Skip to main content
← Back to O Definitions

Options pricing models

What Is Options Pricing Models?

Options pricing models are mathematical frameworks used to calculate the theoretical fair value of an options contract. These models fall under the broader category of derivatives pricing and are crucial for traders, investors, and financial institutions to make informed decisions. By providing a theoretical value, options pricing models help market participants identify potential mispricings, manage risk, and implement various options strategies. The most well-known of these, the Black-Scholes model, revolutionized the understanding and trading of financial instruments. Understanding options pricing models is essential for navigating the complex derivatives market.

History and Origin

The landscape of options trading was significantly transformed with the advent of the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model. Prior to its development, pricing options was largely an art based on intuition and limited quantitative methods. In 1973, economists Fischer Black and Myron Scholes published their seminal paper, "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," which introduced a groundbreaking formula for valuing European-style options. Robert C. Merton further expanded on their mathematical framework, leading to the model often being referred to as Black-Scholes-Merton.

Their work provided a robust, theoretically sound method for determining an option's fair value, based on factors such as the underlying asset's price, the option's strike price, time to expiration date, volatility, and the risk-free rate.9 This breakthrough was instrumental in the rapid expansion of the derivatives market by enabling more standardized and reliable pricing. The fundamental insight was the concept of dynamic hedging, where a portfolio of the underlying asset and the risk-free asset could replicate the option's payoff, thus allowing for a unique, arbitrage-free price.8 Myron Scholes and Robert C. Merton were later awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1997 for their contributions, with Fischer Black recognized posthumously.7

Key Takeaways

  • Options pricing models provide a theoretical fair value for options contracts, aiding in trading and risk management.
  • The Black-Scholes model is a cornerstone of derivatives pricing, published in 1973 by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, with contributions from Robert C. Merton.
  • These models consider factors like the underlying asset's price, strike price, time to expiration, volatility, and the risk-free interest rate.
  • They are primarily used for European-style options but have been adapted and extended for other option types and complex derivatives.
  • While powerful, options pricing models rely on several assumptions that may not always hold true in real-world markets.

Formula and Calculation

The most prominent options pricing model is the Black-Scholes formula for a European call option. The formula is:

C=S0N(d1)KerTN(d2)C = S_0 N(d_1) - K e^{-rT} N(d_2)

Where:

  • (C) = Theoretical call option price
  • (S_0) = Current stock price
  • (K) = Strike price of the option
  • (T) = Time to expiration (in years)
  • (r) = Risk-free annual interest rate
  • (N(x)) = Cumulative standard normal distribution function
  • (e) = Euler's number (approximately 2.71828)
  • (d_1) and (d_2) are calculated as follows:

d1=ln(S0/K)+(r+σ2/2)TσTd_1 = \frac{\ln(S_0/K) + (r + \sigma^2/2)T}{\sigma \sqrt{T}}

d2=d1σTd_2 = d_1 - \sigma \sqrt{T}

Where:

  • (\ln) = Natural logarithm
  • (\sigma) = Volatility of the underlying asset's returns (annualized standard deviation)

For a European put option, the formula is:

P=KerTN(d2)S0N(d1)P = K e^{-rT} N(-d_2) - S_0 N(-d_1)

These formulas illustrate the mathematical complexity involved in options pricing models and the precise inputs required for their calculation.

Interpreting the Options Pricing Models

Options pricing models provide a theoretical value, which serves as a benchmark for market participants. If an option's market price is significantly different from the model's calculated value, it may suggest an opportunity for arbitrage or simply indicate that the market's implied expectations (particularly regarding future volatility) differ from the model's inputs. Traders often use these models to determine if an option is overvalued or undervalued, influencing their decision to buy or sell.

The output of an options pricing model, while a single numerical value, reflects the intricate interplay of its various inputs. For instance, a higher expected volatility of the underlying asset will generally result in a higher theoretical value for both call and put options, reflecting the increased probability of large price movements. Similarly, a longer time to expiration typically increases an option's value due to more time for the underlying asset to move favorably. Understanding these sensitivities, often described by the "Greeks" in options trading, is critical for effective interpretation and application of the model's output.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor evaluating a call option on XYZ Corp. stock using an options pricing model.

Scenario:

  • Current Stock Price ((S_0)): $100
  • Strike Price ((K)): $105
  • Time to Expiration ((T)): 0.5 years (6 months)
  • Risk-Free Rate ((r)): 3% (0.03)
  • Expected Volatility ((\sigma)): 20% (0.20)

Calculation Steps:

  1. Calculate (d_1):
    (d_1 = \frac{\ln(100/105) + (0.03 + 0.20^2/2) * 0.5}{0.20 * \sqrt{0.5}})
    (d_1 = \frac{\ln(0.95238) + (0.03 + 0.04/2) * 0.5}{0.20 * 0.7071})
    (d_1 = \frac{-0.04879 + (0.03 + 0.02) * 0.5}{0.14142})
    (d_1 = \frac{-0.04879 + 0.025}{0.14142} = \frac{-0.02379}{0.14142} \approx -0.1682)

