What Is Extraordinary Item?
An extraordinary item was a gain or loss recognized on a company's income statement that was considered both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. These items were distinct from a company's normal operating activities and, when present, could significantly impact reported profitability. The classification of an extraordinary item fell under the purview of financial accounting principles, aiming to provide a clearer view of a company's core performance by separating these one-time, exceptional events. Prior to changes in accounting standards, an extraordinary item was reported separately to highlight its non-recurring nature.
History and Origin
The concept of an extraordinary item has a significant history within financial reporting, particularly under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States. Historically, accounting standards required events or transactions to be classified as extraordinary if they were both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence within the context of the entity's environment. When such an item met these strict criteria, it was segregated from the results of ordinary operations and presented separately on the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations.15
However, the application of the "unusual and infrequent" criteria often led to uncertainty and complexity for preparers, auditors, and regulators. It became increasingly rare in practice for a transaction or event to genuinely meet the stringent requirements for extraordinary item presentation. Recognizing this, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-01, "Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20)," in January 2015. This update formally eliminated the concept of extraordinary items from U.S. GAAP for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, simplifying income statement presentation., 14T13hirteen years earlier, in 2002, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) had already removed extraordinary items as a line item in its International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).,
12
11## Key Takeaways
- An extraordinary item was a gain or loss that was both unusual and infrequent in nature.
- Historically, these items were reported separately on the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations.
- The FASB eliminated the extraordinary item classification from U.S. GAAP in 2015 (ASU 2015-01).
- The IASB removed the concept from IFRS in 2002.
- Events that would have been classified as extraordinary are now typically reported as a component of income from continuing operations or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
Interpreting the Extraordinary Item
Before their elimination as a separate line item, extraordinary items provided users of financial statements with a clear signal that a reported gain or loss was unlikely to recur. The intent was to prevent highly unusual events from distorting the perception of a company's regular, ongoing operational performance. By separating an extraordinary item, analysts and investors could more accurately assess the underlying profitability trend of a business.
Although no longer presented as a distinct category, items that are unusual or infrequent are still disclosed by companies. These are now typically reported as separate components of income from continuing operations or detailed within the footnotes to the financial statements. F10inancial statement users must therefore carefully read the disclosures to identify such material events and understand their one-time or unusual nature when evaluating a company's performance.
Hypothetical Example
Imagine a manufacturing company, "Widgets Inc.," with operations based primarily in a region not prone to natural disasters. In a particular year, a rare and severe earthquake causes significant damage to one of its production facilities, resulting in a substantial uninsured loss of $50 million. Prior to ASU 2015-01, this loss would likely have qualified as an extraordinary item because it was both unusual (earthquakes are not common in the region) and infrequent (unlikely to happen again soon).
Widgets Inc. would have reported this $50 million loss separately, net of any tax benefits, below its income from continuing operations on its income statement. This clear segregation would have allowed investors to see that while the company incurred a significant loss, it was due to an exceptional event rather than a decline in its core manufacturing business or recurring expenses. Under current GAAP, this loss would still be disclosed as an unusual or infrequent event, but it would be presented as part of the continuing operations.
Practical Applications
While the specific classification of an extraordinary item has been eliminated from major accounting frameworks, the underlying concept of identifying and understanding unusual and infrequent events remains crucial for financial analysis. These events, even if no longer labeled "extraordinary," still show up in financial reporting and demand careful consideration.
One notable real-world example of an event that, at the time, generated significant discussions around extraordinary items or non-recurring charges was the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The catastrophic explosion and subsequent environmental disaster led to billions of dollars in cleanup costs, legal settlements, and penalties for BP., 9S8uch immense, unforeseen liabilities, although a direct consequence of operations, were highly unusual and infrequent. Today, these types of significant, one-time impacts are still clearly disclosed within a company's financial statements, often within sections related to other income/expenses or within the footnotes, allowing analysts to adjust their assessments of core profitability. Companies filing their financial statements adhere to these disclosure requirements, ensuring that even without the "extraordinary item" label, users can discern recurring performance from exceptional occurrences.
Limitations and Criticisms
The primary criticism of the extraordinary item classification, which ultimately led to its elimination from U.S. GAAP, was the subjectivity involved in applying the "unusual and infrequent" criteria. Determining whether an event met both conditions was often challenging, leading to inconsistencies in financial reporting across different companies. P7reparers spent time and resources assessing whether an event qualified, and auditors and regulators had to evaluate those assessments, adding unnecessary complexity without consistently providing truly unique insights.,
6
5Furthermore, some argued that even "extraordinary" events could still provide relevant information about a company's overall risk profile or management effectiveness, and fully segregating them might obscure the full economic reality. The move to eliminate the extraordinary item classification reflected a broader simplification initiative in financial reporting, aiming to reduce costs and complexity while maintaining the usefulness of financial information. Now, material items that are unusual or infrequent are still disclosed, but they are presented as part of income from continuing operations, requiring users to exercise judgment in their analysis.,
4
3## Extraordinary Item vs. Non-Recurring Item
The distinction between an extraordinary item and a non-recurring item has historically been a point of confusion in financial analysis, though the formal elimination of "extraordinary item" has largely merged these concepts in practice.
Historically, for an event to be classified as an extraordinary item under U.S. GAAP, it had to meet two strict criteria: it must be both unusual in nature (highly abnormal and clearly unrelated to typical activities) and infrequent in occurrence (not reasonably expected to recur in the foreseeable future). Examples often cited included uninsured losses from major natural disasters in areas not typically affected.
A non-recurring item, on the other hand, is a broader category that includes any gain or loss recognized on the income statement that is not part of a company's normal, ongoing operations and is unlikely to continue. This category encompasses items that are either unusual or infrequent, but not necessarily both. Common examples include restructuring costs, gains or losses from the sale of assets, litigation settlements, or impairments.,
2
1Today, with the extraordinary item classification removed from U.S. GAAP and IFRS, events that previously might have qualified as extraordinary are now typically treated as specific types of non-recurring items. They are generally presented as separate components within income from continuing operations or disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements, allowing analysts to identify their one-time impact.
FAQs
1. Are extraordinary items still reported on financial statements?
No, the specific classification of "extraordinary items" has been eliminated from both U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Events that previously met these criteria are now typically reported as part of a company's income from continuing operations and often disclosed separately or in the footnotes to the financial statements.
2. Why was the extraordinary item classification removed?
The classification was removed primarily due to its infrequent application in practice and the subjectivity involved in determining if an event was truly both "unusual" and "infrequent." The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) aimed to simplify financial reporting and reduce the costs and complexities associated with these assessments, while ensuring that material unusual events are still transparently disclosed.
3. How do analysts account for events that would have been extraordinary items?
Financial analysts still adjust for the impact of significant unusual or infrequent events when evaluating a company's core performance and future profitability. Although these items are no longer separately listed as "extraordinary," they are typically identified through detailed disclosures in the income statement or notes to the financial statements. Analysts often exclude their impact to get a clearer picture of recurring earnings.
4. What are examples of events that were once considered extraordinary items?
Historically, examples included uninsured losses from major natural disasters (like an earthquake or flood in an area unaccustomed to such events), expropriation of assets by a foreign government, or certain prohibitions under newly enacted laws or regulations. The key was that the event had to be highly abnormal and unlikely to recur.