Regulation fair disclosure

What Is Regulation Fair Disclosure?

Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) is a rule enacted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to prevent selective disclosure of material nonpublic information by publicly traded companies. It falls under the broader category of securities regulation. Specifically, Regulation Fair Disclosure mandates that whenever a public company or anyone acting on its behalf discloses material information that is not publicly known, it must do so broadly and simultaneously to all investors, or promptly thereafter if the disclosure was unintentional²². This regulation aims to create a level playing field for all investors, including individual investors and large institutional investors, ensuring that no single group gains an unfair informational advantage.

History and Origin

Before the implementation of Regulation Fair Disclosure, a common practice known as selective disclosure allowed companies to share important, nonpublic information with favored financial analysts and institutional investors before making it available to the broader public. This practice could lead to certain market participants trading on privileged information, potentially eroding investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the capital markets.

In response to these concerns, the SEC proposed Regulation FD in December 1999, which garnered significant support from individual investors. After a period of public comment and debate, the SEC officially adopted Regulation Fair Disclosure in August 2000, and it became effective on October 23, 2000²¹. The core objective was to eliminate the informational advantage that some market participants held due to selective disclosures, thereby fostering a more transparent and equitable information environment for all investors²⁰. The SEC's official adopting release for Regulation FD, titled "Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading," provided the detailed framework and rationale for the new rule, codifying it as 17 CFR 243.

Key Takeaways

• Regulation Fair Disclosure prohibits public companies from selectively disclosing material nonpublic information.
• The rule requires that material nonpublic information be disseminated broadly and simultaneously to all investors.
• The purpose of Regulation Fair Disclosure is to prevent information asymmetry and level the playing field among investors.
• Public disclosures under Reg FD can be made through various channels, including press releases, public conference calls, and Form 8-K filings.
• Violations of Regulation Fair Disclosure can lead to SEC enforcement actions against the company or responsible individuals.

Interpreting the Regulation Fair Disclosure

Interpreting Regulation Fair Disclosure primarily involves understanding what constitutes "material nonpublic information" and what methods are considered "public disclosure." Information is generally deemed material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision, or if it would significantly alter the "total mix" of information available. This includes details about earnings announcements, mergers, acquisitions, or significant changes in business operations.

For a disclosure to be considered public under Regulation Fair Disclosure, it must be reasonably designed to provide broad, non-exclusionary distribution of the information to the general public¹⁹. Acceptable methods include filing a Form 8-K with the SEC, issuing a press release through a widely circulated news service, or conducting a conference call or webcast that is accessible to the public, with adequate notice provided¹⁸. The SEC has also clarified that companies can use social media platforms for public disclosure if investors are notified about which platforms will be used and access is not restricted. The goal is to ensure that information reaches all investors equally and at the same time, preventing a privileged few from acting on private insights.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Alpha Corp," a publicly traded technology company. Its CEO, during a private call with a few select institutional investors, inadvertently mentions that the company's new product, anticipated to launch next quarter, is experiencing unexpected production delays that will significantly impact future revenue projections. This information is considered material and nonpublic.

Under Regulation Fair Disclosure, because this material nonpublic information was disclosed to a select group, Alpha Corp is obligated to make a prompt public disclosure. If the CEO's disclosure was unintentional, the company must make the information public "promptly" – typically within 24 hours or before the start of the next day's trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Alpha Corp would likely issue a press release detailing the production delays and their potential impact on revenue projections, and file a corresponding Form 8-K with the SEC to ensure broad public dissemination of the corporate governance update. This ensures all investors, from large funds to individual shareholders, receive the same critical information simultaneously, preventing an unfair advantage based on selective access.

Practical Applications

Regulation Fair Disclosure significantly impacts how public companies communicate with the investment community. Companies regularly use methods like widely distributed press releases and accessible conference calls for their earnings announcements and other significant updates to comply with Reg FD. This ensures that all market participants have equal access to vital data that can influence shareholder value. For instance, Compass, Inc., a real estate technology company, explicitly states that it uses its investor relations website and SEC filings, among other channels, for disclosing information to comply with its Regulation Fair Disclosure obligations. ¹⁷This approach allows companies to transparently share information while adhering to regulatory requirements.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its aim to foster a level playing field, Regulation Fair Disclosure has faced various criticisms and debates regarding its unintended consequences. Some academic research suggests that by prohibiting selective disclosure, Reg FD might inadvertently lead to a "chilling effect" on the overall flow of information from companies to the market. ¹⁵, ¹⁶The argument is that companies, fearful of violating the rule due to ambiguous definitions of "materiality" or "nonpublic," may choose to disclose less information informally, potentially reducing the total amount of available information to financial analysts and investors.
¹⁴
Another critique from academic circles posits that Regulation Fair Disclosure might heighten herding behavior among financial analysts, as they lose access to differentiated insights previously gained through selective briefings. ¹³This could potentially lead to less diverse analyses and, in some cases, less accurate forecasts. ¹²While the regulation successfully eliminated the information advantage previously enjoyed by certain investors, its impact on the overall information environment and the quality of analyst research remains a subject of ongoing study and discussion in the financial community.
¹¹

Regulation Fair Disclosure vs. Insider Trading

Regulation Fair Disclosure and Insider Trading both address the fair use and dissemination of corporate information but target different aspects of information asymmetry. Regulation Fair Disclosure is an issuer disclosure rule designed to prevent public companies from selectively disclosing material nonpublic information to certain market professionals or investors. Its focus is on the company's obligation to make information broadly available to the public simultaneously or promptly if disclosed to a select few. ¹⁰The goal is to ensure equal access to information for all investors, leveling the playing field.

In contrast, insider trading involves individuals (insiders or those tipped by insiders) trading securities on the basis of material nonpublic information obtained through a breach of a fiduciary duty or similar relationship of trust and confidence. While Regulation Fair Disclosure aims to prevent the selective provision of information in the first place, insider trading laws focus on prohibiting the exploitation of such information for personal gain. A violation of Regulation Fair Disclosure is not automatically a violation of anti-fraud provisions like Rule 10b-5, which typically govern insider trading, though the same facts could potentially give rise to both issues.
⁹

FAQs

What kind of information is covered by Regulation Fair Disclosure?

Regulation Fair Disclosure covers "material nonpublic information." This refers to any information that a reasonable investor would consider important in making an investment decision and that has not yet been disseminated broadly to the investing public. Examples include financial results, significant business developments, mergers, acquisitions, or changes in leadership.

How do companies comply with Regulation Fair Disclosure?

Companies typically comply with Regulation Fair Disclosure by making material nonpublic information public through methods designed for broad, non-exclusionary distribution. Common practices include issuing press releases via wire services, filing a Form 8-K with the SEC, and hosting public conference calls or webcasts that investors can access. ⁸Adequate advance notice of these public events is crucial.

Does Regulation Fair Disclosure apply to all companies?

Regulation Fair Disclosure applies to U.S. public companies that have a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act or are required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, including closed-end investment companies. ⁷It generally does not apply to foreign governments or foreign private issuers, nor does it apply to a company's initial public offering (IPO).
⁵, ⁶

What happens if a company violates Regulation Fair Disclosure?

If a company violates Regulation Fair Disclosure, the SEC can take enforcement action against the company and potentially against individuals responsible for the violation. ³, ⁴These actions can include cease-and-desist orders and civil penalties. Importantly, a violation of Regulation Fair Disclosure does not automatically create a private right of action for investors to sue the company directly for damages.¹, ²