  2. Calculate (d_2):
    (d_2 = d_1 - \sigma \sqrt{T} = -0.1682 - 0.20 * 0.7071 = -0.1682 - 0.14142 \approx -0.3096)

  3. Find (N(d_1)) and (N(d_2)) using a standard normal distribution table or calculator:
    (N(d_1) = N(-0.1682) \approx 0.4331)
    (N(d_2) = N(-0.3096) \approx 0.3785)

  4. Calculate the call option price ((C)):
    (C = 100 * N(-0.1682) - 105 * e^{(-0.03 * 0.5)} * N(-0.3096))
    (C = 100 * 0.4331 - 105 * e^{-0.015} * 0.3785)
    (C = 43.31 - 105 * 0.9851 * 0.3785)
    (C = 43.31 - 39.16 \approx 4.15)

Based on these inputs, the theoretical fair value of the call option is approximately $4.15. An option trader would then compare this value to the actual market price to decide on their trading action.

Practical Applications

Options pricing models are fundamental tools across various facets of finance. In investment management, portfolio managers use them to value derivatives positions and manage portfolio risk. They are integral to quantitative trading firms that employ complex algorithms to exploit perceived mispricings in the market. The models also facilitate the creation of synthetic financial instruments and structured products.

Beyond direct trading, these models are used for risk management by helping to calculate metrics such as Value at Risk (VaR) for portfolios containing options. Financial institutions use them to assess counterparty risk in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts. For example, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) collects and publishes statistics on OTC derivatives, highlighting the vast scale and importance of these markets, which rely heavily on sophisticated pricing models.6 Regulatory bodies also employ these models, directly or indirectly, in assessing capital requirements for banks and other financial entities that hold significant derivatives exposures. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provides guidance to investors on understanding options, underscoring the necessity of informed decision-making in this complex area.5

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their widespread use, options pricing models, particularly the Black-Scholes model, have several limitations. One primary criticism is the assumption of constant volatility. In reality, market volatility is rarely constant and can fluctuate significantly, often increasing during periods of market stress. This discrepancy can lead to the "volatility smile" or "volatility skew," where implied volatilities vary across different strike prices and maturities, contradicting the model's assumption.4

Another limitation is the assumption that underlying asset prices follow a log-normal distribution, implying continuous price movements without sudden jumps.3 However, real-world markets often experience discontinuous price jumps due to unexpected news or events. The original Black-Scholes model also assumes no dividends are paid, no transaction costs, and that options are European-style (exercisable only at expiration).2 These assumptions can be problematic when valuing American-style options (which can be exercised anytime before expiration) or options on dividend-paying stocks. While extensions and alternative models have been developed to address some of these shortcomings, the core assumptions of the foundational models remain a subject of academic and practical debate.1

Options Pricing Models vs. Binomial Option Pricing Model

While both are options pricing models, the Black-Scholes model and the Binomial Option Pricing Model approach valuation from different perspectives and have distinct applications.

FeatureBlack-Scholes ModelBinomial Option Pricing Model
Time StepsContinuous timeDiscrete time steps
Option TypePrimarily for European optionsCan price both European and American options
ComplexityRequires partial differential equations/complex mathSimpler, tree-based, intuitive
InputsCurrent price, strike, time, rate, volatilityCurrent price, strike, time, rate, volatility, up/down factors
Early ExerciseDoes not directly account for early exerciseAllows for modeling of early exercise decisions
ApplicationWidely used for liquid, actively traded optionsOften used for American options and teaching concepts

The Black-Scholes model provides a closed-form solution, making it efficient for calculating prices for a large number of options, especially European ones. In contrast, the Binomial Option Pricing Model builds a "tree" of possible future stock prices, allowing for decisions at each node, which makes it particularly useful for valuing American options where early exercise is a possibility. While the Black-Scholes model offers speed for European options, the Binomial Model's flexibility in handling early exercise makes it a valuable tool, especially for equity options.

FAQs

What is the most commonly used options pricing model?

The Black-Scholes model is the most well-known and foundational options pricing model. While newer models and variations exist, its principles and insights remain central to the understanding of options valuation in modern finance.

What factors influence an option's price?

Several factors influence an option's price, including the current price of the underlying asset, the option's strike price, the time remaining until its expiration, the volatility of the underlying asset, and the prevailing risk-free interest rate. Expected dividends on the underlying asset can also impact pricing, especially for put options.

Are options pricing models perfectly accurate?

No, options pricing models provide a theoretical value based on a set of assumptions. Real-world markets are dynamic and can deviate from these assumptions (e.g., constant volatility, continuous trading). Therefore, the model's output is a guide, not a definitive prediction of an option's market price. Market forces of supply and demand also play a significant role.

Can options pricing models be used for all types of options?

The original Black-Scholes model is designed for European-style options. However, various extensions and other models, like the Binomial Option Pricing Model or Monte Carlo simulation, are used to price American options, exotic options, and options on different types of underlying assets.

What is implied volatility in the context of options pricing?

Implied volatility is the level of future volatility implied by the current market price of an option. Instead of an input, it is derived by reversing an options pricing model, taking the observed market price and solving for the volatility that makes the model's theoretical value equal to the market price. It is a forward-looking measure of market expectations for the underlying asset's price movements.