Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to S Definitions

Sec rule 11ac1 1

What Is SEC Rule 11Ac1-1?

SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, commonly known as the "Quote Rule," was a key piece of U.S. Securities Regulation designed to enhance the transparency and fairness of Equity Markets. Enacted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), this rule mandated that Market Makers and exchanges promptly publish their best bids, offers, and associated sizes for securities. The fundamental objective of SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 was to ensure that investors, and their Broker-Dealers, had access to the best available prices when executing trades, thereby promoting competition among various Trading Centers.

History and Origin

The origins of SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 date back to a broader initiative by the SEC to modernize the U.S. National Market System. Prior to its adoption, market information could be fragmented, making it challenging for participants to identify the true best prices across different trading venues. In November 2000, the SEC adopted Exchange Act Rule 11Ac1-5 (now known as Rule 605 of Regulation NMS), which was aimed at improving public disclosure of order execution practices. Simultaneously, amendments were made to Rule 11Ac1-1, extending its application to options exchanges and options market makers, effective April 1, 2001.18,17 This action was part of a larger effort to increase Market Transparency and promote Best Execution in the options markets. The intent was to provide greater awareness of how broker-dealers balanced trade-offs between price, speed, and reliability.16 The rule later became part of the comprehensive Regulation NMS, which the SEC introduced in 2005 to refine and strengthen how all listed U.S. stocks are traded.,

Key Takeaways

  • SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, also known as the "Quote Rule," required market participants to display their best available bid and offer prices.
  • It was designed to promote transparency and fair pricing in U.S. equity and options markets.
  • The rule was a precursor and later renumbered as Rule 605 under Regulation NMS.
  • Its principles aim to facilitate the Order Execution of customer orders at the most favorable terms.
  • Compliance with this rule involves reporting requirements for market centers and broker-dealers regarding their execution quality.

Formula and Calculation

SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 itself does not involve a specific quantitative formula or calculation in the traditional sense, as it is a disclosure and quoting requirement rather than a pricing model. However, the data it required to be displayed and subsequently the data reported under its successor, SEC Rule 605, involves several key metrics that are calculated. These metrics are fundamental to assessing Execution Quality and include:

  • Effective Spread: This measures the difference between the execution price and the midpoint of the quoted National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) at the time of order receipt, multiplied by two. It reflects the actual cost of trading for an investor.
  • Price Improvement: This indicates how much better the execution price was compared to the public quote. For a buy order, Price Improvement occurs if the order is filled at a price lower than the prevailing offer. For a sell order, it's a fill at a price higher than the prevailing bid.
  • Speed of Execution: This measures the time elapsed from the moment an order is received to the moment it is executed, often reported in milliseconds or microseconds.

These metrics are typically reported for different order types (e.g., Market Orders, Limit Orders) and order sizes.

Interpreting the SEC Rule 11Ac1-1

The core principle behind SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, and its modern iteration, is the enhancement of Market Transparency. By requiring market makers and exchanges to publicly display their firm quotes, the rule sought to reduce information asymmetry and foster a more competitive trading environment. For investors, this meant a greater likelihood of receiving Best Execution for their orders, as broker-dealers could more easily identify the best available prices across various venues. The rule effectively contributed to the development of the National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO), which serves as the benchmark for measuring execution quality.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine an investor places a Market Order to buy 100 shares of Company XYZ. Under the principles of SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 (and subsequently Rule 605), the investor's broker-dealer is obligated to seek the most favorable price.

Before this rule, a broker might have executed the order at their own internal quote of $50.10, even if another exchange or market maker had a publicly displayed offer of $50.05. With the implementation of SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, all participating Trading Centers and market makers were required to display their firm quotes. This transparency allowed the broker-dealer to identify the $50.05 offer from another venue. By routing the order to that venue, the investor would receive the shares at $50.05, saving $0.05 per share, or $5.00 on the 100-share order. This seemingly small amount demonstrates the rule's impact on achieving Price Improvement for individual trades.

