Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to O Definitions

Option pricing model

_LINK_POOL:

What Is Option pricing model?

An option pricing model is a mathematical framework used to determine the theoretical fair value of an option contract. These models are fundamental to derivatives valuation within the broader category of quantitative finance. By inputting various factors, an option pricing model helps investors and traders estimate what an option should be worth, rather than simply relying on its market price. The objective is to provide a standardized approach to valuing these complex financial instruments, which derive their value from an underlying asset like a stock, commodity, or currency.

History and Origin

The earliest academic work on derivative pricing dates back to Louis Bachelier's 1900 thesis, which applied Brownian motion to derivative pricing. However, his work had limited impact for many years. Significant advancements in options pricing theory emerged in the 1960s with contributions from researchers like Case Sprenkle, James Boness, and Paul Samuelson. A pivotal moment arrived in 1973 when Fischer Black and Myron Scholes published their groundbreaking paper, "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," in the Journal of Political Economy.18,17,16,15 This paper introduced a formula, now famously known as the Black-Scholes model, which provided a closed-form solution for pricing European-style options. Robert C. Merton further expanded on their work, coining the term "Black-Scholes options pricing model" and providing extensions.14, The theoretical framework provided by the Black-Scholes model significantly contributed to the growth and widespread adoption of options trading and laid the foundation for modern financial mathematics.,13

Key Takeaways

  • An option pricing model is a mathematical tool for determining an option's theoretical fair value.
  • The Black-Scholes model, developed in 1973, is one of the most widely recognized option pricing models.
  • Key inputs for these models include the underlying asset's price, strike price, time to expiration, volatility, and interest rates.
  • Option pricing models are crucial for risk management, arbitrage identification, and developing trading strategies.
  • Despite their utility, these models have limitations, such as assumptions about constant volatility and the distribution of asset prices.

Formula and Calculation

The most famous option pricing model is the Black-Scholes model, which calculates the theoretical price of European call option and put option contracts. The formulas are as follows:

For a European Call Option:

C=S0N(d1)−Ke−rTN(d2)C = S_0 N(d_1) - K e^{-rT} N(d_2)

For a European Put Option:

P=Ke−rTN(−d2)−S0N(−d1)P = K e^{-rT} N(-d_2) - S_0 N(-d_1)

Where:

d1=ln⁡(S0K)+(r+σ22)TσTd_1 = \frac{\ln(\frac{S_0}{K}) + (r + \frac{\sigma^2}{2})T}{\sigma \sqrt{T}} d2=d1−σTd_2 = d_1 - \sigma \sqrt{T}

Variables defined:

  • (C) = Theoretical call option price
  • (P) = Theoretical put option price
  • (S_0) = Current price of the underlying asset
  • (K) = Strike price of the option
  • (T) = Time to expiration (in years)
  • (r) = Annualized risk-free rate (e.g., U.S. Treasury bill rate)
  • (\sigma) = Volatility of the underlying asset's returns
  • (N(x)) = Cumulative standard normal distribution function (represents the probability that a standard normal random variable will be less than or equal to x)
  • (e) = The base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828)
  • (\ln) = Natural logarithm

Interpreting the Option Pricing Model

An option pricing model generates a theoretical price, which market participants can compare against the actual market price of an option. If the model's price is higher than the market price, the option might be considered undervalued, and vice versa. This comparison helps traders identify potential arbitrage opportunities or determine if an option is reasonably priced.

The inputs to an option pricing model, particularly volatility and time decay, heavily influence the calculated price. Higher expected future volatility generally leads to higher option premiums, as there's a greater chance for the underlying asset's price to move significantly, increasing the probability of the option ending in the money. Similarly, as an option approaches its expiration date, its extrinsic value, primarily driven by time, diminishes, a phenomenon known as time decay.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor evaluating a call option on Stock ABC with the following characteristics:

  • Current Stock ABC price ((S_0)): $100
  • Strike price ((K)): $105
  • Time to expiration ((T)): 0.5 years (6 months)
  • Annualized risk-free rate ((r)): 3% (0.03)
  • Volatility ((\sigma)): 20% (0.20)

Using the Black-Scholes formula, the investor would calculate (d_1) and (d_2) and then use these values with the cumulative standard normal distribution to find the theoretical call option price. A simplified calculation might yield a theoretical price of, for instance, $3.50. If the market is currently trading this option at $3.00, the model suggests it might be slightly undervalued. Conversely, if it's trading at $4.00, it might be overvalued.

