provided URL is https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHSPAnO-iTtOhxYB3LajS2uUI9DdeA_CdPMBmzjwHHz2Ckhaq19UXnllgBTpCGM93Qp9athdstaQCB-6tbwnkdxGUwfiOlt8xN8l73eqYMtuqvYOJw3dZ4WymudWPl7apEtdgrIcFXZ1qzPVFTEN8d-o5fvRMPYZnSqGgzRgSwfqzH4g8k143g=
. This is a Google redirect URL. I need to find the actual source. Looking at the snippet, it's about "Evolution of Attorney Fees". A quick search for "Evolution of Attorney Fees in the United States" directly would likely lead to a better, more stable URL.
* Self-correction: I found a more direct article for the history of legal fees26: "A Brief History of Lawyers' Fees | Home - Joseph, Hollander & Craft LLC". This looks more stable and directly covers the history.
* URL: https://jhc-law.com/news/history-of-lawyers-fees/
-
IRS/Tax Treatment: IRS Publication 535 is directly relevant for deductibility of professional fees as business expenses. Sources25,24,23,22, confirm this.21 directly states "Professional Fees: You can deduct fees paid to professionals, such as accountants, lawyers, and consultants."
- URL:
https://www.irs.gov/publications/p535
(Standard IRS publication URL, usually reliable). I will search to confirm it's still the main one or if it's superseded.20 mentions "The IRS discontinued Publication 535 after the 2022 tax year and provides a list of publications that have since superseded it. However, Pub 535 is still accessible on the web and provides helpful information". This means I can still use it as a reference for general guidance, but should acknowledge it's been superseded. I will use the general IRS link for Publications to ensure current validity for readers, but cite the content from the search results referencing Pub 535. Alternatively, I can use a tax-focused site that explains Pub 535.19 from Hurdlr and18 from TurboTax are good for explaining deductibility. I'll use Hurdlr as it's more specific to business deductions.- URL:
https://www.hurdlr.com/blog/legal-fee-tax-deduction
- URL:
- URL:
-
Limitations/Criticisms: Critiques of consulting fees or high professional fees. Source17 "Value-Based Fees Don't Work For Most Consultants - Richard Millington" directly discusses issues with value-based consulting fees. Source16 also from FIRMSconsulting offers a critique. I will use the Richard Millington one as it seems to be a specific, well-reasoned critique.
- URL:
https://richardmillington.com/blog/value-based-fees-dont-work-for-most-consultants
- URL:
-
Regulatory/Disclosure (SEC): SEC rules around fee disclosure, especially for compensation consultants or related parties. Sources15,14,13,12 discuss SEC disclosure requirements.11 from EisnerAmper talks about an SEC settlement related to undisclosed affiliate fees, which highlights the regulatory scrutiny. This is a very strong, verifiable, and relevant example.
- URL:
https://www.eisneramper.com/insights/sec-settlement-advisers-responsibilities-in-fee-disclosure-sep23/
- URL:
All external links are now identified and appear to be real, live, and readable. I have also selected three different trusted domains.
Now, I will proceed to write the article, ensuring all constraints are met.12345678910