Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to S Definitions

Self funded insurance

Self Funded Insurance: Definition, Example, and FAQs

What Is Self Funded Insurance?

Self funded insurance, also known as self-insured health plans, is a type of benefit plan where an employer assumes the financial risk for providing healthcare benefits to its employees, rather than paying a fixed premium to an insurance carrier. In this arrangement, the employer pays for each claim as it is incurred, directly from its own cash flow or from a dedicated trust. This approach falls under the broader financial category of risk management, as organizations take on the direct responsibility for their healthcare costs. With self funded insurance, employers gain greater control over plan design, data access, and potential cost savings, but also bear the direct financial risk associated with employee medical claims.

History and Origin

The widespread adoption of self-funded insurance plans, particularly for health benefits, gained significant traction following the enactment of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). This federal law established minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry. Crucially, ERISA generally preempts state insurance laws for self-funded plans, meaning these plans are primarily regulated at the federal level by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and are exempt from many state-specific mandates and premium taxes15, 16, 17. This regulatory framework provided employers with the flexibility to design plans tailored to their specific needs and workforce demographics, fostering the growth of self funded insurance as an alternative to traditional, fully insured arrangements.

Key Takeaways

  • Self funded insurance involves an employer directly paying for employee healthcare claims rather than through an insurance company.
  • Employers assume the financial risk for medical claims, managing their own reserves to cover costs.
  • A key advantage is greater control over plan design, allowing for customization to specific workforce needs and potential cost control.
  • To mitigate catastrophic financial exposure, self-funded employers often purchase stop-loss insurance.
  • Self-funded plans are generally regulated by federal law, primarily ERISA, rather than state insurance laws.

Interpreting Self Funded Insurance

Interpreting a self funded insurance arrangement involves understanding the employer's direct financial responsibility for healthcare expenditures. Unlike traditional insurance where a fixed premium transfers risk to a carrier, self-funded employers manage the actual costs of their employees' medical claims. This means that a healthy year for the employee population can result in significant savings for the employer, as less money is spent on claims than might have been paid in premiums to an insurer. Conversely, a year with a high volume of costly medical events can lead to higher-than-anticipated expenditures.

Employers often engage a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) to handle the administrative aspects of a self-funded plan, such as claims processing, network access, and customer service. However, the financial liability for the claims themselves remains with the employer. The effectiveness of a self funded insurance plan is often evaluated based on the employer's ability to manage its healthcare costs over time, including the impact of preventative care programs and wellness initiatives on overall claims experience. Successful self-funded plans require robust data analysis and proactive risk mitigation strategies.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine "InnovateCorp," a tech company with 500 employees, decides to transition from a fully insured health plan to self funded insurance. Historically, InnovateCorp paid a fixed annual premium of $10 million to an insurance carrier. Under a self-funded model, InnovateCorp sets aside funds to cover anticipated medical claims.

In the first year of self-funding, InnovateCorp budgets $9 million for claims and administrative fees, including a $500,000 premium for stop-loss insurance to protect against extremely high individual claims (e.g., beyond a $100,000 deductible per person). Throughout the year, their employees' total medical claims amount to $8.2 million. Since the actual claims were lower than their budgeted amount, InnovateCorp realizes a savings of $800,000 (excluding the stop-loss premium and administrative costs). This $800,000 is retained by InnovateCorp, rather than being kept by an insurance carrier as profit. Had their claims exceeded the $9 million budget, InnovateCorp would be responsible for the difference up to their stop-loss threshold, at which point the stop-loss insurer would begin covering costs. This example illustrates how self funded insurance directly ties an employer's financial outcomes to the actual healthcare utilization of its workforce.

Practical Applications

Self funded insurance is predominantly utilized by employers, especially larger organizations, as a strategic approach to managing employee benefits and controlling healthcare expenditures. This model allows companies to tailor their benefit plan offerings precisely to the needs of their workforce, rather than choosing from standardized off-the-shelf insurance products. By directly funding claims, employers can gain detailed insights into their healthcare spending patterns, enabling them to implement targeted wellness programs, negotiate directly with healthcare providers, and make data-driven decisions to improve employee health and manage costs.

