher risk, or a temporary anomaly that will quickly be arbitraged away.

Furthermore, pursuing non-obvious insights can be resource-intensive. It often requires extensive research, access to specialized data, and a deep understanding of specific industries or technologies. There's also the risk of confirmation bias, where investors might cherry-pick data to support a "non-obvious" investment thesis that is, in reality, flawed or based on incomplete information. It can lead to overconfidence in unique strategies, potentially overlooking more traditional and robust analytical frameworks.

Non-Obviousness vs. Asymmetric Information

While both concepts relate to information advantages, non-obviousness and asymmetric information describe different facets of informational disparities in finance.

  • Non-obviousness pertains to information that exists publicly or can be derived, but its implications are not immediately apparent or easily discernible by the average, even well-informed, market participant. It requires a deeper level of analysis, creativity, or insight to connect disparate dots and identify underlying patterns or future implications. An insight is non-obvious because it's intellectually challenging to uncover or synthesize. It's about seeing what others aren't, even if the building blocks are accessible.
  • Asymmetric information refers to a situation where one party in a transaction has more or better information than the other. This information is typically private or proprietary, meaning it is not publicly available to all market participants. Examples include corporate insiders having knowledge of an impending merger, or a company's management understanding operational details not visible to outside investors. The challenge with asymmetric information is access, not necessarily interpretation.

In essence, non-obviousness is about interpreting broadly available (or discoverable) information in a unique way, while asymmetric information is about possessing exclusive information. An investor might leverage non-obvious insights derived from public data to gain an advantage, whereas an insider might profit from asymmetric information that is not available to the public at all.

FAQs

What makes an investment opportunity non-obvious?

An investment opportunity is considered non-obvious if the factors contributing to its potential value or risk are not readily apparent from standard financial analysis or publicly disseminated news. It requires unique insight, specialized knowledge, or an alternative analytical framework to uncover.

Is non-obviousness the same as a secret?

No. Non-obviousness does not necessarily mean the information is a secret. The underlying data or facts might be public, but the interpretation, connection of ideas, or implication of those facts for investment returns is not widely understood or recognized. A secret, by contrast, implies private or undisclosed information.

Can individuals find non-obvious investment insights?

Yes, individuals can find non-obvious investment insights, but it often requires significant dedication to research, a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, and a deep dive into specific industries or companies. This approach is often associated with styles like value investing or growth investing where investors look for mispriced assets or future trends before the broader market.

How does non-obviousness relate to market efficiency?

Non-obviousness is in tension with strong forms of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. In a perfectly efficient market, all information would be instantly and fully reflected in prices, leaving no room for non-obvious advantages. However, proponents of active investing argue that market inefficiencies, often due to behavioral biases or information processing delays, create opportunities for discerning investors to identify non-obvious insights.