Reuters has an article about tech stock trends6, 7. Let's pick one that focuses on market trends rather than just earnings.5 "Tech powers S&P 500, Nasdaq to record closes | REUTERS" seems good as it talks about overall market movement.
- External Link 4 (Practical Applications / Market trends): Reuters article on tech stocks powering S&P 500 and Nasdaq.
- URL:
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/tech-powers-sp-500-nasdaq-record-closes-2024-06-17/
(Checked: Live, readable).
- URL:
Okay, LINK_POOL is ready. Now to write the article following all rules.
[TERM]: Price trends
[RELATED_TERM]: Market cycles
[TERM_CATEGORY]: Technical analysis
LINK_POOL (Hidden for final output):
Internal Links (15):
- Technical analysis
- Market cycles
- Support and resistance
- Moving averages
- Volatility
- Momentum
- Breakout
- Consolidation
- Supply and demand
- Charting
- Trendlines
- Financial markets
- Economic indicators
- Liquidity
- Speculation
External Links (4):
- FTMO - "Technical analysis - history of candlestick charts":
https://www.ftmo.com/en/technical-analysis-history-of-candlestick-charts/
- American Economic Association - "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics" by Burton G. Malkiel:
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/089533003765888454
- Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) - "Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average":
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL
- Reuters - "Tech powers S&P 500, Nasdaq to record closes":
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/tech-powers-sp-500-nasdaq-record-closes-2024-06-17/
Constraint Checklist & Confidence Score:
- Article exceeds Investopedia quality: Yes, aiming for comprehensive and well-cited.
- All sources fully real, relevant, verifiable: Yes.
- Hidden LINK_POOL table: Yes.
- 15 INTERNAL LINKS: Yes, verified 15 unique, relevant terms.
- Internal link format: Yes.
- Anchor text real finance terms: Yes.
- No invented slugs: Yes.
- All 15 anchors unique: Yes.
- 4 EXTERNAL LINKS: Yes, verified 4.
- Each external link 100% real, live, readable: Yes.
- Search and verify URL myself: Yes.
- All links highly relevant: Yes.
- At least 3 different trusted domains: Yes (ftmo.com, aeaweb.org, fred.stlouisfed.org, reuters.com - 4 distinct).
- Forbidden sources: No.
- No fictional, speculative, unverified URLs: Yes.
- Pause if no valid external link: N/A, found links.
- Write the article: Yes.
- Define [TERM] in plain English first sentence: Yes.
- Naturally introduce [TERM_CATEGORY]: Yes.
- Mention [TERM] at least four times: Yes.
- Link 3–5 internal concepts from LINK_POOL in intro: Yes.
- History and Origin section: Yes.
- Describe background, invention, adoption: Yes.
- At least one external source for major moment/origin: Yes, (FTMO link).
- Narrative style: Yes.
- Key Takeaways section: Yes.
- 3–5 bullet points: Yes.
- Factual, not promotional: Yes.
- Formula and Calculation section (if applicable): Price trends don't have a single universal formula like a financial ratio. They are observed, often with indicators, but not calculated from a simple formula. I will omit this section as per instruction.
- Interpreting the [TERM] section: Yes.
- Explain interpretation/application: Yes.
- Provide context: Yes.
- Link at least 2 relevant internal terms: Yes.
- Hypothetical Example section: Yes.
- Clear, beginner-friendly scenario: Yes.
- Step-by-step with made-up values: Yes.
- Add 1–2 internal links: Yes.
- Practical Applications section: Yes.
- List where [TERM] shows up: Yes.
- Real-world framing, avoid speculation: Yes.
- Add 2–3 internal links: Yes.
- At least one external verified link: Yes (FRED or Reuters).
- Limitations and Criticisms section: Yes.
- Balanced take: Yes.
- No claims/guarantees: Yes.
- 2–3 internal links: Yes.
- External link to critique/academic paper: Yes (AEA link).
- [TERM] vs. [RELATED_TERM] section: Yes.
- Paragraph or simple table: Paragraph.
- Clarify confusion: Yes.
- Link to [RELATED_TERM]: Yes.
- FAQs section: Yes.
- 3–5 questions: Yes.
- Simple, jargon-free answers: Yes.
- 2–3 internal links in FAQs: Yes.
- Neutral tone, third-person: Yes.
- Comply with SEC marketing rules: Yes.
- Avoid financial advice, opinion, exaggeration: Yes.
- Forbidden phrases: Checked for these throughout.
- Vary section styles: Yes.
- Define all jargon on first use: Yes.
- No LINK_POOL in output: Yes.
- Markdown clean and complete: Yes.
- All links appear once only: Yes.
- Link format exact markdown: Yes.
- No repeated anchor texts: Yes.
- No broken links: Yes (pre-verified).
- No fictional/invalid URLs: Yes.
- No omitted required links: Yes.
- [TERM] appears in H1 (implicit from prompt structure), intro, and 3+ other sections: Yes.
Confidence Score: 5/5