Quasi contract: Meaning, Criticisms & Real-World Uses

LINK_POOL:

What Is Quasi Contract?

A quasi contract is a legal obligation imposed by a court to prevent unjust enrichment, even though no formal contract or agreement exists between the parties. It is a concept within contract law that operates to ensure fairness and equity in situations where one party has received a benefit at the expense of another without a valid legal reason to retain it⁵¹, ⁵², ⁵³, ⁵⁴. In essence, a quasi contract compels a defendant to behave as if a legitimate contract were in place, primarily to facilitate restitution for the plaintiff.

History and Origin

The concept of a quasi contract has deep roots, tracing back to Roman law and developing further within common law jurisdictions. Historically, quasi-contracts emerged from a medieval form of action known as indebitatus assumpsit, which allowed a plaintiff to recover a sum of money from a defendant as if there had been a promise to pay. This legal principle aimed to prevent one party from benefiting unfairly from another's loss, encapsulated by the Latin maxim "Nemo debet locupletari ex aliena iactura," meaning "no one ought to be enriched at another's expense"⁴⁸, ⁴⁹, ⁵⁰.

A significant development in the application of quasi-contract principles occurred in the English case of Moses v. Macferlan in 1760. Lord Mansfield, a prominent jurist, articulated that obligations similar to contracts could arise to prevent unjust enrichment, stating that "The gist of the action is that the defendant, upon the circumstances of the case, is obliged by ties of natural justice and equity to refund the money."⁴⁶, ⁴⁷. This case laid foundational groundwork for recognizing these court-imposed obligations when formal agreements were absent.

Key Takeaways

A quasi contract is a court-imposed legal obligation designed to prevent one party from being unjustly enriched at the expense of another.
It is not a true contract based on mutual consent but rather a remedy created by law.
The primary purpose of a quasi contract is to ensure fairness and compel restitution for the party who has suffered a loss.
Quasi contracts typically apply when one party provides a benefit to another, the recipient knows of the benefit, and retaining it without payment would be inequitable⁴⁴, ⁴⁵.

Formula and Calculation

There isn't a specific "formula" for a quasi contract in the mathematical sense, as it is a legal construct rather than a financial calculation. However, the determination of the amount of damages or restitution in a quasi-contractual claim often involves assessing the value of the benefit conferred upon the defendant. This is frequently referred to as quantum meruit, which translates to "as much as deserved"⁴², ⁴³.

The amount awarded aims to compensate the plaintiff for the value of the goods or services provided, not necessarily to enforce any imagined contractual terms. This value can be determined by considering:

The fair market value of the services or goods provided.
The cost incurred by the plaintiff in providing the benefit.
The extent to which the defendant was enriched.

Interpreting the Quasi Contract

Interpreting a quasi contract involves understanding that it is a legal fiction created by a court. It is not about interpreting the intentions of the parties, as there was no actual mutual assent to form a contract ⁴¹. Instead, the interpretation focuses on whether the circumstances warrant the imposition of such a legal obligation to prevent unjust enrichment.

Courts typically look for three key elements to establish a quasi contract:

Benefit Conferred: The plaintiff must have provided a benefit to the defendant³⁸, ³⁹, ⁴⁰.
Appreciation of Benefit: The defendant must have been aware of, or should have been aware of, the benefit³⁵, ³⁶, ³⁷.
Unjust Retention: It must be inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without compensating the plaintiff³¹, ³², ³³, ³⁴.

If these elements are met, a court may impose a quasi contract to ensure a just remedy.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine Sarah, a professional landscaper, is mistakenly hired by a homeowner, John, who believes she is another landscaper he had previously engaged. Sarah proceeds to meticulously landscape John's entire front yard, including planting new trees and installing an irrigation system. John observes Sarah working daily and even compliments her on the progress, but only realizes the mix-up when he receives Sarah's bill, which is significantly higher than he expected from his usual landscaper.

In this scenario, no formal express contract was formed between Sarah and John because there was a misunderstanding regarding their identities and the terms of the agreement. However, Sarah conferred a clear benefit upon John (a newly landscaped yard), John was aware of the benefit as he observed her work, and it would be unjust for John to retain the benefit without compensating Sarah for her services and materials. A court could impose a quasi contract, obligating John to pay Sarah the fair value of the landscaping work, even though he didn't explicitly agree to hire her for that specific cost. This ensures Sarah is not unjustly deprived of payment for her labor and materials, and John is not unjustly enriched by receiving a free landscaping service.