The Kaiser Family Foundation's 2023 Employer Health Benefits Survey indicates that a significant percentage of U.S. workers, particularly those in large firms, are covered by self-funded plans, highlighting its widespread application in the employer-sponsored health coverage landscape. For example, 54% of all covered workers were in a self-funded plan in 202311, 12, 13, 14. This model also has implications for the broader healthcare economy, influencing healthcare delivery and financing structures as employers become more active purchasers of healthcare services10.

Limitations and Criticisms

While offering significant advantages in cost control and flexibility, self funded insurance plans come with notable limitations and criticisms. The primary drawback is the direct assumption of financial risk by the employer. Unlike a fully insured plan where the insurer bears the financial burden of high or unexpected claims, a self-funded employer is directly responsible for all eligible medical claims incurred by its employees. This can lead to unpredictable expenses and significant financial strain, particularly for smaller organizations that may not have sufficient reserves to absorb a year with exceptionally high claims8, 9.

Critics also point to the administrative complexity involved in managing a self funded insurance plan, even with the assistance of a Third-Party Administrator. This includes compliance with federal regulations like ERISA, detailed claims processing, and potentially managing provider networks, which can be demanding for companies without dedicated human resources or finance teams experienced in underwriting and benefits administration7. Furthermore, the exemption of self-funded plans from many state insurance regulations can lead to a less uniform benefits landscape and potential challenges for employees in understanding their rights compared to state-regulated fully insured plans5, 6. The Brookings Institution has highlighted broader systemic issues within employer-sponsored health insurance, including how the current structure, which includes self-funded plans, may face challenges in adapting to the evolving needs of the workforce and promoting equitable access to care1, 2, 3, 4.

Self Funded Insurance vs. Fully Insured Plan

The fundamental difference between self funded insurance and a fully insured plan lies in who bears the financial risk for employee healthcare costs.

In a self-funded insurance arrangement, the employer assumes the direct financial responsibility for paying employee medical claims. The employer essentially acts as its own insurer, setting aside funds (often in a trust) to cover anticipated healthcare expenses. While a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) typically handles the administrative tasks like claims processing, the money to pay those claims comes directly from the employer's balance sheet. This model offers greater control over plan design, access to claims data, and potential for cost control if claims are lower than expected. However, the employer is exposed to the volatility of actual claims, often mitigated by purchasing stop-loss insurance for catastrophic events.

Conversely, with a fully insured plan, the employer pays a fixed, regular premium to a licensed health insurance carrier. In exchange for this premium, the insurance carrier assumes all the financial risk for paying employee medical claims. The insurer is responsible for claims regardless of their total amount, and any profits or losses from claims experience belong to the insurer. Fully insured plans are subject to state insurance laws and mandates, which can dictate covered benefits and rate structures. While offering predictable monthly costs, employers have less control over plan design and typically do not have direct access to detailed claims data. The choice between the two often depends on an employer's size, financial stability, risk management philosophy, and desire for customization.

FAQs

What type of companies typically use self funded insurance?

Larger companies, generally those with 200 or more employee benefits enrollees, are the most common users of self funded insurance. They have a sufficient number of employees to create a predictable pool of claims and possess the financial capacity to absorb potential fluctuations in healthcare costs. While some smaller companies also self-fund, they often rely heavily on stop-loss insurance to limit their financial exposure.

How do self-funded plans handle catastrophic claims?

Self-funded plans typically mitigate the risk of extremely high individual or aggregate claims by purchasing stop-loss insurance. This is a form of reinsurance that protects the employer from unpredictable, large healthcare costs. If an employee's medical expenses exceed a certain individual threshold (specific stop-loss) or the total claims for the entire group exceed a predefined limit (aggregate stop-loss), the stop-loss insurer covers the costs above that level.

Are self-funded plans regulated?

Yes, self-funded plans are regulated primarily at the federal level by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which sets standards for employee benefits plans in the private sector. This federal oversight generally preempts state insurance laws, meaning self-funded plans are often exempt from many state-specific mandates and taxes that apply to fully insured plans. Employers must also comply with provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that apply to self-insured plans, such as coverage of essential health benefits and annual reporting requirements.