Practical Applications

SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, and its successor Rule 605 of Regulation NMS, have several practical applications in the functioning of financial markets:

  • Best Execution Obligation: The rule underpins the Best Execution obligation for Broker-Dealers, requiring them to use reasonable diligence to ascertain the best market for a security and execute customer orders as favorably as possible.15
  • Market Data Transparency: It mandates the public display and dissemination of firm quotes by market participants, contributing significantly to overall Market Transparency. This allows market participants, including investors, to make informed decisions.14,13
  • Performance Measurement: The standardized monthly reports required by Rule 605 provide statistical measures of Order Execution quality, including effective spreads and price improvement, allowing for comparisons across different market centers.12,11
  • Regulatory Oversight: The SEC and FINRA use the data generated by these rules to monitor market practices and ensure compliance with best execution requirements, particularly concerning issues like Payment for Order Flow.10,9

Recent amendments to Rule 605, adopted in March 2024, expand the scope of entities required to report, include more order types (such as odd-lot and fractional share orders), and require time-based metrics in microseconds and milliseconds, reflecting modern market speeds.8,7 These updates are designed to enhance competition among service providers by giving investors better information regarding order execution.6

Limitations and Criticisms

While SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 and its successor Rule 605 aim to promote fair and efficient markets, they have faced certain limitations and criticisms. One significant concern is that the extensive data requirements and complex metrics, especially under Rule 605, can be challenging for retail investors to understand and utilize effectively, despite efforts to improve accessibility.5,4

Furthermore, aspects of Regulation NMS, which Rule 605 is a part of, have been criticized for potentially contributing to market fragmentation and the proliferation of order types. Some argue that the strict requirements, such as the Order Protection Rule (Rule 611 of Regulation NMS), which mandates trading on venues with the best-quoted prices, may inadvertently favor high-frequency trading firms or lead to increased technological costs for market participants. This can create complexities in routing Order Flow and achieving optimal execution, particularly for large institutional orders.3 While the goal is to enhance trading opportunities for all investors, the evolving market structure has led to ongoing discussions about the balance between transparency, efficiency, and potential unintended consequences, such as the cost of market data.2,1

SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 vs. SEC Rule 605

SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, the "Quote Rule," laid the foundational requirements for market participants to publish firm quotes. Its primary focus was on ensuring that displayed bids and offers were actionable and accessible. Over time, as U.S. Equity Markets evolved, the need for more comprehensive transparency regarding order execution became apparent.

This led to the adoption of Regulation NMS in 2005, which included new substantive rules and redesignated existing ones. SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 was renumbered and subsumed into a broader framework, with its principles largely carried forward and expanded under SEC Rule 605. While SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 focused on the firmness of quotes, SEC Rule 605 significantly expanded the scope to mandate public disclosure of detailed order execution quality statistics. This includes metrics like effective spreads, price improvement, and speed of execution across various Trading Centers, enabling investors and regulators to assess and compare how brokers handle customer orders. In essence, SEC Rule 605 represents an evolution of the transparency objectives initially set forth by SEC Rule 11Ac1-1, adapting them to the complexities of modern market structure.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of SEC Rule 11Ac1-1?

The primary purpose of SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 was to ensure that market makers and exchanges promptly and publicly displayed their best executable bid and offer prices for securities. This was intended to enhance Market Transparency and promote Best Execution for investors.

Has SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 been replaced or updated?

Yes, SEC Rule 11Ac1-1 was effectively updated and renumbered as Rule 605 under Regulation NMS in 2005. Its core principles regarding firm quotes were maintained, and Rule 605 significantly expanded the reporting requirements for Order Execution quality by market centers and larger broker-dealers.

How does this rule benefit individual investors?

By requiring public disclosure of firm quotes and, later, detailed execution quality statistics, the rule helps individual investors by promoting competition among trading venues and broker-dealers. This increased transparency allows investors, or their brokers, to seek the best possible prices for their trades and assess the quality of their Broker-Dealer's execution practices.