Practical Applications

Quasi contracts are a critical component of contract law, finding application in various real-world scenarios where formal agreements are absent or unenforceable, but fairness demands a remedy. They are frequently applied in cases involving:

Mistaken Payments: If a party accidentally pays money to another, such as an overpayment or payment for someone else's debt, a quasi contract may require the recipient to return the funds to prevent unjust enrichment³⁰.
Services Rendered Without Agreement: When services are provided to someone without a formal contract, but the recipient accepts and benefits from those services, a quasi contract can compel compensation. For instance, if a homeowner requests emergency repairs from a contractor without discussing payment terms, a court might impose a quasi contract for the fair value of the work²⁸, ²⁹.
Improvements to Property: If an individual makes improvements to another person's property without a formal agreement, often due to a misunderstanding or mistake, the property owner may be unjustly enriched by the increased value. Courts may then impose a quasi contract to require compensation for the value of those improvements²⁶, ²⁷. A common example includes situations where a real estate agent is awarded commission based on unjust enrichment, even without a written agreement, if their actions clearly led to a property sale and benefit for the buyers²⁵.

The doctrine of unjust enrichment, which underpins quasi contracts, ensures that a party does not unfairly benefit from another's loss²³, ²⁴.

Limitations and Criticisms

While quasi contracts serve as an important tool for ensuring fairness and preventing unjust enrichment, they come with certain limitations and have faced criticism. A primary limitation is that a quasi contract cannot be imposed if there already exists an express contract or an implied contract covering the same subject matter²⁰, ²¹, ²². The purpose of a quasi contract is to provide a remedy in the absence of a true [contract], not to override or renegotiate existing contractual terms.

Critics of the term "quasi contract" itself argue that the "contract" label is misleading, as these obligations do not arise from mutual agreement, which is a hallmark of traditional contract law ¹⁸, ¹⁹. Some legal scholars prefer to classify these actions under the broader umbrella of "restitution" or "unjust enrichment law," which focuses directly on the principle that no one should unfairly profit at another's expense¹⁶, ¹⁷. This perspective suggests that focusing on "unjust enrichment" provides a clearer theoretical basis for the legal obligation and the resulting [damages]¹⁵.

Furthermore, proving the elements of a quasi contract, particularly that it would be "unjust" for the defendant to retain the benefit without payment, can be subjective and fact-dependent, requiring extensive factual findings by a court¹⁴. The concept of "officiousness"—where services are volunteered without request—can also limit recovery under quasi-contract principles, as the law aims to protect individuals from having unwanted benefits "thrust upon them".

#¹³# Quasi Contract vs. Implied Contract

The terms "quasi contract" and "implied contract" are often confused, but they represent distinct legal concepts within contract law.

Feature	Quasi Contract (Implied-in-Law Contract)	Implied Contract (Implied-in-Fact Contract)
Basis	Imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment.	Formed by the conduct and actions of the parties, demonstrating an intent to create a [contract].
Mutual Assent	No mutual assent or agreement required.	Parties' actions demonstrate their agreement, even if not explicitly stated.
Purpose	To provide a [remedy] and ensure fairness when no true [contract] exists.	To recognize and enforce an actual [agreement] where the terms are understood through conduct.
Enforceability	Enforced by a court as a [legal obligation].	Legally enforceable as a true [contract].

An implied contract arises from the conduct of the parties, indicating their mutual intent to enter into an [agreement]. For example, when you order food at a restaurant, there's an implied contract that you will pay for the meal. A quasi contract, conversely, is a legal construct where no such intent or mutual assent is present; it is a court-ordered [remedy] to avoid an unfair outcome.

#¹²# FAQs

What is the main purpose of a quasi contract?

The main purpose of a quasi contract is to prevent unjust enrichment. It ensures that one party does not unfairly benefit at the expense of another in situations where there is no formal contract.

#¹⁰, ¹¹## Is a quasi contract a real contract?
No, a quasi contract is not a real or true contract. Unlike an express contract or an implied contract, it is not based on the mutual agreement or intentions of the parties. Instead, it is a legal obligation imposed by a court for the sake of justice and [restitution].

#⁸, ⁹## When would a court impose a quasi contract?
A court would typically impose a quasi contract when three conditions are met: one party has conferred a benefit upon another, the receiving party has knowledge of that benefit, and it would be unfair or inequitable for the receiving party to retain the benefit without compensating the conferring party. Th⁶, ⁷is often occurs when there is no existing [agreement] that covers the situation.

#⁴, ⁵## Can you sue for breach of contract under a quasi contract?
No, you cannot sue for breach of contract under a quasi contract because there is no actual [contract] to breach. The [remedy] sought in a quasi-contractual claim is typically [restitution], aiming to return the wronged party to their original position or compensate them for the value of the benefit conferred, rather than enforcing contractual terms.

#², ³## How is the amount of compensation determined in a quasi contract?
The amount of compensation in a quasi contract is usually determined based on the principle of quantum meruit, which means "as much as deserved." This involves assessing the fair value of the benefit that the [plaintiff] conferred upon the [defendant], rather than relying on any agreed-upon price from a non-existent [contract].¹