Resource leveling

What Is Resource Leveling?

Resource leveling is a project management technique used to optimize the allocation of resources, such as personnel, equipment, and materials, across a project's timeline. This process aims to prevent overallocation or underutilization of resources, ensuring a balanced workload and efficient use of available supply. By adjusting the start and finish dates of activities, resource leveling resolves conflicts that arise when demand for a particular resource exceeds its availability at a specific time, thereby creating a more realistic project schedule.

History and Origin

The concept of resource leveling gained prominence with the evolution of modern project management methodologies, particularly alongside techniques like the Critical Path Method (CPM). Early project scheduling focused primarily on activity sequences and minimizing project duration, often assuming infinite resource availability. However, real-world projects consistently faced limitations in resources, leading to the development of techniques to address these constraints. Resource leveling emerged as a crucial approach to reconcile theoretical schedules with practical resource limitations. The Project Management Institute (PMI) formalized the definition of resource leveling within its A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), defining it as "A technique in which start and finish dates are adjusted based on resource constraints with the goal of balancing demand for resources with the available supply."
³

Key Takeaways

Resource leveling balances the demand for resources with their available supply over a project's duration.
It primarily addresses situations of resource overallocation, where more resources are required than are available.
The technique often involves adjusting activity start and finish dates, which may lead to an extension of the overall project duration.
It aims to create a more stable and realistic workload for project teams, preventing burnout and improving efficiency.
Resource leveling is a crucial component of effective resource allocation in complex projects.

Interpreting Resource Leveling

Resource leveling provides a practical schedule that reflects the real-world availability of resources. When a project manager performs resource leveling, the output schedule shows how resources are distributed over time, highlighting any periods of high demand or idle capacity. The primary interpretation of a leveled schedule is that it is achievable given the specified budget constraints and resource limits.

A well-leveled schedule ensures that individual team members are not overburdened, which can prevent errors, reduce stress, and improve morale. Conversely, it also identifies periods where resources might be underutilized, allowing for potential reallocation to other tasks or projects. The process provides a realistic baseline for tracking progress, as it accounts for resource limitations from the outset. Understanding the impact of resource leveling involves recognizing that it might extend the project's overall activity duration, especially if the critical path is affected by resource unavailability.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a small software development project with two key tasks: "Frontend Development" (5 days, requires 2 developers) and "Backend Development" (7 days, requires 2 developers). The project has only 3 available developers.

Initial Schedule (without leveling): If both tasks are scheduled to start simultaneously, they would require 4 developers (2 for frontend + 2 for backend). However, only 3 are available, leading to an overallocation.
Resource Leveling Application: The project manager identifies this conflict. To resolve it using resource leveling, one of the tasks must be delayed or staggered.
- Option 1: Staggering: Start "Frontend Development" with 2 developers. Once complete (Day 5), one developer can join another developer to start "Backend Development". This means "Backend Development" would now effectively require 3.5 days to complete with 2 developers, assuming they split the work, but still needs a total of 14 person-days, and 7 calendar days at 2 developers. If it starts after Frontend, the Backend would start on Day 6.
- Option 2: Prioritization and Delay: The project manager decides "Frontend Development" is higher priority. "Backend Development" is then delayed until sufficient developers are available.
  - Days 1-5: 2 developers work on "Frontend Development." 1 developer is available.
  - Days 6-12: Once "Frontend Development" is done, all 3 developers can work on "Backend Development." Since "Backend Development" requires 14 person-days (7 days * 2 developers), with 3 developers, it would take roughly 4.67 days (14 person-days / 3 developers). So it would be complete by end of Day 10 or 11.
- In this scenario, resource leveling helps re-sequence task dependencies to accommodate the limited developer pool, potentially extending the total project duration but making the schedule feasible.

Practical Applications

Resource leveling is widely applied across various industries and project types to ensure efficient cost management and prevent bottlenecks. Its primary use cases include:

