Sample size

What Is Sample Size?

Sample size, in the context of statistics and financial analysis, refers to the number of individual observations or data points collected from a larger population to draw conclusions or make inferences about that entire group. It is a critical component of data collection and research methodology, particularly within inferential statistics, as it directly impacts the reliability and generalizability of the findings. Selecting an appropriate sample size is essential to ensure that the chosen subset adequately represents the characteristics of the broader population, enabling accurate analysis and sound decision-making without the prohibitive cost or impracticality of examining every single element.

History and Origin

The concept of using a small group to understand a larger one has roots tracing back centuries, with early applications evident in demographic estimations. One notable early instance was John Graunt's work in 1662, where he used a subset of London's burial records to estimate its total population. However, the formal theoretical underpinnings of statistical sampling, which rigorously allowed for conclusions about an entire population based on a random sample, began to develop more systematically in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Key figures like Anders Kiaer, a Norwegian statistician, promoted the "representative method" in 1895, advocating for samples that mirrored the parent population. Later, statisticians such as Ronald A. Fisher and Jerzy Neyman further developed the statistical theory necessary to evaluate estimations from random samples, convincing the broader scientific community of their enormous value in research and enumeration.⁴ This evolution marked a significant shift from complete enumeration (censuses) to efficient and effective sampling techniques.

Key Takeaways

• Sample size is the number of observations included in a statistical sample.
• An adequate sample size is crucial for the validity and reliability of statistical conclusions drawn about a larger population.
• Factors such as the desired confidence level, acceptable margin of error, and population variance influence sample size determination.
• Too small a sample size can lead to unreliable results and a lack of statistical significance.
• Conversely, an excessively large sample size can be resource-intensive without significantly improving the precision of results.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of sample size depends on the type of data (proportions or means), whether the population size is known, and the desired level of precision. For proportions in a large population, a common formula, known as Cochran's formula, is often used:

$n = \frac{Z^2 \times p \times (1-p)}{E^2}$

Where:

• (n) = Sample size
• (Z) = The Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (e.g., 1.96 for 95% confidence)
• (p) = Estimated proportion of the population possessing the characteristic being studied (often 0.5 is used as a conservative estimate if unknown, maximizing the required sample size)
• (E) = Desired margin of error (e.g., 0.05 for ±5 percentage points)

For example, to determine a sample size for a survey with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error, assuming an unknown population proportion (thus using (p=0.5)):

$n = \frac{(1.96)^2 \times 0.5 \times (1-0.5)}{(0.05)^2}$
$n = \frac{3.8416 \times 0.25}{0.0025}$
$n = \frac{0.9604}{0.0025}$
$n = 384.16$

Thus, approximately 385 respondents would be needed for this scenario.

When dealing with small sample sizes or when the population standard deviation is unknown, the t-distribution is often used instead of the normal distribution for calculating confidence intervals and determining sample size.

Interpreting the Sample Size

Interpreting the sample size involves understanding its implications for the reliability and precision of statistical findings. A larger sample size generally leads to a more precise estimate of the population mean or proportion, reducing the margin of error and increasing the statistical power of a study. For instance, a poll conducted with a sample size of 1,000 people will typically have a smaller margin of error than one conducted with only 100 people, making its results more representative of the overall population. However, simply having a large sample size does not guarantee accuracy if the sampling method is flawed or introduces bias. Researchers must balance the desire for precision with practical constraints like cost and time. The interpretation also involves considering the variability within the population; highly variable data requires a larger sample size to achieve the same level of precision.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine a financial analyst wants to estimate the average daily trading volume of a specific penny stock over the past year. Due to the high frequency of trades, collecting data for every single day is impractical. Instead, the analyst decides to take a sample.

The analyst wants to be 90% confident that their estimated average trading volume is within 10,000 shares of the true average. From historical data on similar volatile stocks, they estimate the standard deviation of daily trading volume to be around 75,000 shares.

To determine the required sample size, they would use a formula for means, considering the z-score for a 90% confidence level (which is approximately 1.645), the estimated standard deviation, and the desired margin of error:

$n = \left( \frac{Z \times \sigma}{E} \right)^2$

Where:

• (n) = Sample size
• (Z) = Z-score (1.645 for 90% confidence)
• (\sigma) = Population standard deviation (estimated at 75,000 shares)
• (E) = Desired margin of error (10,000 shares)

$n = \left( \frac{1.645 \times 75000}{10000} \right)^2$
$n = \left( \frac{123375}{10000} \right)^2$
$n = (12.3375)^2$
$n \approx 152.22$

The analyst would need to randomly select approximately 153 trading days from the past year to achieve the desired level of confidence and precision for their estimate of the stock's average daily trading volume. This calculated sample size helps manage the probability of sampling error.