Practical Applications

Option pricing models are widely used across various facets of finance:

  • Valuation: The most direct application is determining the fair value of options for trading, accounting, and regulatory purposes. This helps market participants make informed buy or sell decisions.
  • Risk Management: Models help quantify the risk associated with option positions. For example, "Greeks" like delta, gamma, theta, and vega, which are outputs of models like Black-Scholes, provide insights into an option's sensitivity to changes in the underlying asset price, time, and volatility. This is essential for hedging strategies.12
  • Portfolio Management: Fund managers use option pricing models to assess the impact of adding options to a portfolio, optimizing returns for a given level of risk, or implementing specific market views.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Regulatory bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversee options markets to ensure fair and orderly trading.,11,10 The use of established pricing models can contribute to transparency and compliance in valuation practices. The SEC, along with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), establishes rules for options trading, including margin requirements and reporting standards.9,8

Limitations and Criticisms

While option pricing models, particularly the Black-Scholes model, revolutionized financial markets, they are not without limitations. A primary criticism is their reliance on several simplifying assumptions that may not hold true in real-world markets.7,,6

Key limitations include:

  • Constant Volatility: The Black-Scholes model assumes that the volatility of the underlying asset remains constant over the life of the option, which is rarely the case in dynamic markets.,5 Actual market volatility fluctuates, leading to the "volatility smile" phenomenon where options with the same expiration but different strike prices have different implied volatilities.4,3
  • Constant Risk-Free Rate: The model assumes a constant risk-free rate, whereas interest rates can change over time.
  • No Dividends: The original Black-Scholes model assumes the underlying asset does not pay dividends. While adjustments can be made, it's a simplification.
  • European-Style Options Only: The basic Black-Scholes model is designed for European options, which can only be exercised at expiration. It is not directly suitable for American options, which can be exercised at any time up to expiration.,2 Other models, such as the binomial option pricing model, are better suited for American options.
  • No Transaction Costs or Taxes: The model assumes no transaction costs or taxes, which are present in real-world trading.
  • Efficient Markets: The models implicitly assume highly efficient markets with no arbitrage opportunities, where information is instantaneously reflected in prices.

These limitations can lead to discrepancies between theoretical model prices and actual market prices, especially during periods of market stress or high uncertainty.1

Option pricing model vs. Implied Volatility

While an option pricing model uses volatility as an input to calculate an option's theoretical price, implied volatility is derived from the market price of an option using an option pricing model.

  • Option Pricing Model: This is the mathematical formula (like Black-Scholes) that takes known inputs (current stock price, strike price, time to expiration, risk-free rate, and expected volatility) to output a theoretical option price.
  • Implied Volatility: This is the level of volatility that, when plugged into an option pricing model, makes the model's theoretical price equal to the current market price of the option. It represents the market's expectation of future volatility for the underlying asset. Traders often compare implied volatility to historical volatility to gauge if options are relatively expensive or cheap. The concept of implied volatility emerged as a way to "reverse engineer" the Black-Scholes model, as real-world market prices often diverged from the model's outputs when using historical volatility.

FAQs

Q: What is the most common option pricing model?
A: The Black-Scholes model is the most well-known and widely used option pricing model, particularly for European options.

Q: Why are option pricing models important?
A: Option pricing models are crucial because they provide a standardized, mathematical framework for valuing complex derivatives. This helps investors and traders make informed decisions, manage risk through hedging, and identify potential mispricings in the market.

Q: Can option pricing models predict future stock prices?
A: No, option pricing models do not predict future stock prices. Instead, they use the current stock price, along with other inputs like volatility and interest rates, to calculate a theoretical fair value for the option at a given point in time.

Q: Are all option pricing models the same?
A: No, while the Black-Scholes model is prominent, various other models exist, such as the binomial option pricing model and Monte Carlo simulations. These models may be better suited for different types of options (e.g., American option) or market conditions, addressing some of the limitations of simpler models.