Construction Projects: In construction, heavy equipment and skilled labor are often limited resources. Resource leveling helps schedule tasks like excavation, concrete pouring, or structural work to avoid conflicts where multiple teams or pieces of equipment are needed simultaneously but are not available. This prevents costly idle time for equipment or delays due to labor shortages.
Software Development: Software teams often face limitations in specialized developers (e.g., specific programming language experts). Resource leveling helps manage workloads for these key individuals, ensuring critical modules are developed without overwhelming the team, as highlighted by examples of project planning from Atlassian.
Manufacturing and Production: In manufacturing, machines and production lines are critical resources. Resource leveling helps sequence production batches to optimize machine utilization and reduce setup times, preventing overload on specific equipment.
Event Planning: For large events, specific venues, sound engineers, or catering staff might be limited. Resource leveling assists in scheduling different event components to ensure all necessary resources are available when needed.
Research and Development: R&D projects often rely on limited laboratory equipment or highly specialized scientific personnel. Resource leveling ensures these resources are optimally utilized across different experiments or research phases.
Healthcare: In healthcare, operating rooms, specialized medical equipment, and highly skilled medical professionals are finite resources. Resource leveling can optimize surgical schedules or patient treatment plans to make the best use of these critical assets.
Consulting Services: Consulting firms often have a finite number of consultants with specific expertise. Resource leveling helps them manage multiple client engagements concurrently, ensuring consultants are not overbooked and client deadlines can be met realistically.
Project Management Software: Modern project management software often includes built-in algorithms for resource leveling, allowing project managers to automatically adjust schedules based on defined resource availability and priorities. Visual tools like a Gantt chart are often used to visualize the impact of leveling.

Limitations and Criticisms

While resource leveling offers significant benefits, it also comes with certain limitations and criticisms that project managers must consider.

One major criticism is that resource leveling can extend the overall project duration. By delaying non-critical tasks to resolve resource conflicts, the project's end date may shift, potentially impacting stakeholder expectations or market opportunities. This trade-off between resource efficiency and project timeline is a key consideration.

Another limitation is that resource leveling primarily focuses on smoothing resource usage, often without directly considering the financial implications of delaying tasks or extending the project. While it helps in optimizing resource usage, it does not inherently guarantee the most cost-effective schedule. Furthermore, the effectiveness of resource leveling can be diminished by various project manager-created issues, such as hard constraints on tasks or disallowing split tasks, which can leave overallocations even after the leveling process.
²
Challenges also arise when dealing with highly complex projects or multi-project environments. When resources are shared across several concurrent projects, leveling one project might negatively impact another, creating a ripple effect. This requires a portfolio-level approach to resource allocation that can be more complex to manage.

Moreover, resource leveling relies on accurate forecasting of resource availability and work breakdown structure. Inaccurate estimates or unforeseen changes in resource availability (e.g., team member illness, equipment breakdown) can render the leveled schedule ineffective. It also assumes that resources are interchangeable within their skill sets, which may not always be true in specialized roles. Effective risk management practices are essential to mitigate these uncertainties.

Resource Leveling vs. Resource Smoothing

Resource leveling and resource smoothing are both resource optimization techniques in project management, but they differ in their primary objective and impact on the project schedule.

Resource Leveling is applied when resources are over-allocated or when there's a need to balance resource demand with available supply. Its key characteristic is that it may change the project's critical path and extend the project's overall duration. The goal is to ensure no resource is used beyond its capacity, even if it means delaying tasks that have float or, if necessary, tasks on the critical path. This technique is often used in situations where resource availability is the primary constraint.

Resource Smoothing, on the other hand, is used when the project deadline is fixed and cannot be extended. Its objective is to optimize resource utilization within the existing project end date. Resource smoothing achieves this by adjusting activities within their available float without affecting the project's critical path or total duration. The aim is to create a more even, "smoothed" resource profile, minimizing peaks and valleys in resource usage without impacting the project completion date. This is typically applied when maintaining a consistent workload is desired, but time is the overriding constraint. The distinction between these two concepts was formalized with the evolution of the PMBOK Guide, with resource smoothing being introduced in the 5th Edition.
¹
In essence, resource leveling sacrifices time (potential project extension) to manage resource constraints, while resource smoothing prioritizes time (fixed deadline) and only adjusts resource usage within existing schedule flexibility.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main goal of resource leveling?
A1: The main goal of resource leveling is to prevent resources from being overallocated, meaning requiring more resources than are available at a given time. It balances the demand for resources with the existing supply to create a realistic and achievable project schedule.

Q2: Does resource leveling always extend the project duration?
A2: Not always, but it often does. Resource leveling works by adjusting activity start and finish dates. If resource constraints affect tasks on the critical path, then delaying those tasks to accommodate resource availability will inevitably extend the overall project duration. If only tasks with float are affected, the project duration might remain unchanged.

Q3: Can resource leveling be done manually or with software?
A3: Both. For small, simple projects, resource leveling can be done manually by reviewing a Gantt chart and adjusting task dates. However, for larger, more complex projects with numerous resources and task dependencies, project management software with built-in leveling algorithms is commonly used to automate and optimize the process.