Skip to main content
← Back to P Definitions

Preferential trade agreement

What Is a Preferential Trade Agreement?

A preferential trade agreement (PTA) is a trading pact between two or more countries that grants preferential market access to certain products by reducing, but not necessarily eliminating, tariffs or other trade barriers on goods and services imported from the participating countries. As a key component of international trade policy and economic integration, PTAs aim to facilitate trade and commerce among their members by offering more favorable terms than those extended to non-member countries18. Unlike broader agreements, preferential trade agreements are inherently discriminatory, as they do not extend the same benefits to all trading partners under the most-favored-nation (MFN) principle typically upheld by the World Trade Organization (WTO).

History and Origin

The concept of preferential trade treatment has historical roots, often emerging from specific geopolitical or economic objectives. While multilateral efforts like the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), established in 1947, aimed to promote non-discriminatory global trade liberalization, the post-World War II era also saw the emergence of regional trade arrangements. A prominent early example is the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), formed in 1951, which laid the groundwork for what would become the European Union (EU), the most significant example of a deeper preferential trade agreement today17.

The proliferation of preferential trade agreements accelerated noticeably in the 1990s and 2000s. From around 70 PTAs in force in 1990, the number surged to nearly 300 by 2010, with the average WTO member being party to multiple such agreements. This surge has transformed the global trading landscape, with a significant portion of world trade now occurring under some form of preferential arrangement16.

Key Takeaways

  • A preferential trade agreement (PTA) reduces tariffs or other trade barriers for member countries, offering them better trade terms than non-members.
  • PTAs are a form of regional or bilateral economic integration, facilitating increased trade among participants.
  • While beneficial for members through market access and lower costs, PTAs can lead to trade diversion from more efficient non-member producers.
  • They often include provisions beyond just tariffs, such as rules of origin, investment, and services.
  • The number of preferential trade agreements has grown significantly, indicating a shift towards more regionalized trade policies.

Interpreting the Preferential Trade Agreement

A preferential trade agreement is interpreted primarily by its scope and the depth of its preferences. Unlike a free trade area, which aims to eliminate tariffs entirely among members, a PTA merely reduces them15. The benefits granted by a preferential trade agreement may involve price-related advantages, such as reduced customs fees, or non-price-related benefits like simplified trade formalities14.

The terms of a PTA, particularly its rules of origin, are crucial for understanding its impact. These rules define which goods qualify for preferential treatment, ensuring that only products substantially produced within the member countries benefit from the reduced trade barriers13. Analyzing the specific provisions of a preferential trade agreement helps in evaluating its potential to foster trade creation (increased trade between members due to efficiency) versus trade diversion (shifting trade from a more efficient non-member to a less efficient member due to preferential tariffs).

Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical countries, Alpha and Beta, that enter into a preferential trade agreement. Before the agreement, both Alpha and Beta impose a 10% tariff on imported textiles from all countries, including each other. Through their PTA, they agree to reduce the tariff on textiles originating from each other to 2%. For textiles from non-member countries like Gamma, the 10% tariff remains.

As a result of this preferential trade agreement, Beta's textile manufacturers now find it significantly cheaper to export textiles to Alpha compared to producers in Gamma. Similarly, Alpha's textile industry gains a competitive edge in Beta's market. This incentivizes Alpha and Beta to increase their international trade in textiles, as the lower import duties make their products more attractive within the bloc. Consumers in Alpha and Beta might benefit from lower prices for imported textiles, assuming the cost savings from reduced tariffs are passed on.

Practical Applications

Preferential trade agreements are widely applied in modern trade policy to foster closer economic ties between nations or blocs. They are commonly seen in various forms of regional integration, from simple tariff reductions to more complex frameworks that include provisions on services, investment, and intellectual property.

One common application is the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), where developed countries offer non-reciprocal preferential market access to products from developing and least-developed countries11, 12. This unilateral preferential trade agreement aims to promote economic growth in beneficiary countries by providing duty-free or reduced-duty entry for a wide range of products10.

Another significant application involves bilateral agreements between specific countries. For instance, the United States has entered into numerous free trade agreements (which are advanced forms of PTAs) with partners such as Chile, which immediately eliminated a large percentage of bilateral trade tariffs upon entry into force9. These agreements are critical for businesses, impacting supply chains, production locations, and overall competitive strategies by offering preferential access and potentially easing other trade-related formalities7, 8.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their widespread adoption, preferential trade agreements face several limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is the potential for "trade diversion." This occurs when a PTA causes trade to shift from a more efficient non-member producer to a less efficient member producer simply because the member producer benefits from the preferential tariff reduction, even if their underlying costs are higher6. Such diversion can lead to an overall reduction in global welfare by distorting efficient resource allocation and reducing Gross Domestic Product for affected non-members4, 5.

Another criticism revolves around the complexity and fragmentation they introduce into the global trading system. The proliferation of diverse PTAs with varying rules of origin and specific provisions can create a "spaghetti bowl" effect, making it challenging for businesses to navigate the intricate web of trade regulations and for customs authorities to implement them3. This administrative complexity can undermine the efficiency gains sought by these agreements. Furthermore, some critics argue that the focus on preferential trade agreements detracts from efforts to strengthen the multilateral trade system under the WTO, as countries may prioritize bilateral gains over broader, non-discriminatory liberalization2.

Preferential Trade Agreement vs. Free Trade Agreement

While often used interchangeably in casual conversation, a preferential trade agreement (PTA) and a free trade agreement (FTA) represent different stages of economic integration.

A PTA is the broadest and least restrictive form of trade pact. It involves member countries agreeing to reduce, but not necessarily eliminate, tariffs on certain goods or services exchanged between them. The key characteristic is "preferential access," meaning that members receive better terms than non-members, but duties are not necessarily zero.

An FTA, on the other hand, is a more advanced form of a PTA. In a free trade agreement, member countries commit to eliminating all tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers on substantially all trade between them. While trade among members is free, each member country retains its own independent trade policy with respect to non-member countries. Essentially, all free trade agreements are preferential trade agreements, but not all preferential trade agreements are free trade agreements, as the latter implies complete tariff elimination within the bloc for specified goods.

FAQs

Q: What is the main goal of a preferential trade agreement?
A: The main goal of a preferential trade agreement is to promote international trade and economic cooperation among its members by granting them better access to each other's markets through reduced trade barriers.

Q: Are preferential trade agreements permitted under WTO rules?
A: Yes, the WTO allows for exceptions to its non-discrimination principle under certain conditions, permitting the formation of preferential trade agreements. These agreements must generally comply with specific rules, such as those outlined in GATT Article XXIV for free trade areas and customs unions, or the Enabling Clause for agreements involving developing countries1.

Q: How does a preferential trade agreement differ from a common market?
A: A preferential trade agreement is a basic form of trade cooperation involving reduced tariffs. A common market represents a much deeper level of economic integration. A common market not only eliminates internal tariffs but also establishes a common external tariff towards non-members (like a customs union) and allows for the free movement of factors of production, such as labor and capital, among member countries.