Practical Applications

Sample size determination is integral across various facets of finance, investing, and economic analysis. In market research, companies use sample size calculations to gauge consumer sentiment regarding new products or services before a full-scale launch. Economic indicators, such as unemployment rates or consumer price indices, are often derived from large-scale surveys that rely on precisely calculated sample sizes to ensure the data accurately reflects the national economy. For instance, the U.S. Census Bureau, in collaboration with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, conducts the Current Population Survey (CPS), a monthly survey of households, to collect data on employment, unemployment, and other characteristics of the civilian noninstitutional population. The methodology for this vital survey heavily depends on robust sampling techniques and appropriate sample sizes to produce reliable national statistics.
³
In investment analysis, fund managers might use sampling to assess the performance of a large portfolio by analyzing a subset of its assets, especially in private equity or real estate, where full data on every asset might be hard to compile. Credit risk modeling also utilizes sampling when evaluating large loan portfolios to predict default rates. Regulators and auditors often employ sampling to test compliance with financial regulations or to verify the accuracy of financial statements, inspecting a subset of transactions rather than every single one. Hypothesis testing in quantitative finance, such as testing the effectiveness of a new trading strategy, also critically depends on adequately powered sample sizes to draw statistically sound conclusions.

Limitations and Criticisms

While essential, relying on sample size alone has limitations. The primary criticism often revolves around the potential for sampling bias if the sample is not truly random or representative. A larger sample size cannot correct for fundamental flaws in the sampling methodology. For example, if a survey only targets affluent individuals, even a large sample may not accurately reflect the financial opinions of the general population. This can lead to misleading conclusions and incorrect statistical inferences. The Pew Research Center highlights how various forms of sampling errors, including undercoverage or nonresponse bias, can compromise the accuracy of survey results, regardless of the raw number of participants.
²
Furthermore, in rapidly changing financial markets, historical data used for sample size calculations might not adequately capture current market conditions, potentially leading to an undersized or oversized sample. Overemphasis on achieving a statistically significant sample size without considering the practical significance or real-world impact of the findings can also be a pitfall. An extremely small effect, while statistically significant with a huge sample, might be economically trivial. Conversely, in situations with highly skewed data or outliers, even a large sample might not fully capture the true distribution without robust statistical techniques to handle such anomalies.

Sample size vs. Confidence Interval

Sample size and confidence interval are closely related concepts in statistics, both playing a crucial role in determining the reliability and precision of estimations from sample data. However, they refer to different aspects of statistical inference.

While sample size refers to the quantity of data, the confidence interval describes the quality of the estimate derived from that data. A researcher seeking higher precision (a narrower confidence interval) for their estimates will typically need to collect a larger sample size. Conversely, a given sample size, along with the observed variability, directly determines the width of the resulting confidence interval.

FAQs

What is the ideal sample size?

There is no single "ideal" sample size; it depends on the specific research question, the variability of the population, the desired confidence level, and the acceptable margin of error. For some highly uniform populations, a small sample might suffice, while highly diverse populations require much larger samples.

How does sample size affect the reliability of results?

A larger sample size generally leads to more reliable and precise results because it reduces the impact of random variation and makes the sample more representative of the overall population. This increased reliability is reflected in a narrower confidence interval.

What happens if the sample size is too small?

If the sample size is too small, the results may not be representative of the population, leading to less reliable conclusions. The estimates derived from the sample will have a wide margin of error, meaning there is a greater uncertainty about the true population parameter. This can also lead to a lack of statistical power to detect true effects or differences.

Can a sample size be too large?

Yes, a sample size can be too large. While a larger sample increases precision, there comes a point where the added precision is negligible and does not justify the additional cost, time, and resources required for data collection. An excessively large sample size can be inefficient and resource-wasteful without providing significant additional insights.

What is the Z-score and how is it used in sample size calculation?

A Z-score measures how many standard deviations an element is from the mean. In sample size calculation, the Z-score corresponds to the desired confidence level. For example, for a 95% confidence level, the Z-score is 1.96, meaning that 95% of the data falls within 1.96 standard deviations of the mean in a standard normal distribution. This value is used in the sample size formula to establish the required precision.¹