Reasonable cause

What Is Reasonable Cause?

Reasonable cause is a legal and regulatory standard that, in financial contexts, often refers to a valid and justifiable reason for failing to comply with a legal obligation or regulatory requirement. Within the broader category of Legal standards and Regulatory bodies, it is a crucial defense against penalties, asserting that despite exercising ordinary business care and prudence, compliance was not possible due to unforeseen circumstances beyond one's control. This principle recognizes that sometimes, external events or unavoidable situations prevent an individual or entity from meeting their obligations, even when they have acted in good faith.

History and Origin

The concept of "reasonable cause" has deep roots in various legal systems, aiming to provide a degree of flexibility and fairness in the application of laws and regulations. In the context of U.S. tax law, for example, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) developed guidelines for "reasonable cause" to allow taxpayers to request abatement of penalties. These guidelines evolved to consider the specific facts and circumstances surrounding a taxpayer's failure to file a return, pay taxes, or provide information on time. The IRS evaluates whether a taxpayer exercised "ordinary business care and prudence" and was still unable to comply due to certain events, such as serious illness, death in the immediate family, natural disasters, or the inability to obtain necessary records¹⁹. Similarly, within securities law, the notion of "reasonable grounds" or "reasonable investigation" has been a foundational element for establishing defenses against liability, notably under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as detailed in SEC Rule 176, which outlines circumstances affecting the determination of what constitutes a reasonable investigation¹⁸.

Key Takeaways

• Reasonable cause serves as a defense against penalties for non-compliance with legal or regulatory obligations.
• It requires demonstrating that the failure occurred despite exercising ordinary care and prudence due to circumstances beyond control.
• Common examples include natural disasters, serious illness, death, or unavoidable absence.
• The determination of reasonable cause is typically made on a case-by-case basis, considering all facts and circumstances.
• It is distinct from a lack of funds or ignorance of the law, which generally do not qualify as reasonable cause.

Interpreting Reasonable Cause

Interpreting reasonable cause involves a thorough assessment of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding a failure to comply. Regulatory bodies, such as the IRS or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), examine whether the party exercised ordinary Due diligence and care but was still unable to meet their obligations. This assessment often considers the nature of the event that caused non-compliance, its direct link to the failure, and the party's prior Compliance history.

For instance, the IRS evaluates factors like the taxpayer's efforts to report the correct tax, the complexity of the tax issue, and their education or experience in tax law when considering accuracy-related penalties¹⁷. In the Securities industry, the concept of "reasonable investor" is used to determine the materiality of information—whether there is a substantial likelihood that a hypothetical reasonable investor would consider it important in making Investment decisions. ¹⁶This standard is central to assessing whether disclosures were adequate or if fraud occurred.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a small business owner, Sarah, who typically files her quarterly Payroll taxes electronically and on time. Two days before the filing deadline, a severe regional cyberattack disrupts the internet and power grid for several days, making it impossible for her to access her financial software or submit the taxes. Despite her efforts to find alternative internet access, the widespread outage prevented her from complying. When she receives a penalty notice from the tax authority, she can apply for penalty abatement based on reasonable cause. Her argument would hinge on the verifiable and unforeseen nature of the cyberattack, demonstrating that she exercised ordinary care and prudence by attempting to file before the deadline and that the event was beyond her control.

Practical Applications

Reasonable cause appears in various facets of finance and regulation. A primary application is in tax law, where taxpayers can seek Tax penalties relief if they can demonstrate that their failure to file or pay was due to reasonable cause. ¹⁵This covers scenarios like natural disasters, serious illness, or the death of an immediate family member.
¹³, ¹⁴
In the financial sector, reasonable cause is also relevant in assessing the actions of financial professionals and firms. For example, Broker-dealers are expected to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to achieve compliance with Financial regulations. If a firm faces Enforcement actions from a body like FINRA for a violation, they might argue that they had a reasonable supervisory system in place, and the violation occurred despite reasonable efforts. FINRA, for instance, investigates and takes disciplinary actions against firms and individuals for rule violations, often evaluating whether firms failed to "reasonably supervise" certain activities. ¹¹, ¹²This highlights the importance of robust Internal controls and sound Risk management to prevent non-compliance.

Limitations and Criticisms

While reasonable cause provides a vital safeguard against unfair penalties, its application is not without limitations. It is typically determined on a case-by-case basis, which can lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistencies. What one regulatory agent deems reasonable, another might not. For example, simply lacking sufficient funds to pay taxes is generally not accepted as reasonable cause, unless there are extreme, unforeseen circumstances that caused the financial inability. ⁹, ¹⁰Ignorance of the law or reliance on a tax preparer (without demonstrating the preparer's significant error or misconduct) are also typically not sufficient grounds for abatement based on reasonable cause.
⁸
Furthermore, proving reasonable cause often requires substantial documentation and evidence to support the claims, which can be challenging for individuals or small businesses, particularly after a disruptive event like a natural disaster. Critics sometimes argue that the burden of proof placed on the individual can be onerous, and that the "ordinary business care and prudence" standard can be ambiguous in practice. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) itself has faced challenges in precisely proving proximate causation for ill-gotten gains in disgorgement cases, leading courts to sometimes accept a "reasonable approximation" due to the inherent difficulties in such proofs. ⁷This ongoing tension underscores the complexities in applying a "reasonableness" standard across various legal and financial contexts.

Reasonable Cause vs. Probable Cause

While both "reasonable cause" and "Probable cause" are legal terms involving a degree of justification, they operate in distinct contexts and require different levels of certainty.

The confusion often arises because both concepts involve a "reasonable" person's perspective. However, reasonable cause centers on the justification for a failure to act as required by regulation, often leading to administrative relief. Probable cause, conversely, is a higher standard used in criminal proceedings to justify intrusive state actions like arrests or searches, rooted in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
⁶

FAQs

What circumstances qualify for reasonable cause?

Common circumstances that may qualify for reasonable cause include natural disasters (e.g., fires, floods), serious illness or death of the taxpayer or an immediate family member, unavoidable absence, and the inability to obtain necessary records due to events beyond one's control. ⁵These are situations where an individual or entity, despite exercising Ordinary care and prudence, could not meet their obligations.

Can I claim reasonable cause if I simply forgot to file my taxes?

Generally, simple forgetfulness, oversight, or ignorance of tax law is not considered sufficient for reasonable cause. ⁴The standard requires an unforeseen circumstance that prevented compliance, not just a failure to remember or understand.

Does reasonable cause apply to all types of penalties?

The applicability of reasonable cause can vary depending on the type of penalty and the specific laws governing it. While it's commonly used for failure-to-file or failure-to-pay penalties, it may not apply to all penalties, such as certain estimated tax penalties. ³It is always best to consult the specific regulatory guidelines for the penalty in question.

Is financial hardship considered reasonable cause?

Financial hardship alone is generally not sufficient for reasonable cause for penalty abatement, unless it stems directly from an unforeseen and uncontrollable event, such as a natural disaster or severe illness, that significantly impacted the ability to pay. ²Simply not having enough money to pay taxes typically doesn't meet the criteria.

How do I request penalty relief based on reasonable cause?

To request penalty relief based on reasonable cause, you typically need to write a letter or submit a specific form to the relevant regulatory body (e.g., the IRS), explaining the facts and circumstances that prevented your compliance. You must provide supporting documentation to substantiate your claims. ¹This process requires clear communication and evidence to demonstrate that you acted with Good faith and that the non-compliance was truly beyond your control.